scholarly journals USAGE OF PARAMEDIAN APPROACH FOR CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CATHETER INSERTION TECHNIQUE AND COMPLICATION

2022 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ananta Bonar ◽  
Dahril
Keyword(s):  
Bowel Perforation ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Catheter Insertion ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Insertion Technique ◽  
Exit Site Infection ◽  
Drainage Problem ◽  
Esrd Patients

Objective: This study aims to review the usage and complication of paramedian approach for CAPD catheter insertion. Material & Methods: This is a retrospective study. All ESRD patients ongoing CAPD at the Dialysis Clinic of Zainoel Abidin General Hospital in Aceh, Indonesia between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2018 were included in the present study. Complication outcomes included mechanical and infectious complications are documented and reviewed. Results: A total of 190 ESRD patients had been performed CAPD catheter insertion using paramedian approach in this period. Out of these patients, complication occurred in 31 cases (16.32%). All the complication that occurred in this study are 5 cases of leakage (2.63%), 9 cases of infection (4.74%), 8 cases of drainage problem (4.21%), 9 cases of malposition (4.74%), and no case of bowel perforation. From total of 9 cases of infections, 1 patient had peritonitis from the catheter insertion. The other infection was exit site infection. Conclusion: CAPD catheter insertion using paramedian approach is safe with low complication rates. It could decrease post-operative complications and can be recommended for CAPD catheter insertion technique due to its safety.

A modified laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis insertion technique, the ‘one scar technique’ can minimise short and long term complications: A retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982096197
Author(s):  
Aya Musbahi ◽  
Venkatesh Kanakala
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Catheter Insertion ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Insertion Technique ◽  
Catheter Migration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Modification Technique ◽  
Post Modification

Introduction: Peritoneal dialysis is a renal replacement therapy that has advanced in technique over the last few decades. In this study, we describe a novel method for laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion and fixation and compare its outcome to standard laparoscopic insertion technique with better cosmetic outcome. Method: Peri-operative and follow up data was collected retrospectively for 184 patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion from September 2012 to September 2018. Results: The post-modification technique showed no difference in catheter blockage rates, incisional hernia or catheter replacement rates. A significant difference was found in catheter migration rate and exit site infections and overall complication rates, found to be lower using the new technique. Conclusion: A modification of the laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis technique is superior to standard laparoscopic insertion with a cosmetically more appealing outcome due to one visible.

Outcomes of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Left in Place after Kidney Transplantation

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 651-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saúl Pampa-Saico ◽  
Fernando Caravaca-Fontán ◽  
Víctor Burguera-Vion ◽  
Víctor Diéz Nicolás ◽  
Estefanía Yerovi-León ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Exit Site Infection

No clear consensus has been reached regarding the optimal time to remove the peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) after kidney transplantation (KT). This retrospective observational study, conducted in a single peritoneal dialysis (PD) unit including all PD patients who received a KT between 1995 - 2015, was undertaken to evaluate the clinical outcomes and potential complications associated with a PDC left in place after KT. Of the 132 PD patients who received a KT, 20 were excluded from the study. Of the remaining, 112 (85%) patients with functioning KT were discharged with their PDC left in place and had it removed in a mean interval of 5 ± 3 months after KT, after achieving optimal graft function. During this follow-up period, 7 patients (6%) developed exit-site infection and there were 2 cases (2%) of peritonitis; all of them were successfully treated. Delayed PDC removal after KT is associated with low complication rates, although regular examination is needed so that mild infections can be detected early and therapy promptly instituted.

