scholarly journals Koncepcja koprodukcji wiedzy a tworzenie polityki oparte na dowodach. Analiza literatury przedmiotu

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1(29)) ◽  
pp. 107-124
Author(s):  
Wojciech Gędek

W ostatnich latach pojęcie koprodukcji wiedzy zyskuje na znaczeniu. Wyrażenie to pozostaje jednak niejasne, podobnie jak jego związek z nurtem tworzenia polityki publicznej opartego na dowodach naukowych (evidence-based policy). Niniejszy artykuł, mający charakter przeglądowy, ma na celu przedstawienie, w jaki sposób, w wybranych publikacjach ważnych z punktu widzenia debaty naukowej na ten temat, rozumiana jest koprodukcja wiedzy. W tym - jak przedstawiane są role podmiotów uczestniczących w procesie koprodukcji wiedzy, a także jak kształtuje się związek między koprodukcją wiedzy a evidence-based policy. Analiza literatury umożliwia m.in. stwierdzenie, że koprodukcja wiedzy traktowana jest przez jej badaczy zarówno jako partycypacyjne podejście metodologiczne, jak i rozwiązanie instytucjonalne służące lepszej implementacji polityki.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Hahn ◽  
David Lagnado ◽  
Stephan Lewandowsky ◽  
Nick Chater

The present crisis demands an all-out response if it is to be mastered with minimal damage. This means we, as the behavioural science community, need to think about how we can adapt to best support evidence-based policy in a rapidly changing, high-stakes environment. This piece is an attempt to initiate this process. The ‘recommendations’ made are first stabs that will hopefully be critiqued, debated and improved.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Pfaff ◽  
Christopher P. Guzelian

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Garrett

Advancing evidence-based policy change is a leadership challenge that nurses should embrace. Key tips to ensure that evidence-based policy changes are successful at the individual, community, and population levels are offered to help nurses through the change process. The public trust in the nursing profession is a leverage point that should be used to advance the use of evidence, expedite change, and improve health for students and across communities.


Author(s):  
Kathryn Foti ◽  
Randi E. Foraker ◽  
Pamela Martyn-Nemeth ◽  
Cheryl A.M. Anderson ◽  
Nancy R. Cook ◽  
...  

Implementation of prevention policies has often been impeded or delayed due to the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with hard clinical outcomes (eg, incident disease, mortality). Despite the prominent role of RCTs in health care, it may not always be feasible to conduct RCTs of public health interventions with hard outcomes due to logistical and ethical considerations. RCTs may also lack external validity and have limited generalizability. Currently, there is insufficient guidance for policymakers charged with establishing evidence-based policy to determine whether an RCT with hard outcomes is needed before policy recommendations. In this context, the purpose of this article is to assess, in a case study, the feasibility of conducting an RCT of the oft-cited issue of sodium reduction on cardiovascular outcomes and then propose a framework for decision-making, which includes an assessment of the feasibility of conducting an RCT with hard clinical outcomes when such trials are unavailable. We designed and assessed the feasibility of potential individual- and cluster-randomized trials of sodium reduction on cardiovascular outcomes. Based on our assumptions, a trial using any of the designs considered would require tens of thousands of participants and cost hundreds of millions of dollars, which is prohibitively expensive. Our estimates may be conservative given several key challenges, such as the unknown costs of sustaining a long-term difference in sodium intake, the effect of differential cotreatment with antihypertensive medications, and long lag time to clinical outcomes. Thus, it would be extraordinarily difficult to conduct such a trial, and despite the high costs, would still be at substantial risk for a spuriously null result. A robust framework, such as the one we developed, should be used to guide policymakers when establishing evidence-based public health interventions in the absence of trials with hard clinical outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document