scholarly journals What Constitutes a New Nonprofit? Investigating Nonprofit Organizational Founding Dates

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Levine Daniel ◽  
Fredrik Andersson
Keyword(s):  
Survey Data ◽  
Administrative Data ◽  
Discrete Event ◽  
Arts Organizations ◽  
Fundamental Challenge ◽  
Sufficient Precision

The question of when a new nonprofit is founded has not been pursued with sufficient precision. Specifically, a fundamental challenge facing any nonprofit researcher planning to detect, isolate, and analyze new nonprofits is that nonprofit founding is a process, not a discrete event. This study uses administrative data that includes three different founding indicators from more than 4,000 arts organizations, supplemented with survey data from 242 organizations, to illustrate some of the problems inherent in treating the founding process as one discrete event. It also elevates the voices of founders to demonstrate their conceptualization of the concept and offer insights into the multidimensionality of founding.  

Linking Federal Surveys with Administrative Data to Improve Research on Families

2016 ◽  
Vol 669 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy O’Hara ◽  
Rachel M. Shattuck ◽  
Robert M. Goerge
Keyword(s):  
Survey Data ◽  
Administrative Data ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Family Relationships ◽  
Census Data ◽  
Federal State ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Science Literature ◽  
Administrative Records ◽  
State And Local

Linkage of federal, state, and local administrative records to survey data holds great promise for research on families, in particular research on low-income families. Researchers can use administrative records in conjunction with survey data to better measure family relationships and to capture the experiences of individuals and family members across multiple points in time and social and economic domains. Administrative data can be used to evaluate program participation in government social welfare programs, as well as to evaluate the accuracy of reporting on receipt of such benefits. Administrative records can also be used to enhance collection and accuracy of survey and census data and to improve coverage of hard-to-reach populations. This article discusses potential uses of linked administrative and survey data, gives an overview of the linking methodology and infrastructure (including limitations), and reviews social science literature that has used this method to date.

New Evidence on Earnings Volatility in Survey and Administrative Data

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 287-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Carr ◽  
Emily E. Wiemers
Keyword(s):  
Survey Data ◽  
Administrative Data ◽  
Panel Study ◽  
Program Participation ◽  
Income Dynamics ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Earnings Volatility ◽  
Apparent Inconsistency ◽  
New Evidence

Despite the rise in cross-sectional inequality since the late 1990s, there is little consensus on trends in earnings volatility during this period. Using consistent samples and methods in administrative earnings data matched to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP GSF) and survey data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), we examine earnings volatility for men from 1978 through 2011. In contrast to the apparent inconsistency in trends across administrative and survey data in the existing literature, we find recent increases in volatility in the SIPP GSF and the PSID, though increases are larger in the PSID.

scholarly journals NEPS Starting Cohort 6 survey data linked to administrative data of the IAB (NEPS-SC6-ADIAB)

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Bachbauer
Keyword(s):  
Survey Data ◽  
Administrative Data ◽  
Linked Data ◽  
Panel Study ◽  
Data Access ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Employment Agency ◽  
Educational Trajectories ◽  
Analytical Potential ◽  
Site Access

BackgroundNEPS-SC6-ADIAB is a new linked data product containing survey data of Starting Cohort 6 of the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) and administrative employment data from the Institute for Employment Research (IAB), the research institute of the Federal Employment Agency. NEPS is provided by the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi). Starting Cohort 6 of this panel survey includes adults in their professional life, the survey focuses on education in adulthood and lifelong learning. The administrative data in NEPS-SC6-ADIAB consist of comprehensive information on the employment histories. ObjectivesCombining these two data sources increases for example the information about individual employment history. Overall, the data volume is increased by the linkage between the survey data and the administrative data. MethodsA record linkage process was used to link the two data sources. The data access is free for the whole scientific community. In addition to a large number of On-site access locations within Germany, there are also international On-site access locations. Including London and Colchester. In addition a Remote Data Access is offered. ConclusionsThis data linkage project is very innovative and creates an extensive database, which results in extensive analytical potential. A short application example is made to exemplify the comprehensive analytical potential of NEPS-SC6-ADIAB. This ongoing project deals with nonresponse in survey data. The linked data has a variety of variables collected in both data sources, administratively and through the NEPS survey, allowing for comparative analyses. In this case an idea to compensate nonresponse in income data with administrative data is drawn.

“The Miracle Tablet Maybe”: Legalization of the Pill and Women’s Childbearing and Career Decisions

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 276-298
Author(s):  
Henning Finseraas ◽  
Øyvind Søraas Skorge
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Survey Data ◽  
Administrative Data ◽  
Birth Control ◽  
Sexual Debut ◽  
Career Decisions ◽  
The United States ◽  
Economic Empowerment ◽  
Birth Control Pill ◽  
Teenage Motherhood

Abstract A substantial literature argues that the legalization of the birth control pill in the United States reduced fertility and enhanced career investments. This study questions whether the broader effects hold across contexts. We use administrative data to study the Norwegian legalization of the pill and find effects on teenage motherhood but not on subsequent career outcomes. Using survey data, we show that the pill's impact on fertility is largest for women with an early sexual debut; nevertheless, broader effects of pill usage are still absent. Our study indicates that the pill cannot explain the rise of Norwegian women's economic empowerment.

scholarly journals Improving risk prediction accuracy for new soldiers in the U.S. Army by adding self-report survey data to administrative data

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha L. Bernecker ◽  
Anthony J. Rosellini ◽  
Matthew K. Nock ◽  
Wai Tat Chiu ◽  
Peter M. Gutierrez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survey Data ◽  
Risk Prediction ◽  
Administrative Data ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Self Report ◽  
The U.S

scholarly journals The impact of different data sources on the level and structure of income inequality

SERIEs ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Ayala ◽  
Ana Pérez ◽  
Mercedes Prieto-Alaiz
Keyword(s):  
Income Inequality ◽  
Social Security ◽  
Survey Data ◽  
Administrative Data ◽  
Living Conditions ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Social Security Administration ◽  
The Social ◽  
Income Data ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThis paper aims to analyze the effect on measured inequality and its structure of using administrative data instead of survey data. Different analyses are carried out based on the Spanish Survey on Income and Living Conditions (ECV) that continued to ask households for their income despite assigning their income data as provided by the Tax Agency and the Social Security Administration. Our main finding is that the largest discrepancies between administrative and survey data are in the tails of the distribution. In addition to that, there are clear differences in the level and structure of inequality across data sources. These differences matter, and our results should be a wake-up call to interpret the results based on only one source of income data with caution.

Timing Is Everything: Late Registration and Stratified Access to School Choice

2018 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelley Fong ◽  
Sarah Faude
Keyword(s):  
School Choice ◽  
Survey Data ◽  
Administrative Data ◽  
School System ◽  
Equal Access ◽  
Schools Of Choice ◽  
Late Registration ◽  
Full Participation ◽  
Data Survey ◽  
Participation Inequality

School choice policies necessarily impose registration timelines, constraining access to schools of choice for students who register late. Drawing on administrative data, survey data, and interviews with 33 parents in Boston, we find that late registration is common and highly stratified: Nearly half of black kindergarteners miss the first registration deadline, a rate almost three times higher than their white peers, consigning them to the least preferred schools. Contexts of instability and bureaucratic complexity serve as barriers to registering months in advance, and parents describe disengagement from the school system following their late registration. These findings show how despite equal access in theory, bureaucratic structures such as timeline-based lotteries hinder many families, particularly those disadvantaged already, from full participation. Inequality in school choice outcomes and experiences thus results not only from families’ selections, the focus of previous research, but also the misalignment of district bureaucratic processes with family situations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document