scholarly journals Elderly And Burn Injuries: A Ten-Year Analysis of 612 Patients

Author(s):  
Zahra Haghani Dogahe ◽  
Reza Zarei ◽  
Shahin Hallaj ◽  
Mohammadreza Mobayen

Abstract Background: With all the progress made in geriatric medicine, we expect to have a growing population of elderly soon. With burn injuries, as one of the most common unpredictable injuries to the elderly, it is essential to clarify the epidemiological pattern and factors related to worse outcomes in geriatric burn patients. We aimed to investigate burn characteristics in the elderly in Guilan province, IRAN, in ten years.Methods: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of burn patients aging 60yrs and over in Velayat Burn Center between 2010 and 2020. The data collected from the hospital information system included age, sex, marital state, occupation, residency, season and month of the incident, place of incident, total body surface area (TBSA), burn degree, cause of the burn, anatomical site of the injury, pre-injury morbidities, surgical managements, length of hospital stay and mortality.Results: Among 612 patients, the mean age was 72.20±8.94 years. The female to male ratio was 1.14:1 with a total of 53.3% female burn patients. 94.90% of patients lived with family members. 59.3% lived in urban areas. Most of the burn injuries happened during winter and summer. 82.5% happened indoors. The mean was 19.70±22.13%. The most common causes were flames (50.0%) and scalds (44.3%). The mean length of hospital stay (LOS) was 6.14±6.27 days. The overall mortality rate was 15%.Conclusion: We concluded that most burn injuries among the geriatric population happen indoors, during the first hours of the day, and on the first day of the week, making it essential to establish special prevention programs suiting these situations. On the other hand, with the increased life expectancy and the unpredictable nature of burn injuries, it is essential to identify risk factors and establish prevention programs for the elderly.

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pujisriyani Pujisriyani ◽  
Aditya Wardhana

Background: Burns are one of the most devastating conditions encountered in medical world. It affects people of all ages, from the very young to the elderly, and represents an assault on all aspects of the patient, from the physical to the psychological.Method: The collection and analysis of burn patients admitted to Cipto Mangunkusumo Burn Centre between January 2009 and December 2010 were studied retrospectively in terms of admissions, age, sex, extent of burn, causes of burns, referral, length of hospital stay (LOS) and mortality. Result: A total of 303 burn patients were admitted with the male to female ratio is 2.26 : 1 and the mean age of admission is 25.7 years (15-54 yr). Most of the patient presented with 20-50% extent of burn (mean 45.87%). The most common cause of burn injury is LPG at 30.4 % followed by flame at 25.7% and by scald at 19.1%. The overall mean LOS and mortality are 13.72 days and 34%. Conclusion : LPG is the major cause of burn and the mortality are 42.4%. Because of level of the mortality, the prevention and management of LPG and the safety of the product of LPG should be given in terms of government regulations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Tam Song ◽  
Jolie Hwee ◽  
Colin Song ◽  
Bien Keem Tan ◽  
Si Jack Chong

