scholarly journals Superiority of Siriraj Stroke Score Over Guy’s Hospital Score in Diagnosing Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke at Bedside

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-146
Author(s):  
Raseul Kabir ◽  
Md Amjad Hossain Pramanik ◽  
SM Emdadul Haque ◽  
Muhatarima Tabassum ◽  
Fateha Sultana
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Kappa Statistic ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: The clinical diagnosis of stroke in a patient admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) is undeniably challenging. Several point-based risk scores have been developed to predict clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke. Objective: To assess the Siriraj stroke score and Guy’s Hospital stroke score in the clinical diagnosis of acute stroke. Materials and Methods: All patients were subjected to Computed tomography (CT) scan head within 72 hours of admission. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value was calculated for both the scores. Comparability between the scores and CT scan head finding was determined with the help of Kappa statistic program. Results: Sensitivity of Guy’s Hospital stroke score for ischemic stroke is 100%, specificity is 96.4%, accuracy 97.1%, positive predictive value of 87.5% and negative predictive value 100%. The sensitivity of Guy’s Hospital stroke score for hemorrhage stroke is 96.4%, specificity is 100%, accuracy 97.1%, positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value 87.5% Conclusion: Siriraj stroke score as a simple method of screening patients for intracerebral hemorrhage, as it is easier to use at bedside and has a greater accuracy in diagnosing hemorrhage than Guy’s Hospital score. KYAMC Journal. 2021;12(3): 142-146

scholarly journals Comparison of Clinical Diagnosis of Stroke with Computed Tomographic Scan of the Brain

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-101
Author(s):  
Sirajee Shafiqul Islam ◽  
Aminur Rahman ◽  
Md Manzur Alahi ◽  
Md Ahmed Ali ◽  
Md Kafiluddin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
The Brain

Background and purpose: Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in both developed as well as developing countries. The clinical presentation of stroke depending on the site and extent of lesions. For the management purpose it is important to know whether we are dealing with a bleed or an infarct. Methodology: Computed Tomography (CT scan) is available most of the tertiary level hospitals in Bangladesh. This study was carried out to compare clinical diagnosis of stroke with Computed tomography (CT) scan findings in ascertaining the type of stroke (hemorrhagic or ischemic). Materials and methods: This cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in the Department of Neurology, Rajshahi Medical College Hospital during the period of January 2010 to December 2010. Total 200 stroke patients were selected by purposive sampling technique on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria as the study sample. . CT brain scan was done for all the patients. The clinical diagnosis was compared with the results of CT scan and performance test was done. Results: Clinically 67 patients were diagnosed as hemorrhagic stroke and 133 patients were diagnosed as ischemic stroke. Out of these 67 hemorrhagic patients CT scan revealed that 56 patients had intracerebral hemorrhage, 5 had infarct, 4 had subarachnoid hemorrhage and 2 had space occupying lesions in the brain. Out of these 133 ischemic patients CT scan revealed that 119 patients had infarction, 6 had intracerebral hemorrhage and 8 had space occupying lesions in the brain. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of clinical diagnosis of hemorrhagic stroke were 90.32%, 92.03%, 83.58%, 92.02% and 91.5% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of clinical diagnosis of ischemic stroke were 95.96%, 81.58%, 89.47%, 92.53% and 90.5% respectively. Conclusion: The diagnosis of stroke in clinically with high accuracy, but perform a CT scan will help to confirm and differentiate to type stroke. Thus CT scan should be done in all cases stroke to specify the diagnosis. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjn.v28i2.17179 Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2012; Vol. 28 (2): 96-101

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS USING ULTRASOUND

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (02) ◽  
pp. 315-321
Author(s):  
Abdullah Hamdan ◽  
◽  
Nasraldeen Alnaeem M. Alkhidir ◽  
Abdelmoneim Saeed ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Histopathological Report

The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is mainly clinical and to confirm the clinical diagnosis ultrasonography (USG) of the abdomen is being used to help in diagnosis of the disease. To find out the role of USG in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in clinically equivocal cases and to correlate USG findings with histopathological reports (HPR) of removed appendix.Total numbers of 100 patients were included in the study from 12March 2019 to 5 December 2019. Findings on ultrasound were finally compared with histopathological report of appendices removed on surgery. Those cases with alternate diagnosis were followed up and proved with other means of investigation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and overall accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in our study were found to be 79 %, 84.20 %, 95.50%, 48.40% and 80% respectively.

