9 Delinking from Coloniality and Increasing Participation in Early Literacy Teacher Education

2022 ◽  
pp. 155-172
Author(s):  
Carolyn McKinney
Perspectiva ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 231
Author(s):  
Íris Susana Pires Pereira ◽  
Fernanda Leopoldina Viana ◽  
Cristina Vieira da Silva

<p>http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2015v33n1p231</p><p>Neste texto recuperamos o quadro teórico proposto por Lee S. Shulman para dar resposta à seguinte questão: Qual o conhecimento de base do professor alfabetizador? A partir desta questão, entende-se que o ensino da alfabetização implica a convocação e a operacionalização de conhecimentos de diferentes naturezas, alguns dos quais subinvestigados e, por isso mesmo, ainda dependentes das intuições e práticas não sistematizadas e dificilmente passíveis de aprendizagem nos contextos de formação académica. Argumenta-se que é pela mesma ordem de razões que a tarefa pedagógica de ensinar a ler se torna difícil de conceber para os jovens professores. Defende-se que o modelo do conhecimento do professor alfabetizador que apresentamos se configura como basilar na concepção da formação do professor alfabetizador no atual contexto formativo português, que também é brevemente caracterizado.</p><p> </p><p><strong>On early literacy teacher education: a contribution for characterizing the knowledge base for the early literacy teacher</strong></p><p> <strong>Abstract</strong></p><p>In this paper, we recover the theoretical framework proposed by Lee S. Shulman to answer to the following question: What is the base knowledge of the literacy teacher? From this question, one may understand that the teaching of literacy implies in the calling and in the operationalization of different kinds of knowledge, some of which have not been researched deeply and, for this reason are still dependent on intuition and unsystematic practices that are hardly available for learning in academic contexts training. We argue that it is for this same reason that the pedagogical task of teaching to read becomes difficult to be conceived by young teachers. We sustain that the model of knowledge of the literacy teacher that we present can be considered in the design of the current Portuguese literacy teacher training context, which we is also characterized briefly.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Early Literacy Teacher. Professional Learning. Elementary School Teacher.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Sobre la formación del maestro de la educación primaria: una contribución para la caracterización del conocimiento de base del maestro alfabetizador</strong></p><p><strong> </strong><strong>Resumen</strong></p><p>En este trabajo recuperamos el marco teórico propuesto por Lee S. Shulman para dar respuesta a la siguiente cuestión: ¿Cuál es el conocimiento de base de un profesor alfabetizador? Nuestra respuesta es que la enseñanza de la alfabetización implica convocar y operacionalizar conocimientos de diferente naturaleza, algunos de los cuales muy poco investigados y, por esta razón, todavía muy dependientes de intuiciones y prácticas no sistematizadas, difícilmente susceptibles de ser aprendidas en los contextos de formación académica. Argumentamos que es por este mismo tipo de razones que la tarea pedagógica de enseñar a leer resulta difícil de imaginar para los jóvenes profesores. Defendemos que el modelo de conocimiento del profesor alfabetizador que aquí presentamos se configura como básico en la concepción de la formación de tal profesor en el actual contexto formativo en Portugal, que también será brevemente caracterizado.</p><p><strong>Palabras claves:</strong> Profesor alfabetizador. Aprendizaje profesional. Maestro de educación primaria.</p>


2013 ◽  
pp. 51-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Paula Ghiso ◽  
Tamara Spencer ◽  
Lan Ngo ◽  
Gerald Campano

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-44
Author(s):  
Marcelle M. Haddix

In this 2019 presidential address, I reflect on the significance of community across four areas: with youth and in school communities, within literacy teacher education, in community-engaged theories and methodologies, and within the professional organization. How do we define and understand community? Who and what is included and excluded? As a literacy research community, who are we becoming and who do we want to be? Drawing from historical and contemporary examples within and beyond literacy research, I take a look back and at the present to examine discourses of community and imagine possibilities for the future.


2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy Bomer ◽  
Charlotte L. Land ◽  
Jessica Cira Rubin ◽  
Laura M. Van Dike

This review of empirical research focused on the preparation of writing teachers synthesizes findings from 82 articles published between 2000 and early 2018. The new understandings generated through this analysis are presented in two sections. First, we provide an overview of how the studies we reviewed draw from and circulate dominant discourses of writing, leading to a call for more transparency and clarity on the part of scholars who study writing and writing pedagogy. Then, we explore experiences in literacy teacher education that may shift the writing identities, beliefs, or teaching practices of prospective writing teachers. We position these shifts as being potentially disruptive to the often uninterrupted circulation of powerful discourses in important and generative ways, since the teaching of writing in the 21st century must break from inherited traditions to best prepare writers to use their voices actively and confidently in the world.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document