Laparoscopic Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement with Chest Wall Exit Site for Neonate with Stoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anh Ta ◽  
Saurabh Saxena ◽  
Faidah Badru ◽  
Ashley Sang Eun Lee ◽  
Colleen M. Fitzpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Chest Wall ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Exit Site Infection ◽  
Glue Injection ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted

Neonates requiring peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters have been shown to have complication rates up to 70%. The presence of a concurrent stoma significantly increases the risk of peritonitis, exit-site infection, and catheter failure. As such, multiple techniques have been proposed to reduce these risks, including a chest wall exit site. In this case, the patient was born with bilateral hypoplastic kidneys and an anorectal malformation, requiring a colostomy soon after birth. At 4 weeks of life, he required placement of a PD catheter for dialysis. Given the high risk of infection, a laparoscopic-assisted PD catheter placement with a chest wall exit remote from the colostomy was performed. This report describes the operative technique including omentectomy, placement of a percutaneous stitch between the catheter cuffs, and fibrin glue injection around the catheter. The patient had no catheter-related infections. Laparoscopic-assisted PD catheter placement with chest wall exit site is a safe alternative in patients with any type of abdominal stoma.

Modification of the percutaneous approach to peritoneal dialysis catheter placement under peritoneoscopic visualization: clinical results in 78 patients.

1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-107
Author(s):  
N S Nahman ◽  
D F Middendorf ◽  
W H Bay ◽  
R McElligott ◽  
S Powell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Seldinger Technique ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Dialysis Access ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Exit Site Infection ◽  
Percutaneous Approach ◽  
Tunnel Infection

The placement of percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheters under direct peritoneoscopic visualization is a relatively new technique for establishing peritoneal dialysis access. In this study, in which a modification of the Seldinger technique was used to facilitate the placement of the peritoneoscope, the experience with 82 consecutive catheterization procedures in 78 patients is reported. In 2 (2.4%) of 82 catheterization procedures, we were unable to enter the peritoneal cavity but experienced no other complications unique to the percutaneous approach. Of the 80 successful catheterization procedures, 76 represented first-time catheter placement and constituted a population subjected to life-table analysis examining catheter survival rates, the time to first cutaneous exit site or s.c. tunnel infection, and the time to first episode of peritonitis. After a follow-up period of 50.1 patient yr, 11 catheters were lost because of catheter dysfunction. Other clinical complications included peritoneal fluid leaks at the cutaneous exit site in 11 instances (0.22/patient yr), cutaneous exit site infection in 7 instances (0.14/patient yr), s.c. tunnel infection in 2 instances (0.04/patient yr), and 34 episodes of peritonitis (0.68/patient yr). The results of this study demonstrate that the suggested modification of the percutaneous placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters, under peritoneoscopic visualization, is a viable method for establishing peritoneal access.

scholarly journals Selective Infracolic Omentecomy and Fixation Reduces Complications after Laparoscopic Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement

2018 ◽  
Vol I (1) ◽  
pp. 06-11
Author(s):  
Andries Ryckx
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
P Value ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Exit Site Infection ◽  
Catheter Survival ◽  
Catheter Obstruction ◽  
Infracolic Omentectomy

Introduction Peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) provides a competitive alternative to hemodialysis (HD). Long-term catheter survival remains challenging and techniques are not standardized. Advanced laparoscopic placement with fixation and omentectomy might increase catheter survival. The goal of our study was to evaluate if selective infracolic omentectomy and fixation reduced complications after CAPD catheter placement. Materials and Methods A prospective database of patients with CAPD catheter placement from March 2004 to March 2015 was analyzed. All procedures were performed laparoscopically assisted and under general anesthesia by a single surgeon. 78 patients were included, there were no exclusion criteria. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS. Fisher exact test and log-rank test with calculation of P-value was executed. P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results Of the 78 patients who underwent catheter placement, 53 (68%) were males and 25 (32%) were females. The mean age was 54 (ranged from 13 to 88 years). Selective infracolic omentectomy was performed in 32 patients if the momentum reached beyond the promontory. Non-resorbable sutures to fix the catheter were applied in 33 patients. The average duration of peritoneal dialysis was 21 months (range from ten days to 84 months). Omentectomy significantly reduced the incidence of catheter obstruction (3 vs. 11%, P=0.028) but not of catheter dislocation (19 vs. 30%, P=0.101). Omentectomy did not significantly increase the incidence of peritonitis (22 vs. 31%,P=0.133) or exit-site infection (16vs 17%, P=0.238). Catheter fixation with non-resorbable sutures reduced catheter dislocation (21 vs. 23%, P=0.226) and catheter obstruction( 12 vs.17%,P=0.223) with a significant reduction of peritonitis (15 vs. 29%, P=0.044) and no effect on exit-site infection (15 vs. 17%,P=0.251). Conclusion Laparoscopic PD catheter placement with selective omentectomy and fixation of the catheter to the abdominal wall is safe and feasible and leads to fewer complications. Key words: peritoneal, dialysis, catheter, complications, laparoscopy, omentectomy.

