scholarly journals Algebraic Extensions

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-47
Author(s):  
Christoph Schwarzweller ◽  
Agnieszka Rowińska-Schwarzweller
Keyword(s):  
Field Theory ◽  
Field Extension ◽  
Field Extensions ◽  
Intermediate Field ◽  
Finite Set ◽  
Algebraic Elements ◽  
Roots Of A Polynomial

Summary In this article we further develop field theory in Mizar [1], [2], [3] towards splitting fields. We deal with algebraic extensions [4], [5]: a field extension E of a field F is algebraic, if every element of E is algebraic over F. We prove amongst others that finite extensions are algebraic and that field extensions generated by a finite set of algebraic elements are finite. From this immediately follows that field extensions generated by roots of a polynomial over F are both finite and algebraic. We also define the field of algebraic elements of E over F and show that this field is an intermediate field of E|F.

scholarly journals On Monomorphisms and Subfields

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-137
Author(s):  
Christoph Schwarzweller
Keyword(s):  
Irreducible Polynomial ◽  
Field Extension ◽  
Isomorphic Copy ◽  
Field Extensions ◽  
The Third ◽  
Fourth Part ◽  
Roots Of Polynomials ◽  
Classical Proof ◽  
Do So

Summary This is the second part of a four-article series containing a Mizar [2], [1] formalization of Kronecker’s construction about roots of polynomials in field extensions, i.e. that for every field F and every polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F there exists a field extension E of F such that p has a root over E. The formalization follows Kronecker’s classical proof using F [X]/<p> as the desired field extension E [5], [3], [4]. In the first part we show that an irreducible polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F has a root over F [X]/<p>. Note, however, that this statement cannot be true in a rigid formal sense: We do not have F ⊆ [X]/ < p > as sets, so F is not a subfield of F [X]/<p>, and hence formally p is not even a polynomial over F [X]/ < p >. Consequently, we translate p along the canonical monomorphism ϕ : F → F [X]/<p> and show that the translated polynomial ϕ (p) has a root over F [X]/<p>. Because F is not a subfield of F [X]/<p> we construct in this second part the field (E \ ϕF )∪F for a given monomorphism ϕ : F → E and show that this field both is isomorphic to F and includes F as a subfield. In the literature this part of the proof usually consists of saying that “one can identify F with its image ϕF in F [X]/<p> and therefore consider F as a subfield of F [X]/<p>”. Interestingly, to do so we need to assume that F ∩ E = ∅, in particular Kronecker’s construction can be formalized for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅. Surprisingly, as we show in the third part, this condition is not automatically true for arbitray fields F : With the exception of 𝕑2 we construct for every field F an isomorphic copy F′ of F with F′ ∩ F′ [X] ≠ ∅. We also prove that for Mizar’s representations of 𝕑n, 𝕈 and 𝕉 we have 𝕑n ∩ 𝕑n[X] = ∅, 𝕈 ∩ 𝕈 [X] = ∅ and 𝕉 ∩ 𝕉 [X] = ∅, respectively. In the fourth part we finally define field extensions: E is a field extension of F iff F is a subfield of E. Note, that in this case we have F ⊆ E as sets, and thus a polynomial p over F is also a polynomial over E. We then apply the construction of the second part to F [X]/<p> with the canonical monomorphism ϕ : F → F [X]/<p>. Together with the first part this gives - for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅ - a field extension E of F in which p ∈ F [X]\F has a root.

Valued Differential Fields

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Aschenbrenner ◽  
Lou van den Dries ◽  
Joris van der Hoeven
Keyword(s):  
Asymptotic Behavior ◽  
Residue Field ◽  
Field Extension ◽  
Field Extensions ◽  
Differential Field ◽  
Differential Fields ◽  
Dominant Part

This chapter deals with valued differential fields, starting the discussion with an overview of the asymptotic behavior of the function vsubscript P: Γ‎ → Γ‎ for homogeneous P ∈ K K{Y}superscript Not Equal To. The chapter then shows that the derivation of any valued differential field extension of K that is algebraic over K is also small. It also explains how differential field extensions of the residue field k give rise to valued differential field extensions of K with small derivation and the same value group. Finally, it discusses asymptotic couples, dominant part, the Equalizer Theorem, pseudocauchy sequences, and the construction of canonical immediate extensions.

scholarly journals How Fields Can have a Product

1978 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-254
Author(s):  
Frank Zorzitto
Keyword(s):  
Field Extension ◽  
Universal Property ◽  
Field Extensions

