scholarly journals Benefit Cost Analysis of Small Farm Machineries Used for Rice Cultivation in Nepal

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 448-453
Author(s):  
Prakash Acharya ◽  
Punya Prasad Regmi ◽  
Devendra Gauchan ◽  
Dilli Bahadur KC ◽  
Gopal Bahadur KC
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Discount Rate ◽  
Payback Period ◽  
Rice Cultivation ◽  
Sample Size Determination ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Small Farm ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
Power Tiller ◽  
Benefit Cost

A study was conducted in Jhapa, Sunsari and Bardiya district of Nepal to assess the benefit cost (BCA) analysis of small farm machineries (transplanter, reaper and power tiller) used for rice cultivation. Out of total respondents of 274 under mechanized farm category selected using Raosoft Software of sample size determination, 74% reaper owner (20),  67% power tiller owner (20) and 100% transplanter owner (09)  were selected for analyzing benefit cost analysis using simple random sampling. BCA analysis showed that the NPV, B/C ratio, IRR and Payback Period of investing in transplanter were NRs 452743.62, 1.61, 24% and 2.75 years at 12% discount rate respectively. Similarly, NPV, B/C ratio, IRR and Payback period for reaper and power tiller were NRs 422541.93, 2.89, 123% and 1.14 years and NRs 619,719.34, 2.32, 65% and 1.46 years at 12% of discount rate respectively. The investment on reaper and power tiller would be profitable for their higher Benefit Cost ratio and IRR, and lower payback period. The results of sensitivity analysis showed that investments in reaper and power tiller would be profitable even if decrease in benefit or increase in cost or decrease in benefit and increase in cost by 20% is considered. However, in case of transplanter, the IRR would be less than the discount rate when benefit decreases by 20% and cost increases by 20%. Due to high investment at the initial stage, the payback period was longer and IRR was also less than 30% per annum in transplanter which indicated that investment would not be made for transplanter unless price of transplanter is lowered through regulation of price and provision of subsidy. It is suggested to motivate farmers for adoption of small farm machineries in rice cultivation through provision of differentiated rates of subsidy and technical capacity build up.

scholarly journals Appropriate Discounting for Benefit-Cost Analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Burgess ◽  
Richard O. Zerbe
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Discount Rate ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Hyperbolic Discounting ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
The Social ◽  
Net Benefits ◽  
Benefit Cost

In order to be sensible about what discount rate to use one must be clear about its purpose. We suggest that its purpose is to help select those projects that will contribute more net benefits than some other discount rate. This approach, which is after all the foundation for benefit-cost analysis, helps to reconcile different suggested procedures for determining the discount rate. We suggest that the social opportunity cost of capital (SOC) is superior to other suggested approaches in its generality and its ease of use. We use the SOC to determine a range of real rates that vary between 6% and 8%. We suggest that approaches based on determination of preferences, which result in hyperbolic discounting, are less appropriate and less useful.

A Hybrid Approach Based on the Fuzzy AHP and Benefit Cost Analysis to Evaluating Cutting Blade Alternatives

2013 ◽  
Vol 364 ◽  
pp. 513-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Wei Xu ◽  
Jin Yao ◽  
Jun Li
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Manufacturing Systems ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Manufacturing Cost ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
Consumption Cost ◽  
Benefit Cost

The cutting blade selection has been important issue for manufacturing systems due to the fact that it might affect productivity, precision and manufacturing cost. It is a multiple-criteria decision making problem for evaluating blade alternatives. In this paper, the hybrid approach is discussed,which combined the fuzzy AHP and benefit cost analysis. An improved AHP method based on triangular fuzzy number is used to analyze the cutting performance of blade alternatives. It can make up for the deficiency in the conventional AHP. Furthermore, the benefit cost analysis is carried out to evaluate the economic performance of alternatives. The benefit cost ratio is calculated by using the fuzzy AHP score and tool consumption cost. Tool consumption cost is obtained in consideration of tool service life and procurement cost. The optimal blade alternative with highest benefit/cost ratio can be found out. In addition, the proposed approach is also illustrated on a sample case study.

