scholarly journals Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of intraoperative complications in a tertiary care hospital.

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (01) ◽  
pp. 19-25
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sayyar ◽  
Yousaf Jan ◽  
Shaukat Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasound ◽  
International Studies ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Research Committee ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Complications

Objectives: The main objective was to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of intra-operative complications and the rate and reasons of conversion to open cholecystectomy. Study Design: Descriptive Study. Setting: Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. Period: June 2018 to May 2019. Material & Methods: After taking consent of Hospital ethical & research committee, patients admitted with clinical diagnosis of cholelithiasis and chronic cholecystitis, confirmed by abdominal ultrasound, undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy fulfilling inclusion criteria were selected. Results: A total of 150 were included in the study. Mean age was 39.2yrs with female to male ratio of 9.75:1. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully accomplished in 98% cases. In 2% (3 patients) converted cases the most common cause of conversion observed was dense adhesions in the calots triangle. Intra-operative complications were noted in 1.4% patients, those included bile duct injury and leakage from the gallbladder bed. However other complications such as bowel injury, blood vessel injury, and post operative hemorrhage did not occur. Overall morbidity was 1.4% with no mortality. Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and effective procedure in our setup to the accepted standards, as evident by the national and international studies. And it can be accomplished with minimal morbidity and low rate of conversion with the increasing surgeon’s experience.

scholarly journals Experience of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies in a Tertiary Care Hospital: a Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. E202043
Author(s):  
Aamir Hussain Hela ◽  
Haseeb Mohammad Khandwaw ◽  
Rahul Kumar ◽  
Mir Adnan Samad
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most commonly performed surgical procedure of digestive tract. It has replaced open cholecystectomy as gold standard treatment for cholelithiasis and inflammation of gallbladder.  It is estimated that approximately 90% of cholecystectomies in the  United States are performed using a laparoscopic approach.  The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in context to its complications, morbidity and mortality in a tertiary care hospital.  Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 1200 patients, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomies, during the period from January 2019 to December 2019, at Government Medical College Jammu J & K, India and necessary data was collected and reviewed. Results: In our study, a total of 1200 patients were studied including 216 males (18%) and 984 females (82%). The mean age of the patients was 43.35±8.61. The mean operative time in our study was 55.5±10.60 minutes with range of 45 – 90 minutes. Conversion rate was 2.6%. 2 patients were re-explored. Bile duct injury was found in 6 patients (0.5%).  Conclusions: Gallstone disease is a global health problem. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has now replaced open cholecystectomy as the first choice of treatment for gallstones. Gall stone diseases is most frequently encountered in female population. The risk factors for conversion to open cholecystectomy include male gender, previous abdominal surgery, acute cholecystitis, dense adhesions and fibrosis in Calot’ s triangle, anatomical variations, advanced age, comorbidity, obesity, suspicion of common bile duct stones, jaundice, and decreased surgeon experience. The incidence of surgical site infection has significantly decreased in laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to open cholecystectomy. In our study we could not find any case of surgical site infection.

scholarly journals Assessment of different stress responses after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in patients attending tertiary care hospital, Bhuj, Gujarat, India: a prospective study

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1575
Author(s):  
Bhavin Kothari ◽  
Gyaneshwar Rao
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Stress Responses ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
The Body ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein

Background: Surgical trauma by incision and dissection of tissue stimulates the body to respond proportionately to the extent of injury. This study was conducted with an aim to compare metabolic and inflammatory responses after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy namely serum cortisol and C-reactive protein levels before and after operation at Bhuj, Kutch, India.Methods: Present study was non-randomized, and comparative study carry out in the General Surgery Department at Gujarat Adani prospective institute of Medical Science, Bhuj, Kutch, Gujarat, India for an era of two years. One hundred and two patients were included in this study and were divided into two groups of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Out of these 102 patients, 41 undergo open cholecystectomy and 61 laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative and anesthetic medications were consistent in all the patients.Results: It was found that metabolic responses like serum cortisol were significantly higher after open procedure 6 hours and 48 hours postoperatively. Similarly, inflammatory response indicator C-reactive protein was raised significantly higher 48 hours after open as compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Conclusions: Open cholecystectomy caused further tissue responses as compared to its laparoscopic alternative.

scholarly journals Rate and Risk Factors for Conversion and Complications of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-62
Author(s):  
MM Sarker ◽  
MK Sarker ◽  
NA Perveen
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Biliary Leakage ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Excessive Bleeding ◽  
Port Site Hernia ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Complications

