scholarly journals Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for Saudi Governmental Projects as seen by Project Managers العوامل الرئیسیة لنجاح المشروعات الحکومیة السعودیة من وجهة نظر مدیری المشروعات

2024 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
ترکی النمر
Keyword(s):  
Critical Success Factors ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Project Managers ◽  
Critical Success

scholarly journals Project managers’ and change managers’ contribution to success

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 451-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Pollack ◽  
Chivonne Algeo
Keyword(s):  
Critical Success Factors ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Organisational Change ◽  
Project Managers ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Project Risks ◽  
Change Projects ◽  
Specific Project

Purpose – Many projects involve an organisational change component. Project management (PM) and change management (CM) have the potential to jointly contribute to the delivery of organisational changes. However, there is a lack of clarity in the literature about the boundary and relationship between these disciplines. The purpose of this paper is to explore the contribution these disciplines make to a set of project critical success factors, to understand the ways that these disciplines can most effectively work together. Design/methodology/approach – This paper analyses data collected through an online survey, examining project managers’ and change managers’ perception of each disciplines’ contribution to critical success factors. The survey received 455 responses. Findings – This paper identifies the success factors that are most clearly influenced by PM and CM, and areas where practitioners of these disciplines hold significantly different perceptions of their contributions. The results have been used to rank and categorise success factors based on the influence of each discipline. This has been used to develop a risk-based questionnaire to guide the contribution of PM and CM to the mitigation of specific project risks. Originality/value – These findings will be of use to practitioners managing organisational change projects, or projects with a significant change component. The findings will be of assistance in determining the ways in which these disciplines should work together to mitigate risks associated with specific critical success factors.

The Core Critical Success Factors in Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems

2012 ◽  
pp. 86-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Payam Hanafizadeh ◽  
Roya Gholami ◽  
Shabnam Dadbin ◽  
Nicholas Standage
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Model ◽  
Enterprise Resource Planning ◽  
Critical Success Factors ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Resource Planning ◽  
Project Managers ◽  
Entropy Method ◽  
Erp Systems ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems

The Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems require huge investments while ineffective implementations of such projects are commonly observed. A considerable number of these projects have been reported to fail or take longer than it was initially planned, while previous studies show that the aim of rapid implementation of such projects has not been successful and the failure of the fundamental goals in these projects have imposed huge amounts of costs on investors. Some of the major consequences are the reduction in demand for such products and the introduction of further skepticism to the managers and investors of ERP systems. In this regard, it is important to understand the factors determining success or failure of ERP implementation. The aim of this paper is to study the critical success factors (CSFs) in implementing ERP systems and to develop a conceptual model which can serve as a basis for ERP project managers. These critical success factors that are called “core critical success factors” are extracted from 62 published papers using the content analysis and the entropy method. The proposed conceptual model has been verified in the context of five multinational companies.

Variations in Critical Success Factors Over the Stages in the Project Life Cycle

1988 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey K. Pinto ◽  
John E. Prescott
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Critical Success Factors ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Project Managers ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Life Cycle Stages ◽  
Project Life Cycle ◽  
Ridge Regression Analysis ◽  
Project Life

Afield study was conducted to investigate changes in the importance of project critical success factors across four stages in the project life cycle. A total of 408 project managers or project team members cur-rently involved in a project responded to the questionnaire. Ridge regression analysis was performed on the initially derived ten critical success factors, reducing the final number of critical success factors to eight. A stepwise regression was then done on the critical success factors at each of the four stages in the project life cycle. Results indi-cated that the relative importance of several of the criticalfactors change significantly based on life cycle stages.

