scholarly journals Problems of the mechanism for challenging of transactions of the debtor in bankruptcy case

2021 ◽  
pp. 30-45
Author(s):  
Viktoriya Viktorovna Kalinkina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this research is a set of legal norms that regulate relations in the sphere of challenging of transactions of the debtor, as well as the law enforcement practice. The object of this research is the social relations that develop in the context of challenging of transactions of the debtor in bankruptcy case. The article discusses the problems faced by the arbitration and financial executives at the stage of claim preparation for challenging of transactions of the debtor, i.e. formation of evidence, as well as at the stage of execution of the corresponding court ruling. The purpose goal of this article lies in articulation of the problem, substantiation of the need for legislative regulation, and formulation of recommendation for the improvement of current legislation on the subject matter. The scientific novelty consists in addressed the issues that have not previously become the subject of separate research; as well as in the author’s conclusions and recommendations aimed at the improvement of the Federal Law No. 127-FZ of. October 26, 2002 “On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)” and other normative legal acts regulating this field. The acquired results can also be used in the Russian legal science for further elaboration on the issues related to the effectiveness of the mechanism for challenging of transactions of the debtor, and as well  as improvement of the current legislation of the Russian Federation and law enforcement practice that regulate this field.

scholarly journals Procedural problems in cases of tax violations discovered in the course of tax audits (Article 101 of the Taxation Code of the Russian Federation)

2020 ◽  
pp. 46-57
Author(s):  
Konstantin Evgenevich Shilekhin
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Document Analysis ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Empirical Material

The goal of this article lies in studying the problems of administration of law in the course of brining taxpayers to tax liability and formulation of recommendations of their elimination. The object of this research is the social relations characterizing tax liability and procedural order in this regard. The subject is the legal norms establishing liability for tax violations, as well as regulation the activity of tax and judicial bodies pertinent to application of the fiscal legislation of the Russian Federation. Research methodology is based on the dialectical method of cognition of social reality. For collection, processing, generalization, analysis and interpretation of empirical material, the author uses the methods of induction and deduction, statistical analysis and document analysis. The conclusion is made on the weakness of normative legal regulation of separate procedures of legal investigation on tax violation in terms of the Article 101 of the Taxation Code of the Russian Federation. The author suggest making a number of amendments to the fiscal legislation to improve the mechanism of holding the taxpayers liable.

scholarly journals Aggregate as a type of multiplicity of administrative offences: concept and legal formalization

2020 ◽  
pp. 11-17
Author(s):  
Natal'ya Anatol'evna Akhtanina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Law Schools ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Administrative Legislation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

The object of this research is social relations emerged on the basis of administrative-legal norms, which regulate the aggregate of administrative offences. The subject of this research is the scientific literature, normative legal acts and law enforcement practice related to the concept of the aggregate of administrative offences. The author examines approaches of the scientists of various law schools to the concept of aggregate of administrative offences, its development and transformation in time. The author indicated the flaws in the current administrative legislation in part of the absence of legislative consolidation of the concept of “aggregate” of offence, which results in occurrence of a number of problems. The article explores the legal norms that regulate aggregate of offences in administrative legislation of the Russian Federation. A comparative analysis is conducted on consolidation of the aggregate of offences in administrative and criminal law. The scientific novelty is defined by upcoming changes in administrative legislation. This is the reason why improvement of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation with regards to regulation of the question of the aggregate of administrative offences gains more relevance. A conclusion is made on the need for establishing in law the unified detailed definition of the “aggregate” of administrative offences, which would allow ensuring more effective application of legal norms. A need is also underlined for the need of legislative consolidation of such feature of offences that are a part of the aggregate as “absence of bringing to accountability for earlier commission of an unlawful act”.  

scholarly journals Pretrial procedure for disputes settlement associated with challenging transactions of the debtor within the framework of the case of insolvency (bankruptcy)

2021 ◽  
pp. 38-47
Author(s):  
Viktoriya Viktorovna Kalinkina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Arbitration Procedure ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Pretrial Procedure