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gall bladder disease, but conversion to open cholecystectomy and both operative and post operative complications are still inevitable in certain cases. Knowledge of the rate and impact of the underlying reasons for conversion and complications could help surgeons during preoperative assessment and improve the informed consent of patients. In this study we retrospectively evaluated the rate and reasons for conversion and assessed complications of our laparoscopic cholecystectomy series. We included data of 720 consecutive patients who were attempted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 2008 to March 2014 at Islami Bank Medical College Hospital, Rajshahi. The study included 468 (65%) female and 252 (35%) male with mean age of 38 years (range 16-78 years). Conversion to open procedure was carried out in 58 patients with conversion rate of 8.05%. Dense and extensive adhesions were the most common reasons for conversion (21, 36. 2%). The conversion rate due to operative complications was 13.8% of all converted cases. The major operative complications were extrahepatic bile ducts injuries 2(0.3%), duodenal injury 1(0.1%), excessive bleeding 10(1.4%). The incidence of postoperative complications was 2.8%. The most common post-operative complication was wound infection (11, 1. 52%) followed by biliary leakage in 4(0.55%) patients. Delayed complications seen in our series is port site hernia (1,0.13%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred method even in difficult cases. Conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy should be based on the sound clinical judgment of the surgeon and not be due to a lack of individual expertiseTAJ 2014; 27(2): 58-62

scholarly journals OUTCOME OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH GALLSTONE DISEASE AT A SECONDARY LEVEL CARE HOSPITAL

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed TAKI-ELDIN ◽  
Abd-Elnaser BADAWY
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gallstone Disease ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Biliary Leakage ◽  
Port Site Hernia ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Secondary Hospital

ABSTRACT Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most commonly performed operation of the digestive tract. )It is considered as the gold standard treatment for cholelithiasis. Aim: To evaluate the outcome of it regarding length of hospital stay, complications, morbidity and mortality at a secondary hospital. Methods: Data of 492 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ demographics, co-morbid diseases, previous abdominal surgery, conversion to open cholecystectomy, operative time, intra and postoperative complications, and hospital stay were collected and analyzed from patients’ files. Results: Out of 492 patients, 386 (78.5%) were females and 106 (21.5%) males. The mean age of the patients was 49.35±8.68 years. Mean operative time was 65.94±11.52 min. Twenty-four cases (4.9%) were converted to open surgery, four due to obscure anatomy (0.8%), 11 due to difficult dissection in Calot’s triangle (2.2%) and nine by bleeding (1.8%). Twelve (2.4%) cases had biliary leakage, seven (1.4%) due to partial tear in common bile duct, the other five due to slipped cystic duct stables. Mean hospital stay was 2.6±1.5 days. Twenty-one (4.3%) developed wound infection. Port site hernia was detected in nine (1.8%) patients. There was no cases of bowel injury or spilled gallstones. There was no mortality recorded in this series. Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and effective line for management of gallstone disease that can be performed with acceptable morbidity at a secondary hospital.

scholarly journals Outpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

HPB Surgery ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Smith ◽  
D. Kolyn ◽  
R. Pace
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Post Operative Period ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
The Future ◽  
Elective Cholecystectomy ◽  
Post Operative Complications

Outpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy was attempted in 98 patients selected from 266 patients presenting for elective cholecystectomy (37%). Two patients required admission following conversion to “open” Cholecystectomy, one patient was admitted for observation because of a technically difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and 16 patients were admitted because of refractory nausea and vomiting in the early post-operative period. Seventy-nine patients (81%) were able to be discharged home within 4 to 6 hours of surgery, with only one patient requiring readmission to hospital because of the onset of nausea and vomiting. There were no post-operative complications attributable to the outpatient experience. We believe this approach to elective gallbladder pathology can be safely accomplished in selected patients and will be increasingly utilized in the future.

scholarly journals Anaotmical variability in the position of cystic artery and its affect on surgical approach during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Samir Irfan Wasi ◽  
Omer Fateh ◽  
Syed Muhammad Abdullah Bukhari
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Cystic Duct ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Cystic Artery ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Safe Area ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background: The laparoscopic view of extrahepatic biliary tract and cystic artery is different anatomically from open approach. Consequently iatrogenic injuries due to inadverent damage to cystic artery are not uncommon. These complications can be prevented by careful dissection in Calots triangle and better knowledge of laparoscopic anatomy of cystic artery and its variations. The aim of this study is to establish the prevalence of variation in position of cystic artery in relation to cystic duct in Asia’s largest slum area. This will help identify the safe area for dissecting peritoneum in Calots triangle and thus help young surgeons overcome the long learning curve associated with laparoscopy.Methods: During a 2 year period from 2018-2019, 192 laparoscopic cholecystectomies that were performed at a tertiary care hospital were studied. Patients above the age of 70 years, pregnant females, patients with history of previous abdominal surgery and the cases of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy were excluded from the study. Cystic artery was divided into four groups based on its relative position to cystic duct. It includes superomedial, superolateral, anterior and absent cystic artery relative to the cystic duct.Results: Out of 192 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy 174 (90.62%) patients had cystic artery superomedial to cystic duct and 10 (5.208%) had a cystic artery at superolateral position to cystic duct. In 5 (2.6%) patients it was found anterior to cystic duct and in 3 (1.56%) patients it was absent.Conclusions: As the least common position of cystic artery was found to be anterior to cystic duct in our study, it is concluded that blind dissection from anterior side is the safest approach to avoid injury to cystic artery. This technique can help young surgeons overcome the long learning curve associated with laparoscopy.

