scholarly journals EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF INTRA-ARTICULAR HYALURONIC ACID IN ATHLETES WITH ARTICULAR LESIONS: A MULTICENTER, PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Author(s):  
Jordi Puigdellívol Grifell ◽  
Juan Pérez Estévez ◽  
Enrique Herrera Otto ◽  
Jordi Marcos ◽  
Mindaugas Gudelis

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a novel intra-articular formulation of hyaluronic acid (HA) to treat athletes with articular lesions. Methods: Multicenter, prospective, interventional, observational study analyzing the clinical evolution of athletes who received 2 or 3 intra-articular injections of HA. The study was scheduled in Visit 1 (week 0), Visit 2 (week 1), Visit 3 (week 2), Visit 4 (week 3), and Visit 5 (end of follow up, week 24). The change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of pain and in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the rate of return to physical activity were evaluated upon treatment initiation for up to 24 weeks. The incidence of adverse events was recorded throughout the study. Results: Sixty patients were recruited: 28 (46.7%) in the 2-injection group and 32 (53.3%) in the 3-injection group. Mean VAS gradually decreased across the visits, with statistically significant reductions in both groups from Visit 2 to Visit 3 and to Visit 5 (P < 0.0001). Inter-group differences in the change in VAS from Visit 2 to Visit 5 were statistically comparable (P = 0.8271). At Visit 5, the KOOS of all subscales statistically improved in both treatment groups. At the end of follow-up (Visit 5), 75.9% of patients returned to sport in the overall population. Only one patient reported an adverse event. Conclusion: This novel formulation of HA is effective and safe for at least 24 weeks, resulting in a promising treatment option for athletes with articular lesions.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1485.3-1485
Author(s):  
F. Carubbi ◽  
A. Alunno ◽  
P. Cipriani ◽  
V. Pavlych ◽  
C. DI Muzio ◽  
...  

Background:Over the last 2 decades rituximab (RTX) has been widely used, albeit off-label, in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS). Several studies reported that B-lymphocyte depletion with RTX is effective in this disease not only by reducing disease activity but also by affecting the inflammation and the lymphoid organization that occur in target tissues. With the recent release of several RTX biosimilars (bRTX) on the market, the demonstration of their interchangeability with RTX originator (oRTX) is required.Objectives:To compare efficacy and safety of oRTX and bRTX in pSS patients in a real-life setting.Methods:Clinical records of pSS patients referring to a tertiary rheumatology clinic were retrospectively evaluated. Patients having received at least 2 courses of either oRTX or bRTX (1000 mg IV infusion, repeated after 2 weeks -1 course- and the course repeated after 24 weeks) with complete data at baseline and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment were enrolled. Disease activity was assessed with the EULAR SS disease activity index (ESSDAI) and its clinical version without the biological domain (ClinESSDAI). Patient-reported symptoms were assessed with the EULAR SS Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI).Results:Seven patients that received oRTX and 7 patients that received bRTX were enrolled. Baseline clinical features, including ESSDAI and ESSPRI were similar in the 2 treatment groups. Both compounds significantly reduced ESSDAI and ESSPRI as early as 3 months and no difference between the groups was observed at any time point (Figure 1). Of interest, ESSDAI slowly decreased until month 6 when the most pronounced reduction was observed. Conversely, ESSPRI dropped to its lowest values already at month 3. With regard to safety, at 12 months of follow-up no adverse event was observed in any of the treatment groups.Conclusion:At 12 months of follow-up, oRTX and bRTX display similar efficacy and safety profiles. The improvement of patient reported outcomes is faster than the improvement of disease activity with both compounds. Our data support interchangeability of oRTX and bRTX in pSS.References:[1]Carubbi F et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15(5):R172[2]Carubbi F et al. Lupus. 2014;23(13):1337-49Figure 1 ESSDAI and ESSPRI values at every time point in the 2 treatment groups. Asterisks indicate p values <0.05 compared to the other treatment group at the same time pointDisclosure of Interests:Francesco Carubbi Speakers bureau: Francesco Carubbi received speaker honoraria from Abbvie and Celgene outside this work., Alessia Alunno: None declared, Paola Cipriani Grant/research support from: Actelion, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Actelion, Pfizer, Viktoriya Pavlych: None declared, claudia di muzio: None declared, Roberto Gerli: None declared, Roberto Giacomelli Grant/research support from: Actelion, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Roche, Actelion, BMS, MSD, Ely Lilly, SOBI, Pfizer


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah T. Gold ◽  
David L. Weinstein ◽  
Gerhardt Pohl ◽  
Kelly D. Krohn ◽  
Yi Chen ◽  
...  

