scholarly journals Key Intervention Categories to Provide Person-Centered Dementia Care: A Systematic Review of Person-Centered Interventions

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Wiebke Mohr ◽  
Anika Rädke ◽  
Adel Afi ◽  
David Edvardsson ◽  
Franka Mühlichen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Psychosocial Interventions ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Person Centered Care ◽  
Centered Care

Background: Person-centered care (PCC) is an important concept in many countries’ national guidelines and dementia plans. Key intervention categories, i.e., a taxonomy of person-centered (PC)-interventions, to provide person-centered dementia care, are difficult to identify from literature. Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify and categorize published PC-interventions into key intervention categories to guide the provision of person-centered dementia care. Methods: Conduct of this systematic review followed Cochrane guidelines. A search of the dimensions ‘Dementia’, ‘Person-Centered Care’, and ‘Intervention’ combined was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Study selection was based on 2-stage screening against eligibility criteria, limited to controlled study designs. Information about interventions and outcomes was extracted into an “Effects Table”. The identified PC-interventions were categorized in intervention categories to provide person-centered dementia care. Results: Searches identified 1,806 records. 19 studies were included. These covered a range of psychosocial interventions, oftentimes multi-component interventions, which followed heterogeneous approaches. Studies were conducted in long-term care/hospital settings. Nine key intervention categories were identified: social contact, physical activities, cognitive training, sensory enhancement, daily living assistance, life history oriented emotional support, training and support for professional caregivers, environmental adjustments, and care organization. Conclusion: Our findings provide a current overview of published PC-interventions in dementia, which followed heterogeneous approaches under the PCC-concept. The heterogeneity made it challenging to identify a well-defined concept of PCC and common key intervention categories. An effectiveness-evaluation of “PC”-including “relationship-centered”-interventions may be valuable, to assess whether an explicit focus on relationships around PCC-interventions yields an added benefit. PROSPERO-ID: CRD42021225084.

scholarly journals Person-Centered Care in Persons Living with Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Hee Lee ◽  
Ji Yeon Lee ◽  
Bora Kim
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cognitive Function ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Clinical Excellence ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Person Centered Care ◽  
Centered Care

Abstract Background and Objectives The concept of person-centered care has been utilized/adapted to various interventions to enhance health-related outcomes and ensure the quality of care delivered to persons living with dementia. A few systematic reviews have been conducted on the use of person-centered interventions in the context of dementia care, but to date, none have analyzed intervention effect by intervention type and target outcome. This study aimed to review person-centered interventions used in the context of dementia care and examine their effectiveness. Research Design and Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. We searched through five databases for randomized controlled trials that utilized person-centered interventions in persons living with dementia from 1998 to 2019. Study quality was assessed using the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The outcomes of interest for the meta-analysis were behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD) and cognitive function assessed immediately after the baseline measurement. Results In total, 36 studies were systematically reviewed. Intervention types were: reminiscence, music, and cognitive therapies, and multisensory stimulation. Thirty studies were included in the meta-analysis. Results showed a moderate effect size for overall intervention, a small one for music therapy, and a moderate one for reminiscence therapy on BPSD and cognitive function. Discussion and Implications Generally speaking, person-centered interventions showed immediate intervention effects on reducing BPSD and improving cognitive function, although the effect size and significance of each outcome differed by intervention type. Thus, healthcare providers should consider person-centered interventions as a vital element in dementia care.

scholarly journals Working Conditions Supporting Person-Centered Care of Persons Living with Dementia in Long-Term Care Homes

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 962-962
Author(s):  
Marie Savundranayagam ◽  
Susan Docherty-Skippen ◽  
Shalane Basque
Keyword(s):  
Working Conditions ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Support Person ◽  
Personal Support ◽  
Person Centered Care ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the importance of person-centered dementia care and working conditions that support such care in long-term care (LTC) home settings. Personal support workers (PSWs), known also as certified nursing assistants, provide the most direct formal care for persons living with dementia. However, little is known about the working conditions that enable person-centered care. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to examine the working conditions and the impact of those conditions on PSWs in LTC homes. PSWs (N=39) employed at one of five LTC homes in southwestern Ontario, Canada participated in a series of one-hour focus groups before, during, and after Be-EPIC, a person-centred communication training program for formal caregivers of persons living with dementia. Using an interpretive description investigative framework, textual data from focus group conversation transcripts were open-coded into categories. Overarching themes were interpreted inductively. Study credibility was enhanced through investigator triangulation. Three themes emerged related to working conditions of PSWs: dementia care is complex, lack of trained staff to provide person-centered dementia care, and residents’ families are not situated in the residents’ care circle. Four themes emerged related to the impact of current working conditions of PSWs: occupational burnout, poor resident care, frustrated and disengaged families, and PSWs leave their role. The findings offer opportunities for employers to ameliorate working conditions to support person-centered care. We conclude with specific workplace recommendations that respond to the complexity of dementia care and the associated occupational stresses PSWs experience in the current LTC environment.