scholarly journals Peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion surgery and management

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 97-99
Author(s):  
Kazunari Yoshida ◽  
Daisuke Ishii
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Catheter Insertion ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Less Invasive Surgery ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Less Invasive ◽  
Access Surgery ◽  
Dialysis Discontinuation

Peritoneal access surgery is the first step to achieve successful peritoneal dialysis. It is important to perform easy, safe, and less invasive surgery of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. Secure peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion will lead to less infection, that is, exit site, tunnel infection, and peritonitis, which sometimes result in peritoneal dialysis discontinuation. To avoid these undesirable results, we should perform good and proper peritoneal dialysis insertion surgery. In this article, we describe peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion surgery and its management.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Peritoneal Dialysis: Outcomes and Infectious Complications

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenq-Wen Huang ◽  
Kuan-Yu Hung ◽  
Chung-Jen Yen ◽  
Kwan-Dun Wu ◽  
Tun-Jun Tsai
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Age And Gender ◽  
Exit Site Infection ◽  
Technique Survival ◽  
And Gender

Objective Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the most common secondary glomerulonephritis resulting in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among young adults in Taiwan. Studies of the infectious complications and outcomes among such SLE patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) are limited. Design A retrospective age- and gender-matched case control study. Setting A university teaching hospital. Patients There were 23 SLE patients with ESRD receiving PD for more than 3 months during the past 15 years. Another 46 age- and gender-matched non-SLE nondiabetic patients receiving PD were selected as the control group in this study. Intervention All patients underwent PD as renal replacement therapy and were regularly followed up at this hospital. Main Outcome Measures Technique survival and incidences of exit-site infection (ESI) and peritonitis in these patients. Results The SLE patients had a lower predialysis serum albumin than the control group (3.16 ± 0.50 g/dL vs 3.52 ± 0.50 g/dL, p < 0.01). The incidences of exit-site infection (ESI) and peritonitis were higher for SLE patients than for control patients ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis indicated that SLE patients had shorter time intervals to first infectious complications, and poorer technique survival. Infection was the major cause of dropout and mortality in the SLE patients. The SLE patients had a reduced chance of receiving a renal transplant. The use of steroids by SLE patients was associated with a higher incidence of peritonitis ( p = 0.04), but association with ESI was insignificant. In a Cox regression model, the underlying SLE was the only risk factor for technique failure and time interval to first infectious complication. Conclusion SLE patients undergoing PD are more susceptible to infection than age- and gender-matched non-SLE nondiabetic patients and have poorer technique survival. Systemic lupus erythematosus itself may further compromise the immunity of uremic patients.

scholarly journals Geographical Variation in Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion and Initiation within the United States

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 691-693
Author(s):  
Achint Patel ◽  
Harshil Shah ◽  
Shanti Patel ◽  
Girish N. Nadkarni ◽  
Jaime Uribarri
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Geographical Variation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Catheter Insertion ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
The West ◽  
Esrd Patients

