scholarly journals HISTORICAL EXPERIENCE AND ITS CONCEPTUALIZATION IN THE HERITAGE OF MAX WEBER

Author(s):  
Дмитрий Германович Кукарников

В данной статье прослеживается процесс осуществления Максом Вебером синтеза теоретических представлений в различных областях социально-гуманитарного знания с целью обосновать собственную концепцию генезиса капитализма современного западного типа. Отталкиваясь от разрабатываемых им принципов понимающей социологии и общеметодологических оснований исторического знания философии неокантианства, Вебер в своей социологии религии прорабатывает вопрос о роли внеэкономических факторов в становлении капитализма, а именно о значении мотивации трудовой и предпринимательской деятельности, которую он находит прежде всего в религии. Разработанный общесоциологический аппарат понятий применяется им для анализа огромного массива конкретно-исторического материала, благодаря чему Веберу удалось переосмыслить наличный исторический опыт и сформировать оригинальную и плюралистическую по своему характеру философско-историческую концепцию. Его труды как в области философии и методологии, так и в области исторической социологии продолжают играть значимую роль в современной социальной теории. This article traces the process of realization by Max Weber the synthesis of theoretical concepts in various areas of social and humanitarian knowledge in order to substantiate his own concept of the genesis of modern Western-type capitalism. Based on the principles of understanding sociology that he developed and the general methodological foundations of the historical knowledge in the philosophy of neo-Kantianism, Weber, in his sociology of religion, is working on the issue of the role of non-economic factors in the formation of capitalism, namely, the meaning of motivation for labor and entrepreneurial activity, which he finds primarily in religion. The developed general sociological apparatus of concepts is used by him to analyze a huge mass of concrete historical material, thanks to which Weber managed to rethink the available historical experience and form an original and pluralistic philosophical and historical concept. His works both in the field of philosophy and methodology, and in the field of historical sociology continue to play a significant role in modern social theory.

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 225
Author(s):  
A. D. Hathaway

In The Real Dope: Social, Legal, and Historical Perspectives on the Regulation of Drugs in Canada, Edgar-Andre? Montigny brings together a broad range of recent writing on a wide variety of drugs. The collection is well worth reading for the insights it provides into Canada’s socio-legal historical experience of the regulation of different psychoactive substances and for its documentation of the wealth of expertise coalescing in this area of research. This subject matter has inspired much critical analysis and scholarly debate about the role of academics in informing policy discussions about drug use and support for liberal drug policy reform. The present contribution is unique in its broad coverage of different “types” of drugs in different eras, and in its accessible, coherent presentation of historical material. Each chapter stands both alone and as an asset to its larger contemporary relevance, as interpreted by authors drawn from a variety of disciplinary backgrounds.


1970 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Stephen Warner

The theme of this conference, “The Organizational Forms of Economic Life and Their Evolution,” implies a concern for specifying the limits of the applicability of classical and neo-classical economic theory. Presumably because we sociologists have been in the forefront of those who insist on the recognition of these limits, I have been asked to present a paper from the viewpoint of historical sociology. Now I suppose that your field and mine are alike in at least one respect: the infrequency of finding any one view on a broad and significant question. I am sure you will understand, therefore, my concentration on some lessons to be learned from the work of one of the heroes of my discipline, Max Weber (1864–1920). Weber, as you may know, was, among his other titles, a professor of economics and avoided the epithet of “sociologist.” Yet because sociology has changed since his day, largely under his influence, and because he was also a professor of law and of political science, we sociologists have now claimed him. Nevertheless, many of the issues that informed his massive scholarly research were and are issues central to both your field and mine.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-100
Author(s):  
K.A. Afanasieva ◽  

Social, political and ideological factors that have significantly influenced the formation of the Russian education system are revealed. The historical material shows the functional role of the education system in the social and political system of Russia, which has been transformed in accordance with the interests of the state. The conclusion about the instrumental application of the education system in political management is substantiated.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 477-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
KENNETH W. YU

This article begins with a remark by Jean-Pierre Vernant in his inaugural lecture at the Collège de France about the inadequacy of Max Weber's historical sociology for the study of ancient religions. Despite posing shared research questions and often reaching similar conclusions, Vernant, one of the most influential twentieth-century ancient historians, neither engaged nor acknowledged Weber and thereby secured his absence in the field of ancient religions generally. Vernant's narrative of the historical emergence of Greek rationality is at direct odds with Weber's views on the matter inSociology of Religionand elsewhere, and I argue that, beyond methodological concerns, Vernant's fundamentally Durkheimian position inherits early twentieth-century polemics between French and German sociologists. Vernant's relationships with Marcel Mauss, Ignace Meyerson, and Claude Lévi-Strauss, and his participation in the French Resistance, moreover, reaffirmed his Durkheimian views about society and committed him to a long tradition of anti-German scholarship. I conclude with a brief coda on the historiographical implications of these observations for the study of religion and its relation to social life.


Author(s):  
George Steinmetz

Chapter abstract This chapter explores some of the ways Bourdieusian theory is reinvigorating historical sociology. The first section reconstructs Bourdieu’s increasingly serious engagement over the course of his career with historians and historical material. It argues that Bourdieu generated and encouraged among his students a unique approach to historical sociology. The second section argues that the historical turn in Bourdieu’s work is firmly grounded in the fundamentally historicity of his two key theoretical concepts, habitus and field. The third section sketches an agenda for future work in historical sociology based on Bourdieu’s mature theory. The final section surveys recent social research using Bourdieusian field theory, arguing that this constitutes an unacknowledged and growing tendency within historical sociology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-90
Author(s):  
Ahmad Tohri ◽  
H. Habibuddin ◽  
Abdul Rasyad

This article discusses the Sasak people’s resistance against MataramKarangasem and Dutch colonial rulers in the 19th century in Lombok, Indonesia. It particularly focuses on Tuan Guru Umar Kelayu and his central role in the emergence of Sasak people’s resistance which transformed into Sasak physical revolution local and global imperialismcolonialism. Using the historical method, this article collected data through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. The data analysis involved the historical methods of heuristics, verification or criticism, interpretation, and historiography. The findings show that Sasak people’s resistance was not only caused by economic factors but also related to other factors such as social, cultural, and religious ones. Tuan Guru Umar Kelayu played a key role in the Sasak people’s resistance in that it was under his leadership and influence that the resistance transformed into a physical struggle against MataramKarangasem and Dutch colonialism as seen in Sakra War and Praya War which were led by his students and friends.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document