Abstract Background With various changes implemented such as perioperative antibiotics for tangential excision, this retrospective study reviews the infection profile of burn patients at Singapore’s only centralized burns unit. Worldwide, the appearance of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains of Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) continues to worsen patient outcomes. This study also surveys the role of blood cultures in burns at our unit. Methods Four hundred fifty-two burn patients admitted to the unit between 2011 and 2013, and with cultures performed, were included in the study. The yields of various cultures were evaluated and 2684 samples were amassed, of which 984 (36.7 %) were positive. Patient variables for predictors of MDR A. baumannii infection acquisition and bacteremia were evaluated through multivariate analyses. Results Pseuodomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) (67 patients) was the most common organism in those with total body surface area (TBSA) burn <20 % while MDR A. baumannii (39 patients) was most prevalent in those with TBSA burn ≥20 %. We found a yield of 1.1 % positive blood cultures for TBSA burn <20 % and a yield of 18.6 % positive cultures in TBSA burn ≥20 %. The median time between surgery and bacteremia was 6.5 days (range -18 to 68 days, interquartile range 4.5); 2.9 and 8.8 % of bacteremic episodes occurred within 24 and 48 h, respectively. This is a decrease from a predeceasing study (45.3 % for 24 h and 60 % for 48 h). Multivariate analysis revealed that length of hospital stay and TBSA burn ≥20 % were predictors of MDR A. baumannii infection and positive blood cultures. Conclusions MDR A. baumannii infection burdens patient management, especially in those with TBSA burn ≥20 % and longer hospital stay. Prophylactic antibiotics may reduce perioperative bacteremia, but their role in MDR infections needs to be evaluated. The role of blood cultures in TBSA burn <20 % needs reconsideration.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (06) ◽  
pp. 1042-1047
Author(s):  
FIRDOUS KHAN ◽  
ASIF SHAH ◽  
ABDUL AZIZ JANAN

Aim: To determine major risk factors of mortality and causes of death in patients presented with burn injury. Study design:Prospective Descriptive Study. Setting and duration: Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar,Pakistan from April 2008 and June 2012. Methodology: A prospective descriptive study was performed among the patients whoadmitted to the Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan between April 2008 and June2012. All relative information was collected through a detailed proforma and patient’s treatment files. Patients of any age, any degree ofburns and burns exceeding 10% TBSA were included. Patients presenting after more than one week post burn or patients referred fromother hospitals were excluded. Within this period, demographic data, treatment, and outcomes of treatment were reviewed and analyzed.Survivors and non-survivors among burn patients were compared to define the predictive factors of mortality. Results: Between April2008 and June 2012, 1850 patients were admitted with burn injuries. There were 1150 male patients (62%) and 700 female patients(38%). Mean age was 36 years with range of 1-70 years. Inhalation injuries were present in 45 patients (2.40%). Causes were flameburns (65.0%), electrical burns (15%), scalds (13%) and chemical burns (7.0%). The total body surface area (TBSA) burn ranged from10- 100%, with a mean of 38% TBSA burn. Mean length of hospital stay was 12 days (ranging from 24 hours to 170 days). Mortality ratewas 11.2%. Higher age, larger burn area, wound infection, longer hospital stay and the presence of multi-system organ failuresignificantly predicted increased mortality. Conclusions: Prevention is a key factor in reducing the morbidity and mor tality associatedwith burn injury. A campaign to educate people that burns can be prevented will be important in our community. The prevention of multiorganfailure and septicemia are likely to be more effective than their treatment.


QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nourhan E Hassan ◽  
Mennatallah S. S Elaraby ◽  
Samia A Abdul-Rahman ◽  
Mohamed Farouk Allam ◽  
Somaia M Ebeid

