6552 Background: In previous work, we demonstrated that Breslow thickness at diagnosis is significantly related to distance to provider for patients with melanoma in North Carolina (NC). Expanding the study population to include patients in New Jersey (NJ) and southern California (CA), we hypothesize that distance to provider is an effective measure of access to melanoma care regardless of geographic region. Methods: An IRB-approved secondary data analysis was performed of all incident cases of invasive cutaneous melanoma in 2000 from 3 population-based ascertainment areas (CA, NC, NJ). Patients and providers were geocoded to street address; Euclidian distances between patients and providers were calculated. The outcome variable, Breslow thickness at diagnosis, was logged for analysis. Simple and multiple linear regression were used to test associations between Breslow thickness and multiple sociodemographic factors. Results: Of 1,408 eligible cases, 16% were excluded for missing Breslow data. Median Breslow thickness was 0.6 mm (range 0.01–30.0 mm). Median distance to provider was 7 miles (range 0–372 miles). There was no significant difference in Breslow between the 3 geographic regions. Males had on average 15.5% thicker tumors than females, p=0.009. Patients 51–80 years old had 15.3% thicker tumors than patients =50, p=0.015, and those >80 had 64.3% thicker tumors than patients =50, p<0.001. For all patients, Breslow thickness increased only 2% for each 10 mile increase in distance, p=0.047. However, when limited to patients from rural areas, each 10 mile increase in distance corresponded to an 8% increase in Breslow, p<0.001. Meanwhile, Breslow was not associated with any area-based measures of rurality or provider supply. Each 1% increase in poverty rate corresponded to a 1% increase in Breslow, p=0.036. Conclusion: Breslow thickness at diagnosis is strongly correlated with distance to provider, especially for patients from rural areas. Distance to provider is a better measure of access to melanoma care than area-based measures of rurality. No significant financial relationships to disclose.