Dual pathway inhibition in atherothrombosis prevention: yes, now we can!

Author(s):  
Francesco SUMMARIA ◽  
Giuseppe BIONDI-ZOCCAI ◽  
Enrico ROMAGNOLI ◽  
Mamas A. MAMAS ◽  
Francesco FRANCHI ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (suppl_G) ◽  
pp. G3-G9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borja Ibanez ◽  
Gemma Vilahur ◽  
Juan J. Badimon

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 2367-2373 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Gibson ◽  
Daniel T. Ruan ◽  
Vera A. Paulson ◽  
Justine A. Barletta ◽  
Glenn J. Hanna ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (09) ◽  
pp. 1528-1534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Zeymer ◽  
Benedikt Schrage ◽  
Dirk Westermann

AbstractThe optimal anti-thrombotic therapy for secondary prevention after an acute coronary syndrome is still a matter of debate. While current guidelines recommend dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor over 12 months especially in patients with stent implantation, the value of prolonged anticoagulation is still controversial. In the ATLAS-TIMI 52 trial, a low-dose direct factor Xa inhibition with rivaroxaban compared with placebo reduced the combined primary endpoint of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infraction and stroke with an increase in major bleeding complications. This article discusses the value and problems of adding low-dose rivaroxaban to anti-platelet therapy as secondary prevention measure after an acute myocardial infarction. It will describe the pros and cons of intensified anti-platelet therapy versus dual pathway inhibition and give recommendations for different patient groups in clinical practice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 603-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Patrick Algazi ◽  
Julia Rotow ◽  
Christian Posch ◽  
Susana Ortiz‐Urda ◽  
Alyson Pelayo ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi52-vi52
Author(s):  
Norihiko Saito ◽  
Kazuya Aoki ◽  
Nozomi Hirai ◽  
Ryo Suzuki ◽  
Satoshi Fujita ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 120 (10) ◽  
pp. 1352-1356
Author(s):  
Dion Stub ◽  
Himawan Fernando ◽  
James D. McFadyen ◽  
Jathushan Palasubramaniam ◽  
James Shaw ◽  
...  

AbstractThere have been numerous and intriguing advancements in antithrombotic therapy for myocardial infarction since it was described in the earliest issues of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. In this article, we revisit historical breakthroughs and describe the four most challenging contemporary themes relating to antithrombotic therapy in myocardial infarction. In all four, the challenge is to find the best balance of reducing specific levels of ischaemic risks without increasing bleeding risk. The first is the question of the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This includes discussion of monotherapy after a period of DAPT. The second relates to the role of genotype and phenotype-guided individualisation of antiplatelet therapy. There is emerging evidence for a role of pheno/genotyping in identifying individuals at high risk for recurrent ischaemic events or in guiding the timing of cardiac surgery for patients on DAPT. The third addresses the increasing evidence for dual pathway inhibition, for example, with rivaroxaban in addition to aspirin in patients where high ischaemic and low bleeding risk is demonstrated. Finally the fourth highlights the challenge of the most appropriate combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy for patients with known atrial fibrillation after PCI. In most individuals, oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy combined with a direct acting oral anticoagulant appears to be the best strategy based on the available evidence. Overall, the progress in antithrombotic therapy achieved over the last seven decades is remarkable, however, there are important issues to address and progress still to be made.


1994 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 9-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Lauritsen ◽  
L. S. Laursen ◽  
J. Kjeldsen ◽  
K. Bukhave ◽  
J. Rask-Madsen

Hematology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-84
Author(s):  
Jori E. May ◽  
Stephan Moll

Abstract Arterial thrombotic events in younger patients without a readily apparent etiology present significant diagnostic and management challenges. We present a structured approach to diagnosis with consideration of common causes, including atherosclerosis and embolism, as well as uncommon causes, including medications and substances, vascular and anatomic abnormalities, systemic disorders, and thrombophilias. We highlight areas of management that have evolved within the past 5 years, including the use of dual-pathway inhibition in atherosclerotic disease, antithrombotic therapy selection in embolic stroke of undetermined source and left ventricular thrombus, the role of closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary stroke prevention, and the thrombotic potential of coronavirus disease 2019 infection and vaccination. We conclude with a representative case to illustrate the application of the diagnostic framework and discuss the importance of consideration of bleeding risk and patient preference in determining the appropriate management plan.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document