scholarly journals Nursing Care of Low-Risk Newborns in Low Resource Setting: Nurses' Aides May Bridge the Gap at Community Hospitals

2022 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Subhashchandra Daga
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Newborn Care ◽  
Low Resource Settings ◽  
Neonatal Deaths ◽  
Low Resource ◽  
General Duty ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Resource Setting ◽  
Low Resource Setting

Objective: To study the role of a nurses' aide in the care for newborns weighing between 1500 and 2000 g at birth in a low resource setting. Study Design: Observational. Setting: The General hospital in 1994-95, in a public sector, located in a remote area in India Intervention: A female ward assistant with seven years of schooling trained, on-the-job, to keep babies warm, initiate maternal breastfeeding, and to detect rapid breathing. The nursing staff from the pediatric ward supervised her performance. A separate "warm room" appropriately heated for preterm and sick babies became a makeshift nursery. The nursing staff administered enteral feeding, oxygen, and antibiotics. Services of the resident doctors or general duty medical officers were not available. Results: The survival rate was nearly 100% for babies with birthweights between 1,500 and 2,000 g (none referred out). Conclusions: A nurses' aide may facilitate the delivery of special care for newborns where nursing personnel are grossly inadequate and saving babies weighing between 1,500 and 2,000 g may need minimal inputs. It may be worthwhile to target 1,500 and 2,000 g birthweight categories even when resources are meager. What is already known about this subject? Low resource settings face staff shortages, especially nursing staff. Health workers with midwifery skills can deliver nearly 90% of essential care services for maternal and neonatal health. A substantial proportion of neonatal deaths occur among moderately low birth weight babies. What does this study add? It is possible to train a semi-literate person to facilitate early breastfeeding and to keep a baby warm. A large proportion of deaths among babies with birthweight ranging from 1500 to 2000 g are preventable with meager resources. How might this impact on clinical practice or future developments? The facilities facing shortage of nursing staff in low resource settings, may employ nurses’ aide to deliver basic newborn care.

scholarly journals Health facility service availability and readiness to provide basic emergency obstetric and newborn care in a low-resource setting: evidence from a Tanzania National Survey

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e020608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deogratius Bintabara ◽  
Alex Ernest ◽  
Bonaventura Mpondo
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Health Facility ◽  
Newborn Care ◽  
Service Availability ◽  
Signal Functions ◽  
Low Resource ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Resource Setting ◽  
Low Resource Setting ◽  
Maternal And Newborn

ObjectiveThis study used a nationally representative sample from Tanzania as an example of low-resource setting with a high burden of maternal and newborn deaths, to assess the availability and readiness of health facilities to provide basic emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC) and its associated factors.DesignHealth facility-based cross-sectional survey.SettingWe analysed data for obstetric and newborn care services obtained from the 2014–2015 Tanzania Service Provision Assessment survey, using WHO-Service Availability and Readiness Assessment tool.Primary and secondary outcome measuresAvailability of seven signal functions was measured based on the provision of ‘parental administration of antibiotic’, ‘parental administration of oxytocic’, ‘parental administration of anticonvulsants’, ‘assisted vaginal delivery’, ‘manual removal of placenta’, ‘manual removal of retained products of conception’ and ‘neonatal resuscitation’. Readiness was a composite variable measured based on the availability of supportive items categorised into three domains: staff training, diagnostic equipment and basic medicines.ResultsOut of 1188 facilities, 905 (76.2%) were reported to provide obstetric and newborn care services and therefore were included in the analysis of the current study. Overall availability of seven signal functions and average readiness score were consistently higher among hospitals than health centres and dispensaries (p<0.001). Furthermore, the type of facility, performing quality assurance, regular reviewing of maternal and newborn deaths, reviewing clients’ opinion and number of delivery beds per facility were significantly associated with readiness to provide BEmONC.ConclusionThe study findings show disparities in the availability and readiness to provide BEmONC among health facilities in Tanzania. The Tanzanian Ministry of Health should emphasise quality assurance efforts and systematic maternal and newborn death audits. Health leadership should fairly distribute clinical guidelines, essential medicines, equipment and refresher trainings to improve availability and quality BEmONC.

scholarly journals Ethical issues raised by cluster randomised trials conducted in low-resource settings: identifying gaps in the Ottawa Statement through an analysis of the PURE Malawi trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 388-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiwonge K Mtande ◽  
Charles Weijer ◽  
Mina C Hosseinipour ◽  
Monica Taljaard ◽  
Mitch Matoga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
National Standards ◽  
Guidance Document ◽  
Randomised Trials ◽  
Low Resource Settings ◽  
Low Resource ◽  
Cluster Randomised Trials ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
Resource Setting