The object this research is the social relations developed in terms of the mandatory pretrial of disputes settlement associated with challenging transactions of the debtor. Subject of this research is the set of legal norms regulating the relations in the area of challenging transactions of the debtor, as well as the law enforcement practice. The research is carried out through the prism of consideration of such problem as the absence in the current legislation of the Russian Federation of the norm that establishes compliance with the pretrial procedure for dispute settlement associated with challenging transactions of the debtor. Special attention is given to analysis of the norms of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, Federal Law No. 127-FZ of 10.26.2002 “On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)” and the law enforcement practice. The goal of this work consists in articulation of the problem, substantiation of the need for legislative regulation in the indicated field, as well as development of proposals on improvement of the Bankruptcy Act. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that the field of this research has not yet acted as an independent subject of scientific understanding. The scientific novelty is defined by the fact that this topic has not previously become a subject of a separate scientific research, as well as in systemic and comparative legal approach, analysis and criticism of legal sources. The conclusion is made on the need for legislative consolidation of the mandatory pretrial disputes settlement associated with challenging transactions of the debtor. The acquired may be valuable in further formulation of the proposals on improvement of legislation and law enforcement practice within the science of Russian law.

scholarly journals Concerning the Legal Regulation of the Order of Weapon Issue to Judges in the Russian Federation

2019 ◽  
pp. 12-20
Author(s):  
Rinat Mikhailovich Karimov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Safety Measures ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The Social ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

In this article Karimov analyzes whether it is necessary to amend available safety measures in relation to judicial authorities of the Russian Federation. The aim of the research is to analyze the current order of weapon issue to judges in the Russian Federation. The object of the research is the social relations rising in the process of implementation of legal provisions about the order of weapon issue to judges in the Russian Federation. The subject of the research is the legal acts that regulate the order of weapon issue to judges in the Russian Federaton. The researcher analyzes kinds of weapons that can be issued to a judge upon his or her written inquiry. The research is based on the comparative legal analysis of previous provisions about the order of weapon issue to judges and legal provisions that have been implemented just lately. The analysis is also based on the use of such research methods as analysis and synthesis, generalisation and logical research method. The author of the article proves the idea that the legal specificiation of the order of weapon issue to judges in the Russian Federation will eliminate possibility of attacking judges or their family members. The author focuses on the gaps in relevant legal regulations and suggests to review and make changes in the current law that regulates the order of weapon issue to judges. 

scholarly journals Petty crime: quo vadis?

2020 ◽  
pp. 20-29
Author(s):  
Elena Aleksandrovna Suponina ◽  
Igor' Petrovich Dolgikh
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Academic Community ◽  
Public Place ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Systemic Analysis ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Quo Vadis ◽  
Definition Of

The subject of this research is the normative gaps that have been an intrinsic part of petty crime for many years. Among most discussible within the academic community problems related to such legal violation, the author selected the following: absence of legal definition of the concept of obscenities in the national legislation; complexity of delimitation of petty crime from the adjacent administrative and criminal offences; disaccord in interpretation of the concept of “public place”. Particular attention is paid to the prospects of optimization of administrative-legal norms established in the Article 20.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. The main conclusion of the conducted research lies in the statement that from the perspective of legal technique, the article 20.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation is in a permanent motion. However, this motion is chaotic and inconsequential. The introduced amendments to the text of codified law did not enhanced the protection of public order, as well as created the additional difficulties for the law enforcer. This article makes an attempt of systemic analysis of provisions of the Federal Law No.28-FZ of 03.18.2019 that complemented the article 20.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation with the Sections 3-5.

scholarly journals On the relevant questions of usage of information technologies for preventive purposes in oversight activity of the executive branch of government

2020 ◽  
pp. 27-37
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Nikolaevna Smirnova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Executive Branch ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Close Integration

The subject of this research is the legal norms regulating the usage of digital technologies in oversight activity of the executive branch of government, as well as law enforcement practice of utilization of digital technologies for preventive purposes in oversight activity of the executive branch of government. The object of this research is the social relations establishing in the process of digitalization of the prevention of violations of mandatory requirements. The author examines such aspects as usage of artificial intelligence in prevention of violations of mandatory requirements, as well as analyzes the implementation of “digital control” preventive purposes of oversight activity of the executive branch of government. The main conclusions of the conducted research consists in determination of positive experience from implementation of digital technologies for preventing violations of mandatory requirements, as well as in proposal of the new ways of using digital technologies for improving the effectiveness of implementation of preventive vector of oversight activity. The author also revealed a number of problems that may arise in case of close integration of digital technologies into preventive vector of oversight activity. The novelty consists in the fact that this article is first to explore the question of digitalization of prevention of violations of mandatory requirements, analyze the prospects of usage of digital technologies, as well as outline the “problematic” aspects of the phenomenon under consideration.

scholarly journals The concept of significance of violation of procedural norms of legislation of the Russian Federation on taxes and fees in terms of appointing an on-site tax audit

