scholarly journals A mixed-source approach to public participation for assessing urban accessibility of neighbourhood public spaces.

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huskinson Mariana ◽  
Bernabeu Bautista Álvaro ◽  
Serrano Estrada Leticia ◽  
Martí Pablo
2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 847-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen L. McClish

This essay argues that the disruption of the routine ways we engage with our cities is necessary for democratic activity and public participation. Building on research that examines the relationship between public spaces and democratic action, I explore temporary forms of creative street installation as interrupting the marketing pleas that have become the only authorized forms of visual art in our cities. I argue that tactics in urban spaces that are temporary and provide nebulous meanings are necessary to grab our attention and make us linger. I propose that these forms of engagement act in the same way as people performing or playing in public spaces. I specifically employ Yi-Fu Tuan’s theoretical notions of space and movement and Margaret Kohn’s discussion of the significance of presence in public spaces to examine the creative ways we engage with and experience our cities. I examine two activist/artist projects: Mark Jenkins’ tape installations and Detroit Demolition. My analysis of these two sites demonstrates the importance of citizens engaging in their urban spaces. By creating temporary artwork that is nebulous in meaning, activists/artists are interrupting the routine ways we experience our cities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
W. (Bill) Wei ◽  
Hanneke Heerema ◽  
Rebecca Rushfeld ◽  
Ida van der Lee

Cultural heritage professionals are becoming increasingly concerned about the lack of care being taken by municipalities for their cultural heritage objects which include works of art in public places. They have therefore begun to ask the public to help take care of “their” cultural heritage through so-called public participation projects. Cultural heritage professionals tacitly assume that if they “teach” the public to treasure such objects of “their” heritage, the public will become more proactive in helping to conserve them. However, research being conducted by the authors is showing that a majority of the general public often has a completely different awareness and/or feeling about cultural heritage objects in their neighborhoods than the cultural heritage professionals think they have, or think they should have. Three recent case studies carried out by the authors show that these differences are most noticeable during so-called “value moments” at the beginning and at the perceived end of an object’s life. These are the two moments when decisions are made, usually by cultural heritage professionals, to place an object in a neighborhood or have it significantly changed or removed, often to the surprise and disagreement of the residents. Between these two moments lay many moments when an object is taken for granted, grudgingly accepted, or not even noticed. Given the fact that cultural heritage professionals often make the ultimate decisions and do not always consider or outright ignore public opinion, it should not be surprising that there is an increasingly negative public perception of what they do. The results of the case studies illustrate the need for professionals to consider and accept as valid, public feelings about cultural heritage objects in their neighborhoods.


Author(s):  
Zulmira NÓBREGA ◽  
Alline LIMA

ResumoEste artigo investiga a participação da audiência ativa e crítica na construção e repasse de notícias no âmbito das instituições públicas, com foco no conteúdo produzido pela Assessoria de Comunicação da Reitoria do Instituto Federal de Pernambuco. Foram usados estudos de MATOS (2012), FAUSTO NETO (2016); RECUERO, BASTO E ZAGO (2015); e SHIRKY (2014). A equipe de profissionais envolvida no processo foi entrevistada, explorando o envolvimento do público na produção de conteúdo para as redes. Postagens no Facebook e Instagram foram analisadas para identificar exemplos de colaboração externa. Descobriu-se que a participação do público é tímida, mas ela existe e é incentivada pela instituição. A pesquisa também conclui que o IFPE investe numa comunicação que contribui para a promoção de espaços públicos de debates transparentes, que estimulam a prática da cidadania e fortalecem a democracia.Palavras-chaveJornalismo; Comunicação Pública; Audiência Ativa; Redes Sociais; IFPE.AbstractThis article investigates the participation of active and critical audience in the construction and transfer of news in the scope of public institutions, focusing on the production by Communication Advisory of Instituto Federal de Pernambuco. Studies of MATOS (2012), FAUSTO NETO (2016); RECUERO, BASTO AND ZAGO (2015); and SHIRKY (2014) were used. The team of professionals involved in the process was interviewed, exploring the involvement of the public in the production of content for the networks. Posts on Facebook and Instagram were analyzed to identify examples of external collaboration. It has been found that public participation is timid, but it exists and is encouraged by the institution. The research also concludes that IFPE invests in a communication that contributes to the promotion of public spaces of transparent debates that stimulate the practice of citizenship and strengthen democracy.KeywordsJournalism; Public Communication; Active Audience; Social Networks; IFPE.


Author(s):  
Lindsey Fransen ◽  
Antonio La Vina ◽  
Fabian Dayrit ◽  
Loraine Gatlabayan ◽  
Dwi Andreas Santosa ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 477-487
Author(s):  
Taylor M. Lampe ◽  
Sari L. Reisner ◽  
Eric W. Schrimshaw ◽  
Asa Radix ◽  
Raiya Mallick ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 55-76
Author(s):  
Jodie Gil ◽  
Jonathan L Wharton

This qualitative analysis of public participation in Connecticut open meetings highlights how Connecticut communities adjusted when the state’s open meeting law was temporarily revised under emergency order during COVID-19. A survey of officials in 95 municipalities found a majority had the same or more participation in budget deliberations during that time. Only about a quarter saw decreased public participation. A closer look at four communities highlights specific challenges and successes during the sudden shift in public meetings. Connecticut’s varied forms of government give multiple perspectives, which can provide insight for other communities looking to expand virtual access to open meetings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document