scholarly journals Vaginal Delivery versus Elective Caesarean Section for Breech Presentation - Experience in Institute of Child and Mother Health (ICMH)

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Mahe Jabeen ◽  
Sabiha Shimul ◽  
Ummay Salma ◽  
Jebunnesa
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Maternal Morbidity ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction: Compared with a fetus with cephalic presentation, a breech fetus faces increased risk during labour and delivery of asphyxia from cord compression and of traumatic injury during delivery of the shoulders and head. Caesarean section avoids most of this risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of vaginal delivery of uncomplicated singleton breech presentation by evaluating early neonatal morbidity and mortality as well as maternal morbidity following vaginal and caesarean delivery for breech presentation. Materials and Methods: This is a cross sectional comparative study.104 women with singleton breech presentation at term in labour were included consequetively in labour ward of Institute of Child and Mother Health (ICMH). Informed consent was taken from them. Neonatal and maternal outcome were recorded and statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 22. Results: APGAR at 5 min and Neonatal Intensive Care Unite (NICU) admission were not affected by mode of delivery. Long term neonatal outcome is similar in either mode of delivery. Maternal morbidity and duration of hospital stay is increased in caesarean births. Conclusion: Neonatal outcome did not depend on mode of delivery though maternal morbidity and cost of care is increased following Caesarean Section. Proper selection of cases and by improving skill & confidence in new generation obstetrician, vaginal delivery of singleton fetuses in breech presentation at term remains a safe option that can be offered to a woman in a tertiary care centre. Medicine Today 2019 Vol.31(1): 23-26

scholarly journals Breech presentation at term: outcomes and mode of delivery in a tertiary care teaching hospital In South India

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 4111
Author(s):  
Liji David ◽  
Anuja Abraham ◽  
Preethi Navaneethan ◽  
Annie Regi
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Maternal Morbidity ◽  
South India ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
External Cephalic Version ◽  
Clinical Records

The aim of this study was to study the outcomes of all patients who presented with breech presentation at term (≥37 weeks), to assess what percentage of patients were offered External cephalic version (ECV), the rates of success of the procedure and the rates of vaginal delivery following successful ECV. It was a retrospective study of 669 patients diagnosed with breech at term, their clinical records were retrieved and data like age, BMI, parity, type of breech and scan findings noted. ECV was done in 256 patients and was successful in 35.5% of women with 51.1% being multigravidas and 26.8% in primigravidas. 76.9% of women with successful ECV delivered vaginally.  There was no significant fetal or maternal morbidity documented as a result of ECV in this study.  

scholarly journals MODE OF DELIVERY AND ITS IMPACT ON NEONATAL OUTCOMES IN PRETERM INFANTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. e27-e27
Author(s):  
Sarah McKnight ◽  
Bishal Gautam ◽  
Michael Miller ◽  
Bryan S Richardson ◽  
Orlando da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Periventricular Leukomalacia ◽  
Ductus Arteriosus ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Neonatal Outcomes ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract BACKGROUND The optimal mode of delivery for preterm infants remains controversial, and routine Caesarean sections (C/S) are not recommended, except for maternal indications. Nonetheless, many preterm infants are delivered by C/S, particularly those in breech presentation, and recent retrospective data have suggested that these infants may have improved outcomes. OBJECTIVES To examine whether C/S as the mode of preterm delivery is associated with decreased mortality and improved short term outcomes. DESIGN/METHODS This retrospective, population-based cohort study examined infants with a gestational age between 23 0/7 weeks and 32 6/7 weeks, born between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016, and admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at a single Canadian Tertiary Care hospital. Infants with major congenital anomalies were excluded. Data were abstracted from the local Neonatal-Perinatal database for all infants. Two groups, those delivered vaginally and those delivered by C/S, were compared for major neonatal outcomes including the primary outcomes of death and severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), defined as grade 3 or higher. RESULTS A total of 1442 infants met inclusion criteria (784 born by C/S and 658 vaginally). There was no significant difference in neonatal mortality (7.0% vs 7.1%, p=0.925) or severe IVH (6.1% vs 7.4%, p=0.317). There was, however, a significant difference in the incidence of IVH, any grade (19.9% vs 27.5%, p=0.001), which remained after controlling for other significant predictors. There were no other significant differences in the secondary outcomes examined including need for extensive resuscitation, respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, periventricular leukomalacia, or retinopathy of prematurity. CONCLUSION Caesarean section was not associated with decreased mortality in preterm infants, relative to vaginal births. Caesarean section was associated with a reduced rate of IVH (any grade) and there was a trend towards decreased severe IVH which may warrant further study.

