scholarly journals Experience on Commissioning the first Halcyon Linear Accelerator in China

Author(s):  
Bo Yang ◽  
Lang Yu ◽  
Zhiqun Wang ◽  
Bei Wang ◽  
Wenbo Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: This study is aimed to establish a proper clinical commissioning procedure for the Halcyon 1.0 linear accelerator (linac) with pre-configured reference beam data (RBD) set and to ensure the commissioning results meet the clinical treatment requirements. Methods: Four parts were carried out during the commissioning work on the first Halcyon linac in China, which were according to the characteristics of this linac, the experience of the acceptance tests and commissioning procedure of our existing linacs and treatment planning systems (TPS), reports of AAPM & IAEA and relevant publications with the choice of appropriate quality assurance (QA) tools and procedures. These four aspects were as follows: 1. Commissioning of the Halcyon linac; 2. commissioning of the Eclipse TPS; 3. QA and quality control (QA & QC) of the Halcyon linac; 4. QA & QC of the Eclipse TPS and developing the corresponding procedures. Results: The 3D radius of the isocenter of gantry and collimator rotation from Winston-Lutz test was 0.64mm, the coincidence of the virtual isocenter and the treatment isocenter was quite well, and the maximum travel position deviation was 0.7mm. Percentage Depth Doses (PDDs) was 63.3% at 10cm at the reference setup and the tolerance was within 1%. The Machine Performance Check (MPC) results were within the relevant tolerance, and the gantry isocenter size measured from MPC test was 0.67mm. The pre-configured beam model data was in agreement with the measured data. In the process of rotation, the speed of gantry rotation and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) movement and the control of dose rate were all accurate with all deviations were controlled below 2%. The CT values of Surface and Interior of the carbon fiber treatment couch were -750HU and -950HU, respectively. All MPPG 5.a recommended regular field gamma compare tests met the requirements. The task group 119 test was also performed on Halcyon, the point dose difference for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and RapidArc techniques were -0.003 ± 0.011 and - 0.012 ± 0.006, respectively, with confidence limits of 0.025 and 0.024. Conclusion: The measured data of the Halcyon linac are in good consistency with the pre-configured beam model data in Eclipse TPS. The commissioning results of the IMRT technique and the RapicArc technique are all within the tolerance ranges recommended by AAPM and relevant publications, which could meet the needs of clinical requirements. The pre-configured data can facilitate the commissioning work and the validation and replace fully collecting beam data, which will be the trend of the commissioning of linac in the future.

Author(s):  
Gen Fu ◽  
Alexandrina Untaroiu ◽  
Walter O’Brien

The measurement of the aeromechanical response of the fan blades is important to quantifying their integrity. The accurate knowledge of the response at critical locations of the structure is crucial when assessing the structural condition. A reliable and low cost measuring technique is necessary. Currently, sensors can only provide the measured data at several discrete points. A significant number of sensors may be required to fully characterize the aeromechanical response of the blades. However, the amount of instrumentation that can be placed on the structure is limited due to data acquisition system limitations, instrumentation accessibility, and the effect of the instrumentation on the measured response. From a practical stand point, it is not possible to place sensors at all the critical locations for different excitations. Therefore, development of an approach that derives the full strain field response based on a limited set of measured data is required. In this study, the traditional model reduction method is used to expand the full strain field response of the structure by using a set of discrete measured data. Two computational models are developed and used to verify the expansion approach. The solution of the numerical model is chosen as the reference solution. In addition, the numerical model also provides the mode shapes of the structure. In the expansion approach, this information is used to develop the algorithm. First, a cantilever beam model is created. The influences of the sensor location, number of sensors and the number of modes included are analyzed using this cantilever beam model. The expanded full field response data is compared with the reference solution to evaluate the expansion procedure. The rotor 67 blade model is then used to test the expansion method. The results show that the expanded full field data is in good agreement with the calculated data. The expansion algorithm can be used for the full field strain by using the limited sets of strain data.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 2369-2376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tucker Netherton ◽  
Yuting Li ◽  
Paige Nitsch ◽  
Simona Shaitelman ◽  
Peter Balter ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 80-81 ◽  
pp. 1091-1095
Author(s):  
Dong Dong Ni ◽  
Xu Wu ◽  
Jian Qi Chen ◽  
Jia Jing ◽  
Cai Xia Liu

Purpose: A multi-leaf collimator leaf sequencing comparison program in the sense that it translates beam intensity maps into the least number of MLC field segments was presented. Methods: The IMRT leaf sequencing calculation program based on Galvin, Bortfeld algorithms was constructed. The output of the leaf sequencing program were the number of segment and the total number of monitor unit. Results: Assuming 15 x 15 bixel fields with an average of 10 intensity levels, Bortfeld algorithm could yield better result on example 1 while Galvin algorithm yielded better results on example 2. Conclusions: This represented a useful tool for optimizing the leaf sequencing of static multi-leaf collimator that can yield shorter treatment time and higher utilization of photons by comparing with the total number of monitor units and number of segments of existed typical algorithms. It was an effective strategy and could be applied in commercial Treatment Planning Systems.


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (6Part13) ◽  
pp. 246-246
Author(s):  
M Bakhtiari ◽  
J Schmitt ◽  
A Sedaghat ◽  
V Aroumougame ◽  
M Sarfaraz ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6Part20) ◽  
pp. 3573-3573
Author(s):  
B Juneja ◽  
S Gao ◽  
P Balter ◽  
P Nitsch

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document