scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Je-Wook Park ◽  
Song-Yi Yang ◽  
Min Kim ◽  
Hee Tae Yu ◽  
Tae-Hoon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Autonomic Function ◽  
Ablation Lesion ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

Introduction: Whereas, high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation is generally used in atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA), its efficacy, safety, and influence on autonomic function have not been well established in a large population. This study compared HPSD-AFCA and conventional power (ConvP)-AFCA in propensity score matched-population.Methods: In 3,045 consecutive patients who underwent AFCA, this study included 1,260 patients (73.9% male, 59 ± 10 years old, 58.2% paroxysmal type) after propensity score matching: 315 in 50~60W HPSD group vs. 945 in the ConvP group. This study investigated the procedural factors, complication rate, rhythm status, and 3-month heart rate variability (HRV) between the two groups and subgroups.Results: Procedure time was considerably short in the HPSD group (135 min in HPSD vs. 181 min in ConvP, p < 0.001) compared to ConvP group, but there was no significant difference in the complication rate (2.9% in HPSD vs. 3.7% in ConvP, p = 0.477) and the 3-month HRV between the two groups. At the one-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in rhythm outcomes between the two groups (Overall, Log-rank p = 0.885; anti-arrhythmic drug free, Log-rank p = 0.673). These efficacy and safety outcomes were consistently similar irrespective of the AF type or ablation lesion set. The Cox regression analysis showed that the left atrium volume index estimated by computed tomography (HR 1.01 [1.00–1.02]), p = 0.003) and extra-pulmonary vein triggers (HR 1.59 [1.03–2.44], p = 0.036) were independently associated with one-year clinical recurrence, whereas the HPSD ablation was not (HR 1.03 [0.73–1.44], p = 0.887).Conclusion: HPSD-AFCA notably reduced the procedure time with similar rhythm outcomes, complication rate, and influence on autonomic function as ConvP-AFCA, irrespective of the AF type or ablation lesion set.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of 50-60 Watt high-power short-duration radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A propensity score matching study

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
HN Pak ◽  
SY Yang ◽  
M Kim ◽  
HT Yu ◽  
TH Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Short Duration ◽  
High Power ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Ablation Lesion ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Clinical Recurrence

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Although high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency (RF) energy is commonly utilized in atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA), its efficacy, safety, and autonomic neural effects have not yet been evaluated in a large patient number. We compared HPSD-AFCA and conventional power (ConvP)-AFCA after propensity score matching. Methods Among 3,221 consecutive AF ablation patients, we included 1,720 patients (74.4% male, 59 ± 10 years old, 56.5% paroxysmal type) who underwent AFCA after propensity score matching: 430 in 50∼60W HPSD group vs. 1,290 in the ConvP group. We evaluated the procedural factors, complication risk, rhythm outcome, and 3-month heart rate variability (HRV) between the two groups and subgroups. Results Procedure times were significantly shorter in the HPSD group (p < 0.001), but the complication rate (p = 0.088) and the 3rd-month HRV did not differ between the two groups. At the 12-month follow-up, rhythm outcomes did not differ between the two groups (Overall, Log-rank p = 0.212; anti-arrhythmic drug off Log rank p = 0.246). These efficacy and safety outcomes were consistently similar regardless of the AF type or ablation lesion set. In the Cox regression analysis, the left atrium volume index measured by computed tomography (HR 1.009 [1.003-1.015]), p = 0.005) and extra-pulmonary vein triggers (HR 1.587 [1.033-2.440], p = 0.035) were independently associated with 1-year clinical recurrence, while the HPSD strategy was not (HR 1.188 [0.903-1.564], p = 0.218). Conclusions HPSD-AFCA significantly shortened the procedure time with similar rhythm outcomes, complication risks, and autonomic neural effects as ConvP-AFCA, regardless of the AF type or ablation lesion set. Abstract Figure.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation – more effectively and safely

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (54) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
Piotr Kułakowski ◽  
Agnieszka Sikorska ◽  
Tomasz Kryński ◽  
Roman Piotrowski ◽  
Jakub Baran
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Future Perspectives ◽  
Significant Progress ◽  
One Year

