scholarly journals Rural Household Resource Allocation

1970 ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Joseph Faris
Keyword(s):  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Family Size ◽  
Household Income ◽  
Rural Households ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Rural Household ◽  
Ecological Zones ◽  
Household Resource Allocation ◽  
Permanent Residency ◽  
Household Resource

This study is a survey of rural households in Lebanon, covering ten families in each of four villages and representing different human and ecological zones in this country. The four villages are Maad {Jubail, Mt. Lebanon}, Sa'adin {Akkar}, Ain-Zebdeh {Beka'a}, Hassin (Kesrouan, Mt. Lebanon). The ten families were studied in depth, on the basis of family size, permanent residency, employment of head household, income, and land ownership.

Effectiveness of non-farm diversification on rural household income – evidence and policy implications from India

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shreya Kapoor ◽  
Sanjeev Kapoor
Keyword(s):  
Household Income ◽  
Rural Households ◽  
Rural Household ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Sample Survey ◽  
Indian States ◽  
Farm Sector ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Farm Diversification ◽  
Household Incomes

Purpose Doubling farming households’ income through occupational diversification to the non-farm sector has been advocated to be of paramount importance in an agrarian economy such as India. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the effects of non-farm activities on rural household incomes in four different Indian states by using a propensity score matching technique and developing an endogenous switching model. Design/methodology/approach The research is based on secondary data taken from four quinquennial rounds of employment and unemployment surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organization. Findings The matching results indicate a maximum monthly rise in per capita income of Rs. 60 in Gujarat and a minimum increase of Rs. 18 in Rajasthan among rural households employed in the non-farm sector as compared to the farm sector. The findings confirm that rural non-farm structural diversification cannot be viewed as a blueprint for increasing rural household incomes in different states. Further, it suggests the need to segmenting the different states on the basis of agricultural development for increasing rural incomes. Research limitations/implications The study argues that Indian states with a strongly developed farm sector i.e. Gujarat and Punjab are not ideally suited to undergo structural changes in their economic pursuit. The estimates suggest that the transition of rural households from farm to non-farm-sector activities is a very weak strategy in agriculturally developed states of Gujarat and Punjab, whereas non-farm diversification becomes a pivotal strategy for increasing rural household incomes in less agriculturally developed states such as Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. A contrasting point that arises from these evidence is that although diversification to the non-farm sector leads to higher income, but the resultant figures are very scanty. Originality/value The present study contributes to the existing literature by providing evidence and policy implications on rural non-farm diversification in India and its impact on the rural household income. The study can help the policymakers in framing policies aiming at increasing the income of the rural household through the structural transition of the rural economy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document