381 Role of CT scans of abdomen and pelvis in management of patients with immunotherapy-induced colitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A406-A406
Author(s):  
Juan Ibarra Rovira ◽  
Raghunandan Vikram ◽  
Selvi Thirumurthi ◽  
Bulent Yilmaz ◽  
Heather Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Wall Thickening ◽  
Low Sensitivity ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

BackgroundColitis is one of the most common immune-related adverse event in patients who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1). Although radiographic changes are reported on computed tomography such as mild diffuse bowel thickening or segmental colitis, the utility of CT in diagnosis of patients with suspected immune-related colitis is not well studied.MethodsCT scans of the abdomen and pelvis of 34 patients on immunotherapy with a clinical diagnosis of immunotherapy induced colitis and 19 patients receiving immunotherapy without clinical symptoms of colitis (control) were enrolled in this retrospective study. Segments of the colon (rectum, sigmoid, descending, transverse, ascending and cecum) were assessed independently by two fellowship trained abdominal imaging specialists with 7 and 13 years‘ experience who were blinded to the clinical diagnosis. Each segment was assessed for mucosal enhancement, wall thickening, distension, peri-serosal fat stranding. Any disagreements were resolved in consensus. The degree of distension and the spurious assignment of wall thickening were the most common causes for disagreement. The presence of any of the signs was considered as radiographic evidence of colitis.ResultsCT evidence of colitis was seen in 16 of 34 patients with symptoms of colitis. 7 of 19 patients who did not have symptoms of colitis showed signs of colitis on CT. The sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value for colitis on CT is 47%, 63.2%, 69.5% and 40%, respectively.ConclusionsCT has a low sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value for the diagnosis of immunotherapy-induced colitis. CT has no role in the diagnosis of patients suspected of having uncomplicated immune-related colitis and should not be used routinely for management.Trial RegistrationThis protocol is not registered on clinicaltrials.gov.Ethics ApprovalThis protocol was IRB approved on: 11/16/2015 - IRB 4 Chair Designee FWA #: 00000363 OHRP IRB Registration Number: IRB 4 IRB00005015ConsentThis protocol utilizes an IRB approved waiver of consent.

scholarly journals Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 503
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Monaghan ◽  
Syed N. Rahman ◽  
Christina W. Agudelo ◽  
Alan J. Wein ◽  
Jason M. Lazar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Medical Literature ◽  
Disease Prevalence ◽  
Positive Test Result ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Test Result ◽  
Test Probability

Sensitivity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a positive assignment out of all subjects who are actually positive for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly have the outcome of interest. Specificity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a negative assignment out of all subjects who are actually negative for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly do not have the outcome of interest. Positive predictive value reflects the proportion of subjects with a positive test result who truly have the outcome of interest. Negative predictive value reflects the proportion of subjects with a negative test result who truly do not have the outcome of interest. Sensitivity and specificity are inversely related, wherein one increases as the other decreases, but are generally considered stable for a given test, whereas positive and negative predictive values do inherently vary with pre-test probability (e.g., changes in population disease prevalence). This article will further detail the concepts of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values using a recent real-world example from the medical literature.

Diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect diabetic neuropathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
Sujan Shrestha ◽  
Mamen Prasad Gorhaly ◽  
Manil Ratna Bajracharya
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Perception Threshold ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Vibration Perception ◽  
Monofilament Test

Background Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a significant independent risk factor for diabetic foot, and an effective screening instrument is required to diagnose DPN early to prevent future ulceration and amputation. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir hospital, Mahabouddha, Kathmandu from February 2016 to January 2017. A total of 96 diabetic patients attending inpatient and outpatient Department were selected. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy was assessed by measurement of loss of protective sensation (LOPS) by monofilament test and compared with vibration perception threshold by standard biothesiometer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of monofilament test were calculated. Results The prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy was 26%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of monofilament test were found to be 92.0%, 95.8%, 88.5% and 97.1% respectively. There was strong association between LOPS by monofilament and vibration perception threshold by biothesiometer. Conclusion This study showed a strong diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect DPN when compared with biothesiometer. As monofilament test is a cheap, easily available, and portable, it can be used in the periphery where biothesiometer is not available.  

Abstract TP221: Using Berlin Questionnaire and Epworth Sleepiness Scale to Identify Stroke Patients at Risk for the Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Millene Camilo ◽  
Alan Eckeli ◽  
Heidi Sander ◽  
Regina Fernandes ◽  
Joao Leite ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Epworth Sleepiness Scale ◽  
Berlin Questionnaire ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

Background: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is frequent in the acute phase of stroke. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been found in 62% of stroke patients. The impact of OSA is significant after ischemic stroke, including early neurological deterioration, poor functional outcome and increased long-term mortality. However, performing polysomnography (PSG) for all patients with acute stroke for diagnose OSA is still impracticable. Therefore clinical tools to select patients at higher risk for OSA would be essential. The aim of this study was to determine the validity of the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) to identify stroke patients in whom the PSG would be indicated. Methods: Subjects with ischemic stroke were stratified into high and low risk groups for SDB using a BQ. The ESS ≥ 10 was used to define excessive daytime sleepiness. The BQ and ESS were administered to the relatives of stroke patients at hospital admission. All patients were submitted to a full overnight PSG at the first night after symptoms onset. OSA severity was measured by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Results: We prospectively studied 40 ischemic stroke patients. The mean age was 62 ± 12.1 years and the obstructive sleep apnea (AHI ≥ 15) was present in 67.5%. On stratifying risk of OSA in these patients based on the QB, 77.5% belonged to the high-risk and 50% to the ESS ≥ 10. The sensitivity of QB was 85%, the specificity 35%, the positive predictive value 74% and the negative predictive value 55%. For ESS was respectively 63%, 85%, 89% and 52%. The diagnostic value of the BQ and ESS in combination to predict OSA had a sensitivity of 58%, a specificity of 89%, a positive predictive value of 95% and a negative predictive value of 38%. Conclusions: The QB even applied to the bed-partners of stroke patients is a useful screening tool for OSA.

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF GRAY SCALE ULTRASONOGRAPHY VERSUS COLOR DOPPLER IN SUSPECTED CASES OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahir Iqbal ◽  
Muhammad Usman Shahid ◽  
Ishfaq Ahmad Shad ◽  
Shahzad Karim Bhatti ◽  
Syed Amir Gilani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Gray Scale ◽  
Versus Color ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A common surgical emergency is acute appendicitis. Various diagnostic tools are available to diagnosis acute appendicitis. Radiological investigations play an important role in making accurate and early diagnosis and thus preventing morbidity associated with the disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of gray scale ultrasonography versus color Doppler in suspected cases of acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried in the department of Radiology of Mayo Hospital, Lahore. A total of 75 patients were enrolled of age 18-40 years, both genders who were suspected cases of acute appendicitis. All patients underwent baseline investigations along with gray scale ultrasonography and color Doppler. All patients were subjected to surgery to confirm the diagnosis and findings were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 23.25 ±10.55 and mean transverse diameter of appendix was 8.37 ±3.39. There were 62.7% males and 37.3%females. Findings of gray scale ultrasonography and color Doppler were then correlated with surgical findings to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of these modalities. The results revealed that gray scale ultrasonography sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy was 92.7%, 94.32%, 95%, 91.4% and 93.3% respectively, whereas color Doppler had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 97.7%, 93.9%, 95.3%, 97% and 96% respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of both modalities together was 98.6%. CONCLUSION: Color Doppler has better diagnostic accuracy than gray scale ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis and the combination of both modalities yields diagnostic accuracy that is similar to gold standard.

