scholarly journals Distribution Characteristics Of New AO Classification In Different Age Groups Of Patients With Femoral Neck Fracture

Author(s):  
Yuxuan Jiang ◽  
Yangjun Zhu ◽  
Dongxu Feng ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
Wuqiang Jiang ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The clinical and imaging data of patients diagnosed with femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in Xi 'an Honghui Hospital from 2018 to 2020.The epidemiological characteristics of these patients in different age groups were analyzed. Methods In this study, patients with femoral neck fracture hospitalized in Xi 'an Honghui Hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were divided into four groups according to age: the young group (≤44 years old), the middle-aged group (45-59 years old),the young old group (60-74 years old), and the elderly group (≥75 years old) to analyze age,sex,side,injury mechanism,new AO classification and other features. A total of 2071 patients were included for analysis. Results There were 742 males (35.8%) and 1,329 females (64.2%).There were 1,106 patient s(53.4%) on the left side and 965 on the right side (46.6%).There were 1781 cases of low energy injury (86%) and 290 cases of high energy injury (14%), and the main injury mechanism was falling.The number of patients with femoral neck fracture in each year was 719 patients in 2018, 694 patients in 2019, and 661 patients in 2020, respectively. The number of patients showed a decreasing trend year by year, and the gender ratio and injury mechanism showed no significant trend of change. In the age group, the proportion of the young group was increasing year by year.Among the new AO classification, there were 1023 cases of B1.3, accounting for the highest proportion of 49.4%.The proportion of B2.2 was the highest in the young group (32.4%) .B1.3 and B2.2 were the main types in the middle-aged group, accounting for 31.7% and 32.0, respectively.B1.3 was dominant in the young old and elderly group (47.1% and 63.4%, respectively). Conclusion The new classification combines the classic classification, which is easier to remember. The stability of fracture is more carefully distinguished,which is conducive to guiding the surgical treatment of many stable femoral neck fractures in middle-aged and young old people. ORIF treatment can be used to delay the age of hip replacement.

2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (38) ◽  
pp. 1543-1547
Author(s):  
Krisztina Juhász ◽  
Imre Boncz ◽  
Péter Kanizsai ◽  
Andor Sebestyén

Abstract: Introduction: Although several national studies reported on the risk factors for contralateral hip fracture, there are no data about the prognostic factors of the time until contralateral hip fractures. Aim: The aim of the study was to analyse the impact of different prognostic factors on the time until the development of contralateral fracture and to determine the incidence of contralateral hip fractures after femoral neck fractures. Method: Patients aged 60 years and over with contralateral hip fracture between 01 Jan 2000 and 31 Dec 2008 were identified among those who suffered their femoral neck fracture in Hungary in 2000. Risk factors as age, sex, comorbidities, type of fracture and surgery, place of living and hospitals providing treatment for primary fracture were analysed by one way ANOVA focusing on the time until the development of contralateral hip fracture. Results: 312 patients met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of contralateral hip fracture after femoral neck fracture ranged between 1.5% and 2.1%, the cumulative incidence was 8.24%. The mean time until the development of contralateral hip fracture was 1159.8 days. The incidence of contralateral hip fracture showed no significant deviation. Significantly shorter time (p = 0.010) was detected until the contralateral hip fracture in older patients with femoral neck fracture. Conclusions: The yearly incidence of contralateral hip fracture showed no significant difference by patients with femoral neck fracture over 60 years. The shorter time until the contralateral hip fracture by the older age groups highlights the need of elaboration of prevention strategies. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(38): 1543–1547.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jichao Liu ◽  
Zhengwei Li ◽  
Jie Ding ◽  
Bingzhe Huang ◽  
Chengdong Piao

Abstract Background Femoral neck fracture combined with anterior dislocation of the femoral head is very rare. To our knowledge, there is no classification system yet for this rare form of injury, and the injury mechanism of femoral neck fracture combined with obturator head dislocation has not been described in the literature. In this study, we systematically reviewed the literature and the cases treated in our hospital, and identified and classified all injury types according to the injury mechanism of femoral neck fracture combined with anterior dislocation of the femoral head. Further, based on the experience of treating a patient with femoral neck fracture and obturator dislocation of the femoral head, a theoretical hypothesis was proposed for the injury mechanism of this rare type of injury. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, WOS, CNKI database. These fractures were classified according to the dislocation site and injury mechanism (one injury or two injuries). Results 1891 articles were initially identified through PubMed and other databases, and after bibliographic research, study screening, and removing duplicates, 1455 articles were selected. After applying the exclusion criteria, a total of 18 full-text articles describing femoral neck fractures combined with anterior dislocation of the femoral head. Different dislocation sites have different injury mechanisms. Our classification system, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, allowed us to include all types of femoral neck fractures combined with anterior dislocation of the femoral head from the literature. According to the proposed classification system, the morphological features of femoral neck fracture combined with anterior dislocation of the femoral head can be accurately conveyed between doctors. Conclusions All injury patterns can likely be identified using the proposed classification system. This can help avoid confusion in the nomenclature of femoral neck fractures combined with anterior dislocation of the femoral head and help surgeons to more accurately detect lesions, thereby guiding surgical treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yipeng Wu ◽  
Muguo Song ◽  
Guangliang Peng ◽  
Yongqing Xu ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This systematic review was conducted to gather available evidence on the effectiveness of muscle pedicle bone flap transplantation in adult patients with femoral neck fractures. Methods Databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, IEEE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library were searched from their dates of inception until March 2021. Two reviewers independently selected the interventional studies on the assessment of the effectiveness of muscle pedicle bone flap transplantation for femoral neck fractures; data extraction and assessment of the methodological quality as per the Institute of Health Economics quality appraisal checklist were also performed by the reviewers. The effectiveness and complication outcomes were assessed by calculating the average rates. Results Overall, 20 studies with 1022 patients were included in this review. Notably, the methodologic quality of the included studies was typically poor. The average effective rates were as follows: good, 73.4%; fair, 15.4%; and poor, 10.9%. Moreover, the average nonunion rate, average avascular necrosis rate, average collapse rate, and the overall reoperation rate were 9.0%, 6.7%, 4.7%, and 7.3%, respectively. Conclusions This systematic review of heterogeneous studies with varying number of patients and varying surgical techniques indicated that muscle pedicle bone flap transplantation provides promising results with low rates of avascular necrosis and nonunion. Nevertheless, further controlled studies are required to ascertain the effectiveness of muscle pedicle bone flap transplantation in treating femoral neck fracture.


