scholarly journals Promoting De-Implementation of Inappropriate Antimicrobial Use in Cardiac Device Procedures By Expanding Audit and Feedback: Protocol for Hybrid III Type Effectiveness/ Implementation Quasi-Experimental Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Westyn Branch-Elliman ◽  
Rebecca Lamkin ◽  
Marlena Shin ◽  
Hillary J Mull ◽  
Isabella Epshtein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Inappropriate Prescribing ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Provider Education ◽  
Implementation Barriers ◽  
Cardiac Device ◽  
Formative Evaluations

Abstract Background: Despite a strong evidence base and clinical guidelines specifically recommending against prolonged post-procedural antimicrobial use, studies indicate that the practice is common following cardiac device procedures. Formative evaluations conducted by the study team suggest that inappropriate antimicrobial use may be driven by information silos that drive provider belief that antimicrobials are not harmful, in part due to lack of complete feedback about all types of clinical outcomes. De-implementation is recognized as an important area of research that can lead to reductions in unnecessary, wasteful, or harmful practices, such as excess antimicrobial use following cardiac device procedures; however, investigations into strategies that lead to successful de-implementation are limited. The overarching hypothesis to be tested in this trial is that a bundle of implementation strategies that includes audit and feedback about direct patient harms caused by inappropriate prescribing can lead to successful de-implementation of guideline-discordant care.Methods: We propose a Hybrid Type III effectiveness-implementation stepped-wedge intervention trial at three high-volume, high-complexity VA medical centers. The main study intervention (an informatics-based, real-time audit-and-feedback tool) was developed based on learning/unlearning theory and formative evaluations and guided by the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) Framework. Elements of the bundled and multifaceted implementation strategy to promote appropriate prescribing will include audit-and-feedback reports that include information about antibiotic harms, stakeholder engagement, patient and provider education, identification of local champions, and blended facilitation. The primary study outcome is adoption of evidence-based practice (de-implementation of inappropriate antimicrobial use). Clinical outcomes (cardiac device infections, acute kidney injuries and Clostridioides difficile infections) are secondary. Qualitative interviews will assess relevant implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, fidelity, feasibility).Discussion: De-implementation theory suggests that factors that may have a particularly strong influence on de-implementation include strength of the underlying evidence, the complexity of the intervention, and patient and provider anxiety and fear about changing an established practice. This study will assess whether a multifaceted intervention mapped to identified de-implementation barriers leads to measurable improvements in provision of guideline-concordant antimicrobial use. Findings will improve understanding about factors that impact successful or unsuccessful de-implementation of harmful or wasteful healthcare practices.Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05020418)

scholarly journals 1101. What Do Electrophysiologists Think about Peri-Procedural Antibiotics? A Qualitative Assessment of Factors Driving Use and Facilitators for Implementing Change

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S391-S391
Author(s):  
Westyn Branch-Elliman ◽  
Rani Elwy ◽  
Kalpana Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Academic Community ◽  
Qualitative Assessment ◽  
Local Culture ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Cardiac Device ◽  
Implementing Change ◽  
Formative Evaluations

Abstract Background Prolonged courses of antimicrobials are common following cardiac device procedures, but there are little data to explain drivers of this practice and factors that may facilitate change. Methods We conducted formative evaluations consisting of semi-structured, qualitative interviews with electrophysiologists (EP) to identify perceived barriers to discontinuing post-procedure antimicrobial prophylaxis and factors that may facilitate improvements. A directed content analysis approach was used to map qualitative responses to key factors in the Proctor Implementation Outcomes Framework, with flexibility to allow for new themes to emerge. Interviews ceased after data saturation was reached. Results 13 interviews were conducted with EPs representing diverse US regions (Northeast, Midwest, South, West) and diverse settings of care (academic, community, VA). Responses to questions about antimicrobial use and willingness (or lack thereof) to stop post-procedural antimicrobials most commonly mapped to the acceptability domain; feasibility, fidelity, cost and appropriateness were also frequently identified factors (see figure for exemplary quotes). Themes that emerged during the interview process associated with prolonged antimicrobial prescribing included beliefs and knowledge, local culture and normative behaviors, and organizational structure. There was a strong “cultural inertia” to conform to normative practices within an institution. Reasons for this ranged from reports of streamlining processes for clinical staff to ensure standardized care across all patients and concerns about being perceived as an “outlier.” Infectious diseases staff were important influencers of practice and potential facilitators of improvement. Conclusion Formative evaluations of stakeholders are essential for designing successful implementation interventions to facilitate behavioral change. Local culture appeared to be a major driver of antimicrobial use. The desire to conform to normative behaviors and to promote institutional standardization suggests that strategies to facilitate implementation of antimicrobial stewardship guidelines must include facility-level changes, rather than individual-provider-level interventions. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Pragmatic randomized trial of a distress screening program using an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5-5
Author(s):  
Erin Elizabeth Hahn ◽  
Corrine E. Munoz-Plaza ◽  
Dana Pounds ◽  
Lindsay Joe Lyons ◽  
Janet S. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Implementation Barriers ◽  
Distress Screening ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Adaptive Workflow ◽  
New Diagnosis