scholarly journals Comparison of RMI 3 and RMI 4 in pre-operative evaluation of ovarian masses

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 3602
Author(s):  
Badugu Rao Bahadur ◽  
Gangadhara Rao Koneru ◽  
Prabha Devi Kodey ◽  
Jyothi Melam
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Clinical Approach ◽  
Ovarian Mass ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Operative Evaluation ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Final Confirmation

Background: To differentiate ovarian mass as benign or malignant could change clinical approach. Finding a screening and diagnostic method for ovarian cancer is challenging due to high mortality and insidious symptoms. Risk malignancy index (RMI) has the advantage of rapid and exact triage of patients with ovarian mass.Methods: Prospective study carried for 2 years at NRI Medical College and General Hospital, Chinakakani, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India. 79 patients with ovarian mass were investigated and risk malignancy index (RMI-3 and RMI-4) calculated. Final confirmation was done based on histopathological report. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated for RMI 3 and RMI 4 taking histopathology as control and comparison was done.Results: (n=79); 50 (63.29%) cases were benign and 29 (36.70%) were malignant based on histopathology. RMI 4 is more sensitive (68.96%) than RMI 3 (62.06%), but RMI 3 is more specific (94%) than RMI 4 (92%).The positive predictive value of RMI-3 and RMI-4 were 85.71%  and 83.33% respectively. The negative predictive value for RMI-4 and RMI-3 were 83.63% and 81.03% respectively.Conclusions: With increasing age, chance of malignancy increases. RMI 4 was more sensitive than RMI-3, however less specific than RMI 3 in differentiating benign and malignant tumors. The positive predictive value is slightly more for RMI 3, than RMI 4. Negative predictive value is slightly more for RMI 4, than RMI 3. 

Συγκριτική μελέτη της μορφομετρίας κατά τον κλασικό ακτινολογικό έλεγχο (MRX) και της μορφομετρίας με χρήση απορροφησιομετρίας (VFA) στον καθορισμό σπονδυλικών παραμορφώσεων σε οστεοπορωτικούς ασθενείς μετά από κυφοπλαστική

