scholarly journals Unplanned Hemodialysis Initiation and Low Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Scores are Associated with End-Stage Renal Disease Outcomes

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryoichi Maenosono ◽  
Daisuke Kobayashi ◽  
Tomohisa Matsunaga ◽  
Yusuke Yano ◽  
Shunri Taniguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index ◽  
Nutritional Risk Index ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Abstract Background Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have low nutritional status, presenting a high mortality risk. The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is a predictive marker of malnutrition. However, it is unclear whether the association between unplanned hemodialysis (HD) and GNRI scores is related to mortality. Methods The 180 patients who underwent HD at our hospital were divided into two groups: unplanned initiation with a central venous catheter (CVC; n=73) or planned initiation with prepared vascular access (n=107). Results There were no significant differences in sex, age, malignant tumor, hypertension, and vascular disease, while there were significant differences in time from the first visit to HD initiation (0 vs. 7 times, p=0.012) and days between the first visit and HD (12 vs. 186 days, p<0.001). The CVC insertion group had significantly lower GNRI scores at initiation (85.5 vs. 98.8, p<0.001). The adjusted hazard ratios were 4.115 and 3.077 for the GNRI scores and frequency, respectively. Three-year survival was significantly lower in the CVC + low GNRI group (p<0.0001). GNRI after 1 month was significantly inferior in the CVC insertion group. Conclusions Inadequate general management due to late referral to the nephrology department is a risk factor for patients with ESRD.

Serum Thiamine Values in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients under Maintenance Hemodialysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 85 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 348-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masamitsu Ubukata ◽  
Nobuyuki Amemiya ◽  
Kosaku Nitta ◽  
Takashi Takei
Keyword(s):  
Thiamine Deficiency ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Maintenance Hemodialysis ◽  
Dialysis Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nutritional Risk Index ◽  
Serum Aspartate Aminotransferase ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Abstract. Objective: Hemodialysis patients are prone to malnutrition because of diet or many uremic complications. The objective of this study is to determine whether thiamine deficiency is associated with regular dialysis patients. Methods: To determine whether thiamine deficiency is associated with regular dialysis patients, we measured thiamine in 100 patients undergoing consecutive dialysis. Results: Average thiamine levels were not low in both pre-hemodialysis (50.1 ± 75.9 ng/mL; normal range 24 - 66 ng/mL) and post-hemodialysis (56.4 ± 61.7 ng/mL). In 18 patients, post-hemodialysis levels of thiamine were lower than pre-hemodialysis levels. We divided the patients into two groups, the decrease (Δthiamine/pre thiamine < 0; - 0.13 ± 0.11) group (n = 18) and the increase (Δthiamine/pre thiamine> 0; 0.32 ± 0.21)) group (n = 82). However, there was no significance between the two groups in Kt/V or type of dialyzer. Patients were dichotomized according to median serum thiamine level in pre-hemodialysis into a high-thiamine group (≥ 35.5 ng/mL) and a low-thiamine group (< 35.4 ng/mL), and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. The low-thiamine value group (< 35.4 ng/ml; 26.8 ± 5.3 ng/ml) exhibited lower levels of serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase than the high-thiamine value group (≥ 35.4 ng/ml; 73.5 ± 102.5 ng/ml) although there was no significance in nutritional marker, Alb, geriatric nutritional risk index , protein catabolic rate and creatinine generation rate. Conclusion: In our regular dialysis patients, excluding a few patients, we did not recognize thiamine deficiency and no significant difference in thiamine value between pre and post hemodialysis.

American Association of Kidney Patients survey of patient preferences for hemodialysis vascular access

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-236
Author(s):  
Saravanan Balamuthusamy ◽  
Larry E Miller ◽  
Diana Clynes ◽  
Erin Kahle ◽  
Richard A Knight ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
American Association ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Objectives: To determine the vascular access modalities used for hemodialysis, the reasons for choosing them, and determinants of satisfaction with vascular access among patients with end-stage renal disease. Methods: The American Association of Kidney Patients Center for Patient Research and Education used the American Association of Kidney Patients patient engagement database to identify eligible adult hemodialysis patients. Participants completed an online survey consisting of 34 demographic, medical history, and hemodialysis history questions to determine which vascular access modalities were preferred and the reasons for these preferences. Results: Among 150 respondents (mean age 54 years, 53% females), hemodialysis was most frequently initiated with central venous catheter (64%) while the most common currently used vascular access was arteriovenous fistula (66%). Most (86%) patients previously received an arteriovenous fistula, among whom 77% currently used the arteriovenous fistula for vascular access. Older patients and males were more likely to initiate hemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula. The factors most frequently reported as important in influencing the selection of vascular access modality included infection risk (87%), physician recommendation (84%), vascular access durability (78%), risk of complications involving surgery (76%), and impact on daily activities (73%); these factors were influenced by patient age, sex, and race. Satisfaction with current vascular access was 90% with arteriovenous fistula, 79% with arteriovenous graft, and 67% with central venous catheter. Conclusion: Most end-stage renal disease patients continue to initiate hemodialysis with central venous catheter despite being associated with the lowest satisfaction rates. While arteriovenous fistula was associated with the highest satisfaction rate, there are significant barriers to adoption that vary based on patient demographics and perception of procedure invasiveness.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Electrocardiographic Parameters Predicting Cardiovascular Events in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease before and after Transplantation