The Moral Justification of Benefit/Cost Analysis

1994 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald C. Hubin
Keyword(s):  
Social Policy ◽  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Moral Theory ◽  
Moral Justification ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Moral Foundations ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
Moral Theories ◽  
Benefit Cost ◽  
Direct Implementation

Benefit/cost analysis is a technique for evaluating programs, procedures, and actions; it is not a moral theory. There is significant controversy over the moral justification of benefit/cost analysis. When a procedure for evaluating social policy is challenged on moral grounds, defenders frequently seek a justification by construing the procedure as the practical embodiment of a correct moral theory. This has the apparent advantage of avoiding difficult empirical questions concerning such matters as the consequences of using the procedure. So, for example, defenders of benefit/cost analysis (BCA) are frequently tempted to argue that this procedure just is the calculation of moral Tightness – perhaps that what it means for an action to be morally right is just for it to have the best benefit-to-cost ratio given the accounts of “benefit” and “cost” that BCA employs. They suggest, in defense of BCA, that they have found the moral calculus – Bentham's “unabashed arithmetic of morals.” To defend BCA in this manner is to commit oneself to one member of a family of moral theories (let us call them benefit/cost moral theories or B/C moral theories) and, also, to the view that if a procedure is (so to speak) the direct implementation of a correct moral theory, then it is a justified procedure. Neither of these commitments is desirable, and so the temptation to justify BCA by direct appeal to a B/C moral theory should be resisted; it constitutes an unwarranted short cut to moral foundations – in this case, an unsound foundation. Critics of BCA are quick to point out the flaws of B/C moral theories, and to conclude that these undermine the justification of BCA. But the failure to justify BCA by a direct appeal to B/C moral theory does not show that the technique is unjustified. There is hope for BCA, even if it does not lie with B/C moral theory.

scholarly journals Analisis Finansial Perkebunan Kayuputih Skala Kecil: Studi Kasus Pilot Project Pengembangan Kayuputih untuk Kelompok Tani di Kampung Rimbajaya, Distrik Biak Timur

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Prastyono Prastyono ◽  
Noor Khomsah Kartikawati ◽  
Sumardi Sumardi ◽  
Anto Rimbawanto
Keyword(s):  
Discount Rate ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Payback Period ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Internal Rate Of Return ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
Financial Feasibility ◽  
Benefit Cost

Produksi minyak kayuputih dari Kepulauan Maluku dan Pulau Jawa saat ini masih jauh di bawah permintaan kayuputih dalam negeri. Ekstensifikasi perkebunan kayuputih skala kecil yang  dikelola oleh masyarakat dengan menggunakan benih unggul dapat menjadi solusi untuk meningkatakan produksi minyak kayuputih di Indonesia. Tulisan ini dimaksudkan untuk mengetahui tingkat kelayakan finansial dari usaha perkebunan kayuputih skala kecil dengan menggunakan data dari pilot project pengembangan industri kayuputih skala kecil di Kampung Rimbajaya, Distrik Biak Timur seluas 5 ha. Kelayakan finansial dilihat dari kriteria investasi yang umum digunakan yaitu net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), benefit-cost ratio (BCR) dan payback period. Hasil analisis finansial menunjukkan bahwa kebun kayuputih unggul skala kecil layak untuk diusahakan dengan NPV untuk jangka waktu 25 tahun pada discount rate 9,2% adalah sebesar Rp 757.171.972,00 (Rp 151.434.394,32 per hektar), IRR sebesar 72,74%, BCR sebesar 1,77 dan payback period setelah 2 tahun 3 bulan. Secara finansial perkebunan kayuputih yang menggunakan benih unggul lebih layak diusahakan dibandingkan dengan komoditas bambu, sengon, sawit dan kopi. Financial Analysis of a Small Scale Cajuput Plantation: A Case Study of A Pilot Project for A Farmer Group in Rimbajaya Village, East Biak DistrictAbstractProduction of cajuput oil from the Moluccas and Java Island is currently far below the domestic demand for the oil. Extensification of small-scale cajuput plantations managed by community using improved seeds is expected to increase cajuput oil production inIndonesia. This study investigates the financial feasibility of a 5 ha-cajuput plantation using data collected from a pilot project for a farmer group in Rimbajaya Village, East Biak District. Financial feasibility was assessed by calculating four investment criteria: netpresent value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), benefit-cost ratio (BCR) and payback period. The analysis showed that a small-scale cajuput plantation was financially feasible with NPV (25 years) at a 9.2% discount rate was IDR 687,583,363.00 (IDR 137,516,672.63 per hectare), IRR of 66.5%, BCR of 1.70 and payback period after 2 years and 3 months. Investation in a cajuput plantation planted with improved seeds is more feasible than that in bamboo, sengon, palm oil and coffee plantations.