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an effective but underutilized renal replacement therapy modality. There are limited data regarding geographical variation in PD catheter insertion and utilization of PD as a first renal replacement therapy in the United States. We explored the variation in catheter insertion and initiation of PD utilizing 2 large, nationally representative databases. The incidence of catheter insertion differed significantly by geographical region, being highest in the South (7.30/100 end-stage renal disease [ESRD] patients; 95% confidence [CI] interval 6.78 – 7.81) and lowest in the West (5.91/100 ESRD patients; 95% CI 5.43 – 6.38). Peritoneal dialysis initiation also differed by region, being highest in the West (7.10/100 ESRD patients; 95% CI 6.83 – 7.30) and lowest in the Northeast (5.12/100 ESRD patients; 95% CI 4.87 – 5.30). Interestingly, the Northeast region, with the lowest rate of PD utilization, had the highest number of nephrologists per population (3.95/100,000 persons), and the West, with the highest PD utilization, had the lowest number of nephrologists (2.54/100,000 persons). Reasons for this variation should be explored further and efforts should be made to standardize PD implementation throughout the United States.

scholarly journals Advanced Laparoscopic Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Badri M. Shrestha ◽  
Donna Shrestha ◽  
Avneesh Kumar ◽  
Alice Shrestha ◽  
Simon A. Boyes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Catheter Survival ◽  
Catheter Obstruction ◽  
Advanced Laparoscopy

BackgroundThe optimal methodology of establishing access for peritoneal dialysis (PD) remains controversial. Previously published randomized controlled trials and cohort studies do not demonstrate an advantage for 1 technique over another. Four published meta-analyses comparing outcomes of laparoscopic versus open PD catheter (PDC) insertion have given inconsistent conclusions and are flawed since they group basic and advanced laparoscopy together. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to examine whether advanced laparoscopic interventions consisting of rectus sheath tunneling and adjunctive procedures produce a better outcome than open insertion or basic laparoscopy used only to verify the catheter position.MethodsA literature search using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Database was performed, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.5 software (Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK). Outcomes evaluated incidence of catheter obstruction, migration, pericannular leak, hernia, infectious complications (peritonitis and exit-site infection) and catheter survival.ResultsOf the 467 records identified, 7 cohort studies, including 1,045 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. When advanced laparoscopy was compared with open insertion, a significant reduction was observed in the incidence of catheter obstruction (odds ratio [OR] 0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03 – 0.63; p = 0.01), catheter migration (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.06 – 0.26; p = 0.00001), pericannular leak (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11 – 0.64; p = 0.003), and pericannular and incisional hernias (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09 – 0.94; p = 0.04), as well as better 1- and 2-year catheter survival (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28 – 0.97; p = 0.04 and OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28 – 0.92; p = 0.03, respectively). Compared with basic laparoscopy, catheter obstruction and migration were significantly lower in the advanced laparoscopic group, whereas catheter survival was similar in both groups. All outcomes, except catheter obstruction, were similar between the basic laparoscopy and open insertion. The infectious complications such as peritonitis and exit-site infections were similar between the 3 groups.ConclusionsAdvanced laparoscopy was associated with a significant superior outcome in comparison with open insertion and basic laparoscopy.

Randomized Prospective Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Wright ◽  
Khalid Bel'eed ◽  
Brian F. Johnson ◽  
David W. Eadington ◽  
Leslie Sellars ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Catheter Insertion ◽  
Renal Unit ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Catheter Survival ◽  
Conventional Procedure ◽  
Prospective Comparison ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Objective To compare laparoscopic and conventional peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion with respect to post operative discomfort, complication rates, and catheter survival. Design Randomized prospective study. Setting Tertiary referral renal unit. Patients Fifty patients commencing peritoneal dialysis. Intervention Catheters were implanted laparoscopically or by a conventional surgical technique. Main Outcome Measures The duration of surgery, hospital stay, pain scores, and analgesic requirements were recorded. Complications (early/late) and catheter survival were compared. Results The conventional procedure was faster than the laparoscopic (14.3 vs 21.9 minutes, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in any other parameter assessed. Conclusions The data suggest that the insertion techniques are equivalent, and that laparoscopic insertion does not reduce early complication rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document