Let k be a field. Two field extensions E, F of k are said to have a product- in the category of field extensions of k (see e.g. [1, p. 30]) if and only if there exist a field extension P of k and two k -isomorphisms P→ E, P→ F satisfying the following universal property. For any field extension K of k and any pair of k-isomorphisms K→E, K→F, there exists a unique k-isomorphism K→P such that the diagrams below commute.

scholarly journals Multivariable dimension polynomials and new invariants of differential field extensions

2001 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 201-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander B. Levin
Keyword(s):  
Field Extension ◽  
Differential Polynomials ◽  
Finitely Generated ◽  
Field Extensions ◽  
Differential Field ◽  
Differential Dimension ◽  
Characteristic Sets ◽  
Differential Dimension Polynomial ◽  
Dimension Polynomial

We introduce a special type of reduction in the ring of differential polynomials and develop the appropriate technique of characteristic sets that allows to generalize the classical Kolchin's theorem on differential dimension polynomial and find new differential birational invariants of a finitely generated differential field extension.

Subfields and Invariants of Inseparable Field Extensions

1977 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1304-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
James K. Deveney ◽  
John N. Mordeson
Keyword(s):  
Field Extension ◽  
Field Extensions

Let L/K be a field extension of characteristic p ≠ 0. The existence of intermediate fields over which L is regular, separable, or modular is important in recent Galois theories. For instance, see [1; 2; 3; 4; 7; 8; 9 and 14].

scholarly journals On Roots of Polynomials over F[X]/ 〈p〉

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-100
Author(s):  
Christoph Schwarzweller
Keyword(s):  
Irreducible Polynomial ◽  
Field Extension ◽  
Isomorphic Copy ◽  
Field Extensions ◽  
The Third ◽  
Fourth Part ◽  
Roots Of Polynomials ◽  
Classical Proof ◽  
Do So

Summary This is the first part of a four-article series containing a Mizar [3], [1], [2] formalization of Kronecker’s construction about roots of polynomials in field extensions, i.e. that for every field F and every polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F there exists a field extension E of F such that p has a root over E. The formalization follows Kronecker’s classical proof using F [X]/<p> as the desired field extension E [9], [4], [6]. In this first part we show that an irreducible polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F has a root over F [X]/<p>. Note, however, that this statement cannot be true in a rigid formal sense: We do not have F ⊆ [X]/ < p > as sets, so F is not a subfield of F [X]/<p>, and hence formally p is not even a polynomial over F [X]/ < p >. Consequently, we translate p along the canonical monomorphism ϕ: F → F [X]/<p> and show that the translated polynomial ϕ(p) has a root over F [X]/<p>. Because F is not a subfield of F [X]/<p> we construct in the second part the field (E \ ϕF )∪F for a given monomorphism ϕ : F → E and show that this field both is isomorphic to F and includes F as a subfield. In the literature this part of the proof usually consists of saying that “one can identify F with its image ϕF in F [X]/<p> and therefore consider F as a subfield of F [X]/<p>”. Interestingly, to do so we need to assume that F ∩ E =∅, in particular Kronecker’s construction can be formalized for fields F with F \ F [X] =∅. Surprisingly, as we show in the third part, this condition is not automatically true for arbitray fields F : With the exception of 𝕑2 we construct for every field F an isomorphic copy F′ of F with F′ ∩ F′ [X] ≠∅. We also prove that for Mizar’s representations of 𝕑n, 𝕈 and 𝕉 we have 𝕑n ∩ 𝕑n[X] = ∅, 𝕈 ∩ 𝕈[X] = ∅and 𝕉 ∩ 𝕉[X] = ∅, respectively. In the fourth part we finally define field extensions: E is a field extension of F i F is a subfield of E. Note, that in this case we have F ⊆ E as sets, and thus a polynomial p over F is also a polynomial over E. We then apply the construction of the second part to F [X]/<p> with the canonical monomorphism ϕ : F → F [X]/<p>. Together with the first part this gives - for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅ - a field extension E of F in which p ∈ F [X]\F has a root.

scholarly journals On the Intersection of Fields F with F [X]

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-228
Author(s):  
Christoph Schwarzweller
Keyword(s):  
Irreducible Polynomial ◽  
Field Extension ◽  
Isomorphic Copy ◽  
Field Extensions ◽  
The Third ◽  
Fourth Part ◽  
Roots Of Polynomials ◽  
Classical Proof ◽  
Do So

