Back-Pressure Effects of a RDE Area Rule

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig A. Nordeen ◽  
Douglas A. Schwer
Author(s):  
Xiaolei Liu ◽  
Akkharachai Limpasurat ◽  
Gioia Falcone ◽  
Catalin Teodoriu

When developing a transient numerical reservoir simulator, it is important to consider the back pressure effects that waves propagating from one end of the porous medium will have on the temporal distribution of pore fluid pressure within the medium itself. Such waves can be triggered by changing boundary conditions at the interface between reservoir and wellbore. An example is given by the transient reservoir response following pressure fluctuations at the wellbore boundary for gas wells suffering from liquid loading. Laboratory experiments were performed using a modified Hassler cell to mimic the effect of varying downhole pressure on gas flow in the near-wellbore region of a reservoir. Gauges were attached along a sandstone core to monitor the pressure profile. The results of the experiments are shown in this paper. A numerical code for modelling transient flow in the near-wellbore region was run to mimic the experiments. The comparisons of simulations and laboratory test results are presented here, for the initial and final steady-state flowing conditions, and where the inlet pressure was maintained constant while initiating a transient pressure build up at the core outlet. The concept of the U-shaped pressure profile along the near-wellbore region of a reservoir under transient flow conditions, originally proposed by Zhang et al. [1], was experimentally and numerically reproduced for single-phase gas flow. This is due to a combination of inertia and compressibility effects, leading to the reservoir response not being instantaneous. The results suggest that, in two phase gas-liquid conditions, liquid re-injection could occur during liquid loading in gas wells. From the experimental results, the U-shaped curves were more obvious and of longer duration in the case of greater outlet pressure. The transition from the initial to the final steady state condition occurred rapidly in all the cases shown here, with the U-shaped pressure profile appearing only over a relatively short time (at the small scale and low pressures tested in this study).


Author(s):  
Fouad A. Solomon ◽  
Gioia Falcone ◽  
Catalin Teodoriu

Liquid loading in gas wells is a phenomenon where the liquid content of the well is sufficient to create a back pressure (usually dominated by gravitational pressure changes) which restricts, and in some cases even stops, the flow of gas from the reservoir. Liquid loading is an all too common problem in mature gas fields around the world. It is estimated that in the U.S.A. alone, at least 90% of the producing gas wells are operating in liquid loading regime. The phenomenon is more detrimental in tight wells than in prolific wells and it poses a serious problem in subsea tie-backs, where back pressure effects through the risers and the flowlines may have an important role. Such is the importance of liquid loading; the oil and gas industry has devoted a lot of attention to the alleviation of the problem using various measures. However, the fundamental understanding of the associated phenomena is still surprisingly weak. This applies not only to the flows in the wells, but also to how these flows interact with those in the reservoir. It is this latter dynamic interaction that has received the least attention by the industry. Reliable predictive models to link the well dynamics with the intermittent response of a reservoir, that is typical of liquid loading in gas wells, remain unavailable. This paper introduces the complexity of liquid loading and critically reviews recent attempts to model liquid loading and the dynamic interactions between reservoir and wellbore. The paper then illustrates the need for a better understanding of the transient flow phenomena taking place in the near-wellbore region of the reservoir. This includes re-injection of the heavier phase, a phenomenon that has yet to be proven by fluid mechanics.


2012 ◽  
Vol 116 (49) ◽  
pp. 25715-25720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoonyoung Kim ◽  
Son-Jong Hwang ◽  
Young-Su Lee ◽  
Jin-Yoo Suh ◽  
Heung Nam Han ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
В.С. Кузнецов ◽  
◽  
А.С. Шабловский ◽  
В.В. Яроц ◽  
◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document