scholarly journals Anastomoses (Superficial Cervical Ansa) Between the Cervical Plexus and Peripheral Facial Nerve Branches: Implications for Regional Anesthesia in Carotid Endarterectomies – Anatomical Study

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 133-138
Author(s):  
Ronald Seidel ◽  
Andreas Wree ◽  
Marko Schulze
Skull Base ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Papakostas ◽  
J. Xenelis ◽  
A. Parashos ◽  
S. Anagnostopoulou

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Taşar ◽  
Mehmet Kalender ◽  
Okay Güven Karaca ◽  
Ata Niyazi Ecevit ◽  
Salih Salihi ◽  
...  

Background: Carotid artery disease is not rare in cardiac patients. Patients with cardiac risk factors and carotid stenosis are prone to neurological and cardiovascular complications. With cardiac risk factors, carotid endarterectomy operation becomes challenging. Regional anesthesia is an alternative option, so we aimed to investigate the operative results of carotid endarterectomy operations under regional anesthesia in patients with cardiac risk factors. <br />Methods: We aimed to analyze and compare outcomes of carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia with cardiovascular risk groups retrospectively. Between 2006 and 2014, we applied 129 carotid endarterectomy ± patch plasty to 126 patients under combined cervical plexus block anesthesia. Patients were divided into three groups (high, moderate, low) according to their cardiovascular risks. Neurological and cardiovascular events after carotid endarterectomy were compared.<br />Results: Cerebrovascular accident was seen in 7 patients (5.55%) but there was no significant difference between groups (P &gt; .05). Mortality rate was 4.76% (n = 6); it was higher in the high risk group and was not statistically significant (P = .180). Four patients required revision for bleeding (3.17%). We did not observe any postoperative surgical infection.<br />Conclusion: Carotid endarterectomy can be safely performed with regional cervical anesthesia in all cardiovascular risk groups. Comprehensive studies comparing general anesthesia and regional anesthesia are needed. <br /><br />


2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ouattara ◽  
C. Vacher ◽  
J.-J. Accioli de Vasconcellos ◽  
S. Kassanyou ◽  
G. Gnanazan ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Onur Ozlu ◽  
Sema Sanalbas ◽  
Dilek Yazicioglu ◽  
Gulten Utebey ◽  
Ilkay Baran

Objective. To present the conscious sedation and the regional anesthesia technique, consisting of scalp block and superficial cervical plexus block, used in our institution for patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods. The study included 26 consecutive patients. A standardized anesthesia protocol was used and clinical data were collected prospectively. Results. Conscious sedation and regional anesthesia were used in all cases. The dexmedetomidine loading dose was 1 μg kg−1 and mean infusion rate was 0.26 μg kg−1 h−1 (0.21) [mean total dexmedetomidine dose: 154.68 μg (64.65)]. Propofol was used to facilitate regional anesthesia. Mean propofol dose was 1.68 mg kg (0.84) [mean total propofol dose: 117.72 mg (59.11)]. Scalp block and superficial cervical plexus block were used for regional anesthesia. Anesthesia related complications were minor. Postoperative pain was evaluated; mean visual analog scale pain scores were 0 at the postoperative 1st and 6th hours and 4 at the 12th and 24th hours. Values are mean (standard deviation). Conclusions. Dexmedetomidine sedation along with scalp block and SCPB provides good surgical conditions and pain relief and does not interfere with neurophysiologic testing during DBS for PD. During DBS the SCPB may be beneficial for patients with osteoarthritic cervical pain. This trial is registered with Clinical Trials Identifier NCT01789385.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
xiaofeng wang ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Zhenwei Xie ◽  
Qingfu Zhang ◽  
Wei Jiang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The innervation of shoulder-upper extremity area is complicated and unclear. Regional anesthesia with brachial plexus and cervical plexus block is probably inadequate for the proximal humeral surgery. Missing blockade of T1-T2 nerves may be the reason. We conduct this prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) to explore whether additional T2 thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) can improve the success rate of regional anesthesia for elderly patients in proximal humeral fracture surgery. Methods: The patients aged 65 or older, referred for anterior approach proximal humeral fracture surgery, will be enrolled. Each patient will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive IC block (combined interscalene brachial plexus with superficial cervical plexus block) or ICTP block (combined thoracic paravertebral block with brachial plexus and superficial cervical plexus block). The primary outcome is the success rate of regional anesthesia without rescue analgesic methods. The secondary outcomes are as follows: sensory block at surgical area, proportion of patients who need rescue anesthesia (intravenous remifentanil or conversion to general anesthesia), cumulative doses of intraoperative vasoactive medications and adverse events. The total sample size is estimated to be 80 patients. Discussion: This RCT aims to confirm whether additional T2 TPVB can provide better anesthetic effects of regional anesthesia with brachial and cervical plexus block in elderly patients undergoing proximal humeral surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document