scholarly journals Myocardial Scar Characterization and Future Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alwin B. P. Noordman ◽  
Alexander H. Maass ◽  
Hessel Groenveld ◽  
Bart A. Mulder ◽  
Michiel Rienstra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Arrhythmia ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Myocardial Scar ◽  
Qrs Complex ◽  
Icd Therapy ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Appropriate Therapy ◽  
Lge Cmr

Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is associated with several deleterious effects, which can be reduced by antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation. However, it is largely unknown which patients might benefit from these therapies. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether myocardial scar characterization improves risk stratification for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) occurrence in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and an ICD.Methods: In this study, 82 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who received an ICD were enrolled retrospectively. Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) images were analyzed using an investigational software tool to obtain quantitative data regarding the total scar, core, and border zone (BZ). Data regarding the QRS complex was obtained from electrocardiography (ECG). The primary endpoint was appropriate ICD therapy.Results: During a median follow-up duration of 3.98 years [interquartile range (IQR) 2.89–5.14 years], appropriate therapy occurred in 24 (29.3%) patients. Patients with appropriate ICD therapy had a significantly larger total scar mass [60.0 (IQR 41.2–73.4) vs. 43.3 (IQR 31.2–61.2) g; P = 0.009] and BZ mass [32.9 (IQR 26.9–42.4) vs. 24.5 (IQR 18.8–32.5) g; P = 0.001] than those without appropriate therapy. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, total scar mass [hazard ratio (HR) 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00–1.04]; P = 0.014] and BZ mass (HR 1.04 [95% CI 1.01–1.07]; P = 0.009) independently predicted appropriate ICD therapy. Core mass and the QRS complex, however, were not significantly associated with the primary endpoint.Conclusion: LGE-CMR-based, but not ECG-based myocardial scar characterization improves risk stratification for VA occurrence in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who received an ICD.

scholarly journals CMR-Based Risk Stratification of Sudden Cardiac Death and Use of Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 7115
Author(s):  
Laura Keil ◽  
Céleste Chevalier ◽  
Paulus Kirchhof ◽  
Stefan Blankenberg ◽  
Gunnar Lund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Icd Therapy ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator

Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) is one of the most important entities for arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Previous studies suggest a lower benefit of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with NICM as compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Nevertheless, current guidelines do not differentiate between the two subgroups in recommending ICD implantation. Hence, risk stratification is required to determine the subgroup of patients with NICM who will likely benefit from ICD therapy. Various predictors have been proposed, among others genetic mutations, left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left-ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDD), and T-wave alternans (TWA). In addition to these parameters, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has the potential to further improve risk stratification. CMR allows the comprehensive analysis of cardiac function and myocardial tissue composition. A range of CMR parameters have been associated with SCD. Applicable examples include late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), T1 relaxation times, and myocardial strain. This review evaluates the epidemiological aspects of SCD in NICM, the role of CMR for risk stratification, and resulting indications for ICD implantation.

scholarly journals Long‐Term Outcomes Among a Nationwide Cohort of Patients Using an Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator: UMBRELLA Study Final Results

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sem Briongos‐Figuero ◽  
Arcadio García‐Alberola ◽  
Jerónimo Rubio ◽  
José María Segura ◽  
Aníbal Rodríguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Dilated Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Valvular Heart Disease ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Icd Therapy ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator

Background Large‐scale studies describing modern populations using an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) are lacking. We aimed to analyze the incidence of arrhythmia, device interventions, and mortality in a broad spectrum of real‐world ICD patients with different heart disorders. Methods and Results The UMBRELLA study is a prospective, multicenter, nationwide study of contemporary patients using an ICD followed up by remote monitoring, with a blinded review of arrhythmic episodes. From November 2005 to November 2017, 4296 patients were followed up. After 46.6±27.3 months, 16 067 episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmia occurred in 1344 patients (31.3%). Appropriate ICD therapy occurred in 27.3% of study population. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.51; 95% CI, 1.29–1.78), dilated cardiomyopathy (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07–1.53), and valvular heart disease (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.43–2.62) exhibited a higher risk of appropriate ICD therapies, whereas patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54–0.96) and Brugada syndrome (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14–0.45) showed a lower risk. All‐cause death was 13.4% at follow‐up. Ischemic cardiomyopathy (HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.58–5.90), dilated cardiomyopathy (HR, 3.33; 95% CI, 2.18–5.10), and valvular heart disease (HR, 3.97; 95% CI, 2.25–6.99) had the worst prognoses. Delayed high‐rate detection was enabled in 39.7% of patients, and single‐zone programming occurred in 52.6% of primary prevention patients. Both parameters correlated with lower risk of first appropriate ICD therapy, with no excess risk of mortality. The rate of inappropriate shocks at follow‐up was low (6%) and did not differ among type of ICD but was lower in SmartShock‐capable devices. Conclusions Irrespective of the cause, contemporary ICD patients with heart failure–related disorders had a similar risk of ICD life‐saving interventions and death. Current ICD programming recommendations still need to be implemented. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NTC01561144.

