scholarly journals Understanding of Professional Ethics Among a Sample of Medical Practitioners in Bangladesh

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-175
Author(s):  
MU Jahan ◽  
SMM Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Medical Ethics ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Dhaka City ◽  
Medical Studies ◽  
Ethical Practice ◽  
Medical Practitioners ◽  
Ethical Knowledge

Background: Ethical practice not only protects the rights of patients but is also a safeguard of medical practitioners. But, practicing medical ethics among the Bangladeshi health care professionals are not at a satisfactory level. Objectives: The study was aimed to assess the level of understanding regarding medical ethics among the health care professionals. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted among registered 400 doctors of tertiary care hospitals and general practitioners in Dhaka City during June 2016 to January 2017. A non-probability sampling method was used for selecting the medical colleges, hospitals, institutions, medical university and general practitioners from the different areas of Dhaka city. A self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection assuring confidentiality and anonymity. Ethical approval was obtained from the National Research Ethics Committee (NREC) of Bangladesh Medical Research Council (BMRC) and from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the American University of Sovereign Nations (AUSN). The collected data were analysed through SPSS software, windows, version 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R programming language. Results: Of the 400 respondents, 68.0% were male. Mean (±SD) age of them was 30 (±6.5) years. About 93.0% respondents had only a MBBS degree and 65.0% were medical officers. About 38.0% respondents have below 5 years of clinical experience. Highest number of respondents got ethical information from book, second highest from lectures and then general text. About 32.0% respondents got ethical knowledge from one source. About 97.0% respondents agreed that medical ethics should be included in both undergraduate and postgraduate medical studies and 90.0% of them know only about theHippocratic Oath. Very few of them knew the Nuremberg Code (16.0%) and Helsinki Declaration (16.0%).Only 27.0% participants said that they never face any ethical problems in their clinical practice. About 75.0% reported that ethical practice is important in workplace. About 35.0% respondents have a very little knowledge and 46.0% have average knowledge on ethical law. Conclusion: Findings of the study indicate that ethical knowledge of the respondents is not satisfactory although they realise that it is important in clinical practice and should include both undergraduate and graduate medical studies. Also need to develop practice in the workplace by law and legislations according to the guidelines of Bangladesh Medical & Dental Council (BMDC) and Bangladesh Medical Association (BMA). Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2020; 46(3): 168-175

scholarly journals Development and Process Evaluation of a 5-Week Exercise Program to Prevent Falls in People after Stroke: The FALLS Program

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. R. van Duijnhoven ◽  
D. De Kam ◽  
W. Hellebrand ◽  
E. Smulders ◽  
A. C. H. Geurts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Fall Prevention ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Falls Prevention ◽  
Common Complication

Falls are a common complication after stroke, with balance and gait deficits being the most important risk factors. Taking into account the specific needs and capacities of people with stroke, we developed the FALLS program (FALL prevention after Stroke), based on the “Nijmegen falls prevention program” (a proven-effective 5-week exercise program designed for community-dwelling elderly people). The program was tested in twelve community-dwelling persons with stroke, and a process evaluation was conducted with patients, trainers, health care professionals, and managers. The FALLS program was considered suitable and feasible by people with stroke in the study and relevant health care professionals, and recommendations for implementation in clinical practice have been suggested.

scholarly journals Medical Ethics in Clinical Practice in Nepal: Challenges and Way Forward

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
Shristi Raut ◽  
Anand Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Medical Ethics ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Undergraduate Curriculum ◽  
Medical Professionals ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Treatment Providers ◽  
Level Of Knowledge ◽  
Hospital Ethics