scholarly journals Person-Centered Dementia Care: Workforce and Organizational Supports in Nursing Homes

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 669-669
Author(s):  
Jennifer Morgan ◽  
Elisabeth Burgess ◽  
Yun-Zih Chen
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Organizational Strategies ◽  
Institutional Practices ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Person Centered Care ◽  
Leadership Engagement ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Care Facilitators

Abstract Person-centered care that supports choice and autonomy of residents is foundational to implementing high quality care for long-term care residents including those living with dementia. Organizational change that supports person-centered approaches requires leadership engagement and a stable, well-qualified dementia-capable workforce. This paper uses survey data from a statewide probability sample of nursing homes and their staff (N=438) to identify barriers and facilitators to person-centered care. Findings show key barriers to delivering person-centered care, including a lack of staff empowerment practices and irregular use of consistent assignment. While most organizations are implementing some person-centered resident care practices, few have moved beyond predominantly institutional practices. Staff stability and retention also remain key barriers to person-centered care. Facilitators include adoption of evidence-based and inclusive quality improvement strategies. The paper will discuss implications for state, community and organizational strategies for improving staff empowerment, integrating dementia care competencies, promoting culture change and increasing leadership engagement.

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF GPS' KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDE ABOUT PERSON CENTRED CARE

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 567-570
Author(s):  
Radost Assenova ◽  
Levena Kireva ◽  
Gergana Foreva
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Patient Empowerment ◽  
Patient Relationship ◽  
Preliminary Assessment ◽  
Doctor Patient Relationship ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Family Doctors ◽  
Person Centered Care ◽  
Centered Care

Introduction: The European definition of WONCA of general practice introduces the determinant elements of person-centered care regarding four important, interrelated characteristics: continuity of care, patient "empowerment", patient-centred approach, and doctor-patient relationship. The application of person-centred care in general practice refers to the GP's ability to master the patient-centered approach when working with patients and their problems in the respective context; use the general practice consultation to develop an effective doctor–patient relationship, with respect to patient’s autonomy; communicate, set priorities and establish a partnership when solving health problems; provide long-lasting care tailored to the needs of the patient and coordinate overall patient care. This means that GPs are expected to develop their knowledge and skills to use this key competence. Aim: The aim of this study is to make a preliminary assessment of the knowledge and attitudes of general practitioners regarding person-centered care. Material and methods: The opinion of 54 GPs was investigated through an original questionnaire, including closed questions, with more than one answer. The study involved each GP who has agreed to take part in organised training in person-centered care. The results were processed through the SPSS 17.0 version using descriptive statistics. Results: The distribution of respondents according to their sex is predominantly female - 34 (62.9%). It was found that GPs investigated by us highly appreciate the patient's ability to take responsibility, noting that it is important for them to communicate and establish a partnership with the patient - 37 (68.5%). One third of the respondents 34 (62.9%) stated the need to use the GP consultation to establish an effective doctor-patient relationship. The adoption of the patient-centered approach at work is important to 24 (44.4%) GPs. Provision of long-term care has been considered by 19 (35,2%). From the possible benefits of implementing person-centered care, GPs have indicated achieving more effective health outcomes in the first place - 46 (85.2%). Conclusion: Family doctors are aware of the elements of person-centered care, but in order to validate and fully implement this competence model, targeted GP training is required.

Evidence for person-centred care in chronic wound care: A systematic review and recommendations for practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (Sup9b) ◽  
pp. S1-S22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgina Gethin ◽  
Sebastian Probst ◽  
Jan Stryja ◽  
Natalia Christiansen ◽  
Patricia Price
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Wound Healing ◽  
Chronic Wounds ◽  
Chronic Wound ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Patient Knowledge ◽  
Person Centered Care ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Recommendations For Practice ◽  
The Impact

Background Chronic wounds affect an estimated 2.21 per 1000 population. They are a significant source of morbidity and affect individuals physically, psychologically, socially and financially. Person-centered care is one approach to improve patient outcomes in wound care as it values patients' perspectives, beliefs and autonomy and considers the person as a whole within the cultural context in which care is provided. Aim We aimed to review the evidence on the use of person-centered care (PCC) in chronic wound care management and provide recommendations for practice and future research. Method Using a systematic review methodology, we searched six databases for full-text papers from 2009–2019 published in peer-reviewed journals with no limits on language. Results Eighteen articles on studies involving 3149 patients from nine countries were identified. Studies were conducted under three broad intervention categories: healthcare professional education (n=1); patient education (n=14) and telemedicine (n=3). Studies were equally focused on prevention and treatment of chronic wounds. Significant improvements were reported in patient knowledge, pain and self-care behaviours. Only two studies evaluated the impact on wound healing and one study estimated the cost of implementing person-centered care. Conclusions The evidence base to support PCC in wound management is developing and based on our review has shown improved outcomes in areas of pressure ulcer prevention, patient satisfaction, patient knowledge and quality of life, but clinical outcomes such as wound healing were less well explored. Further research with more objective outcome measures are required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document