scholarly journals Risk of subsequent ventricular arrhythmia is higher in primary prevention patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator than in secondary prevention patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
You Zhou ◽  
Shuang Zhao ◽  
Keping Chen ◽  
Wei Hua ◽  
Yangang Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Ventricular Arrhythmia ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Home Monitoring ◽  
Icd Therapy ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Because of previous ventricular arrhythmia (VA) episodes, patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for secondary prevention (SP) are generally considered to have a higher burden of VAs than primary prevention (PP) patients. However, when PP patients experienced VA, the difference in the prognosis of these two patient groups was unknown. Methods The clinical characteristics and follow-up data of 835 ICD patients (364 SP patients and 471 PP patients) with home monitoring feature were retrospectively analysed. The incidence rate and risk of subsequent VA and all-cause mortality were compared between PP patients after the first appropriate ICD therapy and SP patients. Results During a mean follow-up of 44.72 ± 20.87 months, 210 (44.59%) PP patients underwent appropriate ICD therapy. In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the PP patients after appropriate ICD therapy were more prone to VA recurrence and all-cause mortality than SP patients (P<0.001 for both endpoints). The rate of appropriate ICD therapy and all-cause mortality in PP patients after the first appropriate ICD therapy was significantly higher than that in SP patients (for device therapy, 59.46 vs 20.64 patients per 100 patient-years; incidence rate ratio [IRR] 2.880, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.305–3.599; P<0.001; for all-cause mortality, 14.08 vs 5.40 deaths per 100 patient-years; IRR 2.607, 95% CI: 1.884–3.606; P<0.001). After propensity score matching for baseline characteristics, the risk of VA recurrence in PP patients with appropriate ICD therapy was still higher than that in SP patients (41.80 vs 19.10 patients per 100 patient-years; IRR 2.491, 95% CI: 1.889–3.287; P<0.001), but all-cause mortality rates were similar between the two groups (12.61 vs 9.33 deaths per 100 patient-years; IRR 1.352, 95% CI: 0.927–1.972; P = 0.117). Conclusions Once PP patients undergo appropriate ICD therapy, they will be more prone to VA recurrence and death than SP patients.

Abstract 16519: Meta-analysis of Outcome After Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sisir Siddamsetti ◽  
Mojgan Golzy ◽  
Sandeep Gautam
Keyword(s):  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Cardiac Amyloidosis ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Icd Therapy ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Appropriate Therapy

Introduction: Cardiac amyloidosis is associated with high risk for sudden cardiac death. However, the potential benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation in CA is unknown due to limited available data regarding outcomes following ICD implantation in this patient population. We sought to perform a meta-analysis of trials that evaluated the outcomes of ICD implantation in CA. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review in PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane to identify all studies that evaluated ICD therapy in CA until May 2020. Outcomes analyzed were all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD therapy rates. A random effects model was used to calculate percentages and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of outcomes. Results: Of the screened articles, 5 observational studies were included for analysis. A total of 151 patients were analyzed. Mean age of population was 61.6 +/- 0.7 years and 79.2% were male. The all-cause mortality rate was 33% (95% CI:16 to 51%) and the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy was 23% (95% CI:16 to 30%) over a mean follow up period of 16 months (Figure). In trials that evaluated ICD therapy in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy such as DANISH, DEFINITE and SCD-HeFT trials mortality rates in the ICD arm were 21.6 % over 67.6 months, 9.4% over 29 months and 16.7% over 45.5 months, respectively. The incidence of appropriate therapy in DANISH, DEFINITE and SCD-HeFT trials were 28.9%, 19.8 % and 21% respectively. Conclusions: CA patients with ICD have equivalent appropriate therapy with disproportionately higher mortality over a shorter follow up compared to randomized trials of primary prevention ICD placement in NICMP. The benefit of ICD placement for mortality reduction in CA remains unclear and further large-scale studies are required to address this issue.

scholarly journals Looking for appropriate criterias for SCD prevention: prognostic role of MRI in patients with nonischemic ventricular arrhythmias

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Berdibekov ◽  
S Aleksandrova ◽  
N Bulaeva ◽  
O Gromova ◽  
E Golukhova
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Ventricular Arrhythmias ◽  
Interobserver Variability ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Icd Therapy ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator

