Taking Away Excuses to Quit: The Role of Structural Supports in Completion and Learning within Online Professional Development
Online courses, particularly in the MOOC (Massive Online Open Course) format, have a mixed reputation due to their potential to democratize access to educational opportunities and their markedly low completion rates. Yet educators continue to enroll in online courses, including MOOCs, in high numbers. For teachers at under-resourced schools or of under-served populations, free online courses may be their only professional development option. It thus remains important to understand if and how online courses, in their various formats, can serve as vehicles for supporting teacher learning and whether this can happen on a large-scale. This mixed-method study examines completion and learning outcomes in a MOOC designed for teachers of English Learners (ELs). In particular, the study identifies and examines face-to-face, structural supports that were simultaneously available to some course participants and investigates whether these were significantly related to completion and learning within the course. Findings indicate that participants who received more structural supports were significantly more likely to complete the course. While participants, on average, showed evidence of learning within the course, participants receiving structural supports did not show evidence of learning more than other participants did. This is potentially due to omitted variable bias that suggests participants who completed the course without structural supports may differ from participants who completed the course with structural supports in important, unaccounted for ways. This study contributes to research on blended learning within the context of teacher professional development, suggesting that blended learning may be useful in supporting MOOC completion, particularly for certain teacher populations.