5 Background: Implementation of guideline-recommended distress screening in oncology remains challenging. Evidence suggests that multicomponent care pathways to identify distress severity with algorithm-based referral and management are effective, yet testing of pragmatic implementation in community settings remains limited. We conducted a pragmatic randomized trial of a distress screening program in a large healthcare system to evaluate effectiveness and simultaneously examined implementation outcomes. Methods: We designed a highly pragmatic study per the Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 with adaptive workflow design. Randomization was at the medical center level (N=6); eligible patients had a new diagnosis of breast cancer (no exclusions). Eligible patients were offered the distress screening program as part of usual care: PHQ-9 screening, algorithm-based scoring and referral, referral tracking, and audit and feedback of performance data. Control sites had access to the PHQ-9 and scoring algorithm. We compared number screened, distress severity, and referral. We conducted qualitative interviews with stakeholders on implementation barriers and facilitators. Results: We enrolled 1,436 eligible patients; 692 control, 744 intervention. Groups were similar in demographic and tumor characteristics (Table); 80% of patients completed screening at intervention sites vs <1% at control sites. Of those screened at intervention sites, 10% scored in the medium/high range indicating need for referral; 94% received an appropriate referral. We conducted 20 interviews; the program was found to be highly feasible and acceptable. Conclusions: Our pragmatic, adaptive approach resulted in the large majority of patients screened and appropriately referred with a high degree of acceptability and feasibility. Our results can promote more widespread, sustained adoption of effective distress screening programs. Clinical trial information: NCT02941614. [Table: see text]

Understanding changes in the standardized antimicrobial administration ratio for total antimicrobial use after implementation of prospective audit and feedback

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1476-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan E. Griebel ◽  
Brett Heintz ◽  
Bruce Alexander ◽  
Jason Egge ◽  
Michihiko Goto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Antimicrobial Prescribing ◽  
Single Center Study ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
Center Study ◽  
Antimicrobial Administration

AbstractIn this single-center study, the standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR) for total antimicrobial use decreased in response to a stewardship intervention. Antimicrobial prescribing and clinical outcomes were stable or improved during the period of lower SAARs. Our findings suggest that SAAR values of ~0.8 can be safely achieved.

scholarly journals Novel Methodology to Measure Preprocedure Antimicrobial Prophylaxis: Integrating Text Mining With Structured Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s12-s13
Author(s):  
Hillary Mull ◽  
Kelly Stolzmann ◽  
Emily Kalver ◽  
Marlena Shin ◽  
Marin Schweizer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Structured Data ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Implementation Barriers ◽  
Cardiac Device ◽  
Device Infection ◽  
Manual Review

Background: Antimicrobial prophylaxis is an evidence-proven strategy for reducing procedure-related infections; however, measuring this key quality metric typically requires manual review, due to the way antimicrobial prophylaxis is documented in the electronic medical record (EMR). Our objective was to combine structured and unstructured data from the Veterans’ Health Administration (VA) EMR to create an electronic tool for measuring preincisional antimicrobial prophylaxis. We assessed this methodology in cardiac device implantation procedures. Methods: With clinician input and review of clinical guidelines, we developed a list of antimicrobial names recommended for the prevention of cardiac device infection. Next, we iteratively combined positive flags for an antimicrobial order or drug fill from structured data fields in the EMR and hits on text string searches of antimicrobial names documented in electronic clinical notes to optimize an algorithm to flag preincisional antimicrobial use with high sensitivity and specificity. We trained the algorithm using existing fiscal year (FY) 2008-15 data from the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking-Electrophysiology (CART-EP), which contains manually determined information about antimicrobial prophylaxis. We then validated the performance of the final version of the algorithm using a national cohort of VA patients who underwent cardiac device procedures in FY 2016 or 2017. Discordant cases underwent expert manual review to identify reasons for algorithm misclassification and to identify potential future implementation barriers. Results: The CART-EP dataset included 2,102 procedures at 38 VA facilities with manually identified antimicrobial prophylaxis in 2,056 cases (97.8%). The final algorithm combining structured EMR fields and text-note search results flagged 2,048 of the CART-EP cases (97.4%). Algorithm validation identified antimicrobial prophylaxis in 16,334 of 19,212 cardiac device procedures (87.9%). Misclassifications occurred due to EMR documentation issues. Conclusions: We developed a methodology with high accuracy to measure guideline-concordant use of antimicrobial prophylaxis before cardiac device procedures using data fields present in modern EMRs that does not rely on manual review. In addition to broad applicability in the VA and other healthcare systems with EMRs, this method could be adapted for other procedural areas in which antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended but comprehensive measurement has been limited to resource-intense manual review.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Prospective Audit for Antimicrobial Use and Stewardship Practices in Intensive Care Unit at a Tertiary-Care Center in India

