scholarly journals Congenital Chlamydia Infection – case presentation

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-19
Author(s):  
Gáll Zsuzsanna ◽  
Sánta Réka ◽  
Moréh Zsuzsanna ◽  
Cucerea Manuela ◽  
Simon Márta

Abstract There are several pathogens involved in the etiology of neonatal infections. Based on etiology, these can be classified into materno-fetal and nosocomial infections. Bacteria of the Chlamydia family behave like intracellular parasites. The most well-known member is Chlamydia trachomatis, which is the cause of the most common sexually transmitted disease in developed societies. In this case, we present a 27-days-old girl who presented at our clinic with conjunctivitis, dyspnea and coughing. Laboratory and imaging findings reported leucocytosis, eosinophilia, and bronchopneumonia. Her condition improved rapidly during antibiotic treatment, but her conjunctivitis recurred. Serological tests confirmed Chlamydia infection of the newborn. She became asymptomatic after the whole family has been cured. In case of neonatal conjunctivitis, pneumonia and eosinophilia, Chlamydia should be considered and the whole family treated to prevent re-infections.

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose A. Bazan ◽  
Patricia Carr Reese ◽  
Allahna Esber ◽  
Samantha Lahey ◽  
Melissa Ervin ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dagmar Long ◽  
Graham Mulley

The diagnosis of neurosyphilis is important but remains difficult because of variable clinical features and an unpredictable course. Laboratory confirmation involves a combination of serological tests, none of which alone provides a reliable indication of current disease activity. Although in the UK the incidence of neurosyphilis has fallen steadily, its many manifestations require clinicians to remain alert to the diagnosis, particularly because incidental antibiotic therapy may modify the presenting features. As a sexually-transmitted disease, the diagnosis of syphilis carries great social stigma. The need for informed consent before routine testing, and the provision of psychological support for the patient and carers in the event of a positive diagnosis, must be considered.


Author(s):  
Samuel K. Cohn, Jr.

By exploring the wide range of names given to the ‘new’ sexually transmitted disease—the Great Pox—this chapter dispels notions held for two centuries or more. Instead, no tit-for-tat-naming war among nations accused of carrying the disease ensued. The ‘French disease’ alone became standard in medical texts, but not among commoners and not after the late sixteenth century for physicians. The chapter challenges a second truism of the historiography: that naming meant blaming. Although the disease was named after the French, no laws or pogroms ensued against them or any other ‘other’. However, physicians increasingly identified humans as the essential carriers of this new disease and became concerned with tracking human contacts. By the end of the sixteenth century, medical texts had renamed it the territorially neutral lues venerea. Coincidently, with the rise of this new name, blame placed on women, the poor, and victims of the disease increased.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document