Critical success factors for project management support information systems: SEBRAE/RN Case

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tâmara Patrícia Filgueira de Melo Moura
Keyword(s):  
Project Management ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Critical Success Factors ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Project Managers ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Case Study Methodology ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Quantitative And Qualitative Research ◽  
Economic Climate

The current economic climate is driving the work of companies in the execution of projects that need to be managed and monitored periodically. Historically term goals, cost and quality are thermometers to measure success or failure of companies. For better project management, systems are needed that give support from the structure to the budget of each project, as well as its monitoring throughout the execution. The result of the components mentioned above reflect the overall results of the institution. Therefore, this study investigated through case study methodology, critical success factors for information systems that support project management in Sebrae/RN, and sought, through the project managers, to raise factors that influence decisions in search of improving the performance of the organization studied. Thus, a quantitative and qualitative research was applied. The results showed the critical success factors that hinder optimal performance of information systems from the structuring to the execution and monitoring of projects.

scholarly journals EXPLORING CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Yang ◽  
Geoffrey Qiping Shen ◽  
Manfong Ho ◽  
Derek S. Drew ◽  
Albert P. C. Chan
Keyword(s):  
Construction Projects ◽  
Critical Success Factors ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Stakeholder Management ◽  
Project Managers ◽  
Pilot Studies ◽  
Five Dimensions ◽  
Social Responsibilities ◽  
Critical Success

With a focus on different aspects of stakeholder management, various sets of critical success factors (CSFs) have been suggested in the literature. It is crucial to explore the relative importance and groupings of these factors. This paper aims to identify CSFs associated with stakeholder management in construction projects, and explore their ranking and underlying relationship. 15 CSFs were identified through a literature review, and consolidated by interviews and pilot studies with professionals in construction industry. A questionnaire instrument containing these 15 CSFs was sent out to project managers in Hong Kong, and 183 completed questionnaires were retrieved. The top three ranked factors for stakeholder management were “managing stakeholders with social responsibilities”, “assessing the stakeholders’ needs and constraints to the project”, and “communicating with stakeholders properly and frequently”. Using factor analysis and considering the high importance of the factor “managing stakeholders with social responsibilities”, the 15 CSFs were grouped into five dimensions namely, precondition factor, stakeholder estimation, information inputs, decision making, and sustainable support. All these five groupings and their relationship were included in a framework for successful stakeholder management in construction projects. These findings help to clarify what the high prioritized factors are, and could also be used as an assessment tool to evaluate the performance of stakeholder management and thus help to identify areas for improvement. Santrauka Atsižvelgiant į skirtingus suinteresuotųjų šalių valdymo aspektus, literatūroje siūlomi įvairūs kritinių sėkmės veiksnių (KSV) kompleksai. Svarbiausia yra sugrupuoti šiuos veiksnius ir nustatyti jų santykinį reikšmingumą. Šio straipsnio tikslas – nustatyti KSV, susijusius su suinteresuotųjų šalių valdymu statybos projektuose, išnagrinėti jų prioritetus ir pagrindinius tarpusavio ryšius. 15 KSV buvo nustatyta remiantis literatūros analize, statybos šakos profesionalų apklausomis ir eksperimentinėmis studijomis. Projektų valdytojams Honkonge išsiųstas klausimynas ir gauti 183 atsakymai. Trys aukščiausiai įvertinti veiksniai: projektų dalyvių socialinė atsakomybė, suinteresuotųjų šalių poreikių ir apribojimų įvertinimas, tinkamas ir dažnas bendradarbiavimas su suinteresuotomis šalimis. Naudojantis veiksnių analize ir atsižvelgiant į tai, kad socialinės atsakomybės rodiklis vertinamas kaip labai reikšmingas, 15 KSV suskirstyti į 5 grupes: išankstinių veiksnių, suinteresuotųjų grupių nustatymo, informacijos rinkimo, sprendimų priėmimo ir subalansuotos paramos. Visos šios grupės bei jų ryšiai buvo įtraukti į sistemą, skirtą sėkmingam suinteresuotųjų šalių valdymui statybos projektuose. Šie duomenys padeda paaiškinti, kokiems veiksniams suteikiamas prioritetas ir gali būti naudojami suinteresuotųjų šalių valdymo įgyvendinimui įvertinti bei tobulintinoms sritims nustatyti.