Abstract Background Elderly persons are prone to frequent hospitalization for a longer period of time. It has been reported that approximately 5% of elderly die during hospital stay, whereas 20%– 30% die within one year following hospital discharge. Many factors including aging-associated diseases, chronic diseases, drug abuse, poly pharmacy, functional disability, feeding problems, prolonged length of hospital stay are associated with increasing mortality risk. In addition, symptoms and signs are significantly variable in the elderly and usually atypically represented. Objective To identify predictive factors associated with in-hospital mortality in elderly patients admitted to Ain Shams University Geriatric hospital wards and intermediate care unit. Methods A prospective cohort study of all Egyptian elderly patients (aged 60 years old or above) admitted at Geriatric Hospital (general ward and intermediate care unit), Ain Shams University Hospitals (Cairo, Egypt), over a period of 6 months (from April 2019 to September 2019). Patients were subjected to structured interview questionnaire including data pertaining socio-demographic data, past medical history, relevant physical examination, Short-form of Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) and SOFA score. Association between different risk factors and mortality rate was done to identify the most significant predictive factors leading to mortality in elderly in order to implement specific geriatric interventions in the future to prevent such fatal consequences. Results The present study included 140 patients, of whom 73 (52.1%) were females and 67 (47.8%) were males. Nearly, 80% of the studied sample were discharged, while 20% died during hospitalization. The most common pre-morbid conditions were hypertension (58.6%), diabetes mellitus (40%), gastrointestinal tract diseases (40.7%), cerebrovascular strokes (37.8%) and ischemic heart disease (35.7%). On admission, the mean SOFA score of the discharged group was (6±2.8) while the mean score of the deceased group was (8.9± 3.6). Evaluation of the general characteristics of the discharged and deceased groups revealed that the mortality rate is significantly associated with male gender (p = 0.018), depressive disorders (p < 0.001), hepatic diseases (p = 0.008), gastrointestinal tract diseases (p = 0.048), length of hospital stay (p = 0.001) and initial SOFA score on admission to acute care setting (p < 0.001). Conclusion Predictors of mortality during hospitalization of elderly patients include; male gender, depression, hepatic diseases, GIT diseases, length of hospital stay and initial SOFA score on admission. These factors must be evaluated to identify the potential candidates for specific geriatric interventions and specific plan of care.


Author(s):  
Moslem Heydari pur ◽  
MohammadMehdi Bahri ◽  
Ebrahim SHeykhi

Introduction: Burn injuries are among the most important  causes of disability and medical problems in the world. Weakness and inability of the burn is greater than the pain of the burn. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study-analysis in which the case of 126 patients admitted to the Shohada Mehrab Hospital, affiliated to the Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences in Yazd during the first six months of 2019, has been reviewed. Data were collected in a checklist designed by the researcher, and demographic variables and using the chi-square test, mean comparison, and  using descriptive and analytical statistics and linear regression in the SPSS V.24 software was analyzed (p>0/05).  Results: The findings of this study stated that  73.8% (93people) of patients were male and 26.2% (33 people) were female. 67.5% (85 people) were burned with thermal flames (p>0/019) and 13.5% (17 people) with boiling water (p>0/44). 77% (97people) of home accidents, 22% (28people) occurred at work, and 1% at other places (farm, car, etc.). 57% of these patients were 20% and 31% between 21 -40 percent burns, burns, 22% between 41-60 percent burns and burns 11% between 61 -80 percent and 5 percent are between 81-100 percent burned.This study results showed that the main cause of burns is fire (67/5%). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that most burns are among men, and about 70% of deaths are among men. The average length of hospital stay was 12 days, 22 patients died, and the fatality rate was 17.5%. This study showed that 67.5 % of burns were of the thermal type and hot water and hot liquids were the next cause of burns (13.5 %). Effective factors are fatality, patient age, and total body surface area (TBSA). 77% of burns occurred at home, 22% at work, and 1% at other places (farm, car, etc.). High incidence of burns and the loss of active community force will result in cost and disability. Treatment of burns requires a long hospital stay, which in addition to the high cost, can cause mental and psychological injuries to the patient.


Swiss Surgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 255-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perruchoud ◽  
Vuilleumier ◽  
Givel

Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure as treatments for pilonidal sinus. Subjects and methods: We evaluated a group of 141 patients operated on for a pilonidal sinus between 1991 and 1995. Ninety patients were treated by excision and open granulation, 34 patients by excision and primary closure and 17 patients by incision and drainage, as a unique treatment of an infected pilonidal sinus. Results: The first group, receiving treatment of excision and open granulation, experienced the following outcomes: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time; 72 days; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 40; average off-work delay, 38 days; and average follow-up time, 43 months. There were five recurrences (6%) in this group during the follow-up period. For the second group treated by excision and primary closure, the corresponding outcome measurements were as follows: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time, 23 days; primary healing failure rate, 9%; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 6; average off-work delay, 21 days. The average follow-up time was 34 months, and two recurrences (6%) were observed during the follow-up period. In the third group, seventeen patients benefited from an incision and drainage as unique treatment. The mean follow-up was 37 months. Five recurrences (29%) were noticed, requiring a new operation in all the cases. Discussion and conclusion: This series of 141 patients is too limited to permit final conclusions to be drawn concerning significant advantages of one form of treatment compared to the other. Nevertheless, primary closure offers the advantages of quicker healing time, fewer post-operative visits and shorter time off work. When a primary closure can be carried out, it should be routinely considered for socio-economical and comfort reasons.