scholarly journals Maternal and foetal outcome in elective versus emergency caesarean sections

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1222
Author(s):  
Amit A. Gurunule ◽  
Himangi S. Warke
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Emergency Caesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Emergency Caesarean ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Foetal Outcome ◽  
Tract Infections

Background: Caesarean delivery is defined as the birth of the foetus through an incision in the abdominal wall (i.e. laparotomy) and the uterine wall (hysterotomy). The purpose was to analyze the maternal and foetal outcome in elective versus emergency caesarean sections retrospectively in a tertiary care centre and to analyze the indications of elective versus emergency caesarean sections.Methods: A retrospective observational study of the cases undergoing caesarean sections in KEM hospital, Mumbai, India was carried out during the period of September 2013 to September 2015. Maternal and foetal outcome was studied. The data was collected and analyzed from the maternal medical records. The neonatology records were also examined.Results: Out of the 600 selected patients, 300 patients in each group of elective and emergency caesarean section were studied. The usual indications of emergency caesarean sections were foetal distress, followed by meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) and cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD). The most frequent indicator for elective lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) was patient with previous LSCS not willing for vaginal birth, followed by breech presentation and previous multiple LSCS. There was a significant difference seen in the occurrence of fever, urinary tract infections and wound infections in the two groups. These were more common in the emergency caesarean section group. Significant difference was also seen in the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage in the two groups, which was more in the elective caesarean section group.Conclusions: The maternal morbidity, intra operative and postoperative complications were more in the emergency LSCS group as compared to patients who underwent elective LSCS.

scholarly journals Comparative study of vaginal delivery and caesarean section in antepartum eclampsia at tertiary care hospital

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priti Kumari ◽  
Sipra Singh ◽  
Salma Khatun ◽  
. Shashikar
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Perinatal Mortality ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Multiple Pregnancy ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Sudden Onset ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Maternal Complications

Background: Eclampsia is characterized by the sudden onset of generalized tonic clonic seizures. Eclampsia is usually preceded by a history of the pre-eclampsia but rarely arises in a woman with minimally increased blood pressure and no proteinuria. Eclampsia most commonly occurs in the third trimester, though rarely eclampsia may occur before 20 wks in molar or multiple pregnancy. The aim of the study was to compare maternal and fetal outcome in antepartum eclampsia when terminated by vaginal delivery and caesarean section.Methods: 50 women with eclampsia attending emergency department OBG department of Katihar Medical College, Katihar were collected from Feb 2015 to Sep 2016. Depending upon the mode of delivery, they were divided into two groups, CD group where caesarean section was performed and VD group where vaginal delivery was performed.Results: Of the 50 cases, caesarean section was done in 40% of the cases, while vaginal delivery was carried was carried in 60%.Maternal complications in CD group was 35% and 80% in VD group (p<0.001).The incidence of live births, still birth and neonatal death was 85%, 15%, 0% in CD group and 60%, 40%, 10% in VD group. The corrected perinatal mortality was 50%.Conclusions: Timely caesarean section reduces maternal and perinatal mortality and improves their outcome in antepartum eclampsia.

scholarly journals Personal Preference of Mode of Delivery. What do Urogynaecologists choose? Preliminary Results of the DECISION Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (11) ◽  
pp. 1182-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Bihler ◽  
Ralf Tunn ◽  
Christl Reisenauer ◽  
Jan Pauluschke-Fröhlich ◽  
Philipp Wagner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Pelvic Floor ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Personal Attitude ◽  
Uncomplicated Pregnancy ◽  
Study Participants

