scholarly journals Impact of interlayer on moisture characteristics of reclaimed soil backfilled with Yellow River sediments

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-159
Author(s):  
Xiaotong Wang ◽  
◽  
Zhenqi Hu ◽  
Yusheng Liang ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Yellow River ◽  
River Sediments ◽  
Reclaimed Soil ◽  
Yellow River Sediments

Mineralogy and geochemistry of modern Yellow River sediments: Implications for weathering and provenance

2018 ◽  
Vol 488 ◽  
pp. 76-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongli Pang ◽  
Baotian Pan ◽  
Eduardo Garzanti ◽  
Hongshan Gao ◽  
Xin Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Yellow River ◽  
River Sediments ◽  
Yellow River Sediments

scholarly journals Heavy Mineral Variability in the Yellow River Sediments as Determined by the Multiple-Window Strategy

Minerals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingfu Jin ◽  
Mengyao Wang ◽  
Wei Yue ◽  
Lina Zhang ◽  
Yanjun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Particle Size ◽  
Grain Size ◽  
Yellow River ◽  
River Sediments ◽  
Size Fraction ◽  
Heavy Mineral ◽  
The Yellow River ◽  
Yellow River Sediment ◽  
Yellow River Sediments ◽  
End Members

In this study, heavy mineral analysis was carried out in different size fractions of the Yellow River sediment to extract its end-members. It shows that heavy mineral contents, species, and compositions vary in different grain sizes. Distribution curve of heavy mineral concentration (HMC) and particle size frequency curve are in normal distribution. In most samples, the size fraction of 4.5–5.0 Φ contains the maximum HMC (18% on average). Heavy mineral assemblages of the Yellow River are featured by amphibole + epidote + limonite + garnet. Amphibole content is high in coarse fraction of >3.0 Φ and reaches its peak value in 3.5–4.5 Φ. Epidote is rich in a size fraction of >3.5 Φ, and increase as the particle size becomes fine. Micas content is high in coarse subsamples of <3.0 Φ, but almost absent in fine grains of >4.0 Φ. Metallic minerals (magnetite, ilmenite, hematite, and limonite) increase as the sediment particle size become fine, and reach the peak in silt (>4.0 Φ). Other minerals such as zircon, rutile, tourmaline, garnet, and apatite account for about 15%, and mainly concentrate in fine sediment. Further analysis reveals that similarity value between the most abundant grain size group and wide window grain size group is high (0.978 on average). The grain size of 4.0–5.0 Φ ± 0.5 Φ is suitable to carry out detrital mineral analysis in the Yellow River sediments. Our study helps to eliminate cognitive bias due to narrow grain size strategy, and to provide heavy mineral end-members of the Yellow River sediment for provenance discrimination in the marginal seas of East China.

scholarly journals Soil Quality Change after Reclaiming Subsidence Land with Yellow River Sediments

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 4310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linghua Duo ◽  
Zhenqi Hu
Keyword(s):  
Crop Yields ◽  
Yellow River ◽  
Underground Mining ◽  
River Sediments ◽  
Sustainable Utilization ◽  
Cultivated Land ◽  
Quality Change ◽  
Weakly Alkaline ◽  
Yellow River Sediments

With continuous population growth and decreasing cultivated land area, China’s food security is greatly threatened. Additionally, coal mining in China is primarily underground mining, which causes land subsidence and destroys existing cultivated land. This effect aggravates the contradiction between a growing population and a shrinking area of cultivated land. The purpose of this study was to introduce a method of filling reclamation with Yellow River sediments to restore farmland and realize the sustainable utilization of cultivated land. The properties of the soil and crop yields in reclaimed farmland were assessed. This study examined farmland reclaimed with Yellow River sediments at an experimental site located in Jining City, Shandong Province, China. Filling reclamation procedures with Yellow River sediments were applied. The reclaimed farmland (RF) and unaltered farmland (CK) were continuously monitored for three years, and the soil was sampled six times. A total of 180 soil samples were collected from RF and CK. The soil properties were measured at three depths: 0–20 cm, 20–50 cm, and 50–80 cm. Crop yields were monitored regularly. The results indicate that filling reclamation with Yellow River sediments is an effective method for restoring farmland. The RF and CK soils were weakly alkaline, non-saline soils. The RF soil was suitable for the growth of local crops. With an increasing number of farming years, both the quality of cultivated land and crop yields have increased. Therefore, filling reclamation with Yellow River sediments is an effective way to realize the sustainable utilization of cultivated land.

Competitive adsorption, release and speciation of heavy metals in the Yellow River sediments, China

2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingyun Fan ◽  
Jiang He ◽  
Hongxi Xue ◽  
Changwei LÜ ◽  
Ying Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Metals ◽  
Competitive Adsorption ◽  
Yellow River ◽  
River Sediments ◽  
The Yellow River ◽  
Yellow River Sediments

scholarly journals Optimal Thickness of Soil Cover for Reclaiming Subsided Land with Yellow River Sediments

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 3853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenqi Hu ◽  
Linghua Duo ◽  
Fang Shao
Keyword(s):  
River Sediment ◽  
Soil Cover ◽  
Yellow River ◽  
River Sediments ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Optimal Thickness ◽  
Yellow River Sediment ◽  
Yellow River Sediments ◽  
Experimental Treatments ◽  
Different Thickness

The cultivated land area per capita in China is relatively small compared to the world average. However, most of the coal output is coming from underground mining, resulting in land subsidence and the destruction of existing cultivated land. The Yellow River is known as a ground-suspended river due to its large sediment concentration. Using unpolluted Yellow River sediment to reclaim the coal mine subsidence not only solves the problem of sediment deposition, but also solves the problem of shortage of filling material. Some experimental studies revealed low soil productivity as a result of thin soil cover. To ensure crop growth and production in land reconstructed with Yellow River sediments, determining the optimal thickness of soil cover over the sediment is extremely important. There were four experimental treatments and one control treatment. Each treatment was repeated three times. The control treatment was an original soil profile with 30 cm topsoil plus 110 cm subsoil. The four experimental treatments with different thickness of soil covers had the same thickness of topsoil (30 cm) and Yellow River sediments (60 cm), and different thickness of subsoil, which were 10, 30, 40, and 50 cm, respectively. Thus, the total thicknesses of soil cover (topsoil plus subsoil) were 40 cm, 60 cm, 70 cm, and 80 cm, respectively. The topsoil, subsoil, and Yellow River sediments were collected from Liangshan County. The soil type is fluvo-aquic. Maize (Zea mays L.) is the main crop in Liangshan County. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to investigate the growth of maize. The results showed that (1) the peroxidase (POD) activity, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and malondialdehyde (MDA) content of maize leaf decreased with an increasing thickness of soil, while soluble protein (SP) and leaf relative water content (RWC) increased. (2) The dry biomasses of the shoot and root system in T70 and T80 were not significantly different from those in the control (3) Increased soil thickness is conducive to the storage of more water and available nutrients. Considering the time and cost of reconstruction, 70 cm is the optimal thickness of soil cover on Yellow River sediment to ensure maize growth.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document