scholarly journals Dispatcher-assisted, compression-only bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation does not improve the outcomes of unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational study with component analysis of rescue breath combination and dispatcher-assisted instruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinori Ito ◽  
Hideo Inaba ◽  
Tomoyuki Ushimoto ◽  
Hideki Morita ◽  
Kenshi Murasaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Favourable Outcome ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Assisted Instruction ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Objectives: This study aimed to analyse the effects of rescue breath and chest compression combinations in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) with and without dispatch-assisted CPR (DA) on the outcomes between unwitnessed and bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).Design and Settings: This retrospective study analysed the prospectively collected data of 212,003 unwitnessed and 117,920 bystander-witnessed OHCA cases between 2014 and 2016 in Japan, with BCPR classification based on two clinical components (DA provision [with or without DA] and combination of breaths and compressions [standard or compression-only]).Main outcome measures: Neurologically favourable outcome at 1 monthResults: In univariate analysis, unwitnessed cases had no significant association of BCPR with the overall neurologically favourable outcome (provided vs not provided, 0.65% [686/106,152] vs 0.66% [694/105,851]) compared with bystander-witnessed cases (5.6% [3,538/62,814] vs 3.5% [1,911/55,106]). After BCPR classification by two clinical components, the outcome of unwitnessed cases was improved by standard BCPR with DA (0.88% [69/7,807], adjusted OR; 95% CI, 1.38; 1.05–1.81) and compression-only (1.04% [161/15,497], 1.49;1.23–1.80) and standard (1.18% [41/3,463], 1.71; 1.21–2.43) BCPR without DA, but not by compression-only BCPR with DA (0.52% [415/79,385], 0.88; 0.76–1.01). According to multivariable logistic regression analysis focusing on the two clinical components only in cases with BCPR, neurologically favourable outcomes were worse in DA provision (0.76; 0.60–0.97) but better in standard BCPR, (1.27; 1.01–1.60) without significant interaction (P = 0.16), in unwitnessed cases. In bystander-witnessed cases, DA provision was associated with better outcomes (1.27; 1.01–1.60), with significant interaction (P = 0.03).Conclusions: Compared with no BCPR, compression-only BCPR with DA does not improve the neurologically favourable outcomes, and standard BCPR without DA is ideal in unwitnessed OHCA cases. Education on standard CPR and chest compression-only CPR as an option should be maintained because numerous OHCA cases are not witnessed by bystanders.

scholarly journals The influence of past experiences on future willingness to perform bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keng Sheng Chew ◽  
Shazrina Ahmad Razali ◽  
Shirly Siew Ling Wong ◽  
Aisyah Azizul ◽  
Nurul Faizah Ismail ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Validated Questionnaire ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Past Experiences ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background The influence of past familial experiences of receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and medical help in various cardiac arrest and nonfatal cardiac events toward willingness to “pay it forward” by helping the next cardiac arrest victim was explored. Methods Using a validated questionnaire, 6248 participants were asked to rate their willingness to perform bystander chest compression with mouth-to-mouth ventilation and chest compression-only CPR. Their past familial experiences of receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and medical help in various cardiac arrest and nonfatal cardiac events were also recorded. Results Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn’s pairwise comparisons showed that the following were significantly more willing to perform CPR with mouth-to-mouth ventilation: familial experience of “nonfatal cardiac events” (mean rank = 447) vs “out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with no CPR” (mean rank = 177), U = 35442.5, z = −2.055, p = 0.04; “in-hospital cardiac arrest and successful CPR” (mean rank = 2955.79) vs “none of these experiences” (mean rank = 2468.38), U = 111903, z = −2.60, p = 0.01; and “in-hospital cardiac arrest with successful CPR” (mean rank = 133.45) vs “out-of-hospital arrest with no CPR” (mean rank = 112.36), U = 4135.5, z = −2.06, p = 0.04. For compression-only CPR, Kruskal-Wallis test with multiple runs of Mann-Whitney U tests showed that “nonfatal cardiac events” group was statistically higher than the group with “none of these experiences” (mean rank = 3061.43 vs 2859.91), U = 1194658, z = −2.588, p = 0.01. The groups of “in-hospital cardiac arrest with successful CPR” and “in-hospital cardiac arrest with transient return of spontaneous circulation” were the most willing groups to perform compression-only CPR. Conclusion Prior familial experiences of receiving CPR and medical help, particularly among those with successful outcomes in a hospital setting, seem to increase the willingness to perform bystander CPR.