Purpose. Determine patient-reported reasons for discontinuation with teriparatide.Methods. Patients taking teriparatide in a multicenter, prospective, and observational study were given three questionnaires: baseline, follow-up questionnaire 1 (QF1, 2 to 6 months), and follow-up questionnaire 2 (QF2, 12 months). Discontinuation reported at QF1 and QF2 was defined as “early” and “late,” respectively, and remaining patients were considered persistent. Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to identify factors associated with discontinuation.Results. Side effects, concern about improper use, injection difficulties, and several patient-perceived physician issues were associated with early discontinuation. Low patient-perceived importance of continuing treatment, side effects, difficulty paying, and low patient-perceived physician knowledge were associated with late discontinuation. The most common specific reasons selected for discontinuing treatment were “concerns about treatment outweighing the benefits” (n=53) and “difficulty paying” (n=47).Conclusions. Persistence with teriparatide is dependent on managing side effects, addressing financial challenges, proper training, and obtaining support from the healthcare provider.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Carles Subirà-Pifarré ◽  
Cristina Masuet-Aumatell ◽  
Carlos Rodado Alonso ◽  
Ricardo Medina Madrid ◽  
Cosimo Galletti

Prescription of implant treatments is very widespread at present, mainly due to the low rate of annual loss and, to date, few studies have assessed their survival in the routine clinical practice of dentistry. The purpose of this observational study was to evaluate the effectiveness of dental implants with a calcium-phosphate surface in the daily practice of dental clinics. A multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, observational study was performed, in which three experienced practitioners (one maxillofacial and two oral surgeons) inserted implants using standard external and internal hexagon connections in adult patients requiring ≥1 osseointegrated implants to replace missing teeth. Follow-up was performed for 24 months after implant loading. Two hundred and twelve subjects were included (51.5% men), with a mean age of 51.2 ± 11.90 years, in whom 544 implants were inserted. 87.2% of the patients received 1–4 implants. The preferred connection system was internal hexagon (73.5%). There were nine failures, with an interval survival rate (ISR) at 24 months of 100% and a cumulative survival rate (CSR) of 98.3%. In conclusion, implants with a modified calcium-phosphate surface are associated with a high rate of survival and may be considered a method of choice in clinical practice.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e026323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Tinschert ◽  
Frank Rassouli ◽  
Filipe Barata ◽  
Claudia Steurer-Stey ◽  
Elgar Fleisch ◽  
...  

IntroductionNocturnal cough is a burdensome asthma symptom. However, knowledge about the prevalence of nocturnal cough in asthma is limited. Furthermore, prior research has shown that nocturnal cough and impaired sleep quality are associated with asthma control, but the association between these two symptoms remains unclear. This study further investigates the potential of these symptoms as markers for asthma control and the accuracy of automated, smartphone-based passive monitoring for nocturnal cough detection and sleep quality assessment.Methods and analysisThe study is a multicentre, longitudinal observational study with two stages. Sensor and questionnaire data of 94 individuals with asthma will be recorded for 28 nights by means of a smartphone. On the first and the last study day, a participant’s asthma will be clinically assessed, including spirometry and fractionated exhaled nitric oxide levels. Asthma control will be assessed by the Asthma Control Test and sleep quality by means of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. In addition, nocturnal coughs from smartphone microphone recordings will be labelled and counted by human annotators. Relatively unrestrictive eligibility criteria for study participation are set to support external validity of study results. Analysis of the first stage is concerned with the prevalence and trends of nocturnal cough and the accuracies of smartphone-based automated detection of nocturnal cough and sleep quality. In the second stage, patient-reported asthma control will be predicted in a mixed effects regression model with nocturnal cough frequencies and sleep quality of past nights as the main predictors.Ethics and disseminationThe study was reviewed and approved by the ethics commission responsible for research involving humans in eastern Switzerland (BASEC ID: 2017–01872). All study data will be anonymised on study termination. Results will be published in medical and technical peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT03635710; Pre-results.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6570-6570
Author(s):  
Rosella Hermens ◽  
Lydia Francisca Jacoba van Overveld ◽  
Robert P. Takes ◽  
Jozé C.C. Braspenning ◽  
Ludi E Smeele ◽  
...  

