scholarly journals Tapping into the potential of remote developmental research: introducing the OxfordBabylab app

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola A Gillen ◽  
Serene Siow ◽  
Irina Lepadatu ◽  
Jelena Sucevic ◽  
Kim Plunkett ◽  
...  

The widespread use of mobile touchscreen devices in the home provides the opportunity to conduct remote experimental research with toddlers. We present a study aiming to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of using a mobile app for running alternative forced choice tasks with toddlers in the home. The parents of 153 toddlers aged between 12 and 36 months first completed the Oxford Communicative Development Inventory (CDI) as a measure of their child’s vocabulary, and then completed a receptive vocabulary task with their child on their own mobile device. We evaluated the feasibility in terms of completion and engagement scores and the efficacy in terms of response systematicity. Our results show that it is both feasible and effective to use parents' own mobile devices to run a study with toddlers in their home. Toddlers were successfully engaged and their responses reflected their integration of the audio-visual context presented. We also introduce our OxfordBabylab app, a cross-platform mobile app which implements a customisable template for alternative forced choice tasks.

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoud Jasbi ◽  
Michael C. Frank

Disjunction has played a major role in advancing theories of logic, language, and cognition, featuring as the centerpiece of debates on the origins and development of logical thought. Recent studies have argued that due to non-adult-like pragmatic reasoning, preschool children’s comprehension of linguistic disjunction differs from adults in two ways. First, children are more likely to interpret “or” as “and” (conjunctive interpretations); Second, children are more likely to consider a disjunction as inclusive (lack of exclusivity implicatures). We tested adults and children’s comprehension of disjunction in existential sentences using two and three-alternative forced choice tasks, and analyzed children’s spontaneous verbal reactions prior to their forced-choice judgments. Overall our results are compatible with studies that suggest children understand the basic truth-conditional semantics of disjunction. Children did not interpret “or” as “and”, supporting studies that argue conjunctive interpretations are due to task demands. In addition, even though our forced-choice tasks suggest children interpreted disjunction as inclusive, spontaneous verbal reactions showed that children were sensitive to the adult-like pragmatics of disjunction. Theoretically, these studies provide evidence against previous developmental accounts, and lend themselves to two alternative hypotheses. First, that preschool children’s pragmatic knowledge is more adult-like than previously assumed, but forced-choice judgments are not sensitive enough to capture this knowledge. Second, children may have the knowledge of the relevant lexical scale themselves, but be uncertain whether a new speaker also has this knowledge (mutual knowledge of the scale).


2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 1157-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin M. Bausenhart ◽  
Oliver Dyjas ◽  
Dirk Vorberg ◽  
Rolf Ulrich

2010 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Zacksenhouse ◽  
R. Bogacz ◽  
P. Holmes

2012 ◽  
Vol 367 (1594) ◽  
pp. 1401-1411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Ko ◽  
Hakwan Lau

Blindsight refers to the rare ability of V1-damaged patients to perform visual tasks such as forced-choice discrimination, even though these patients claim not to consciously see the relevant stimuli. This striking phenomenon can be described in the formal terms of signal detection theory. (i) Blindsight patients use an unusually conservative criterion to detect targets. (ii) In discrimination tasks, their confidence ratings are low and (iii) such confidence ratings poorly predict task accuracy on a trial-by-trial basis. (iv) Their detection capacity ( d ′) is lower than expected based on their performance in forced-choice tasks. We propose a unifying explanation that accounts for these features: that blindsight is due to a failure to represent and update the statistical information regarding the internal visual neural response, i.e. a failure in metacognition. We provide computational simulation data to demonstrate that this model can qualitatively account for the detection theoretic features of blindsight. Because such metacognitive mechanisms are likely to depend on the prefrontal cortex, this suggests that although blindsight is typically due to damage to the primary visual cortex, distal influence to the prefrontal cortex by such damage may be critical. Recent brain imaging evidence supports this view.


2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-91
Author(s):  
Engin Arik

Abstract This study offers an experimental perspective to investigate the word order and animacy effects of intransitives in Turkish, an agglutinative language with a canonical, flexible Subject-Object-Verb order. Four experiments were conducted to investigate a total of 528 Turkish speakers’ acceptability judgments using rating scales (Experiments 1 and 3; 7-point Likert scales) and forced choice tasks (Experiments 2 and 4; choosing one of two sentences) for various orders of linguistic forms in a simple intransitive sentence. Results from scalar acceptability judgments showed that there were significant main effects of order and subject, indicating that participants gave significantly higher ratings to SV sentences than VS sentences and that their ratings changed significantly according to the animacy of the subjects. Results from the forced choice tasks showed that participants preferred SV sentences to VS sentences. These findings suggest that Turkish speakers prefer SV order over VS order even though both are readily available.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document