During past twenty years a significant progress in efficacy and safety of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been made. Data from literature and our own experience suggest that success rate during one-year follow-up exceeds 80%, especially in patients with paroxysmal AF. Both, radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon ablation have similar efficacy whereas learning curve is much shorter when using the latter technique. Summary of current status of AF ablation and future perspectives are presented.

scholarly journals Impact of catheter ablation on functional tricuspid regurgitation in patients with atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Nishiwaki ◽  
S Watanabe ◽  
F Yoneda ◽  
M Tanaka ◽  
A Komasa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Tricuspid Regurgitation ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Main Role ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Since atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation (AF-TR) is associated with increased heart failure and mortality, the management of AF-TR is clinically important. Atrial fibrillation (AF) plays the main role in AF-TR. However, the effectiveness of catheter ablation (CA) and mechanism of improvement of AF-TR haven't been fully evaluated. Purpose We sought to investigate the impact of CA for AF on AF-TR in patients with moderate or more TR. Methods We retrospectively investigated consecutive 2685 patients with AF who received CA from February 2004 to December 2019 in Japan. The current study population consisted of 102 patients with moderate or greater TR who underwent CA for AF. The echocardiographic parameters were compared between pre-ablation and post-ablation transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and the recurrence rate of AF/ atrial tachycardia (AT) was measured. Results The mean age was 73.2 years, 53% were women. TR severity and TR jet area significantly improved after CA for AF (TR jet area: 5.8 [3.9–7.6] cm2 to 2.0 [1.1–3.0] cm2, p<0.001). In addition, mitral regurgitation (MR) jet area, left atrial (LA) area, mitral valve diameter, right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic area, right atrial (RA) area, tricuspid valve (TV) diameter decreased after CA (p<0.001, <0.001, <0.001, = 0.02, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference between one-year recurrence of AF/AT and TR severity at pre-ablation TTE (moderate 28.6%, moderate to severe 37.2%, and severe 31.6%, p=0.72). Conclusions TR severity and jet area improved after CA in patients with AF and moderate or more TR. RV size, RA size, TV diameter also decreased after CA, which may be associated with TR improvement. There was no significant difference between one-year recurrence of AF/AT and TR severity at pre-ablation TTE. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

The efficacy and safety of cryoballoon catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adil K. Baimbetov ◽  
Kuat B. Abzaliev ◽  
Aiman M. Jukenova ◽  
Kenzhebek A. Bizhanov ◽  
Binali A. Bairamov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

scholarly journals The safety of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in elderly patients -analysis of the nationwide database in Japan, JROAD-DPC-

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Yokoyama ◽  
K Miyamoto ◽  
M Nakai ◽  
Y Sumita ◽  
N Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Public Institution ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Chads2 Score ◽  
Aged Patients ◽  
Nationwide Database

Abstract Background “Age” is one of the major concerns and determinants of the indications for catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). There are little safety data on CA of AF according to the age. This study aimed to assess the safety of CA in elderly patients undergoing CA of AF. Methods and results We investigated the complication rate of CA of AF for the different age groups (<60 years, 60–65, 65–70, 70–75, 75–80, 80–85, and ≥85) by a nationwide database (Japanese Registry Of All cardiac and vascular Diseases [JROAD]-DPC). The JROAD-DPC included 73,296 patients (65±11 years, 52,883 men) who underwent CA of AF from 516 hospitals in Japan. Aged patients had more comorbidities and a significantly increased CHADS2 score and higher rate of female according to a higher age. The overall complication rate was 2.6% and in-hospital mortality was 0.05%. By comparing each age group, complications occurred more frequently in higher aged groups. A multivariate adjusted hazard ratio revealed an increased age was independently and significantly associated with the overall complications (odds ratio was 1.25, 1.35, 1.72, 1.86, 2.76 and 3.13 respectively; reference <60 years). Conclusions The frequency of complications was significantly higher according to a higher age. We should take note of the indications and procedure for CA of AF in aged patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Intramural Research Fund 17 (Kusano) for Cardiovascular Diseases of the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center

scholarly journals Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in HFpEF Patients – a Propensity‐Score matched Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Rattka ◽  
Anna Kühberger ◽  
Alexander Pott ◽  
Tilman Stephan ◽  
Karolina Weinmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Propensity Score