2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016728
Author(s):  
Joshua S Catapano ◽  
Andrew F Ducruet ◽  
Stefan W Koester ◽  
Tyler S Cole ◽  
Jacob F Baranoski ◽  
...  

BackgroundTransradial artery (TRA) access for neuroendovascular procedures is associated with fewer complications than transfemoral artery (TFA) access. This study compares hospital costs associated with TRA access to those associated with TFA access for neurointerventions.MethodsElective neuroendovascular procedures at a single center were retrospectively analyzed from October 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019. Hospital costs for each procedure were obtained from the hospital financial department. The primary outcome was the difference in the mean hospital costs after propensity adjustment between patients who underwent TRA compared with TFA access.ResultsOf the 338 elective procedures included, 63 (19%) were performed through TRA versus 275 (81%) through TFA access. Diagnostic procedures were more common in the TRA cohort (51 of 63, 81%) compared with the TFA cohort (197 of 275, 72%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.48). The TRA cohort had a shorter length of hospital stay (mean (SD) 0.3 (0.5) days) compared with the TFA cohort (mean 0.7 (1.3) days; p=0.02) and lower hospital costs (mean $12 968 ($6518) compared with the TFA cohort (mean $17 150 ($10 946); p=0.004). After propensity adjustment for age, sex, symptoms, angiographic findings, procedure type, sheath size, and catheter size, TRA access was associated with a mean hospital cost of $2514 less than that for TFA access (95% CI −$4931 to −$97; p=0.04).ConclusionNeuroendovascular procedures performed through TRA access are associated with lower hospital costs than TFA procedures. The lower cost is likely due to a decreased length of hospital stay for TRA.


Author(s):  
Inge Spronk ◽  
Nancy EE Van Loey ◽  
Cornelis H van der Vlies ◽  
Juanita A Haagsma ◽  
Suzanne Polinder ◽  
...  

Abstract An important aspect of the rehabilitation of burn patients is social participation, including daily activities and work. Detailed information on long-term activity impairment and employment is scarce. Therefore, we investigated activity impairment, work status, and work productivity loss in adults 5–7 years following burn injuries, and investigated associations with burn-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) domains. Adult participants completed the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment General Health questionnaire and the Burn Specific Health Scale-brief (BSHS-B) 5–7 years post-burn. Outcomes were compared between participants with mild/intermediate and severe burns (>20% total body surface area burned). Seventy-six (36%) of the 213 participants experienced some degree of activity impairment due to burn-related problems 5–7 years post-burn. Seventy percent of the population was employed; 12% of them experienced work productivity loss due to burn-related problems. Nineteen percent reported changes in their work situation (partly) because of the burn injury. A higher proportion of participants with severe burns had activity impairments (56% vs 29%; P = .001) and work productivity loss (26% vs 8%; P < .001) compared to participants with mild/intermediate burns. Activity impairment and work productivity loss were both associated with burn-related work problems and lower mood, measured with the BSHS-B. In conclusion, a substantial part of the study population experienced activity impairment and work productivity loss, was unemployed, and/or reported changes in their work situation due to their injury. Particularly patients with severe burns reported productivity loss and had lower employment rates. This subscribes the importance of addressing work-related functioning in the rehabilitation of burn patients.


Author(s):  
J. Salvador Marín ◽  
F.J. Ferrández Martínez ◽  
C. Fuster Such ◽  
J.M. Seguí Ripoll ◽  
D. Orozco Beltrán ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document