The Core Critical Success Factors in Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Payam Hanafizadeh ◽  
Roya Gholami ◽  
Shabnam Dadbin ◽  
Nicholas Standage
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Model ◽  
Enterprise Resource Planning ◽  
Critical Success Factors ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Resource Planning ◽  
Project Managers ◽  
Entropy Method ◽  
Erp Systems ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems

The Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems require huge investments while ineffective implementations of such projects are commonly observed. A considerable number of these projects have been reported to fail or take longer than it was initially planned, while previous studies show that the aim of rapid implementation of such projects has not been successful and the failure of the fundamental goals in these projects have imposed huge amounts of costs on investors. Some of the major consequences are the reduction in demand for such products and the introduction of further skepticism to the managers and investors of ERP systems. In this regard, it is important to understand the factors determining success or failure of ERP implementation. The aim of this paper is to study the critical success factors (CSFs) in implementing ERP systems and to develop a conceptual model which can serve as a basis for ERP project managers. These critical success factors that are called “core critical success factors” are extracted from 62 published papers using the content analysis and the entropy method. The proposed conceptual model has been verified in the context of five multinational companies.

Vienna Construction Projects: Redirection of Project Management Critical Success Factors—More Focus on Stakeholders and Soft Skills Development

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-359
Author(s):  
Helmut Wanivenhaus ◽  
Jure Kovač ◽  
Anja Žnidaršič ◽  
Igor Vrečko
Keyword(s):  
Project Management ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Construction Projects ◽  
Critical Success Factors ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Soft Skills ◽  
Project Managers ◽  
The Public ◽  
Business Environments ◽  
Critical Success

Although research interest in project management is increasingly directed at analyzing development trends in different business environments, the public sector in this respect has received surprisingly little intention. This paper analyzes the perception of the relevance of particular project management critical success factors among project managers and other project stakeholders in the public sector with relatively high organizational project management maturity. The main focus of research is the city of Vienna and its construction projects. An extensive quantitative survey showed the changing perceptions of the key projects’ success factors—namely, strengthening the importance of developing soft skills and stakeholders’ management.

scholarly journals Project management in public-private partnerships: a conceptual framework based on a systematic literature review

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Magalhães ◽  
Lucas Baraças Figueiredo ◽  
Lucas Torres de Jesus
Keyword(s):  
Project Management ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Critical Success Factors ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Project Managers ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Management Tools ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Project Cycle

Abstract: Despite the increasing number of Public-Private Partnerships projects, the results have shown little effectiveness and difficulties in several aspects of project management. This study performs a systematic literature review combining bibliometric analysis and content analysis to identify the challenges in managing these projects and techniques to overcome them, highlighting the critical success factors for project management. The results indicate an increasing number of researches in the field, but there is still a lack of systematization of the management tools and absence of critical success factors during the accomplishment of this type of project. This study proposes a systematization of these elements throughout the project cycle, allowing project managers to visualize challenges and techniques to increase the results related to the main success factors of each stage.

scholarly journals Knowledge integration challenges and critical success factors within construction traditional procurement system

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Takhtravanchi ◽  
Chaminda Pathirage
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Construction Projects ◽  
Critical Success Factors ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Knowledge Integration ◽  
Project Managers ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Multiple Case ◽  
Multiple Case Studies ◽  
Procurement System

The purpose of this study is to explore and identify the challenges and Critical Success Factors (CSFs) of Knowledge Integration (KI) in terms of capturing, sharing and transferring knowledge within construction projects based on the Traditional Procurement System (TPS). On the basis of available studies on KI and TPS within the industry investigated, multiple case studies were developed to reach the aforementioned objective, involving two case studies to reflect the building sector within construction industry. Furthermore, an Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) approach was used to summarize and identify the relationships between the identified challenges. ‘Culture of Organization, ‘Contractual Boundaries’ and ‘Knowledge Management System’ (policies and strategies of organization) are identified as the main challenges. Having an ‘open environment’ and ‘clear liability of project members for sharing knowledge at different phases of project’ are two of identified CSFs, which will assist project managers to enhance the KI process within construction projects undertaken through the TPS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document