The increasing use of cluster randomised trials in low-resource settings raises unique ethical issues. The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomised Trials is the first international ethical guidance document specific to cluster trials, but it is unknown if it adequately addresses issues in low-resource settings. In this paper, we seek to identify any gaps in the Ottawa Statement relevant to cluster trials conducted in low-resource settings. Our method is (1) to analyse a prototypical cluster trial conducted in a low-resource setting (PURE Malawi trial) with the Ottawa Statement; (2) to identify ethical issues in the design or conduct of the trial not captured adequately and (3) to make recommendations for issues needing attention in forthcoming revisions to the Ottawa Statement. Our analysis identified six ethical aspects of cluster randomised trials in low-resource settings that require further guidance. The forthcoming revision of the Ottawa Statement should provide additional guidance on these issues: (1) streamlining research ethics committee review for collaborating investigators who are affiliated with other institutions; (2) the classification of lay health workers who deliver study interventions as health providers or research participants; (3) the dilemma experienced by investigators when national standards seem to prohibit waivers of consent; (4) the timing of gatekeeper engagement, particularly when researchers face funding constraints; (5) providing ancillary care in health services or implementation trials when a routine care control arm is known to fall below national standards and (6) defining vulnerable participants needing protection in low-resource settings.

Context

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Tom Bashford ◽  
Julian Gore-Booth ◽  
Jo James ◽  
Stephen Pickering ◽  
Becky Paris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Context ◽  
Technical Aspects ◽  
Low Resource Settings ◽  
Low Resource ◽  
Resource Setting ◽  
Low Resource Setting ◽  
Clinical Background ◽  
Developmental Principles ◽  
The Way

The chapter provides the reader with information on the non-clinical background to working as an anaesthetist in a low-resource setting. It concentrates on important concepts that should inform the way you practise and teach, rather than technical aspects of anaesthesia. Although technical aspects of delivering anaesthesia are usually uppermost in the minds of anaesthetists new to working in low-resource settings, it is often the case that adapting successfully to the local context proves the more challenging aspect. Topics covered include humanitarian and developmental principles, teaching anaesthesia, looking after your own health, being a good visitor, and how to adapt your practice.

scholarly journals Can an mhealth clinical decision-making support system improve adherence to neonatal healthcare protocols in a low-resource setting?

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Brown Amoakoh ◽  
Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch ◽  
Irene Akua Agyepong ◽  
Mary Amoakoh-Coleman ◽  
Gbenga A. Kayode ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Health Improvement ◽  
Neonatal Health ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Protocol Adherence ◽  
Low Resource ◽  
Resource Setting ◽  
Low Resource Setting

Abstract Background This study assessed health workers’ adherence to neonatal health protocols before and during the implementation of a mobile health (mHealth) clinical decision-making support system (mCDMSS) that sought to bridge access to neonatal health protocol gap in a low-resource setting. Methods We performed a cross-sectional document review within two purposively selected clusters (one poorly-resourced and one well-resourced), from each arm of a cluster-randomized trial at two different time points: before and during the trial. The total trial consisted of 16 clusters randomized into 8 intervention and 8 control clusters to assess the impact of an mCDMSS on neonatal mortality in Ghana. We evaluated health workers’ adherence (expressed as percentages) to birth asphyxia, neonatal jaundice and cord sepsis protocols by reviewing medical records of neonatal in-patients using a checklist. Differences in adherence to neonatal health protocols within and between the study arms were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and permutation tests for each morbidity type. In addition, we tracked concurrent neonatal health improvement activities in the clusters during the 18-month intervention period. Results In the intervention arm, mean adherence was 35.2% (SD = 5.8%) and 43.6% (SD = 27.5%) for asphyxia; 25.0% (SD = 14.8%) and 39.3% (SD = 27.7%) for jaundice; 52.0% (SD = 11.0%) and 75.0% (SD = 21.2%) for cord sepsis protocols in the pre-intervention and intervention periods respectively. In the control arm, mean adherence was 52.9% (SD = 16.4%) and 74.5% (SD = 14.7%) for asphyxia; 45.1% (SD = 12.8%) and 64.6% (SD = 8.2%) for jaundice; 53.8% (SD = 16.0%) and 60.8% (SD = 11.7%) for cord sepsis protocols in the pre-intervention and intervention periods respectively. We observed nonsignificant improvement in protocol adherence in the intervention clusters but significant improvement in protocol adherence in the control clusters. There were 2 concurrent neonatal health improvement activities in the intervention clusters and over 12 in the control clusters during the intervention period. Conclusion Whether mHealth interventions can improve adherence to neonatal health protocols in low-resource settings cannot be ascertained by this study. Neonatal health improvement activities are however likely to improve protocol adherence. Future mHealth evaluations of protocol adherence must account for other concurrent interventions in study contexts.

