Endoscopic sinus surgery with two different middle turbinate treatment methods: Impact on olfaction

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZHAO  Chen
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Middle Turbinate ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Treatment Methods

Remodeling of the Paradoxical Middle Turbinate: Preserving Function While Gaining Access

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-100
Author(s):  
Ryan H. Belcher ◽  
Allison K. Ikeda ◽  
John M. DelGaudio
Keyword(s):  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Middle Turbinate ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Middle Meatus ◽  
Anatomic Variant ◽  
And Function ◽  
Improve Access

Background Endoscopic sinus surgery is performed for many reasons, most commonly for chronic rhinosinusitis refractory to medical treatment. A paradoxical middle turbinate is an anatomic variant that can hinder endoscopic access to the sinuses. No publication has addressed how to surgically treat a paradoxical middle turbinate. Method We present a basic endoscopic surgical approach to conservatively resect a paradoxical middle turbinate in order to improve access to the middle meatus and the sinuses while preserving support and function. Conclusion Conservative remodeling of the paradoxical middle turbinate can provide access to the sinuses while maintaining a significant portion of the middle turbinate.

Two different therapies for the middle turbinate during endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 277 (11) ◽  
pp. 3079-3089
Author(s):  
Meichan Zhu ◽  
Yongyi Yan ◽  
Huicheng Gong ◽  
Yunwen Wu ◽  
Guojie Tan
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Middle Turbinate ◽  
Sinus Surgery

Powered Instrumentation in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery II: A Comparative Study

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Krouse ◽  
Dewey A. Christmas
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Middle Turbinate ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Surgical Results ◽  
Standard Techniques

The present paper compares the use of the microdebrider as a form of powered instrumentation for endoscopic sinus surgery with traditional endoscopic surgical techniques. A group of 250 patients undergoing surgery with the microdebrider was compared with a group of 225 patients undergoing traditional procedures in order to evaluate their postoperative recovery, healing, and incidence of complications. The use of the microdebrider demonstrated faster healing with less crusting than standard techniques, as well as decreased bleeding, synechia formation, lateralization of the middle turbinate, and ostial reocclusion. The microdebrider offers excellent surgical results with fewer complications and faster healing than traditional techniques in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Anatomical Variations in Osteomeatal Complex among Patients undergoing Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Narendrakumar ◽  
V Subramanian
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Middle Turbinate ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Anatomical Variations ◽  
Uncinate Process ◽  
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Frequency Of Occurrence ◽  
Osteomeatal Complex

ABSTRACT Aims To study the anatomical variations of osteomeatal complex and the importance of preoperative computed tomography (CT) in patients with chronic sinusitis undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery. We studied the different variations and their frequency of occurrence. Materials and methods A total of 100 patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery were studied by nasal endoscopy, CT scanning, and at the time of definitive surgery, variations were recorded. Results The frequency of occurrence of sinonasal anatomical variations was septal deviation in 76%, agger nasi cells in 71%, concha bullosa in 61%, medialized uncinate process in 48%, prominent bulla ethmoidalis in 41%, paradoxical middle turbinate in 33%, accessory maxillary ostium in 28%, frontal cell in 22%, intumescentia septi nasi anterior in 21%, lateralized uncinate in 15%, pneumatized uncinate process in 4%, Haller cells in 12%, and Onodi cells in 8%. Conclusion The high incidence of variations emphasizes the need for proper preoperative assessment for safe and effective endoscopic sinus surgery. How to cite this article Narendrakumar V, Subramanian V. Anatomical Variations in Osteomeatal Complex among Patients undergoing Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Clin Rhinol An Int J 2016;9(1):28-32.

Examining the Safety of Nasogastric Tube Placement after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

1998 ◽  
Vol 107 (8) ◽  
pp. 662-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Bhattacharyya ◽  
Harsha V. Gopal
Keyword(s):  
Nasogastric Tube ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sphenoid Sinus ◽  
Middle Turbinate ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Nasogastric Intubation ◽  
Nasogastric Tubes ◽  
Fresh Cadaver ◽  
Nasogastric Tube Placement

Several cases of intracranial injury during the placement of nasogastric tubes have been reported, usually in the setting of anterior skull base fractures. The fovea ethmoidalis and sphenoid sinus are often exposed after endoscopic sinus surgery, so that these structures are potentially placed in the line of contact during nasogastric tube placement. In order to evaluate the ability of the fovea ethmoidalis and roof of the sphenoid sinus to withstand penetration from possible contact during nasogastric tube placement, 12 fresh cadaver heads were studied. After complete endoscopic ethmoidectomy and wide sphenoidotomy, standard 18F and 16F nasogastric tubes were inserted to produce deliberate direct contact with both the fovea ethmoidalis and the sphenoid sinus roof. No penetrations of the fovea occurred in 20 specimen sides with the 18F tube; penetration did occur with the 16F tube in 1 of 13 sides (7.7%). With respect to the sphenoid sinus, no intracranial penetrations occurred in 16 and 11 sides for the 18F and 16F tubes, respectively. The sphenoid sinus was easily entered even in the presence of an intact middle turbinate. These data suggest that although intracranial penetration during nasogastric intubation after endoscopic sinus surgery is an unlikely event, there is a non-negligible risk of such injury. Nasogastric intubation should be performed with caution in patients with a history of sinus surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document