6570 Background: Providing patient-centred care is an essential component of high quality integrated care. A method to get insight in patients perspectives about the quality of health care they received, is measuring Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs). We aimed to determine the outcomes of, and differences between PROs and PREs over time and between treatment groups for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Methods: Patientswere recruited from nine hospitals participating in the DHNA. Validated questionnaires were distributed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up. Included PROMs were EuroQol 5 Dimension 3 Level (EQ-5D-3L), EORTC QLQ-C30 and -H&N35. Included PREMs, Consumer Quality index for Oncologic care (CQO) and Radiotherapeutic care (CQR), have similar domains with different questions. With descriptive analysis, ANOVA and mixed model analysis, differences over time and between treatment groups were analyzed. Results: Questionnaires were filled in by 426 patients. Pain decreased significantly at 6 and 12 months follow-up (14 and 21 points on a scale of 0-100) and dry mouth increased significantly at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up compared to baseline (35, 27 and 20 points). Sticky Salvia, problems with social eating and sense problems increased at 3 and 6 months follow-up, but were similar to the baseline score at 12 months follow-up. Pain and sticky saliva differed between radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy or surgery and radiotherapy respectively (p≤0.05). Regarding the CQO domain scores, all treatment groups differed significantly from each other (p≤0.05), especially for the domain Personal input. There was no difference regarding the CQR domain scores. Recognizing the emotional side of HNC and guidance after the treatment scored low in patients. Conclusions: This study gives clues to improve healthcare according the experiences of the patient and we can predict more carefully the outcomes of the patients with different treatment types. PROMs according to the ICHOM criteria and PREMs are promising for measuring and improving quality and personalization of HNC care. However, recognizing the emotional side of HNC and intensifying guidance after the treatment period needs improvement.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 196-196
Author(s):  
Donald A. Richards ◽  
Maen A. Hussein ◽  
Steven L. McCune ◽  
Brian Kent Ulrich ◽  
Mark D. Danese ◽  
...  

196 Background: There is a paucity of data describing the effect of treatment on symptom burden and health status for patients with ED-SCLC receiving care in US community oncology centers. This study explores ED-SCLC patient-reported outcomes independently for either first-line (1L), second-line (2L) or third-line (3L) therapy. Methods: CA209-118 is a prospective observational study of adult patients with lung cancer, including patients with ED-SCLC, in 70 US community practices enrolled between 2014-2017. Participants completed the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) and Euro-QoL 5-D (EQ-5D) utility index and visual analog scale (VAS) at the start of 1L, 2L, or 3L treatment and at follow-up visits. The LCSS is summarized in 3 scales: LCSS total scale which ranges from 0 – 100, average symptom burden scale (ASBI) ranging from 0 – 100, and a three-item global scale (3-IGI) ranging from 0 – 300 (lower scores reflect reduced burden). The EQ-5D scale is a preference based measure of health status with higher scores reflecting better quality and ranges from 0 to 1.0 (index) or 0 – 100 (VAS). LCSS and EQ-5D values at 60 days were predicted in a repeated measures model for patients having a score at baseline and at least 1 follow-up. Results: The mean LCSS and EQ-5D scores at the start of each line of therapy and predicted 60 day change are presented in the table . 60-day improvement was observed only for appetite and cough in 1L. A slight declining trend was seen in 2L and 3L. Conclusions: Patients with ED-SCLC treated in the community reported a high symptom burden at the start of each line of therapy which did not diminish throughout 60 days of treatment. [Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2362-2362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Vij ◽  
Surhud Khare ◽  
Samuel Perez ◽  
Sergey Popov ◽  
Clara Chen