scholarly journals Unravelling ‘low-resource settings’: a systematic scoping review with qualitative content analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. e005190
Author(s):  
Chanel van Zyl ◽  
Marelise Badenhorst ◽  
Susan Hanekom ◽  
Martin Heine
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Low Resource Settings ◽  
Low Resource ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Resource Setting ◽  
Low Resource Setting ◽  
Low Middle Income Countries

IntroductionThe effects of healthcare-related inequalities are most evident in low-resource settings. Such settings are often not explicitly defined, and umbrella terms which are easier to operationalise, such as ‘low-to-middle-income countries’ or ‘developing countries’, are often used. Without a deeper understanding of context, such proxies are pregnant with assumptions, insinuate homogeneity that is unsupported and hamper knowledge translation between settings.MethodsA systematic scoping review was undertaken to start unravelling the term ‘low-resource setting’. PubMed, Africa-Wide, Web of Science and Scopus were searched (24 June 2019), dating back ≤5 years, using terms related to ‘low-resource setting’ and ‘rehabilitation’. Rehabilitation was chosen as a methodological vehicle due to its holistic nature (eg, multidisciplinary, relevance across burden of disease, and throughout continuum of care) and expertise within the research team. Qualitative content analysis through an inductive approach was used.ResultsA total of 410 codes were derived from 48 unique articles within the field of rehabilitation, grouped into 63 content categories, and identified nine major themes relating to the term ‘low-resource setting’. Themes that emerged relate to (1) financial pressure, (2) suboptimal healthcare service delivery, (3) underdeveloped infrastructure, (4) paucity of knowledge, (5) research challenges and considerations, (6) restricted social resources, (7) geographical and environmental factors, (8) human resource limitations and (9) the influence of beliefs and practices.ConclusionThe emerging themes may assist with (1) the groundwork needed to unravel ‘low-resource settings’ in health-related research, (2) moving away from assumptive umbrella terms like ‘low-to-middle-income countries’ or ‘low/middle-income countries’ and (3) promoting effective knowledge transfer between settings.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Treatment With CHOP and EPOCH in Patients With HIV Associated NHL in a Low Resource Setting

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clement Dove Okello ◽  
Abrahams Omoding ◽  
Henry Ddungu ◽  
Yusuf Mulumba ◽  
Jackson Orem
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Low Resource Settings ◽  
Low Resource ◽  
Resource Setting ◽  
Low Resource Setting ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background: The optimal chemotherapy regimen for treating HIV associated NHL in low resource settings is unknown. We conducted a retrospective study to describe survival rates, treatment response rates and adverse events in patients with HIV associated NHL treated with CHOP and dose adjusted-EPOCH regimens at the Uganda Cancer Institute. Methods: A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with HIV and lymphoma and treated at the Uganda Cancer Institute from 2016 – 2018 was done. Results: One hundred eight patients treated with CHOP and 12 patients treated with DA-EPOCH were analysed. Patients completing 6 or more cycles of chemotherapy were 51 (47%) in the CHOP group and 8 (67%) in the DA-EPOCH group. One year overall survival (OS) rate in patients treated with CHOP was 54.5% (95% CI, 42.8 – 64.8) and 80.2% (95% CI, 40.3 – 94.8) in those treated with DA-EPOCH. Factors associated with favourable survival were BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, (p=0.03) and completion of 6 or more cycles of chemotherapy, (p<0.001). The overall response rate was 40% in the CHOP group and 59% in the DA-EPOCH group. Severe adverse events occurred in 19 (18%) patients in the CHOP group and 3 (25%) in the DA-EPOCH group; these were neutropenia (CHOP=13, 12%; DA-EPOCH=2, 17%), anaemia (CHOP=12, 12%; DA-EPOCH=1, 8%), thrombocytopenia (CHOP=7, 6%; DA-EPOCH=0), sepsis (CHOP=1), treatment related death (DA-EPOCH=1) and hepatic encephalopathy (CHOP=1). Conclusion: Treatment of HIV associated NHL with curative intent using CHOP and infusional DA-EPOCH is feasible in low resource settings and associated with >50% one year survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document