scholarly journals Significance of Platinum Distribution to Predicts Platinum Resistance in Ovarian Cancer After Platinum Treatment in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaname Uno ◽  
Nobuhisa Yoshikawa ◽  
Akira Tazaki ◽  
Shoko Ohnuma ◽  
Kazuhisa Kitami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Inductively Coupled Plasma ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Type A ◽  
Platinum Resistance ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Accumulation

Abstract Most advanced ovarian cancer patients experience recurrence and develop resistance to platinum-based agents. However, the diagnosis of platinum resistance based on platinum-free interval is not always accurate and timely. In this study, we employed laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry to visualize platinum distribution in the tissues at the time of interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty seven patients with advanced high grade serous ovarian cancer were enrolled. Two distinct patterns of platinum distribution were observed. Type A (n = 16): platinum accumulation at the adjacent stroma but little in the tumor; type B (n = 11): even distribution of platinum through tumor and adjacent stroma. Type A was significantly correlated with worse prognosis (P = 0.031). Patients classified in type A and treated with platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy after operation were significantly shorter period of recurrence after last platinum-based chemotherapy (P = 0.020) and diagnosed with “platinum-resistant recurrence”. Treatment with non-platinum-based chemotherapy after operation could be effective for the patients who were classified in type A. Our data indicate that the platinum resistance can be predicted prior to recurrence with platinum distribution. Thus, we will be able to select more appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy, which may possibly lead to improve patient’s prognosis.

TRUST: Trial of Radical Upfront Surgical Therapy in advanced ovarian cancer (ENGOT ov33/AGO‐OVAR OP7)

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1327-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Reuss ◽  
Andreas du Bois ◽  
Philipp Harter ◽  
Christina Fotopoulou ◽  
Jalid Sehouli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinoma ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

BackgroundPrimary cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy has been considered standard management for patients with advanced ovarian cancer over decades. An alternative approach of interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was subsequently reported by two randomized phase III trials (EORTC‐GCG, CHORUS), which were criticized owing to important limitations, especially regarding the rate of complete resection.Primary ObjectiveTo clarify the optimal timing of surgical therapy in advanced ovarian cancer.Study HypothesisPrimary cytoreductive surgery is superior to interval cytoreductive surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.Trial DesignTRUST is an international open, randomized, controlled multi-center trial investigating overall survival after primary cytoreductive surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent interval cytoreductive surgery in patients with FIGO stage IIIB–IVB ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma. To guarantee adequate surgical quality, participating centers need to fulfill specific quality assurance criteria (eg, ≥50% complete resection rate in upfront surgery for FIGO IIIB–IVB patients, ≥36 debulking-surgeries/year) and agree to independent audits by TRUST quality committee delegates. Patients in the primary cytoreductive surgery arm undergo surgery followed by 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, whereas patients in the interval cytoreductive surgery arm undergo 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy after histologic confirmation of the disease, followed by interval cytoreductive surgery and subsequently, 3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. The intention of surgery for both groups is complete tumor resection according to guideline recommendations.Major Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaMajor inclusion criteria are suspected or histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma FIGO stage IIIB–IVB (IV only if resectable metastasis). Major exclusion criteria are non-epithelial ovarian malignancies and borderline tumors; prior chemotherapy for ovarian cancer; or abdominal/pelvic radiotherapy.Primary EndpointOverall survival.Sample Size772 patients.Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsAccrual completion approximately mid-2019, results are expected after 5 years' follow-up in 2024.Trial RegistrationNCT02828618.

New biomarkers to predict platinum resistance in ovarian cancer patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17085-e17085
Author(s):  
Oana Trifanescu ◽  
Laurentia Minea Gales ◽  
Maria Iuliana Gruia ◽  
Bianca Andreea Gusoiu ◽  
Florina Torliceanu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Platinum Resistance ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Salts ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

e17085 Background: Epithelial ovarian cancer is the second most common gynecologic malignancy and is characterized by the highest mortality of all gynecological cancers. Despite of initial response, platinum resistance develops and contributes to the poor outcome of advanced stage ovarian cancer patients. The aim of the study was to identify biomarkers helpful in predicting treatment response to platinum salts. Methods: Forty eight patients with advanced ovarian (stage II, III and IV) cancer were prospectively enrolled between 2014 and 2017. All patients underwent surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. Serum reactive oxygen species parameters such as malondialdehyde, ceruloplasmine, and serum VEGF were measured before each cycle of chemotherapy. Results: Mean age at diagnostic was 51.3 +/- 8.1 years, (range 42 - 78). Median follow up was 39 months (range 12-56). Twenty tree percent were platinum resistance. Median progression free survival was 22 months and estimated median overall survival was 84 months, 77% of patients being alive at 3 years. VEGF levels were significantly higher in patients with platinum resistance disease (1210 pg/ml) compare to platinum sensitive (mean VEGF levels 945pg/ml, p = 0.0003). We used a ROC curve to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of VEGF as a predictor to platinum response and find out that the aria under the curve (AUC) was 0.874, p = 0.003, 95% CI 0.734-1 and cut-off value (80% sensibility, 80% specificity) was 1085pg/ml. Malondialdehyde levels were statistically significant higher in patients with platinum resistance disease (mean value 11.1 μmol/100 ml vs. 7.4 μmol/100 ml in platinum sensitive, p = 0.02. The ROC curve for malondialdehyde identify an aria under the curve of 0.818, p = 0.0001 and CI 95% (0.744-0.893) and a cut-off value of 7.74 μmol/100 ml to estimate with 81.3% sensitivity and 64% specificity platinum response validating this bio markers as predicting platinum response. For Ceruloplasmine AUC was 0.706, p = 0.0001, 95% CI (0.617,-0.796). Conclusions: Malondialdehyde, ceruloplasmine and VEGF can estimate with precision the resistance to platinum salts in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

A retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy versus up-front surgery in advanced ovarian cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Steed ◽  
A. M. Oza ◽  
J. Murphy ◽  
S. Laframboise ◽  
G. Lockwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Postoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference

The objective of this study is to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery to primary surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. Retrospective analysis from 1998 to 2003 of 116 patients with ovarian cancer was performed. Fifty women diagnosed by positive cytology received three cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel. Thirty-six patients subsequently underwent cytoreductive surgery and completed three further cycles postoperatively. The OS and PFS were compared in 66 women treated with primary surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. A statistically significant difference was observed for OS (P= 0.03, HR = 1.85, CI = 1.06–3.23) and PFS (P= 0.04, HR = 1.61, CI = 1.03–2.53) favoring the primary surgery group. Due to the small numbers, age, grade, stage, pleural effusions, and histologic cell type were controlled for separately in the bivariate analyses. Controlling for stage made the results weaker. A matched subgroup survival analysis was performed on patients who had surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After matching for stage and grade and controlling age and pleural effusions (N= 28 matched pairs), there was no statistical difference for OS (P= 0.95, HR = 1.04, CI = 0.33–3.30) or PFS (P= 0.79, HR = 1.11, CI = 0.98–1.04). It is concluded that primary surgery should be considered in all patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be an alternative in a subset of women with the intent to also perform interval debulking.

Primary Surgery or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: The Debate Continues…

2016 ◽  
pp. 153-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renee Cowan ◽  
Dennis Chi ◽  
Sean Kehoe ◽  
Matthew Nankivell ◽  
Alexandra Leary
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Primary Debulking Surgery ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by platinum-based chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of treatment for advanced ovarian cancer for decades. Primary debulking surgery has been repeatedly identified as one of the key factors in improving survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, especially when minimal or no residual disease is left behind. Achieving these results sometimes requires extensive abdominal and pelvic surgical procedures and consultation with other surgical teams. Some clinicians who propose a primary chemotherapy approach reported an increased likelihood of leaving no macroscopic disease after surgery and improved patient-reported outcomes and quality-of-life (QOL) measures. Given the ongoing debate regarding the relative benefit of PDS versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), tumor biology may aid in patient selection for each approach. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy offers the opportunity for in vivo chemosensitivity testing. Studies are needed to determine the best way to evaluate the impact of NACT in each individual patient with advanced ovarian cancer. Indeed, the biggest utility of NACT may be in research, where this approach provides the opportunity for the investigation of predictive markers, mechanisms of resistance, and a forum to test novel therapies.

Impact of BRCA mutation status and time to platinum resistance on patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5561-5561
Author(s):  
Alexandra Tyulyandina ◽  
Maxim Filipenko ◽  
Alexey Rumyantsev ◽  
Ilya Pokataev ◽  
Valentina Nechushkina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Resistance ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference

5561 Background: The influence of germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCAmt) on ovarian cancer patients (pts) long-term survival remains controversial. Methods: 228 pts with serous and endometrial ovarian cancer stage Ic-IV were enrolled in the retrospective study. Next-generation sequencing testing of BRCA1/2 in blood was employed. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and time to platinum resistance (TPR) were analyzed. TPR was defined as time from first line chemotherapy to registration of platinum resistance relapse. Results: The rate of pathogenic gBRCAmt was defined in 29.4% (67/228) pts. There was no any significant difference between BRCA1/2 mutation carries and non-carries in both PFS (18.3 and 16.7 months, p = 0.27, HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.52-1.20) and OS (71.9 and 79.1 months, p = 0.69, HR 0.88, 95%CI 0.46-1.68). However, TPR was significantly longer in pts with gBRCAmt than in germline BRCA wild type (gBRCAwt) pts (51.4 and 34.4 months, p = 0.05, HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-0.98). Pts with gBRCAmt had poor prognosis after registration of platinum resistance. gBRCAwt pts had longer survival than gBRCAmt after platinum-resistance relapse: 33.7 and 16.9 months respectively (p = 0.05; HR 1.85, 95%CI 1.02-4.08). Conclusions: Our finding provided possible explanation of equal survival of pts with or without BRCA1/2 mutations. Long-term sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy allowed pts with gBRCA1/2mt to control the disease for a long period of time. However the non-platinum regimens had less efficacy in pts with gBRCAmt than gBRCAwt after platinum resistance.

Primary Chemotherapy: The Future for the Management of Advanced Ovarian Cancer?

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. S17-S19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan A. Ledermann
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Primary Chemotherapy ◽  
Biological Behavior ◽  
Preoperative Imaging ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Debulking

Primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer has been the standard practice for more than 30 years. A survival benefit is principally seen in patients who have optimal cytoreduction with no or small-volume residual disease after surgery. In everyday clinical practice, many patients are not able to undergo optimal tumor debulking. Modern preoperative imaging and assessment can identify most of these patients. Through developments in platinum-based chemotherapy, a high proportion of patients can be expected to respond to primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy. A recent clinical trial has shown that the survival of patients with operable disease is not disadvantaged by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Thus, complete tumor cytoreduction could be achieved in a greater percentage of patients, if primary chemotherapy is used in women in whom optimal primary surgery would be difficult. Furthermore, delayed surgery provides more knowledge about the biological behavior of the tumor, and this could be used to tailor treatment more effectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document