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s40-s40
Author(s):  
Parul Singh ◽  
Purva Mathur ◽  
Kamini Walia ◽  
Anjan Trikha
Keyword(s):  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Empirical Therapy ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Survey Form ◽  
Specimen Collection ◽  
Days Of Therapy

Background: Antimicrobial decision making in the ICU is challenging. Injudicious use of antimicrobials contributes to the development of resistant pathogens and drug-related adverse events. However, inadequate antimicrobial therapy is associated with mortality in critically ill patients. Antimicrobial stewardship programs are increasingly being implemented to improve prescribing. Methods: This prospective study was conducted over 11 months, during which the pharmacist used a standardized survey form to collect data on antibiotic use. Evaluation of antimicrobial use and stewardship practices in a 12-bed polytrauma ICU and a 20-bed neurosurgery ICU of the 248-bed AIIMS Trauma Center in Delhi, India. Antimicrobial consumption was measured using WHO-recommended defined daily dose (DDD) of given antimicrobials and days of therapy (DOT). Results: Antibiotics were ranked by frequency of use over the 11-month period based on empirical therapy and culture-based therapy. The 11-month DDD and DOT averages when empiric antibiotics were used were 532 of 1,000 patient days and 484 per 1,000 patient days, respectively (Figure 1). When cultures were available, DDD was 486 per 1,000 patient days and DOT was 442 per 1,000 patient days (Figure). Conclusions: The quantity and frequency of antibiotics used in the ICUs allowed the AMSP to identify areas to optimize antibiotic use such as educational initiatives, early specimen collection, and audit and feedback opportunities.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Patient safety initiatives in obstetrics: a rapid review

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e020170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesmin Antony ◽  
Wasifa Zarin ◽  
Ba’ Pham ◽  
Vera Nincic ◽  
Roberta Cardoso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Provider Education ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Clinician Education ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Safety Outcomes

ObjectivesThis review was commissioned by WHO, South Africa-Country office because of an exponential increase in medical litigation claims related to patient safety in obstetrical care in the country. A rapid review was conducted to examine the effectiveness of quality improvement (QI) strategies on maternal and newborn patient safety outcomes, risk of litigation and burden of associated costs.DesignA rapid review of the literature was conducted to provide decision-makers with timely evidence. Medical and legal databases (eg, MEDLINE, Embase, LexisNexis Academic, etc) and reference lists of relevant studies were searched. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, abstracted data and appraised risk of bias. Results were summarised narratively.InterventionsWe included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of QI strategies targeting health systems (eg, team changes) and healthcare providers (eg, clinician education) to improve the safety of women and their newborns. Eligible studies were limited to trials published in English between 2004 and 2015.Primary and secondary outcome measuresRCTs reporting on patient safety outcomes (eg, stillbirths, mortality and caesarean sections), litigation claims and associated costs were included.ResultsThe search yielded 4793 citations, of which 10 RCTs met our eligibility criteria and provided information on over 500 000 participants. The results are presented by QI strategy, which varied from one study to another. Studies including provider education alone (one RCT), provider education in combination with audit and feedback (two RCTs) or clinician reminders (one RCT), as well as provider education with patient education and audit and feedback (one RCT), reported some improvements to patient safety outcomes. None of the studies reported on litigation claims or the associated costs.ConclusionsOur results suggest that provider education and other QI strategy combinations targeting healthcare providers may improve the safety of women and their newborns during childbirth.

scholarly journals Utility of Electronic Medical Record Alerts to Prevent Drug Nephrotoxicity