Abstract Introduction: PREAMBLE (Prospective REsearch Assessment in multiple Myeloma: an oBservationaL Evaluation) is an ongoing, prospective, multinational, non-interventional observational study to collect information from medical records regarding treatment and diagnostic procedures. By analyzing these data, a better understanding can be gained of the real-world effectiveness of novel agents used in treating relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and their impact on patient-reported outcomes. This analysis was performed to evaluate comorbidities, treatment patterns, and survival in a PREAMBLE subpopulation that included US patients with MM. Methods: US patients aged ≥18 years with RRMM, ≥1 prior therapy, and initiating treatment with an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), proteasome inhibitor (PI), or IMiD+PI within 90 days before or 30 days after study enrollment (index therapy) were identified from PREAMBLE. Data were collected at the index healthcare provider visit and every 3 (Year 1) and 6 (Years 2-3) months (mo) over 3 years or until the end of patient follow-up. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics and included age, sex, International Staging System (ISS) stage, type of visits and hospitalizations, disease status, line of therapy, and concomitant disorders. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier techniques. MM-specific survival was calculated using Cumulative Incidence Function. Results: 239 patients (median age 66 years; 56% male) were enrolled. At the time of data cut-off (7 December 2015), 124 (52%) were still in the study and 115 (48%) had disenrolled, including 71 (62%) who had disenrolled due to death. Median follow-up was 12.0 mo (range, 0.5-37.7). At study entry, 178 (74%) patients had relapsed MM; 140 had ISS stage assigned, with 28% (n=39), 26% (n=36), and 46% (n=65) for Stage I, II, and III disease, respectively. Median time to index therapy since initial diagnosis was 39.6 mo (range, 4.8-174.2). Cardiovascular disease (CVD) was the most common comorbidity (62%) and other comorbidities were highly prevalent as well (Table). At enrollment, most patients were receiving a PI (n=136, 57%; carfilzomib n=68/136, 50%) or an IMiD (n=63, 26%; pomalidomide n=29/63, 46%); 40 patients (17%) were receiving an IMiD+PI (carfilzomib and/or pomalidomide n=11/40, 28%). Median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1-10). The overall median PFS was 7.9 mo, with a median PFS for second-line, third-line, and fourth- or greater line of 15.4, 9.0, and 6.9 mo, respectively. Median OS has not yet been reached. 18-mo all-cause mortality was 31.1% (95% CI 24.9-38.5), while 18-mo MM-related mortality was 22.3% (95% CI 16.2-28.4), meaning that at 18 mo, approximately 8.8% of patients died due to non-MM-associated causes (Figure). Death rates were independent of comorbidities and number of lines of prior therapy. A strong association was found between disease status and rate of death: refractory disease was associated with higher death rates (hazard ratio 1.92; 95% CI 1.16-3.16), while sex and ISS stage showed weak association with death rates. Conclusions: The progressively shorter PFS with each successive treatment regimen reflects ongoing development of drug resistance. In this preliminary survival analysis of US patients, the majority of deaths resulted from MM. This finding demonstrates the need for additional treatment options for treating RRMM. CVD was highly prevalent as a comorbidity across all lines of treatment. Figure Figure. Disclosures Vij: Jazz: Consultancy; Karyopharma: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Popov:PAREXEL: Employment. Chen:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment.


1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-232
Author(s):  
Gisela Peters

This study investigates the effects of four different imagery techniques: pleasant imagery versus imaginative transformations, and response versus stimulus imagery. One may expect imaginative transformations to be more effective than pleasant imagery. Response imaginative transformations should be more effective than stimulus imaginative transformations, while the pleasant imagery conditions are not expected to have different effects. In a 2x2 design, treatment conditions were compared. Forty patients (33 females, seven males) with different types of chronic headache were referred by their physicians and took part in the study. Pain diaries and questionnaires of pain experience and pain behaviour were used as outcome measures. Imaginative transformations - irrespective of response or stimulus orientation - were found to be more effective than pleasant imagery in reducing headache frequency. Reductions remained stable over an eight-month follow-up. There are no significant differences between response and stimulus imagery. Treatment effects were manifested in a reduction of headache frequency, while headache duration and headache intensity did not change. Suffering and avoidance behaviours were reduced in all treatment groups, while the use of distraction strategies was increased. The reductions in suffering were significantly greater in the groups treated with imaginative transformations. In the eight-month follow-up, group differences in reductions in suffering were no longer significant, which is probably due to the reduced sample size. The results support the hypothesis that a cognitive redefinition is responsible for the beneficial treatment effects because only instructions to imagine a change in pain sensations and/or pain responses led to significant improvements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document