Deciphering the Mechanisms of Microbe Mediated Drought Stress Alleviation in Wheat

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
DEVENDRA SINGH ◽  
Shobit Thapa ◽  
Jagriti Yadav ◽  
Dikchha SINGH ◽  
Hillol Chakdar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Drought Stress ◽  
Plant Growth ◽  
Sugar Content ◽  
Pcr Analysis ◽  
Stress Alleviation ◽  
Microbial Inoculation ◽  
Water Stress Condition ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting Microbes

Abstract Drought stress adversely influences the crop plants. Herein, present research was designed to elucidate the role of plant growth promoting microbes for amelioration of water stress in wheat. A pot experiment was conducted for screening the microorganisms on the basis of plant growth, chlorophyll and proline content under water stress. Bacillus sp. BT3 and Klebsiella sp. HA9 were found more promising strains that positively influenced the plant growth, chlorophyll and proline status of seedlings under water stress condition. Further, Bacillus sp. BT-3 and Klebsiella sp. HA9 along with check strain (BioNPK) were used for elucidating their detailed effect on morphological, biochemical, physiological and molecular traits to mitigate drought stress in wheat. Microbial inoculation significantly enhanced plant growth, biomass, relative water content, chlorophyll content and root morphological parameters over the uninoculated water stressed (30% FC) control. Likewise, sugar content, protein content and antioxidant enzymes were also significantly enhanced due to microbial inoculation under water stress (30% FC). Microbial inoculation significantly decreased proline, glycine betaine, lipid peroxidation, peroxide and superoxide radicals in wheat over the uninoculated water stressed (30%FC) control. Quantitative real-time (qRT)- PCR analysis revealed that Bacillus sp. BT-3, Klebsiella sp. HA9 and BioNPK inoculation significantly upregulated stress responsive genes (DHN, DREB, L15 and TaABA-8OH) over the uninoculated water stressed (30% F.C.) control. The study reports the potential of Bacillus sp. BT3 and Klebsiella sp. HA9 along with BioNPK in water stress alleviation in wheat which could be recommended as effective biofertilizers.

The effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on asparagus seedlings and germinating seeds subjected to water stress under greenhouse conditions

2009 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott M. Liddycoat ◽  
Bruce M. Greenberg ◽  
David J. Wolyn
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Drought Stress ◽  
Plant Growth ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria ◽  
Asparagus Officinalis ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Transplant Shock ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting ◽  
Growth Promoting ◽  
Germinating Seeds

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can have positive effects on vigour and productivity, especially under stress conditions. In asparagus ( Asparagus officinalis L.) field culture, seeds are planted in high-density nurseries, and 1-year-old crowns are transplanted to production fields. Performance can be negatively affected by water stress, transplant shock, and disease pressure on wounded roots. PGPR inoculation has the potential to alleviate some of the stresses incurred in the production system. In this study, the effects of PGPR ( Pseudomonas spp.) treatment were determined on 3-week-old greenhouse-grown seedlings and germinating seeds of 2 asparagus cultivars. The pots were irrigated to a predetermined level that resulted in optimum growth or the plants were subjected to drought or flooding stress for 8 weeks. The cultivars responded differently to PGPR: single inoculations of seedlings enhanced growth of ‘Guelph Millennium’ under optimum conditions and ‘Jersey Giant’ seedlings under drought stress. Seed inoculations with PGPR resulted in a positive response only for ‘Guelph Millennium’, for which both single or multiple inoculations enhanced plant growth under drought stress.

scholarly journals Bitkilerin Kuraklığa Dayanıklılığını Artırmaya Yönelik Uygulamalar

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
İlkay Yavaş ◽  
Hüseyin Nail ◽  
Aydın Ünay
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Drought Stress ◽  
Plant Growth ◽  
Conservation Tillage ◽  
Plant Root ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria ◽  
Development Stage ◽  
Terminal Drought ◽  
Drought Conditions ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting

Terminal drought is a major threat that adversely affects crop growth and metabolism, and limits the yield. Water stress causes many morphological, physiological and biochemical changes in plants. Plant height, root length, leaf area, fresh and dry biomass are reduced under drought stress. Besides, water stress causes the reduction of relative water content, the closure of stomata and decrease in photosynthesis and chlorophyll content. Antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione reductase (GR), superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), ascorbat peroxidase (ASC), glutatiton (GSH), catalase (CAT) enzyme activities, the indicator of oxidative stress malondialdehyde (MDA) and proline levels also changes in drought conditions. Nutrient uptake by plants is prevented or restricted before grain development stage during drought conditions. Therefore the application of plant nutrients followed by micronutrient remobilization within plant is great importance. Osmoprotectants (cytokinin, mannitol, abscisic acid, proline, glycine betaine, polyamine etc.) detoxify adverse effect of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and alleviate drought stress. Exogenous plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) application encourage plant growth by colonizing the plant root and increase plants’ resistance to water stress. Besides, the farmers can use conservation tillage system in dry periods.

scholarly journals Effect of the inoculation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the photosynthetic characteristics of Sambucus williamsii Hance container seedlings under drought stress

AMB Express ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangchun Liu ◽  
Hailin Ma ◽  
Lin Peng ◽  
Zhenyu Du ◽  
Bingyao Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Drought Stress ◽  
Plant Growth ◽  
Water Supply ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria ◽  
Drought Duration ◽  
Chl A ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting ◽  
Growth Promoting ◽  
Photosynthetic Properties

Abstract Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are beneficial bacteria that survive within the range of plant rhizosphere and can promote plant growth. The effects of PGPR in promoting plant growth, activating soil nutrients, reducing fertilizer application, and improving the resistance of plant inducible system have been widely investigated. However, few studies have investigated PGPR as elicitors of tolerance to abiotic stresses, especially drought stress. In this study, the effects of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus X128 on the photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), intracellular CO2 concentration (Ci), and total chlorophyll content [Chl(a+b)] of Sambucus williamsii Hance seedling leaves under moderate drought stress and drought-rewatering conditions were determined. Compared with those of uninoculated seedlings, the average Pn values during the entire drought stress of inoculated seedlings increased by 12.99%. As the drought duration was lengthened, Ci of uninoculated leaves continued to increase after rapidly declining, whereas Gs continuously decreased. Furthermore, their photosynthetic properties were simultaneously restricted by stomatal and non-stomatal factors. After X128 inoculation, Ci and Gs of S. williamsii Hance leaves continued to decrease, and their photosynthetic properties were mainly restricted by stomatal factors. At the end of the drought stress, water stress reduced [Chl(a + b)] of S. williamsii Hance leaves by 13.49%. However, X128 inoculation decreased this deficit to only 7.39%. After water supply was recovered, Pn, Gs, and [Chl(a+b)] in uninoculated leaves were reduced by 14.23%, 12.02%, and 5.86%, respectively, relative to those under well-watered conditions. However, Ci increased by 6.48%. Compared with those of uninoculated seedlings, Pn, Gs, and [Chl(a+b)] in X128-inoculated seedlings were increased by 9.83%, 9.30%, and 6.85%, respectively. Therefore, the inoculation of X128 under arid environments can mitigate the reduction of chlorophyll, delay the restriction caused by non-stomatal factors to Pn in plant leaves under water stress, and can be more conducive to the recovery of photosynthetic functions of leaves after water supply is recovered.

scholarly journals Successful Plant Growth-Promoting Microbes: Inoculation Methods and Abiotic Factors

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monyck Jeane dos Santos Lopes ◽  
Moacyr Bernardino Dias-Filho ◽  
Ely Simone Cajueiro Gurgel
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Abiotic Factors ◽  
Soil Nutrient ◽  
Environmental Conservation ◽  
Plant Tolerance ◽  
Inoculation Methods ◽  
Microbial Inoculation ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting ◽  
Growth Promoting ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting Microbes

Plant-microbe interactions have been the subject of several biotechnological studies, seeking sustainable development and environmental conservation. The inoculation of plant growth-promoting microbes (PGPM) in agricultural crops is considered an environmental-friendly alternative to chemical fertilization. Microbial inoculants are mainly inoculated onto seeds, roots and soil. PGPM improve plant growth by enhancing the availability of nutrients, the regulation of phytohormones, and by increasing plant tolerance against biotic and abiotic stresses. One of the main obstacles with PGPM research are the inconsistent results, which may be the result of inoculation methods and abiotic factors, such as soil (nutrient or heavy metal contents and pH), water availability, light intensity and temperature. This review addresses how the PGPM inoculants act on plant growth, what mechanisms they use to survive under stressful environmental conditions, and how inoculation methods and abiotic factors can interfere on the success of microbial inoculation in plants, serving as a basis for research on plants-microorganisms interaction.