scholarly journals Intra-operative factors responsible for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy in a tertiary care center

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1467
Author(s):  
Anam Saeed ◽  
Mohammed Salim ◽  
Devi Singh Kachhawa ◽  
Renuka Chaudhary
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Visceral Injury ◽  
Critical View Of Safety ◽  
Symptomatic Cholelithiasis ◽  
Calot’S Triangle ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis and has multiple advantages over open approach. With increasing skills and techniques over the years, the contra-indications to laparoscopic cholecystectomy have reduced. Even after careful selection of appropriate candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, it sometimes becomes necessary to convert into an open cholecystectomy to prevent complications. This study was undertaken so as to identify the intra-operative factors necessitating conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy.Methods: In this study conducted at S. P. Medical College and P. B. M. Hospital, Bikaner, over a period of 1 year, 100 consecutive patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis, planned for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed and cases which could not be completed laparoscopically were converted to open cholecystectomy via right subcostal incision. Intra-operative factors necessitating conversion were observed and analyzed.Results: The incidence of conversion was found to be 7%. The most common intra-operative factor for conversion was dense adhesions at the Calot’s triangle (71.43%) followed by obscure anatomy (42.86%). Uncontrolled bleeding and CBD stones also led to conversion. The identification and appearance of CBD and achievement of critical view of safety were significant factors for conversion to open cholecystectomy (p=0.0001).Conclusions: The rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy was 7% which is comparable to similar studies. Conversion is not a failure or complication but actually a safer alternative to ensure completion of the procedure without any real complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy- biliary or visceral injury, haemorrhage, etc.

scholarly journals Safety and feasibility of three port procedure in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1975
Author(s):  
Vipin Gupta ◽  
Shailendra Pal Singh ◽  
Somendra Pal Singh ◽  
Anil Kumar Keshari ◽  
Anil Kumar Erry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Standard Technique ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is widely accepted gold standard technique for management of cholelithiasis and has undergone many refinements including decrease in size and number of ports. Many researchers have claimed that three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible method for management of cholelithiasis but still it is not performed widely by the surgeons. Objective of our study was to assess the safety and feasibility of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy by comparing the various defined parameters with the standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: The study included 100 patients and was divided equally in 2 groups. Patients in Group A underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy by three-port technique and in Group B were operated by four-port technique. Patients in both the groups were compared in terms of operative time, intra-operative complications, post-operative pain, post-operative complications and cosmesis outcome.Results: The mean operative time was similar in both groups. Intra-op and post-op complications were also similar. 3 patients in Group A needed fourth port and 1 patient in both group required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Mean pain score and requirement of parentral analgesia was found to be lower in Group A. Duration of hospital was similar in both the groups. Patients in group A had slightly better cosmetic outcome.Conclusions: Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a minimally invasive, safe and feasible technique and is not difficult to master than other advanced techniques. In experienced hands, laparoscopy cholecystectomy can be initially started with three-ports and can be converted to four-port if rarely necessary.

scholarly journals Is early conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy helpful in preventing iatrogenic injuries: a retrospective study from a single unit of a tertiary care centre

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 2332
Author(s):  
Dheer S. Kalwaniya ◽  
Jaspreet S. Bajwa ◽  
S. V. Arya ◽  
Rajkumar C. ◽  
Ashok K. Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Gall Bladder ◽  
Single Unit ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Gall Stone ◽  
Open Procedure ◽  
Iatrogenic Injuries ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy

Background: Gall stone disease is the commonest hepatobiliary problem which is tackled by either laparoscopic or open technique. Since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy by Eric Muhne in 1985, it has become gold standard for gall bladder removal. But a surgeon must be competent enough to convert it into open procedure, provided there are on table complications. Moreover, since laparoscopic surgery has a learning curve, open procedure for any surgery is must for safety of the patient as well as the surgeon.Methods: A retrospective study is done over a period of 4 years (January, 2015 to December, 2018) and data of 469 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a single unit of Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India has been collected and evaluated for conversion to open procedure on the basis of intraoperative findings. The complications noted and the intraoperative findings and the reasons of conversion to open cholecystectomy have been compared to the previous studies done.Results: Out of total 469 cases, M:F ratio was 1:3.51. Total 40 underwent conversion to open cholecystectomy (8.54%) with M:F ratio of 1:2.07. Most common cause of conversion was dense adhesions in Calot’s triangle along with omentum and bowel. Single patient had agenesis of gall bladder. There was no iatrogenic injury to common bile duct, common hepatic duct and there were no postoperative mortalities.Conclusions: Early conversion to open cholecystectomy is associated with lower intraoperative iatrogenic injuries and hence, lowers postoperative morbidity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document