2021 ◽  
pp. 60-69
Author(s):  
Maksim Igorevich Zimulkin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
The Social ◽  
Relevant Case ◽  
Tax Audit ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this research is the legislation of the Russian Federation, case law, as well as domestic and foreign doctrine, which allow establishing the essence of legal relations for the purpose of appointment of on-site tax audit. The object of this research is the social relations in terms of appointing an on-site tax audit. The author considers legal aspects associated with the procedural issues of appointing an on-site tax audit, and violations committed by tax officials in appointing an audit. Special attention is given to the problems of qualification of procedural violations as significant, i.e. entailing cancellation of the decision of tax authority, acknowledgement of actions (or inaction) of tax officials as unlawful. The scientific novelty of this work consist in formulation of the criterion of significance of violation of procedural norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation on taxes and fees in terms of appointing an on-site tax audit. Leaning on the results of research of the Russian and foreign doctrine, as well as the analysis of the relevant case law, the author determines the procedural violations of tax officials committed in appointing tax audit, which should result in cancellation of the decisions of tax authorities, an acknowledgement of the actions (or inactions) of tax officials as unlawful. The conclusion is made on the content of the criterion of significance of violation of procedural norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation on taxes and fees in terms of appointing an on-site tax audit.

scholarly journals INFORMATIZATION IN SOCIAL SECURITY LAW

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4-2) ◽  
pp. 57-66
Author(s):  
Венера Сайфутдинова
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Security ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Dialectical Logic ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Social ◽  
Social Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Complex Subject

The article is devoted to one of the most important problems - the digitalization of social security law. In theory of social security law, the issue of codification of this branch of law, the creation of the Social Code of the Russian Federation as a way of systematizing the norms of law is still being discussed. This codification is certainly a convenient and necessary way to combine legal norms in this area, including for the purpose of bringing information to citizens. Meanwhile, the law enforcement legislation is quite dynamic, has a diverse, complex subject composition, and is extensive in content, which makes it difficult to create a codified act in this area. Purpose: to analyze the problems of codification and development of digitalization of social security law. Methods: the author uses the methods of comparison, description, interpretation, formal and dialectical logic, interpretation of legal norms. Results: the XXI century dictates new requirements - the accessibility of information, which, in the author's opinion, is possible due to informatization processes that are rapidly entering the legislation of social security law.

scholarly journals PRESIDENTIAL CONTROL OVER OPERATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY SERVICE OF RUSSIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 58-62
Author(s):  
Anatoliy M. Tarasov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
State Control ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Criminal Intelligence ◽  
Security Service ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The relevant and innovative character of the subject of Presidential Control over Operations of the Federal Security Service of Russia is confirmed by the absence of separate research on this topic and the status of the Federal Security Service of Russia established to ensure security, carry out various types of law enforcement operations, in particular, such as criminal intelligence and surveillance, pre-trial investigation, interrogation, where human and civil rights and freedoms may be violated, and the guarantor of human and civil rights and freedoms is the President of the Russian Federation pursuant to Article 80 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The relevance of this subject is also proven by the absence of any federal law on the state control over operations of state authorities including law enforcement ones and the failure to establish the limits (scope) of the presidential control over operations of the Federal Security Service of Russia in statutory acts. The fact that the aims of the presidential control are not only identification of deviations in operations of the Federal Security Service but also the prevention of such deviations in the future raises the importance of this issue. In view of the above, the presidential control is a mechanism of positive, preventive and efficient influence on organizational and practical activities of authorities of the Federal Security Service of Russia.

scholarly journals On exemption from criminal liability for unlawful restriction of competition (the Article 178 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Ol'ga Evgen'evna Derevyagina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this research is the notes to the Article 178 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Article 14.32 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses; foreign antimonopoly legislation on exemption and mitigation of liability for cartels; decisions of the plenums of higher judicial instances of the Russian Federation regarding the grounds and procedure for exemption from liability for cartel agreements; draft of the federal law on introducing amendments to the Article 178 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and antimonopoly practice on cartels. The article aims to examine the grounds for exemption from criminal liability for cartel agreements, including in comparative-legal and interdisciplinary aspects. The novelty of this research consists in establishing extension of the grounds for exemption from liability in the Russian legislation to all cartel participants (unlike foreign legislation, according to which the cartel facilitator is not exempt from liability). This article is firs to provide interpretation to scantily studied questions of the procedure for realization of the conditions of exemption from criminal liability: the instance, when the cartel participant is still able to declare the restriction of competition to law enforcement agencies, and other measures of reparation of the inflicted damage. The author proposes a method for unification of the the grounds for exemption from liability stipulated by the Article 178 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Article 14.32 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses. The acquired results can be applied in the activity of law enforcement agencies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document