The Impact of Radiofrequency on Pelvic Floor Distress, Restoration, and Sexual Function Among Women Suffering from Pelvic Floor Disorders

2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-120
Author(s):  
Zinat Ghanbari ◽  
Marzieh Hajibabaei ◽  
Elaheh Miri Ashtiani ◽  
Azita Ghanbarpour ◽  
Ali Montazeri ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca G. Rogers

Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) can impact sexual function. This summary provides an overview of the impact of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse and their treatments on sexual function. In general, interventions that successfully address PFDs will generally improve sexual function as well. However, there are patients whose sexual function will remain unchanged despite treatment, and a small but significant minority who will report worsened sexual function following treatment for their pelvic floor dysfunction.


Author(s):  
Jonathan E. Handelzalts ◽  
Tal Yaakobi ◽  
Sigal Levy ◽  
Yoav Peled ◽  
Arnon Wiznitzer ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1389-1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphanie Thibault-Gagnon ◽  
Sara Yusuf ◽  
Suzanne Langer ◽  
Vivien Wong ◽  
Ka Lai Shek ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska ◽  
Konrad Futyma ◽  
Dariusz Wydra

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the cutoff scores for sexual dysfunction in disease-specific Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire—IUGA Revised (PISQ-IR) for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFD). Medical history and urogynecological data of 521 women with PFD were collected. The subjects provided information about their sexual activity and completed Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and PISQ-IR questionnaires. Sexually active (SA) women were further analyzed and categorized using their FSFI scores: <26.55—sexual dysfunction, >26.55—no sexual dysfunction. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve tested how well PISQ-IR allowed to discriminate between patients with and without sexual disorders. Area under curve (AUC) was calculated to measure the PISQ-IR Summary Score efficiency in the prediction. The cutoff values which minimalize (1-specifity) and maximize sensitivity were selected. In the analyzed cohort, 250 (48%) women were SA and a total of 226 SA were recruited for the study: 143 (63.3%) with <26.55 FSFI and 83 (36.7%) with >26.55 FSFI (response rate: 90.4%). Using ROC curve analysis, PISQ-IR Summary Score of 2.68 was determined to be the optimal cutoff for distinguishing between dysfunctional and nondysfunctional women (AUC = 0.85), allowing to diagnose sexual dysfunction in SA women with PFD, with 90% sensitivity and 71% specificity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document