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ευστάθιος Δράμπαλος
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Σκοπός: H εφαρμογή για πρώτη φορά διεθνώς της μορφομετρίας της σπονδυλικής στήλης με χρήση απορροφησιομετρίας (VFA) σε ασθενείς με κυφοπλαστική. Αναλύονται τα πλεονεκτήματα και μειονεκτήματα της μεθόδου, ελέγχεται η αξιοπιστία της και συγκρίνεται με την μορφομετρία κατά τον κλασσικό ακτινολογικό έλεγχο (ΜRΧ) στην εκτίμηση των σπονδυλικών παραμορφώσεων στους συγκεκριμένους ασθενείς.Υλικά και Μέθοδος: Πραγματοποιήθηκαν μετρήσεις σε 42 ασθενείς με κυφοπλαστική λόγω οστεοπορωτικών σπονδυλικών καταγμάτων και αναλύθηκαν οι σπόνδυλοι από τον T4 μέχρι τον L4 με την VFA και την MRX. Μετρήθηκαν το πρόσθιο (ha), μέσο (hm) και οπίσθιο (hp) ύψος του σπονδυλικού σώματος και προσδιορίσθηκαν οι λόγοι ha/hp και hm/hp. Αναλύθηκαν για την VFA η συμφωνία αποτελεσμάτων του ίδιου παρατηρητή (IOA) και η συμφωνία αποτελεσμάτων μεταξύ ανεξάρτητων παρατηρητών (INA) για τους λόγους ha/hp και hm/hp καθώς και για την μέθοδο Genant σε επίπεδο σπονδύλου, ‘περιοχής της σπονδυλικής στήλης (θωρακική/ΘΜΣΣ ή οσφυϊκή/ΟΜΣΣ), σε επίπεδο ‘γειτονικών προς την κυφοπλαστική σπονδύλων’, και σε επίπεδο ‘σπονδύλων με κυφοπλαστική’. Σε κάθε επίπεδο χρησιμοποιήθηκε η μέση τιμή ha/hp και hm/hp. Στη συνέχεια, αναλύσαμε την συμφωνία μεταξύ VFA και MRX στον καθορισμό των λόγων ha/hp και hm/hp καθώς και μετά την διχοτόμηση των λόγων ha/hp περί της τιμής όριο που συνήθως χρησιμοποιείται για τον καθορισμό ενός κατάγματος. Αποτελέσματα: Οι IOA και INA για τους λόγους ha/hp και hm/hp στην VFA ήταν ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ σε όλα τα επίπεδα (ICC 0.94-0.98). Η εφαρμογή της μεθόδου Genant κατά την VFA ανέδειξε επίσης ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ INA (ICC=0.833). Η ανάλυση σε επίπεδο σπονδύλου έδειξε ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ συμφωνία μεταξύ VFA και MRX για τον λόγο ha/hp [intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC=0.85], και ‘ισχυρή συμφωνία’ για τον λόγο hm/hp (ICC=0.78). Για τον λόγο ha/hp η συμφωνία ήταν ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ τόσο στην ΘΜΣΣ (ICC=0.82) όσο και στην ΟΜΣΣ (ICC=0.87), ενώ για τον λόγο hm/hp η συμφωνία ήταν ‘ισχυρή’ στην ΘΜΣΣ (ICC=0.75) και ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ στην ΟΜΣΣ (ICC=0.80). Η συμφωνία ήταν εξίσου ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ σε επίπεδο ‘σπονδύλων με κυφοπλαστική’ (ICC=0.83) όσο και σε επίπεδο ‘γειτονικών προς την κυφοπλαστική σπονδύλων’ (ICC=0.80) για τον λόγο ha/hp. Όταν οι λόγοι ha/hp μετατράπηκαν σε κατάγματα (ναι ή όχι κάταγμα) χρησιμοποιώντας διαφορετικές τιμές κατώφλι για την διάγνωση κατάγματος (λόγοι ha/hp 0.75, 0.80 και 0.85) η συμφωνία μεταξύ των μεθόδων ήταν λιγότερο καλή, από μέτρια έως ουσιώδης (κ 0.52-0.63 στην ΟΜΣΣ και 0.53-0.66 στην ΘΜΣΣ). Χρησιμοποιώντας την κατάταξη Genant οι διαφορές στην ταξινόμηση των σπονδύλων ήταν περισσότερο προς την κατεύθυνση της MRX με 32 αναγνωρισμένα κατάγματα μόνο από την MRX και μόνο 5 μόνο από την VFA. Στη μελέτη αυτή, με επιπολασμό σφηνοειδών σπονδυλικών καταγμάτων 9.3%, οι δείκτες ακρίβειας sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) και negative predictive value (NPV) υπολογίστηκαν σε 0.522, 0.97, 0.87 και 0.92 αντίστοιχα. Συμπεράσματα: Η εφαρμογή της VFA σε ασθενείς με κυφοπλαστική έχει υψηλή επαναληψιμότητα και αναπαραγωγιμότητα. Η συμφωνία μεταξύ VFA και MRX στην εκτίμηση των λόγων ha/hp και hm/hm ήταν από ‘ισχυρή’ έως ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ ανάλογα με το επίπεδο εξέτασης. Η συμφωνία στην αναγνώριση των σπονδυλικών καταγμάτων ήταν μέτρια. Οι διαφορές ήταν περισσότερο προς την κατεύθυνση της MRX. Η υψηλή τιμή του δείκτη NPV της VFA στους ασθενείς με κυφοπλαστική, δείχνει ότι η μέθοδος θα μπορούσε να χρησιμοποιηθεί για τον εντοπισμό αυτών που χρήζουν περαιτέρω ακτινολογικού ελέγχου.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document