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Martin ◽  
F. Perry Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Medical Record ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Electronic Medical Record ◽  
Inappropriate Prescribing ◽  
Patient Benefit ◽  
Drug Dosing ◽  
Current State ◽  
Methods Of Evaluation ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Target Effects

Nephrotoxin-induced AKI is an iatrogenic form of AKI that can be potentially avoided or ameliorated by prompt recognition and appropriate prescriber actions. Drug-targeted alerts, either for patients at risk of AKI or patients with existing AKI, may lead to more appropriate drug dosing and management and improved clinical outcomes. However, alerts of this type are complicated to create, have a high potential for error and off-target effects, and may be difficult to evaluate. Although many studies have shown that these alerts can reduce the rate of inappropriate prescribing, few studies have examined the utility of such alerts in terms of patient benefit. In this review, we examine the current state of the literature in this area, identify key technical challenges, and suggest methods of evaluation for drug-targeted AKI alerts.

Clinical impact of a pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship initiative evaluating patients with Clostridioides difficile colitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 888-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paige A Bishop ◽  
Carmen Isache ◽  
Yvette S McCarter ◽  
Carmen Smotherman ◽  
Shiva Gautam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Impact

Clostridioides difficile is the most common cause of healthcare-associated infection and gastroenteritis-associated death in the USA. Adherence to guideline recommendations for treatment of severe C. difficile infection (CDI) is associated with improved clinical success and reduced mortality. The purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of a pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) CDI initiative improved adherence to CDI treatment guidelines and clinical outcomes. This was a single-center, retrospective, quasi-experimental study evaluating patients with CDI before and after implementation of an ASP initiative involving prospective audit and feedback in which guideline-driven treatment recommendations were communicated to treatment teams and documented in the electronic health record via pharmacy progress notes for all patients diagnosed with CDI. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients treated with guideline adherent definitive regimens within 72 hours of CDI diagnosis. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the impact on clinical outcomes, including length of stay (LOS), infection-related LOS, 30-day readmission rates, and all-cause, in-hospital mortality. A total of 233 patients were evaluated. The proportion of patients on guideline adherent definitive CDI treatment regimen within 72 hours of diagnosis was significantly higher in the post-interventional group (pre: 42% vs post: 58%, p=0.02). No differences were observed in clinical outcomes or proportions of patients receiving laxatives, promotility agents, or proton pump inhibitors within 72 hours of diagnosis. Our findings demonstrate that a pharmacist-led stewardship initiative improved adherence to evidence-based practice guidelines for CDI treatment.

scholarly journals Pseudomonas aeruginosa Susceptibility Patterns and Associated Clinical Outcomes in People with Cystic Fibrosis following Approval of Aztreonam Lysine for Inhalation

2020 ◽  
pp. AAC.02327-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire L Keating ◽  
Jonathan B Zuckerman ◽  
Pradeep K Singh ◽  
Matthew McKevitt ◽  
Oksana Gurtovaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
The United States ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Antibiotic Exposure ◽  
Pulmonary Exacerbations

Rationale: Approval of aztreonam lysine for inhalation solution (AZLI) raised concerns that additional antibiotic exposure would potentially affect susceptibility profiles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) isolates from cystic fibrosis (CF) patients.Objective: This 5-year, prospective, observational study tracked susceptibility changes and clinical outcomes in CF patients in the United States with chronic PA infection.Methods: Sputum cultures were collected annually (2011-2016). The primary study endpoint was the proportion of subjects whose least susceptible PA isolate had an aztreonam minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) that was >8 μg/mL (parenteral breakpoint) and increased ≥4-fold compared with the least susceptible isolate from the previous year. Annualized data for pulmonary exacerbations, hospitalizations, and FEV1% predicted were obtained from the CF Foundation Patient Registry and compared between subjects meeting/not meeting the primary endpoint.Results: 510 subjects were enrolled; 334 (65%) completed the study. A consistent proportion of evaluable subjects (13-22%) met the primary endpoint each year; and AZLI use during the previous 12 months was not associated with meeting the primary endpoint. While the annual decline in lung function was comparable for subjects meeting/not meeting the primary endpoint, more pulmonary exacerbations and hospitalizations were experienced by those who met it.Conclusions: Aztreonam susceptibility of PA remained consistent during the 5-year study. The relationship between PA isolate susceptibilities and clinical outcomes is complex; reduced susceptibility was not associated with accelerated decline in lung function, but was associated with more exacerbations and hospitalizations, likely reflecting increased overall antibiotic exposure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document