Abstract Background Currently left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains the only indicator for identifying candidates for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)therapy for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). However the majority of patients suffering SCD have a preserved LVEF and some of them with poor LVEF do not benefit from ICD therapy. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac-MRI (CMR) has been proposed as an independent predictor of ventricular arrhythmias. Limited data exist on the role and methods of LGE quantification in patients with a nonischemic ventricular arrhythmias. Purpose The goal of this study is to explore whether theextent of LGE would improve risk stratification in patients with a nonischemic ventricular arrhythmias with an indication for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for the primary or secondary prevention of SCD. Methods Fifty six patients with a nonischemic ventricular arrhythmias underwent LGE-CMR prior to ICD implantation for primary and secondary prevention of SCD. LGE extent was quantified using both the full-width half-maximum (FWHM) andthe standard deviation–based (2-SD) method. The primary endpoint was appropriate ICD discharge for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Results During a median follow-up of 18 [11,5–26,0] months the primary endpoint occurred in 22 patients. The median percentage of LV myocardium fibrosis assessed by the 2-SD method was 9,8 [6,0–18,8]%, while for the FWHM method it was 5,1 [3,0–10,6]% (p&lt;0,001). Intra-observer and inter-observer variability of the FWHM technique was excellent, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) 0,97 (95% CI: 0,92–0,99) for intraobserver variability and 0,95 (95% CI: 0,85–0,98) for interobserver variability. The ICC for the 2-SD method were lower: 0,92 (95% CI: 0,76–0,97) and 0,90 (95% CI: 0,69–0,96), for intra- and interobserver variability, respectively. By Cox univariate regression analysis, past syncope, HR: 3,14; (CI: 1,28–7,73), past sustained VT, HR: 8,24; (CI: 2,43–27,96), the presence of LBBB before implantation cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D), HR: 0,22; (CI: 0,05–0,96) as well as extent of LGE, HR: 1,067; per 1% increase in the extent of LGE, (CI: 1,029–1,107) demonstrated the strongest association with the appropriate ICD discharge. In multivariate regression analysis, the history of sustained VT, HR: 9,17; (CI: 2,60–32,38; p=0,001) and the value of the extent of LGE, HR: 1,081; per 1% increase in volume of LGE, (CI: 1,034–1,131; p=0,001) demonstrated an independent association with the appropriate ICD discharge. Conclusions FWHM is the optimal semi-automated quantification method in patients with nonischemic ventricular arrhythmias, demonstrating the highest technical consistency. LGE extent is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with nonischemic ventricular arrhythmia and may have an important role in risk stratification. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. LGE Quantification Event-Free Survival

Incidence of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy and mortality after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacement: results from a real-world nationwide cohort

EP Europace ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1211-1219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin H Ruwald ◽  
Anne-Christine Ruwald ◽  
Jens Brock Johansen ◽  
Gunnar Gislason ◽  
Jens Cosedis Nielsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Advanced Age ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Icd Therapy ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Comorbidity Burden ◽  
Appropriate Therapy ◽  
Generator Replacement

Abstract Aims The safety of omitting implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) generator replacement in patients with no prior appropriate therapy, comorbid conditions, and advanced age is unclear. The aim was to investigate incidence of appropriate ICD therapy after generator replacement. Methods and results We identified patients implanted with a primary prevention ICD (n = 4630) from 2007 to 2016, who subsequently underwent an elective ICD generator replacement (n = 670) from the Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register. The data were linked to other databases and evaluated the outcomes of appropriate therapy and death. Predictors of ICD therapy were identified using multivariate Cox regression analyses. A total of 670 patients underwent elective ICD generator replacement. Of these, 197 (29.4%) patients had experienced appropriate therapy in their 1st generator period. During follow-up of 2.0 ± 1.6 years, 95 (14.2%) patients experienced appropriate therapy. Predictors of appropriate therapy in 2nd generator period was low initial left ventricular ejection fraction (≤25%) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.87, confidence interval (CI) 1.13–1.95] and appropriate therapy in 1st generator period (HR 3.95, CI 2.57–6.06). For patients with appropriate therapy in 1st generator period, 4-year incidence of appropriate therapy was 50.6% vs. 16.4% in those without (P < 0.001). Among patients >80 years with no prior appropriate therapy 8.8% of patients experienced appropriate therapy after replacement. Comorbidity burden and advanced age were associated with reduced device utilization after replacement and a high competing risk of death without preceding appropriate therapy. Conclusion A significant residual risk of appropriate therapy in the 2nd generator was present even among patients with advanced age and with a full prior generator period without any appropriate ICD events.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document