Ethics for health care professional have many components. Among them, medical ethics is one of the important but neglected component which deals with issues related to confidentiality, beneficence and non-maleficence between health care providers and stake holders. Four basic principles of medical ethics are autonomy, justice, beneficence and non- maleficence which form the foundation of ethical clinical practice. The level of knowledge on medical ethics that medical students receive during the training is meagre and inadequate. In recent years, clinical practice has become more challenging. This is primarily due to increased opposition, aggression and violence against medical professionals at health care settings. As a result, the gap between clinicians and patients is increasing leading to diminishing trust and real/perceived allegations. In addition, the widening gap between doctors and patients has provided a space for middle men/broker to meddle, oppose and flare up the violence against treatment providers. Doctors and other medical professionals have been increasingly facing such challenges leading to circumspection in their practice, despondence, psychosocial trauma and depression. There is an urgent need of incorporation of medical ethics in undergraduate curriculum and independent hospital ethics committee consisting of experts from the hospital and outside to monitor and provide rational reasons to minimize such challenges.

Paradoxes of Practice Guidelines, Professional Expertise, and Patient Centeredness: The Medical Care Triangle

2018 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Michele Issel
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Health Care Organizations ◽  
Professional Expertise ◽  
Work Processes ◽  
Patient Centeredness ◽  
Medical Practitioners ◽  
Delivery Of Medical Care

The coexistence of institutionalized evidence-based practice guidelines, professional expertise of medical practitioners, and the patient centeredness approach form a triangle. Each component of this Medical Care Triangle has characteristics that create paradoxes for health care professionals and their patients. The value of a paradox lies in uncovering and utilizing the contradiction to better understand the underlying organizational phenomenon. Method: Following Poole and van de Ven’s (1989) suggested approaches to resolving paradoxes, each paradox of the Medical Care Triangle is defined and analyzed. Results: A total of 10 paradoxes related to practice guidelines, professional expertise, and patient centeredness are revealed. The resolution of each paradox yields insights specific to structuring health care organizations in ways that support the delivery of medical care. Implications: The results renew an emphasis on the centrality of practitioners’ work processes to health care organizations; this has potential benefits for organizations, clinicians/employees, and patients.

scholarly journals The evaluation of knowledge and activities of primary health care professionals in promoting breast-feeding

Medicina ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giedra Levinienė ◽  
Aušra Petrauskienė ◽  
Eglė Tamulevičienė ◽  
Jolanta Kudzytė ◽  
Liutauras Labanauskas
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Breast Feeding ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Breast Feed ◽  
Primary Health Care Centers ◽  
Health Care Centers

The objective of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and activities of Kaunas primary health care center professionals in promoting breast-feeding. Material and methods. A total of 84 general practitioners and 52 nurses participated in the survey, which was carried out in Kaunas primary health care centers in 2006. Data were gathered from the anonymous questionnaire. Results. Less than half of general practitioners (45.1%) and 65% of nurses were convinced that baby must be exclusively breast-fed until the age of 6 months, but only 21.6% of general practitioners and 27.5% of nurses knew that breast-feeding with complementary feeding should be continued until the age of 2 years and longer. Still 15.7% of general practitioners and 25% of nurses recommended pacifiers; 7.8% of general practitioners advised to breast-feed according to hours. Half of the health professionals recommended additional drinks between meals; onethird of them – to give complementary food for the babies before the age of 6 months. One-third (29.6%) of the health professionals surveyed recommended mothers to feed their babies more frequently in case the amount of breast milk decreased. Conclusions. The survey showed that knowledge of medical personnel in primary health care centers about the advantages of breast-feeding, prophylaxis of hypogalactia, and duration of breast-feeding was still insufficient.

May We Support Your Decision?

1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Medical Decision Making ◽  
Electronic Patient Record ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Technical Developments

Expert systems to support medical decision-making have so far achieved few successes. Current technical developments, however, may overcome some of the limitations. Although there are several theoretical currents in medical artificial intelligence, there are signs of them converging. Meanwhile, decision support systems, which set themselves more modest goals than replicating or improving on clinicians' expertise, have come into routine use in places where an adequate electronic patient record exists. They may also be finding a wider role, assisting in the implementation of clinical practice guidelines. There is, however, still much uncertainty about the kinds of decision support that doctors and other health care professionals are likely to want or accept.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document