Study to Learn More About the Benefits and Side-effects of Drugs Rivaroxaban and Apixaban Compared to the Drug Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Rapid and Irregular Heartbeat Which is Not Due to a Heart-valve Fault (Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation) in the UK Routine Clinical Practice

Author(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 573
Author(s):  
Raffaele De Caterina ◽  
Young-Hoon Kim ◽  
Yukihiro Koretsune ◽  
Chun-Chieh Wang ◽  
Takeshi Yamashita ◽  
...  

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants such as edoxaban are the standard of care for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The Global Edoxaban Treatment in routiNe clinical prActice (ETNA)-AF program integrates prospective, observational, noninterventional regional studies from Europe, Japan, and other Asian countries, collecting data on patient characteristics and clinical outcomes in unselected patients treated with edoxaban for stroke prevention in AF. Overall, 26,823 patients completed a 1-year follow-up and were treated with edoxaban; either 60 or 30 mg once daily. The majority (82.6%) of patients received the recommended doses according to the local label. At baseline, the median (interquartile range) age was 75 (68, 80) years, the CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.0 (2.0, 4.0), and the hypertension, abnormal renal and liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs, or alcohol (HAS-BLED) score was 2.0 (2.0, 3.0). At one year, there were 273 (1.12%/year) major bleeding events, including 75 (0.31%/year) intracranial hemorrhages and 140 (0.57%/year) major gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds. There were 214 ischemic strokes (0.87%/year). Mortality was 3.03%/year (745 deaths), and cardiovascular mortality accounted for 40% of all deaths (1.22%/year, 299 cardiovascular deaths). In conclusion, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and other major bleeding events were low in patients with AF treated with edoxaban in routine care. Even on anticoagulation, cardiovascular death remained common.


2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (03) ◽  
pp. 527-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Rietbrock ◽  
Jonathan M. Plumb ◽  
Arlene M. Gallagher ◽  
Tjeerd P. van Staa

SummaryThe objective of this study was to evaluate the rate of stroke associated with aspirin and warfarin in routine clinical practice. The study included patients aged 40+ with chronic atrial fibrillation (cAF) registered in the UK General Practice Research Database. The outcome was the rate of stroke during current, past and no use of aspirin and warfarin. The study included 51,807 cAF patients. There was no difference in the rate of stroke between current and past use of aspirin (relative rate [RR]=1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 – 1.15]), while the rate of stroke was reduced during current warfarin use compared to past use (RR=0.62 [95% CI 0.54 – 0.71]). For warfarin, a pattern of lower rates of stroke during current exposure and higher rates with past exposure was seen only in patients treated for at least 6–12 months. For aspirin, no changes in the rates of stroke were observed with discontinuation of aspirin. The effectiveness of warfarin was dependent on the level of anticoagulation, with optimal risk reduction occurring within the recommended international normalised ratio (INR) range of 2.0 to 3.0. The proportion of patients achieving a stable INR within the target therapeutic range was at its lowest during the first three months of warfarin treatment. In conclusion, the results of this study support the effectiveness of warfarin treatment to reduce the rate of stroke in cAF patients in the general clinical practice setting, however the risk reduction is lower than that reported in clinical trials.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Mihajlovic ◽  
A Mihajlovic ◽  
M Marinkovic ◽  
V Kovacevic ◽  
L Vajagic ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and purpose Amiodarone is commonly use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but the organ toxicity side effects limit its long-term use. We investigated the rates of and reasons for permanent amiodarone discontinuation among patients with AF in contemporary clinical practice. Methods A single-centre, ongoing, registry-based observational longitudinal study included consecutive AF patients prescribed with amiodarone in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2017. All patients underwent a loading protocol of 400–600 mg of amiodarone daily for 1–2 weeks, followed by 200–400mg daily for 4–8 weeks and 200mg daily or 1000mg weekly thereafter. Results Of 657 AF patients taking amiodarone (Mean age 62.2±11.0, female n=215 (32.6%), hypertension n=504 (76.7%), diabetes mellitus n=107 (16.3%), coronary arterial disease n=139 (19.8%), History of Myocardial infarction 86 (13.1%), Stroke/TIA 60 (9.1%), chronic kidney disease 157 (23.9%)), the drug was permanently discontinued in total of 248 patients (37.7%). The reasons for amiodarone discontinuation are shown in Figure. On multivariable Cox-regression analysis, physician's decision (HR 5.6; 95% CI 3.9–7.9, p<0.001) and amiodarone side effects (HR 3.9; 95% CI 2.9–5.1, p<0.001) were significantly associated with permanent amiodarone discontinuation. The overall time to discontinuation was 23.2±24.1 months. Compared with others, time to discontinuation was shorter in patients post AF ablation (17.3±21.3 vs 24.5±24.5, p=0.05), longer in those with AF progression (29.2±31.0 vs 20.9±20.3, p=0.014) and similar in patients with amiodarone side effects (23.7±17.7 vs 23.0±26.8, p=0.813). Pulmonary toxicity and proarrhythmia were not observed among study patients (Figure). Chart 1 Conclusion Our study showed that permanent discontinuation of amiodarone in contemporary clinical practice was due to the drug side effects in 12% of amiodarone-treated AF patients, occurring after a mean 2-year treatment course. The most prevalent side effect was thyroid dysfunction, whereas the prevalence of proarrhythmic effect was low. Notably, physician's fear of complications (which may not always be justified), also was an independent driver of permanent amiodarone discontinuation. More data are needed to inform optimal amiodarone use in AF patients in daily practice.


BMC Neurology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Tanislav ◽  
Sonja Milde ◽  
Sabine Schwartzkopff ◽  
Nicole Sieweke ◽  
Heidrun Helga Krämer ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (05) ◽  
pp. 783-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darae Ko ◽  
Christina L. Cove ◽  
Elaine M. Hylek

SummaryWorldwide there is a tremendous need for affordable anticoagulants that do not require monitoring. The advent of the non-warfarin oral anticoagulant drugs represents a major advance for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). The objectives of this review are to 1) identify gaps in our current knowledge regarding use of these single target anticoagulant drugs; 2) outline the potential implications of these gaps for clinical practice, and thereby, 3) highlight areas of research to further optimise their use for stroke prevention in AF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document