scholarly journals Assessing Rectocele Depth and Its Association with Symptoms of Pelvic Floor Disorders Using Transperineal Ultrasound

Author(s):  
Hongyoon Jeong ◽  
Duk Hoon Park ◽  
Daeyoun Won ◽  
Jong Kyun Lee

Abstract Aim We investigated the clinical features of symptomatic rectoceles, as measured by transperineal ultrasound (TPUS), and evaluated the association between rectocele size and the clinical symptoms of pelvic floor disorders. Method This was a retrospective study using data obtained at a pelvic floor centre between August 2020 and January 2021. A total of 125 patients with defaecation disorders, such as constipation and faecal incontinence, were included. The preoperative questionnaire included the Cleveland Clinic Constipation Scoring System (CCCS, Wexner constipation score), Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS, Wexner incontinence score), faecal incontinence severity index (FISI), and faecal incontinence quality of life (FIQOL) scale. The size of the rectocele was measured on the trans-perineal 2D images. Patients were assigned to three groups based on rectocele size: no rectocele (<10 mm), ≥10 mm rectocele, and ≥15 mm rectocele. Results In the study population, 43 participants (34.4%) had no rectocele, 50 (40.0%) had ≥10 mm rectocele, and 32 (25.6%) had ≥15 mm rectocele. From the no rectocele to ≥15 mm rectocele group, the scores for the symptoms of incontinence and constipation increased, and the quality of life worsened. The CCIS (6.00±4.95 vs 8.62±5.77 vs 11.08±5.63, P = 0.004), FIQOL (13.72±4.19 vs 13.42±4.35 vs 10.38±3.88, P = 0.006), FISI (18.83±17.67 vs 25.15±17.34 vs 33.42±15.49, P = 0.010), and CCCS (7.50±6.26 vs 8.65±5.31 vs 13.11±5.90, P = 0.006), respectively. Conclusion The TPUS was a valuable method for the anatomical evaluation of symptomatic rectocele. The larger the size of the symptomatic rectocele measured using TPUS, the more severe the clinical symptoms.

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ieva Stundienė ◽  
Paulius Žeromskas ◽  
Jonas Valantinas

Background. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is a simple, non-invasive treatment, which can be used to treat faecal incontinence. Optimal treatment regimen is not known and various stimulation regimens are used in different centers. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of twice weekly transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence patients, who have failed to respond to maximal conservative treatment. Material and methods. Twenty patients with faecal incontinence resistant to maximal conservative therapy were treated with transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation twice a week for six weeks. The number of the bowel movements per two weeks and the Cleveland Clinic Florida Feacal Incontinence Score were assessed before and after the treatment. The quality of life was estimated using the Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire and the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index. Results. Effect was seen in 55% of patients. Two-week faecal incontinence episodes decreased from median 4  (2–84) to 2  (0–56) (p = 0.002). The mean Cleveland Clinic Florida Faecal Incontinence score improved from 10.9 ± 4.34 to 7.8 ± 3.96 (p = 0.002). The quality of life improved significantly after the treatment. The therapy was well tolerated and no participant experienced any adverse event. Conclusions. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation twice a week for 6 weeks may be efficacious in patients with faecal incontinence, who have failed to respond to maximal conservative treatments.


2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Nosti ◽  
Colleen D. McDermott ◽  
Jeanne M. Schilder ◽  
Frederick B. Stehman ◽  
Patrick J. Woodman

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Wa Katolo ◽  
C Fleming ◽  
G Wilkinson ◽  
A Brannigan

Abstract Aim Rectopexy is a surgical procedure commonly used to correct rectal prolapse. Several studies have investigated different approaches (abdominal, perineal) and techniques (open, laparoscopic, robotic) in this field however reporting outcomes vary significantly among studies impeding comparison of techniques. We aimed to comprehensively analyse primary outcome reporting methods following rectopexy in published literature. Method A systematic search was performed in keeping with PRISMA guidelines and search protocol registered with PROSPERO. Published databases were searched using the following terms: “rectopexy”, “abdominal rectopexy” and “rectopexy outcomes”. Randomised controlled trials, comparative and non-comparative prospective and retrospective studies published between 1992 and 2019 were included for analysis. Review articles, letters, editorials, abstracts, and non-English language studies were excluded. A narrative description of outcomes was reported. Results A total of 1089 articles were screened, and 32 articles were identified as suitable for inclusion, reporting on 1780 patients who underwent rectopexy surgery. Over 30 unique methods of reporting outcomes were recorded, with the most common being the rate of recurrence (n = 15), Cleveland Clinic Faecal Incontinence score (CCIS) (n = 11), and customised symptom questionnaires (n = 10). Many studies recognised the impact of symptoms of rectal prolapse on patients’ quality of life (QoL) however, few utilised standardised quality of life scores to evaluate the outcome of the procedures. Conclusions As surgical technique evolves in rectopexy, incorporating minimally invasive surgery and robotic surgery, it is important that outcome reporting is standardised to facilitate transparent comparison. Improving patient QoL is the mainstay of surgical intervention and it is important that QoL outcome measures are incorporated.


2018 ◽  
Vol 297 (3) ◽  
pp. 725-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Bodner-Adler ◽  
Klaus Bodner ◽  
Oliver Kimberger ◽  
Ksenia Halpern ◽  
Heinz Koelbl ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 200 (5) ◽  
pp. 568.e1-568.e6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktor E. Bovbjerg ◽  
Elisa R. Trowbridge ◽  
Matthew D. Barber ◽  
Tovia E. Martirosian ◽  
William D. Steers ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Lawer Torgbenu ◽  
Christopher O. Aimakhu ◽  
Emmanuel Komla Senanu Morhe

Background: Pelvic floor disorders affect many women globally. Objective: To provide a critical appraisal of the literature on the effects of pelvic floor disorders on the quality of life and functioning of pregnant and postnatal women. Methods: Available literature was reviewed and summarized to discuss the definitions, pelvic floor anatomy, dysfunctions, and the mechanism of the condition, and more specifically, on the strengthening exercises for the pelvic floor muscles. Results: Pelvic floor disorder is an important public health concern because of the high prevalence, deleterious effects on pregnancy, and its outcomes as well as impacts on the health care system. They include genuine urinary incontinence, bladder and bowel incontinence, pelvic pain, weakness of the pelvic muscles, weakness of the muscles of the core stability, as well as the prolapse of pelvic organs. Pregnancy and subsequent vaginal delivery are associated causes of pelvic floor muscle disorders. Approximately 60% and 50% of community settlers and residents of nursing homes respectively are affected by urinary incontinence and the numbers increase with hysterectomy. Multiple birth, obesity, chronic coughs, overweight babies, and heavy lifting are associated risk factors. Treatment of pelvic floor muscle disorders should involve an increased physical activity prescription among women diagnosed with weaker pelvic floor muscles, engaging the multidisciplinary team, increasing the quality of life and functioning of women during and after pregnancy. Training aimed at strengthening the pelvic floor muscles is beneficial and prevention of dysfunctions. Conclusion: Structured and well organised pelvic floor muscle training regimen also known as Kegel exercises are important in preventing disorders of the pelvic floor during pregnancy and after delivery.


Author(s):  
Jon F Pennycuff ◽  
Felice Yang ◽  
Tania Lobo ◽  
Caroline Jackman ◽  
Colleen McGuire ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document