STUDY OF SUBVERTICAL DISINTEGRATION ZONES (“DEGASSING PIPES”) IN THE SEDIMENTARY COVER OF OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS BEARING BASINS (A CASE STUDY OF THE SEA OF OKHOTSK)

2020 ◽  
Vol XIV (2/2020) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Of Okhotsk ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Sedimentary Cover ◽  
The Sea Of Okhotsk ◽  
Offshore Oil And Gas ◽  
Offshore Oil ◽  
Gas Bearing

scholarly journals Contesting Political Decisions Involving Environmental Issues: A Case Study in Portugal Based on the Press About Offshore Oil and Gas Drilling

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Pinto ◽  
Paula Castro
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Oil Companies ◽  
Gas Drilling ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Press ◽  
The Government ◽  
Offshore Oil And Gas ◽  
Offshore Oil ◽  
Political Decisions

This paper presents a case study about the drilling of offshore oil and gas in mainland Portugal, a process that ended with the cancelation of all contracts. It aimed to better understand the argumentative and value dynamics involved in how municipalities, populations, civic organizations, and others successfully contested the central government decision of prospection. Since the press was one of the main stages for this conflict, it was important to analyze how it presented the respective arguments to society. Articles on this topic were collected from the two widely read national newspapers “Correio da Manhã” and “Público” in the culmination period of this confrontation, which occurred between June 2016 and December 2018. In total, 155 articles were found, 61.3% (n = 95) from “Público” and 38.7% (n = 60) from “Correio da Manhã.” The quantitative analysis focused on the number of news per month and the frequency of themes, as well as the frequency of actors and arguments used against and in favor of exploitation on the news. Thematic analysis was used to qualitatively assess the articulation of arguments in the two opposing views. Results show that, in both newspapers, the majority of articles focused on the positions and actions of those opposing prospection, as the Government and other actors in favor of drilling were much less active in presenting its arguments. Overall, the analysis suggests two different strategies: (a) a strong argumentative synergy between a wide range of actors against offshore prospection. Their concerted arguments defended multiple values, including public participation in political decisions, protecting local communities and places from environmental risks, countering climate change, and protecting local economic activities. (b) The Government was usually isolated in its arguments with the occasional exception of oil companies or representatives of the national industry. The scarce arguments used by these actors evoked mostly national economic values, with little engagement with other societal goals. This study suggests that the large mobilization of different sectors of society, their use of a convergent and wide range of arguments, and the lack of engagement of the Government in a dialogical argumentation were crucial to delegitimize the latter’s political decision.

scholarly journals Cargo scheduling decision support for offshore oil and gas production: a case study

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 991-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elham Mardaneh ◽  
Qun Lin ◽  
Ryan Loxton ◽  
Nicola Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Oil And Gas Production ◽  
Offshore Oil And Gas ◽  
Offshore Oil

Case study on erosion–corrosion degradation of pipework located on an offshore oil and gas facility

Wear ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 271 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 1295-1301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinming Hu ◽  
Richard Barker ◽  
Anne Neville ◽  
Abinesh Gnanavelu
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Erosion Corrosion ◽  
Offshore Oil And Gas ◽  
Offshore Oil

Re-Evaluation of Tag Safety Critical Status in an FPSO: A Case Study for Recognizing Inconsistencies

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sina Zahirian ◽  
R. M. Chandima Ratnayake
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Safety Critical ◽  
Offshore Production ◽  
Correct Assignment ◽  
Maintenance Activities ◽  
Offshore Oil And Gas ◽  
Offshore Oil ◽  
Selection Of

Assigning correct ‘safety critical’ (SC) status for tags in offshore production and/or in a process facility is vital for an asset owner. It minimizes not only health, safety & environmental (HSE) challenges but also the wastage in terms of cost, time and effort of maintenance activities. Correct assignment of the SC status for a tag obviates the selection of a tag which does not deserve safety critical status and vice versa. A case study has been carried out to perform a re-evaluation and audit of the safety critical status of the tags which have already been assigned by two engineering contractors (ECs) in a floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) facility designed for offshore oil and gas (O&G) industry. However, the asset owner has discovered a gap between the results of aforementioned SC status assignments which have been carried out by the initial ECs. Hence, the results of initial two SC status assignments have been handed over to a third party engineering contractor for the purpose of re-evaluation and verification. This manuscript maps the work process attached to the reevaluation and verification. Finally, it presents the reasons discovered for the inconsistencies that caused the mismatch in the initial tag SC status assignments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document