Abstract Introduction Currently, almost every third child in Germany is delivered by caesarean section. Apart from straightforward and clear indications for caesarean section which account for approx. 10%, the large proportion of relative indications in particular needs to be critically reviewed if the current C-section rate is to be effectively lowered. It is more than doubtful, however, whether this can be a realistic goal in Germany, especially in the context of international developments. All studies on this topic demonstrate that the personal attitude of the obstetric team has a considerable influence on the pregnant womanʼs personally preferred mode of delivery. Therefore, in the first part of the DECISION study, the personal preferences of urogynaecologists were evaluated regarding the best suitable mode of delivery. Material and Methods All 432 delegates at the 9th German Urogynaecology Congress in Stuttgart in April 2017 were invited to participate in an online questionnaire study. The questionnaire was developed especially for this study. Results Of the 432 registered delegates, 189 (43.8%) participated in the survey. 84.7% (n = 160) of the study participants would prefer a vaginal delivery, in an otherwise uncomplicated pregnancy. Only 12.2% (n = 23) opted for an elective caesarean section. The main reasons stated for this decision were concerns about incontinence (87.5%) and pelvic floor trauma (79.2%). Amongst the study participants, 83.6% would like to be part of a risk stratification system presented in the questionnaire which, with the aid of specific parameters, is intended to allow early identification of a population with a high risk of developing pelvic floor disorders. There was also great interest in postpartum pelvic floor recovery (97.8%) and an associated optional pessary therapy (64.4%). The type of delivery already experienced (vaginal delivery vs. primary caesarean section) and parity also reveals to have a significant influence on the personal preferred mode of delivery as well. Conclusions Urogynaecologists prefer vaginal delivery for themselves. There is a great interest to participate in a risk stratification process in order to approach childbirth in an individualized and risk-adapted manner.

scholarly journals Perinatal determinants of D-dimer levels in a cross-sectional study of low risk pregnant women

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-82
Author(s):  
NM Murphy ◽  
AS Khashan ◽  
DI Broadhurst ◽  
O Gilligan ◽  
K O’Donoghue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
D Dimer ◽  
In Pregnancy

Background To examine perinatal determinants of the antenatal levels of D-dimers. Methods Cross-sectional study of 760 low risk pregnant women recruited into five gestational groups. Variables examined in antenatal groups included maternal age, body mass index, parity, smoking, family history venous thromboembolism (VTE) and previous use of the oral contraceptive pill (OCP). Onset of labour and mode of delivery were also examined in the post-natal group. Results D-dimer levels in group 4 (38–40 + 6) were significantly lower in the women with a history of taking the OCP when compared to those that had not taken it in the past ( P = 0.027). In the day 2 post-natal group, the median level of D-dimer was significantly higher in primparous when compared to multiparous women ( P = 0.015). The median D-dimer levels were significantly lower in the elective Caesarean section group in comparison to spontaneous onset ( P = 0.003) and induction of labour ( P = 0.016). When the mode of delivery was examined, the median D-dimer levels were significantly lower in those that had an elective Caesarean section when compared to normal vaginal delivery ( P = 0.008) and instrumental vaginal delivery ( P = 0.007). Women post elective Caesarean section had a significantly lower D-dimer than those after emergency Caesarean section ( P = 0.008). Discussion There are some significant differences in D-dimer levels when certain perinatal determinants are examined. This work is potentially beneficial to the future diagnosis of VTE in pregnancy as it supports previously published recommended D-dimer levels for the diagnosis of VTE in pregnancy.

scholarly journals The Outcome of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section (VBAC): A Descriptive Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
R Rahman ◽  
NN Khanam ◽  
N Islam ◽  
KF Begum ◽  
HH Pervin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Post Partum ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Lower Segment Cesarean Section ◽  
Medicine Today ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Caesarean

