scholarly journals UNDER & POSTGRADUATES NURSING STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION WITH ACADEMIC ADVISING MANAGEMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shreen Gaber Mohammed ◽  
Shreen Gaber Mohammed
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Academic Advising ◽  
Students Satisfaction

Nursing students' satisfaction with the curriculum: An integrative review

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 648-661
Author(s):  
Silvia Rossini ◽  
Giampiera Bulfone ◽  
Ercole Vellone ◽  
Rosaria Alvaro
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Integrative Review ◽  
Students Satisfaction

scholarly journals Nursing Students’ Satisfaction: A Comparison between Medium- and High-Fidelity Simulation Training

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 804
Author(s):  
Ana Rosa Alconero-Camarero ◽  
Carmen María Sarabia-Cobo ◽  
María José Catalán-Piris ◽  
Silvia González-Gómez ◽  
José Rafael González-López
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Lower Cost ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
Satisfaction Scale ◽  
Clinical Simulation ◽  
Level Of Knowledge ◽  
Spanish Universities ◽  
Students Satisfaction ◽  
Better Than

Training based on clinical simulation is an effective method of teaching in nursing. Nevertheless, there is no clear evidence about if it is better to use high- or medium-fidelity simulation. The aim is to analyse if students are more satisfied when their clinical simulation practices are based on high-fidelity simulation (HFS) or medium-fidelity simulation (MFS). Students´ satisfaction was assessed using the Satisfaction Scale Questionnaire with High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation. The sample is composed of 393 students from two Spanish Universities. Satisfaction with simulation in nursing students is significantly greater in MFS than HFS. Simulation is beneficial for learning in all its forms, but for the acquisition of basic skills, and at a lower cost, MFS proves to be effective. However, high-fidelity is not always better than medium-fidelity as this depends on the student’s level of knowledge and clinical experience.

scholarly journals Comparing the capacity of nurses and nursing students in assessing patient problems during clinical internship: A descriptive comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Mariella Dammiano ◽  
Sandra Scalorbi ◽  
Manuela De Rosa ◽  
Domenica Gazineo ◽  
Paolo Chiari
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Functional Patterns ◽  
Clinical Internship ◽  
Clinical Cases

Objective: No studies were found in the literature which compared the capacity of nurses and nursing students to assess patient problems using the clinical cases followed during internship. Therefore, the aim of this study was to formulate a method for comparing these skills in cases followed during a practical clinical internship.Methods: The sample studied was made up of students of the degree course in nursing during their internship and by community nurses, both trained in using assessment. Each student identified a patient and carried out an assessment of the problems according to the functional patterns of M. Gordon; the nurses also simultaneously carried out the same activity without comparing their work with that of the students. A method was formulated for evaluating the correctness of the two evaluations.Results: The results relative to the assessment showed a percentage of correctness of 85.77% for the students and 91.28% for the nurses with a statistically significant difference (p = .027).Conclusions: The results obtained demonstrated that the students in the last year of their degree course in nursing had developed a good capacity of assessment during their internship in clinical practice in the community in line with the capacity of the nurses who taught them.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document