Morphological, Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Poplar Plants to Drought Stress

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
ARADHNA KUMARI ◽  
IM KHAN ◽  
ANIL KUMAR SINGH ◽  
SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Drought Stress ◽  
Biochemical Parameters ◽  
Sugar Content ◽  
Soluble Sugar ◽  
Field Capacity ◽  
Drought Event ◽  
Total Biomass ◽  
Biochemical Responses ◽  
Physiological And Biochemical

Poplar clone Kranti was selected to assess the morphological, physiological and biochemical responses under drought at different levels of water stress, as it is a common clone used to be grown in Uttarakhand for making paper and plywood. The cuttings of Populus deltoides L. (clone Kranti) were exposed to four different watering regimes (100, 75, 50 and 25% of the field capacity) and changes in physiological and biochemical parameters related with drought tolerance were recorded. Alterations in physiological (i.e. decrease in relative water content) and biochemical parameters (i.e. increase in proline and soluble sugar content and build-up of malondialdehyde by-products) occurred in all the three levels of water stress, although drought represented the major determinant. Drought treatments (75%, 50% and 25% FC) decreased plant height, radial stem diameter, harvest index, total biomass content and RWC in all the three watering regimes compared to control (100% FC). Biochemical parameters like proline, soluble sugar and MDA content increased with severity and duration of stress, which helped plants to survive under severe stress. It was analyzed that for better wood yield poplar seedlings should avail either optimum amount of water (amount nearly equal to field capacity of soil) or maximum withdrawal up to 75% of field capacity up to seedling establishment period (60 days). Furthermore, this study manifested that acclimation to drought stress is related with the rapidity, severity, and duration of the drought event of the poplar species.

scholarly journals Protists as main indicators and determinants of plant performance

Microbiome ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sai Guo ◽  
Wu Xiong ◽  
Xinnan Hang ◽  
Zhilei Gao ◽  
Zixuan Jiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Organic Fertilizer ◽  
Agricultural Practices ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Organic Fertilization ◽  
Plant Yield ◽  
Growing Seasons ◽  
Beneficial Microorganisms ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting Microbes

Abstract Background Microbiomes play vital roles in plant health and performance, and the development of plant beneficial microbiomes can be steered by organic fertilizer inputs. Especially well-studied are fertilizer-induced changes on bacteria and fungi and how changes in these groups alter plant performance. However, impacts on protist communities, including their trophic interactions within the microbiome and consequences on plant performance remain largely unknown. Here, we tracked the entire microbiome, including bacteria, fungi, and protists, over six growing seasons of cucumber under different fertilization regimes (conventional, organic, and Trichoderma bio-organic fertilization) and linked microbial data to plant yield to identify plant growth-promoting microbes. Results Yields were higher in the (bio-)organic fertilization treatments. Soil abiotic conditions were altered by the fertilization regime, with the prominent effects coming from the (bio-)organic fertilization treatments. Those treatments also led to the pronounced shifts in protistan communities, especially microbivorous cercozoan protists. We found positive correlations of these protists with plant yield and the density of potentially plant-beneficial microorganisms. We further explored the mechanistic ramifications of these relationships via greenhouse experiments, showing that cercozoan protists can positively impact plant growth, potentially via interactions with plant-beneficial microorganisms including Trichoderma, the biological agent delivered by the bio-fertilizer. Conclusions We show that protists may play central roles in stimulating plant performance through microbiome interactions. Future agricultural practices might aim to specifically enhance plant beneficial protists or apply those protists as novel, sustainable biofertilizers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document