Summary This is the third part of a four-article series containing a Mizar [3], [1], [2] formalization of Kronecker’s construction about roots of polynomials in field extensions, i.e. that for every field F and every polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F there exists a field extension E of F such that p has a root over E. The formalization follows Kronecker’s classical proof using F [X]/<p> as the desired field extension E [6], [4], [5]. In the first part we show that an irreducible polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F has a root over F [X]/<p>. Note, however, that this statement cannot be true in a rigid formal sense: We do not have F ⊆ F [X]/ < p > as sets, so F is not a subfield of F [X]/<p>, and hence formally p is not even a polynomial over F [X]/ < p >. Consequently, we translate p along the canonical monomorphism ϕ: F → F [X]/<p> and show that the translated polynomial ϕ (p) has a root over F [X]/<p>. Because F is not a subfield of F [X]/<p> we construct in the second part the field (E \ ϕF)∪F for a given monomorphism ϕ: F → E and show that this field both is isomorphic to F and includes F as a subfield. In the literature this part of the proof usually consists of saying that “one can identify F with its image ϕF in F [X]/<p> and therefore consider F as a subfield of F [X]/<p>”. Interestingly, to do so we need to assume that F ∩ E = ∅, in particular Kronecker’s construction can be formalized for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅. Surprisingly, as we show in this third part, this condition is not automatically true for arbitrary fields F : With the exception of ℤ2 we construct for every field F an isomorphic copy F′ of F with F′ ∩ F′ [X] ≠ ∅. We also prove that for Mizar’s representations of ℤn, ℚ and ℝ we have ℤn ∩ ℤn[X] = ∅, ℚ ∩ ℚ[X] = ∅ and ℝ ∩ ℝ[X] = ∅, respectively. In the fourth part we finally define field extensions: E is a field extension of F iff F is a subfield of E. Note, that in this case we have F ⊆ E as sets, and thus a polynomial p over F is also a polynomial over E. We then apply the construction of the second part to F [X]/<p> with the canonical monomorphism ϕ: F → F [X]/<p>. Together with the first part this gives – for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅ – a field extension E of F in which p ∈ F [X]\F has a root.

Soft Int-Field Extension

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Jayanta Ghosh ◽  
Dhananjoy Mandal ◽  
Tapas Kumar Samanta
Keyword(s):  
Field Extension ◽  
Field Extensions ◽  
Algebraic Element

The relation between soft element-wise field and soft int-field has been established and then some properties of soft int-field are studied. We define the notions of soft algebraic element and soft purely inseparable element of a soft int-field extension. Some characterizations of soft algebraic and soft purely inseparable int-field extensions are given. Lastly, we define soft separable algebraic int-field extension and study some of its properties.

scholarly journals Splitting Fields

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-139
Author(s):  
Christoph Schwarzweller
Keyword(s):  
Field Theory ◽  
Existence And Uniqueness ◽  
Field Extension ◽  
Splitting Field

Summary. In this article we further develop field theory in Mizar [1], [2]: we prove existence and uniqueness of splitting fields. We define the splitting field of a polynomial p ∈ F [X] as the smallest field extension of F, in which p splits into linear factors. From this follows, that for a splitting field E of p we have E = F (A) where A is the set of p’s roots. Splitting fields are unique, however, only up to isomorphisms; to be more precise up to F -isomorphims i.e. isomorphisms i with i|F = Id F . We prove that two splitting fields of p ∈ F [X] are F -isomorphic using the well-known technique [4], [3] of extending isomorphisms from F 1 → F 2 to F 1(a) → F 2(b) for a and b being algebraic over F 1 and F 2, respectively.

The neutral relativistic scalar field

2021 ◽  
pp. 105-124
Author(s):  
Jean Zinn-Justin
Keyword(s):  
Field Theory ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Statistical Physics ◽  
Relativistic Quantum ◽  
Pair Potential ◽  
Field Extension ◽  
Bose Gas ◽  
Real Field ◽  
Relativistic Limit ◽  
Grand Canonical

This chapter introduces the relativistic quantum field theory (QFT) of the neutral scalar boson field. It is a local, relativistic invariant, theory for a real field extension of the non-relativistic field theory of the Bose gas. Locality is a property that plays a central role in most of this work. The QFT is discussed both from the viewpoint of real-time evolution and statistical physics. The holomorphic formalism leads to representations of the S-matrix in terms of field integrals. The S-matrix elements are related to the continuation to real time of various kinds of Euclidean correlation functions. It is argued that the massive φ4 QFT has the quantum Bose gas with a pair potential, in the grand canonical formulation, as a non-relativistic limit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document