2020 ◽  
pp. 112070002090712
Author(s):  
Justinas Stucinskas ◽  
Kazimieras Grigaitis ◽  
Alfredas Smailys ◽  
Otto Robertsson ◽  
Sarunas Tarasevicius

Introduction: Elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) are usually operated with arthroplasty but with various combinations of implants and approaches. Thus, the optimal treatment is still controversial. We aimed to compare the results between the cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients operated for FNF regarding revision rate at 1 year postoperatively. Methods: The data were derived from the Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register. We included patients operated with cemented bipolar HA and compared them to the most frequently used cemented THA with 28-mm head during 2011–2016. For survival analysis, we used both revision for all reasons and for dislocations as an endpoint. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse the influence of covariates (age groups, gender, surgical approaches and arthroplasty groups). Results: There were 1177 bipolar HA and 514 THA included in our study. 26 (2.2%) revisions had occurred among the bipolar HAs as compared to 25 (4.9%) among the THAs 1 year after surgery. The main reason for revision was dislocation. The unadjusted cumulative revision rate for any reason at 1 year after surgery was 2.4% for the bipolar HA group and 5.1% for the THA group ( p  = 0.0054). Cox regression analysis showed that the use of bipolar HA, anterolateral approach and younger age groups had lower risk of revision for all reasons. Conclusion: Bipolar HA and anterolateral approach had a significantly lower overall 1-year risk of revision in femoral neck fracture patients as compared to THA with 28-mm femoral heads.


Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eustathios Kenanidis ◽  
Sofia-Chrysovalantou Zagalioti ◽  
Nikolaos Milonakis ◽  
Evangelia M Tsapakis ◽  
Eleftherios Tsiridis

2008 ◽  
Vol 149 (11) ◽  
pp. 493-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andor Sebestyén ◽  
Imre Boncz ◽  
Ferenc Tóth ◽  
Márta Péntek ◽  
József Nyárády ◽  
...  

A csípőtáji törésekhez idős korban magas halálozás társul. A szakirodalomban kevés a nagy beteganyagot feldolgozó, országos kiterjedésű ellátórendszer adatain alapuló feldolgozás. Célkitűzés: A tanulmány célja a 60 év feletti akut, monotraumás combnyaktöröttek primer ellátását követő halálozások vizsgálata havonta és évente ötéves utánkövetéssel, valamint a különböző rizikófaktoraik halálozásra gyakorolt hatásainak értékelése az egyes időperiódusokban. Módszer: Az adatok az Országos Egészségbiztosítási Pénztár adatbázisából származnak. Az értékelés bázisát a fekvőbeteg-ellátást végző intézményekből combnyaktörés primer műtéti ellátását követően 2000. évben emittált betegek képezik. Bemutatjuk az átlagos évenkénti, havonkénti és heti halálozási arányokat, valamint rizikótényezők szerinti alakulásukat havonként és évenként. A rizikótényezők és a halálozás kapcsolatának értékelése logisztikus és Cox-regressziós analízissel történik. Eredmények: A tanulmányban 3783 fő került elemzésre. Átlagéletkoruk 77,97 (SD 8,52) év. A halálozás az első héten 1,71%, 30 napon belül 8,99%, az első évben 30,74%, öt év alatt 61,88% volt. A halálozás havi szinten az első 5 hónapig mutat csökkenést, éves szinten az első év után stagnál. A rizikófaktorok közül a férfinem és a magasabb életkor öt évig, a kísérőbetegségek hatásai a negyedik évig, a laterális combnyaktöréstípus és a 12 órán túli ellátás két évig, a korai lokális szövődmények egy évig, a hétvégi ellátások az első hónapban eredményeznek magasabb halálozási kockázatot. Az országos és egyetemi ellátásokat követően az első évben alacsonyabb a halálozási kockázat. Következtetések: A csípőtáji törések managementjében a halálozások csökkentése érdekében hangsúlyozzuk a 12 órán belüli ellátás, a törési típusnak megfelelő módszerválasztás, a hét minden napján történő azonos ellátási feltételek biztosítása, az ellátások centrumokba történő szervezése, a beteg általános állapotának és kísérőbetegségeinek megfelelő akut ellátás és az utókezelések fontosságát.


1992 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 639-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antti Alho ◽  
Jan Benterud ◽  
Helge Rønningen ◽  
Arne Høiseth

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document