The study, conducted in the tertiary care hospital of Dhaka Bangladesh, describes the outcome of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) in women with a previous caesarean. A prospective study was carried out from 1st January 2007 to 31st December, 2007 on 126 women with one prior lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) for a nonrecurrent cause. All unbooked women and those with estimated fetal weight more than 3.5 kg, breech presentation, history of postoperative wound infection after previous LSCS, anemia (Hb < 10 gm%), pregnancy induced hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, renal disease, cephalopevic disproportion abnormal presentation and placenta praevia were excluded from the study. An informed consent was taken for allowing a trial of vaginal delivery. Spontaneous onset of labor was awaited up to 41 weeks. Induction of labor was considered only in highly selected cases. Labor was constantly supervised by competent staff and meticulously monitored by cardiotocography (CTG). Out of the 126 women enrolled for the study, 26 had to leave the station leaving a total of 100 patients; 72 patients underwent elective repeat C/S, 28 patients (28%) of these underwent trial of labour, among them 15 had successful vaginal delivery (53.57) but 13 patients failed the attempt and had to undergo emergency caesarean section. To assist in the 2nd stage of labour, 6 had ventouse application. In total 85 cases needed repeat caesarean section. Among the cases there was one case of scar dehiscence (6.6%), one case of cervical tear (6.6%), two cases of manual removal of placenta (13.3%), one case of post partum hemorrhage (6.6) and one case of puerperal pyrexia (6.6).Perinatal morbidity was comparable with the elective repeat C/S group. VBAC should be considered in cases of previous one cesarean delivery for nonrecurrent indication. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/medtoday.v25i1.15902 Medicine Today 2013 Vol.25(1): 14-17

scholarly journals Comparative study of early neonatal outcome in low birth weight babies in hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancies with the mode of delivery

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-345
Author(s):  
Sivajyothi Pilli ◽  
Kavitha Bakshi
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Caesarean Delivery ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Survival Advantage ◽  
Hypertensive Disorders ◽  
Significant Difference

Pregnancy induced Hypertension (PIH) is strongly associated with intrauterine fetal growth restriction (IUGR), low birth weight (LBW) and admission to NICU. PIH is not by itself an indication for caesarean delivery. However, the incidence of caesarean is high because of the development of complications in mother and the need to deliver prematurely. To compare the immediate morbidity and survival advantage of LBW vertex presenting babies with the mode of delivery in hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancies. This was a comparative cross-sectional study done on women admitted to the labour ward during the study period with PIH delivering a baby through either a vaginal delivery or a caesarean section with a birthweight of &#60;2.5kgs. A detailed history taking and clinical examination was done. Babies were followed up for one week following delivery to note down the early neonatal outcome. In this study, over all there was no statistically significant difference in neonatal outcome in both vaginal delivery and caesarean section groups. However, there was slight increased incidence of prematurity (68% vs 64%), Birth Asphyxia (14% vs 8%), Sepsis (8% vs 6%), IVH (6% vs 2%) and Hyperbilirubinemia (16% vs 14%) in vaginal delivery group. While, RDS (20% vs 14%) and NEC (4% vs 2%) had higher incidence in caesarean delivery group. Overall, prematurity and IUGR resulting in LBW, contributed to these neonatal complications. Caesarean delivery offers no short-term survival advantage compared with vaginal delivery for LBW vertex presenting foetuses in PIH patients. Neonatal outcomes are not worsened by spontaneous or induced vaginal delivery in women with hypertension with good control and also decreases morbidity due to caesarean section to the mother.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Maternal and Fetal Stress Hormones During the Process of Birth

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Burcu Kisa Karakaya ◽  
Ozlem Moraloglu ◽  
Rahime Bedir Findik ◽  
Necati Hancerliogullari ◽  
Hatice Celik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Response ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Umbilical Cord ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Normal Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Singleton Pregnancy ◽  
Beta Endorphin ◽  
Tertiary Center

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> This study aims to determine whether mode of delivery is associated with the endocrine stress response in mother and newborn.</p><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> This prospective observational study was conducted with 86 women with a normal singleton pregnancy who delivered healthy infants between 37 and 41 weeks of gestation in a tertiary center. Study groups included; (1) women undergoing normal vaginal delivery with epidural anesthesia, (2) women undergoing vaginal delivery with immersion in water for pain relief during labor, (3) women delivered through elective caesarean section without labor. After delivery, thyroid stimulating hormone, cortisol, insulin, prolactin and Beta-endorphin levels were measured in maternal and umbilical cord serum and their relationships between modes of delivery were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> It was found that the concentrations of cortisol and beta-endorphin after vaginal delivery with immersion in water group in both mothers and infants were higher than other two modes of delivery and these differences were statistically significant. Umbilical cord concentration of cortisol was the lowest in the caesarean section group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Maternal and fetal stress response was found to be associated with the mode of delivery and labor.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document