scholarly journals Comparison of Perioperative Active or Routine Temperature Management on Postoperative Quality of Recovery in PACU in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

2022 ◽  
Vol Volume 15 ◽  
pp. 429-436
Author(s):  
Junhui Ji ◽  
Xiafang Gu ◽  
Chengjiao Xiao
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Temperature Management ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Quality Of Recovery ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Thoracoscopic Lobectomy ◽  
Postoperative Quality

scholarly journals Comparison of the impact of propofol versus sevoflurane on early postoperative recovery in living donors after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangbin Han ◽  
Jaesik Park ◽  
Sang Hyun Hong ◽  
Soojin Lim ◽  
Yong Hyun Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Living Donors ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Sevoflurane Group ◽  
Quality Of Recovery ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Hospitalization Period ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Enhancing postoperative recovery of the donor is important to encourage living kidney donation. We investigated the effects of anesthetic agents (intravenous [IV] propofol versus inhaled [IH] sevoflurane) on the quality of early recovery of healthy living kidney donors after hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HALN) under analgesic intrathecal morphine injection. Methods This single-center, prospective randomized controlled study enrolled 80 living donors undergoing HALN from October 2019 to June 2020 at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital. Donors were randomly assigned to the IV propofol group or IH sevoflurane group. To measure the quality of recovery, we used the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire (QoR-40 K) on postoperative day (POD) 1, and ambulation (success rate, number of footsteps) 6–12 h after surgery and on POD 1. The pain score for the wound site, IV opioid requirement, postoperative complications including incidences of nausea/vomiting, and length of in-hospital stay were also assessed. Results The global QoR-40 K score and all subscale scores (physical comfort, emotional state, physical independence, psychological support, and pain) were significantly higher in the IV propofol group than in the IH sevoflurane group. The numbers of footsteps at all time points were also higher in the IV propofol group. Donors in the IV propofol group had a lower incidence of nausea/vomiting, and a shorter hospitalization period. Conclusions Total IV anesthesia with propofol led to better early postoperative recovery than that associated with IH sevoflurane. Trial registration Clinical Research Information Service, Republic of Korea (approval number: KCT0004351) on October 18, 2019.

scholarly journals Quality of Recovery After Low-Pressure Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Facilitated by Deep Neuromuscular Blockade: A Randomized Controlled Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 2950-2958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise M. D. Özdemir-van Brunschot ◽  
Gert J. Scheffer ◽  
Michel van der Jagt ◽  
Hans Langenhuijsen ◽  
Albert Dahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuromuscular Blockade ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Donor Nephrectomy ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy ◽  
Quality Of Recovery ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Comparison of the Impact of Propofol and Sevoflurane on Early Postoperative Recovery in Living Donors After Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangbin Han ◽  
Jaesik Park ◽  
Sang Hyun Hong ◽  
Soojin Lim ◽  
Yong Hyun Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Living Donors ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Sevoflurane Group ◽  
Quality Of Recovery ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Hospitalization Period ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Enhancing postoperative recovery of the donor is important to encourage living kidney donation. We investigated the effects of anesthetic agents (intravenous [IV] propofol versus inhaled [IH] sevoflurane) on the quality of early recovery of healthy living kidney donors after hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HALN) under analgesic intrathecal morphine injection. Methods: This single-center, prospective randomized controlled study enrolled 80 living donors undergoing HALN from October 2019 to June 2020 at Seoul St. Mary’s hospital. Donors were randomly assigned to the IV propofol group or IH sevoflurane group. To measure the quality of recovery, we used the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire (QoR-40K) on postoperative day (POD) 1, and ambulation (success rate, number of footsteps) 6–12 hours after surgery and on POD 1. The pain score for the wound site, IV opioid requirement, postoperative complications including incidence of nausea/vomiting, length of in-hospital stay were also assessed.Results: The global QoR-40K score and all subscale scores (physical comfort, emotional state, physical independence, psychological support, and pain) were significantly higher in the IV propofol group than in the IH sevoflurane group. The numbers of footsteps at all timepoints were also higher in the IV propofol group. The donors in the IV propofol group had a lower incidence of nausea/vomiting, and a shorter hospitalization period.Conclusions: Total IV anesthesia with propofol led to better early postoperative recovery than that associated with IH sevoflurane.Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service, Republic of Korea (approval number: KCT0004351) on October 18, 2019.https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/search_result_st01_kren.jsp?seq=15768&sLeft=2&ltype=my&rtype=my

scholarly journals Erratum to: Quality of Recovery After Low-Pressure Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Facilitated by Deep Neuromuscular Blockade: A Randomized Controlled Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 2949-2949
Author(s):  
Denise M. D. Özdemir-van Brunschot ◽  
Gert J. Scheffer ◽  
Michel van der Jagt ◽  
Johan F. Langenhuijsen ◽  
Albert Dahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuromuscular Blockade ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Donor Nephrectomy ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy ◽  
Quality Of Recovery ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Comparison of the impact of propofol versus sevoflurane on early postoperative recovery in living donors after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangbin Han ◽  
Jaesik Park ◽  
Sang Hyun Hong ◽  
Soojin Lim ◽  
Yong Hyun Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Living Donors ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Sevoflurane Group ◽  
Quality Of Recovery ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Hospitalization Period ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Enhancing postoperative recovery of the donor is important to encourage living kidney donation. We investigated the effects of anesthetic agents (intravenous [IV] propofol versus inhaled [IH] sevoflurane) on the quality of early recovery of healthy living kidney donors after hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HALN) under analgesic intrathecal morphine injection. Methods: This single-center, prospective randomized controlled study enrolled 80 living donors undergoing HALN from October 2019 to June 2020 at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital. Donors were randomly assigned to the IV propofol group or IH sevoflurane group. To measure the quality of recovery, we used the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire (QoR-40K) on postoperative day (POD) 1, and ambulation (success rate, number of footsteps) 6–12 hours after surgery and on POD 1. The pain score for the wound site, IV opioid requirement, postoperative complications including incidences of nausea/vomiting, and length of in-hospital stay were also assessed.Results: The global QoR-40K score and all subscale scores (physical comfort, emotional state, physical independence, psychological support, and pain) were significantly higher in the IV propofol group than in the IH sevoflurane group. The numbers of footsteps at all time points were also higher in the IV propofol group. Donors in the IV propofol group had a lower incidence of nausea/vomiting, and a shorter hospitalization period.Conclusions: Total IV anesthesia with propofol led to better early postoperative recovery than that associated with IH sevoflurane.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document