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 615-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Buerschaper ◽  
Jürgen Floege ◽  
Anja Mühlfeld ◽  
Georg Schlieper
Keyword(s):  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Electrocardiographic Parameters

Background and Objectives: Cardiovascular (CV) mortality represents the leading cause of death in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Efficient screening is required to detect CV disease at an early stage, but the best diagnostic work-up is uncertain. The aim of this study was to identify electrocardiographic parameters in dialysis patients associated with an increased frequency of CV events. Methods: A 12-lead electrocardiogram was performed in 139 patients who were on the renal transplant waiting list and who subsequently received a kidney transplant. CV events were analyzed from the day of listing for kidney transplantation until 1 year after renal transplantation. Results: Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that an elevated T:R ratio in anterior and inferior leads was independently associated with CV events (T:R ratio of anterior leads hazard ratio [HR] 1.32 [95% CI 1.09–1.59; p = 0.004] and inferior leads HR 2.15 [95% CI 1.23–3.77; p = 0.008]). In particular, a T:R ratio in inferior leads exceeding 0.6 was associated with CV events in a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Conclusions: Taken together, we found an increased T:R ratio in ESRD patients to be a predictive marker for CV events.

scholarly journals Do Transferrin Levels Predict Haemodialysis Adequacy in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease?

Nutrients ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1123
Author(s):  
Giovanni Tarantino ◽  
Mauro Vinciguerra ◽  
Annalisa Ragosta ◽  
Vincenzo Citro ◽  
Paolo Conforti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Iron Status ◽  
Albumin Concentration ◽  
Iron Storage ◽  
Protein Energy ◽  
Nutritional Risk Index ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Background: Since haemodialysis is a lifesaving therapy, adequate control measures are necessary to evaluate its adequacy and to constantly adjust the dose to reduce hospitalisation and prolong patient survival. Malnutrition is common in haemodialysis patients and closely related to morbidity and mortality. Patients undergoing haemodialysis have a high prevalence of protein-energy malnutrition and inflammation, along with abnormal iron status. The haemodialysis dose delivered is an important predictor of patient outcome. Aim: To evaluate through haemodialysis adequacy, which parameter(s), if any, better predict Kt/V, among those used to assess nutritional status, inflammation response, and iron status. Methods: We retrospectively studied 78 patients undergoing haemodialysis due to end-stage renal disease. As parameters of nutritional status, geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), transferrin levels, lymphocyte count, and albumin concentration were analysed. As signs of inflammation, C reactive protein (CRP) levels and ferritin concentrations were studied as well. Iron status was evaluated by both transferrin and ferritin levels, as well as by haemoglobin (Hb) concentration. Results: The core finding of our retrospective study is that transferrin levels predict the adequacy of haemodialysis expressed as Kt/V; the latter is the only predictor (P = 0.001) when adjusting for CRP concentrations, a solid marker of inflammation, and for ferritin levels considered an iron-storage protein, but also a parameter of inflammatory response. Discussion and Conclusion: In keeping with the results of this study, we underline that the use of transferrin levels to assess haemodialysis quality combine into a single test the evaluation of the three most important factors of protein-energy wasting.

scholarly journals Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease patients: literature review and worldwide evidence-based practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atthaphong Phongphithakchai ◽  
Phongsak Dandecha ◽  
Sukit Raksasuk ◽  
Thatsaphan Srithongkul
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Dialysis Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

AbstractThe prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is on the rise worldwide. Meanwhile, the number of older people requiring dialysis therapy is increasing as a result of this population. We found that starting dialysis in an unplanned manner is a common occurrence, even for patients with nephrology follow-up. Most centers choose hemodialysis with a high rate of central venous catheter use at the time of initiation of dialysis. Current data has found that central venous catheter use is independently associated with increased mortality and high bacteremia rates. Peritoneal dialysis is one option to avoid bacteremia. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines suggests a break-in period of at least two weeks prior to an elective start of peritoneal dialysis, without mentioning urgent-start peritoneal dialysis. For unplanned ESRD patients, it is unrealistic to wait for two weeks before initiating peritoneal dialysis therapy. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis has been suggested to be a practical approach of prompt initiation of peritoneal dialysis after catheter insertion, which may avoid an increased risk of central venous catheter-related complications, including bacteremia, central venous stenosis, and thrombosis associated with the temporary use of hemodialysis. Peritoneal dialysis is the alternative option, and many studies have presented an interest in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis. Some reports have compared urgent-start hemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis and found that urgent-start peritoneal dialysis is a safe and effective alternative to hemodialysis for an unplanned dialysis patient. This review aims to compare each literature report regarding techniques, prescriptions, outcomes, complications, and costs of urgent-start peritoneal dialysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document