Efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin during peri-radiotherapy period in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianbo Zhu ◽  
Guangpeng Chen ◽  
Kai Niu ◽  
Yongdong Feng ◽  
Lijiao Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Radiation Pneumonitis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Recombinant Human Endostatin

Background: This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin (Rh-endostatin) combined with radiotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients with unresectable stage III and IV NSCLC who treated with radiotherapy were enrolled. Patients who received Rh-endostatin infusion throughout the whole peri-radiotherapy period formed the Endostar group, and those who received no Rh-endostatin infusion were the control group. Results: The median progression-free survival was 8.0 and 4.4 months (hazard ratio: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.32–0.90; p = 0.019) and median overall survival was 40.0 and 13.1 months (hazard ratio: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.28–0.98; p = 0.045) for the Endostar and control groups, respectively. The Endostar group exhibited a numerically lower rate of radiation pneumonitis relapse, radiation pneumonitis death and pulmonary fibrosis. Conclusion: Rh-endostatin infusion throughout the peri-radiotherapy period enhanced radiosensitivity and showed better survival outcomes and a tendency toward fewer radiation-related pulmonary events in patients with NSCLC.

Randomized phase II study of recombinant human endostatin in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (NCT00912392).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7091-7091
Author(s):  
Shun Lu ◽  
Lu Li ◽  
Yi Luo ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Zhiwei Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Recombinant Human Endostatin ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Extensive Stage

7091 Background: Endostar (recombinant human endostatin) is a novel antiangiogenesis drug developed in China for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of promising efficacy signals, we performed a randomized phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of adding endostar to first-line standard chemotherapy for treatment of chemonaive extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods: Extensive-stage SCLC patients with a performance status 0-2 were randomly assigned to endostar group (endostar 7.5mg/m2 D1-D14 with carboplatin AUC=5 plus etoposide 60mg/m2 D1-D5 of a 21-day cycle for six cycles) or the control group (the same dose of carboplatin plus etoposide). Patients in endostar treatment group with CR, PR and SD were treated with single-agent endostar until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point is progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points are overall survival (OS) and response rate (RR). Results: 140 patients were enrolled from June 2009 to June 2011, and 137 patients were included in full analysis set. 68 patients were randomly assigned to the endostar treatment and 69 patients to the control group. Median age was 57 years and 80.9% for male in the endostar group while median age was 58 years and 85.5% for male in the control group. Median PFS was similar for endostar and control group (6.2 v 5.9 months, P=0.163, HR 0.762; 95%CI 0.519-1.119). Median overall survival (OS) was also similar for both groups (12.4 v 12.3 months, P=0.475, HR 0.835; 95%CI 0.508-1.371). Overall RR were 76.5% for endostar group and 68.1% for the control group (p=0.275). 20 patients in the endostar group completed six cycles of therapy and subsequently treated with single-agent endostar as maintenance therapy and the median PFS and OS were 6.8 and 12.4 months respectively. The rate of ≥ 3 grade adverse events occurred in both groups was similar and no new or unexpected safety signals for endostar were observed. Conclusions: The addition of endostar to carboplatin plus etoposide for treatment of extensive stage SCLC didn’t improve the PFS significantly, with an acceptable toxicity profile. And no improvement in OS was observed.

Efficacy and Safety of Antigen-specific Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Patients with Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing-Di Yan ◽  
Xiao-Feng Cong ◽  
Sha-Sha Zhao ◽  
Meng Ren ◽  
Zi-Ling Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Specific Immunotherapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Background and Objective: We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of antigen-specific immunotherapy (Belagenpumatucel-L, MAGE-A3, L-BLP25, and TG4010) in the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). </P><P> Methods: A comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted. Eligible studies were clinical trials of patients with NSCLC who received the antigenspecific immunotherapy. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS). Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for overall response rate (ORR) and the incidence of adverse events. </P><P> Results: In total, six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 4,806 patients were included. Pooled results showed that, antigen-specific immunotherapy did not significantly prolong OS (HR=0.92, 95%CI: 0.83, 1.01; P=0.087) and PFS (HR=0.93, 95%CI: 0.85, 1.01; P=0.088), but improved ORR (RR=1.72, 95%CI: 1.11, 2.68; P=0.016). Subgroup analysis based on treatment agents showed that, tecemotide was associated with a significant improvement in OS (HR=0.85, 95%CI: 0.74, 0.99; P=0.03) and PFS (HR=0.70, 95%CI: 0.49, 0.99, P=0.044); TG4010 was associated with an improvement in PFS (HR=0.87, 95%CI: 0.75, 1.00, P=0.058). In addition, NSCLC patients who were treated with antigen-specific immunotherapy exhibited a significantly higher incidence of adverse events than those treated with other treatments (RR=1.11, 95%CI: 1.00, 1.24; P=0.046). </P><P> Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the clinical survival benefits of tecemotide and TG4010 in the treatment of NSCLC. However, these evidence might be limited by potential biases. Therefore, further well-conducted, large-scale RCTs are needed to verify our findings.

scholarly journals Effect of Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy on the Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab in the Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 107327482098579
Author(s):  
Kengo Umehara ◽  
Kaori Yama ◽  
Keisuke Goto ◽  
Azusa Wakamoto ◽  
Tae Hatsuyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Corticosteroid Administration

Introduction: Corticosteroids are used to treat immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with nivolumab. However, patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who are administered corticosteroids before the initiation of nivolumab treatment are commonly excluded from clinical trials. The appropriate timing for corticosteroid administration in relation to nivolumab treatment, effects of corticosteroids on the efficacy of nivolumab, and resulting adverse events are not clearly understood. In this study, the effects of differences in the timing of corticosteroid administration on nivolumab efficacy and the resulting adverse events were examined. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with 109 patients who were treated with nivolumab at Sapporo Minami-Sanjo Hospital between December 2015 and March 2018. Results: Of the 109 patients treated with nivolumab, 12 patients were administered corticosteroids before the first cycle of nivolumab (pre-CS), and 33 patients were administered corticosteroids after the first cycle of nivolumab (post-CS). These 2 groups were compared with the control group comprising 64 patients who were not administered corticosteroids (non-CS). The objective response rate in the post-CS group was significantly higher than that in the non-CS group, and the disease control rate in the pre-CS group was significantly lower than that in the non-CS group. The overall survival time and progression-free survival time in the pre-CS group were significantly shorter than those observed in the non-CS group; however, these did not differ from those in the post-CS group. Conclusions: These results suggest that corticosteroids administered to patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after initiation of nivolumab treatment did not affect the disease prognosis. Thus, corticosteroids can be administered immediately for rapid treatment of irAEs.

scholarly journals EP1.04-26 Efficacy and Safety of Anti-PD-1 Inhibitors in Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. S979-S980
Author(s):  
Y. Tanaka ◽  
T. Okano ◽  
Y. Kudo ◽  
S. Takeuchi ◽  
Y. Makino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document