scholarly journals Are Canadians more willing to provide chest-compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)?—a nation-wide public survey

CJEM ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Cheskes ◽  
Laurie J. Morrison ◽  
Dorcas Beaton ◽  
Janet Parsons ◽  
Katie N. Dainty
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Public Knowledge ◽  
Response Distribution ◽  
Public Survey ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AbstractBackgroundBystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves the likelihood of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), yet it is performed in only 30% of cases. The 2010 guidelines promote chest-compression-only bystander CPR—a change intended to increase willingness to provide CPR.Objectives1) To determine whether the Canadian general public is more willing to perform chest-compression-only CPR compared to traditional CPR; 2) to characterize public knowledge of OHCA; and 3) to identify barriers and facilitators to bystander CPR.MethodsA 32-item survey assessing resuscitation knowledge, and willingness to provide CPR were disseminated in five Canadian regions. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize response distribution. Logistic regression analysis was applied to assess shifts in intention to provide CPR.ResultsA total of 428 completed surveys were analysed. When presented with a scenario of being a bystander in an OHCA, a greater proportion of respondents were willing to provide chest-compression-only CPR compared to traditional CPR for all victims (61.5% v. 39.7%,p<0.001), when the victim was a stranger (55.1% v. 38.8%,p<0.001), or when the victim was an unkempt individual (47.9% v. 28.5%,p<0.001). When asked to describe an OHCA, 41.4% said the heart stopped beating, and 20.8% said it was a heart attack. Identified barriers and facilitators included fear of litigation and lack of skill confidence.ConclusionsThis study identified gaps in knowledge, which may impair the ability of bystanders to act in OHCA. Most respondents expressed greater willingness to provide chest-compression-only CPR, but this was mediated by victim characteristics, skill confidence, and recognition of a cardiac arrest.

scholarly journals Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: Potential for Improvements in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Chocron ◽  
Julia Jobe ◽  
Sally Guan ◽  
Madeleine Kim ◽  
Mia Shigemura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Medical System ◽  
Emergency Medical System ◽  
Compression Rate ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a critical intervention to improve survival following out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. We evaluated the quality of bystander CPR and whether performance varied according to the number of bystanders or provision of telecommunicator CPR (TCPR). Methods and Results We investigated non‐traumatic out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest occurring in a large metropolitan emergency medical system during a 6‐month period. Information about bystander care was ascertained through review of the 9‐1‐1 recordings in addition to emergency medical system and hospital records to determine bystander CPR status (none versus TCPR versus unassisted), the number of bystanders on‐scene, and CPR performance metrics of compression fraction and compression rate. Of the 428 eligible out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, 76.4% received bystander CPR including 43.7% unassisted CPR and 56.3% TCPR; 35.2% had one bystander, 33.3% had 2 bystanders, and 31.5% had ≥3 bystanders. Overall compression fraction was 59% with a compression rate of 88 per minute. CPR differed according to TCPR status (fraction=52%, rate=87 per minute for TCPR versus fraction=69%, rate=102 for unassisted CPR, P <0.05 for each comparison) and the number of bystanders (fraction=55%, rate=87 per minute for 1 bystander, fraction=59%, rate=89 for 2 bystanders, fraction=65%, rate=97 for ≥3 bystanders, test for trend P <0.05 for each metric). Additional bystander actions were uncommon to include rotation of compressors (3.1%) or application of an automated external defibrillator (8.0%). Conclusions Bystander CPR quality as gauged by compression fraction and rate approached guideline goals though performance depended upon the type of CPR and number of bystanders.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document