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O.M Aldaas ◽  
F Lupercio ◽  
C.L Malladi ◽  
P.S Mylavarapu ◽  
D Darden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background Catheter ablation improves clinical outcomes in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the role of catheter ablation in HF patients with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Purpose To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF relative to those with HFrEF. Methods We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared AF recurrence at one year after catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF versus those with HFrEF. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables, where a RR<1.0 favors the HFpEF group. Results Four studies with a total of 563 patients were included, of which 312 had HFpEF and 251 had HFrEF. All patients included were undergoing first time catheter ablation of AF. Patients with HFpEF experienced similar recurrence of AF one year after ablation on or off antiarrhythmic drugs compared to those with HFrEF (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69–1.10, p=0.24), as shown in Figure 1. Recurrence of AF was assessed with electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, and/or event monitoring at scheduled follow-up visits and final follow-up. Conclusion Based on the results of this meta-analysis, catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF appears as efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm as in those with HFrEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Outcome of contact force-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation or second generation cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: propensity score matched analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Ukita ◽  
A Kawamura ◽  
H Nakamura ◽  
K Yasumoto ◽  
M Tsuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Contact Force ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Late Recurrence ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Atrial Tachyarrhythmia

Abstract Background Little has been reported on the outcome of contact force (CF)-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and second generation cryoballoon ablation (CBA). Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of CF-guided RFCA and second generation CBA for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods We enrolled the consecutive 364 patients with PAF who underwent initial ablation between September 2014 and July 2018 in our hospital. We compared the late recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia more than three months after ablation between RFCA group and CBA group. All RFCA procedures were performed using CF-sensing catheter and all CBA procedures were performed using second generation CB. Results There were significant differences in background characteristics: chronic kidney disease, serum brain natriuretic peptide level, and left ventricular ejection fraction. After propensity score matched analysis (Table), atrial tachyarrhythmia free survival was significantly higher in CBA group than in RFCA group (Figure). Conclusions Second generation CBA showed a significantly lower late recurrence rate compared to CF-guided RFCA. Kaplan-Meier Curve Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Randomized comparison between dexmedetomidine–remifentanil and midazolam–fentanyl for deep sedation during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Choi ◽  
Sung-Hwan Kim ◽  
Ju Youn Kim ◽  
Youmi Hwang ◽  
Tae-Seok Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Hemodynamic Compromise ◽  
3D Mapping System ◽  
Sedative Agents

Abstract Background and objectives The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been well established. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of sedation using dexmedetomidine with remifentanil compared to conventional sedative agents during RFCA for AF. Subjects and methods A total of 240 patients undergoing RFCA for AF were randomized to either the dexmedetomidine (DEX) group (continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil) or the midazolam (MID) group (intermittent injections of midazolam and fentanyl) according to sedative agents. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation was applied to all patients during the procedure. The primary outcome was patient movement during the procedure resulting in a 3D mapping system discordance, and the secondary outcome was adverse events including respiratory or hemodynamic compromise. Results During AF ablation, the incidence of the primary outcome was significantly reduced for the DEX group (18.2% vs. 39.5% in the DEX and the MID groups, respectively, p < 0.001). The frequency of a desaturation event (oxygen saturation < 90%) did not significantly differ between the two groups (6.6% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.056). However, the incidences of hypotension not owing to cardiac tamponade (systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg, 19.8% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.011) and bradycardia (HR < 50 beats/min: 39.7% vs. 21.8%, p = 0.003) were higher in the DEX group. All efficacy and safety results were consistent within the predefined subgroups. Conclusion The combined use of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil provides higher stability sedation during AF ablation, but can lead to more frequent hemodynamic compromise compared to midazolam and fentanyl.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document