scholarly journals Benefit-Cost Analysis of a Package of Early Childhood Interventions to Improve Nutrition in Haiti

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (S1) ◽  
pp. 154-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad Wong ◽  
Mark Radin
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Cost Analysis ◽  
National Income ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Case Scenario ◽  
Base Case Scenario ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
Benefit Cost ◽  
Early Childhood Interventions

We conduct a benefit-cost analysis of a package of early childhood interventions that can improve nutrition outcomes in Haiti. Using the Lives Saved Tool, we expect that this package can prevent approximately 55,000 cases of child stunting, 7,600 low-weight births and 28,000 cases of maternal anemia annually, if coverage reaches 90% of the target population. In addition, we expect these nutrition improvements will avoid 1,830 under-five deaths, 80 maternal deaths and 900,000 episodes of child illness every year. Those who avoid stunting will experience lifetime productivity benefits equivalent to five times gross national income per capita in present value terms, at a 5% discount rate. While previous benefit-cost analyses of this specific package have only estimated the lifetime productivity benefits of avoided stunting, this paper also accounts for reductions in fatal and non-fatal health risks. In the base case scenario, the annualized net benefits of the intervention equal Haitian gourdes 13.4 billion (USD 211 million) and the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) is 5.2. Despite these substantial benefits, the package may not be the most efficient use of a marginal dollar, with alternative interventions to improve human capital yielding BCRs approximately three to four times higher than the base estimate.

A Social Benefit Cost Analysis of Special Economic Zones in India: A Study of Noida SEZ

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 139-153
Author(s):  
Babita ◽  
N. K. Bishnoi
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Social Benefit ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Special Economic Zones ◽  
Positive Role ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
Indian Economy ◽  
Benefit Cost ◽  
Economic Zones

Special economic zones (SEZs) in India have been in news due to their usefulness vis-à-vis adverse effects on economy. A good number of opponents opine that costs incurred by SEZs outweigh the benefits. However, it cannot be denied that SEZs have played a positive role in the welfare of the economy. Thus, to examine this issue, we carried out a social benefit–cost analysis (SBCA) on Noida Special Economic Zone (NSEZ) within the context of enclave model for the period of 2009–2016. The result shows the positive net present value and benefit–cost ratio greater than one under methodological assumptions. This infers that NSEZ is contributing towards the welfare of Indian economy. One interesting findings of the study is that NSEZ is generating positive gains to economy with the absence of various market distortions which could otherwise reduce the realised benefits. Hence, need arises to eliminate such distortions from outside area of economy also to make it competitive at global level. Therefore, it can be concluded that competitiveness of the Indian economy can be enhanced with the removal of market distortions and liberalisation of rules, regulation and policies for economic development activities. Hence, the Government of India should emphasise and make regulations and policies that encourage competitiveness of the industries. JEL Classification: D04, D61, F13, H2, J01

scholarly journals Benefit–Cost Analysis of Undergraduate Education Programs: An Example Analysis of the Freshman Research Initiative

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. rm1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca L. Walcott ◽  
Phaedra S. Corso ◽  
Stacia E. Rodenbusch ◽  
Erin L. Dolan
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Undergraduate Education ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
Research Initiative ◽  
Benefit Cost

Institutions and administrators regularly have to make difficult choices about how best to invest resources to serve students. Yet economic evaluation, or the systematic analysis of the relationship between costs and outcomes of a program or policy, is relatively uncommon in higher education. This type of evaluation can be an important tool for decision makers considering questions of resource allocation. Our purpose with this essay is to describe methods for conducting one type of economic evaluation, a benefit–cost analysis (BCA), using an example of an existing undergraduate education program, the Freshman Research Initiative (FRI) at the University of Texas Austin. Our aim is twofold: to demonstrate how to apply BCA methodologies to evaluate an education program and to conduct an economic evaluation of FRI in particular. We explain the steps of BCA, including assessment of costs and benefits, estimation of the benefit–cost ratio, and analysis of uncertainty. We conclude that the university’s investment in FRI generates a positive return for students in the form of increased future earning potential.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document