Association Between Prediabetes and Erectile Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis

BackgroundDiabetes has been associated with the increased risk of erectile dysfunction (ED). However, previous studies evaluating the association between prediabetes and ED showed inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies to systematically evaluate the above association.MethodsRelevant observational studies were retrieved by search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A random-effect model which incorporated the potential intra-study heterogeneity was used for the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the influences of study characteristics on the outcome.ResultsNine studies (five matched case-control studies and four cross-sectional studies) were included. Age were adjusted or matched in all of the studies. Pooled results showed that compared to men with normoglycemia, men with prediabetes were associated with higher prevalence of ED (odds ratio = 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.28 to 2.07, P < 0.001; I2 = 78%). Subgroup analyses showed that the association was not significantly affected by definition of prediabetes, diagnostic tool for ED, or controlling of additional variables besides age (both P for subgroup difference > 0.05). However, the association between prediabetes and ED seemed to be stronger in case-control studies than that in cross-sectional studies, and in studies with younger men (mean age < 50 years) than in those with older men (mean age ≥ 50 years; both P for subgroup difference < 0.05).ConclusionsPrediabetes is associated with higher prevalence of ED, which may be independent of age of the males and may be stronger in young men.

Download Full-text

ASSOCIATION OF IL-8 -251T>A (RS4073) POLYMORPHISM WITH SUSCEPTIBILITY TO GASTRIC CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS BASED ON 33 CASE-CONTROL STUDIES

Arquivos de Gastroenterologia ◽

10.1590/s0004-2803.202000000-16 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 57 (1) ◽

pp. 91-99

Author(s):

Mansour MOGHIMI ◽

Seyed Alireza DASTGHEIB ◽

Naeimeh HEIRANIZADEH ◽

Mohammad ZARE ◽

Elnaz SHEIKHPOUR ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Case Control ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

Effect Model ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Mixed Populations ◽

Stratified Analysis

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The role of -251A>T polymorphism in the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-8 (IL-8) gene in gastric cancer was intensively evaluated, but the results of these studies were inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive data on the association of IL-8 -251T>A polymorphism with gastric cancer. METHODS: All eligible studies were identified in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Wanfang and CNKI databases before September 01, 2019. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived from a fixed effect or random effect model. RESULTS: A total of 33 case-control studies with 6,192 cases and 9,567 controls were selected. Overall, pooled data showed that IL-8 -251T>A polymorphism was significantly associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer under all five genetic models, i.e., allele (A vs T: OR=1.189, 95% CI 1.027-1.378, P=0.021), homozygote (AA vs TT: OR=1.307, 95% CI 1.111-1.536, P=0.001), heterozygote (AT vs TT: OR=1.188, 95% CI 1.061-1.330, P=0.003), dominant (AA+AT vs TT: OR=1.337, 95% CI 1.115-1.602, P=0.002) and recessive (AA vs AT+TT: OR=1.241, 95% CI 1.045-1.474, P=0.014). The stratified analysis by ethnicity revealed an increased risk of gastric cancer in Asians and mixed populations, but not in Caucasians. Moreover, stratified by country found a significant association in Chinese, Korean and Brazilian, but not among Japanese. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that the IL-8 -251T>A polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer, especially by ethnicity (Asian and mixed populations) and country (Chinese, Korean and Brazilian).

Download Full-text

Psychosis in children of separated parents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

European Psychiatry ◽

10.1192/j.eurpsy.2019.15 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 63 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Luis Ayerbe ◽

María Pérez-Piñar ◽

Quintí Foguet-Boreu ◽

Salma Ayis

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Odds Ratio ◽

Psychotic Disorders ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Childhood Adversity ◽

Case Control ◽

Parental Separation ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Cross Sectional Studies

Abstract Background. Parental separation is a very common childhood adversity. The association between other adverse childhood experiences and an increased risk of psychosis has been reported. However, the evidence on the risk of psychosis for children of separated parents is limited. In this systematic review, cohort, case–control, and cross-sectional studies, comparing the risk of psychotic disorders for people with and without separated parents, were searched, critically appraised, and summarized. Methods. Studies were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Web of Science, from database inception to September 2019. A meta-analysis, using random-effects models, was undertaken to obtain pooled estimates of the risk of psychosis among participants with separated parents. Results. Twelve studies, with 305,652 participants from 22 countries, were included in the review. A significantly increased risk of psychosis for those with separated parents was observed, with a pooled odds ratio: 1.53 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29–1.76), p < 0.001. The association remained significant when cohort, case–control, and cross-sectional studies were analyzed separately. The five cohort studies included in this review showed and increased risk of psychosis with odds ratio: 1.47 (95% CI: 1.26–1.69), p < 0.001. Conclusions. Parental separation is a common childhood adversity associated with an increased risk of psychosis. Although the risk for an individual child of separated parents is still low, given the high proportion of couple that separate, the increased rates of psychosis may be substantial in the population. Further studies on the risk of psychosis in those with separated parents, and the explanatory factors for this association, are required.

Download Full-text

The Association between Helicobacter pylori Infection and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph17072524 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 17 (7) ◽

pp. 2524

Author(s):

Yun-A Kim ◽

Yoon Jeong Cho ◽

Sang Gyu Kwak

Keyword(s):

Helicobacter Pylori ◽

Irritable Bowel Syndrome ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Case Control ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Cross Sectional Studies ◽

H Pylori ◽

Irritable Bowel ◽

The Relationship

The association of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection with functional dyspepsia has been well studied. However, the data on the relationship between H. pylori infection and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are conflicting. This study aims to elucidate the association between H. pylori infection and IBS. PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and SCOPUS databases were searched to identify eligible English articles published up to December 2019. Cross-sectional studies, case–control studies and cohort studies reporting both prevalence of H. pylori infection and IBS were selected for the detailed review. The pooled odds ratio (ORs) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. A total of 7269 individuals in four cross-sectional studies and six case-control studies were included. The prevalence of H. pylori infection ranged from 12.8% to 73.4% in the control group, and 9.7% to 72.1% in the IBS group. The combined OR for H. pylori infection was 1.10 (95% CI: 0.93–1.29, I2: 37.5%). In a subgroup analysis of IBS defined according to Rome criteria, the OR for H. pylori infection was 1.10 (95% CI: 0.93–1.30, I2 = 31.7%). In this meta-analysis, H. pylori infection was not significantly associated with IBS. Well-designed studies are needed to identify the relationship between H. pylori infection and IBS.

Download Full-text

Androgenetic Alopecia and its Association with Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Acta Medica Philippina ◽

10.47895/amp.v53i2.175 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 53 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Leah Antoinette M. Caro-Chang ◽

Mia Katrina R. Gervasio ◽

Claudine Yap-Silva

Keyword(s):

Metabolic Syndrome ◽

Early Onset ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Case Control ◽

Androgenetic Alopecia ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Newcastle Ottawa Scale ◽

Independent Review ◽

Cross Sectional Studies

Objectives. The study aimed to confirm the association between androgenetic alopecia (AGA) and Metabolic Syndrome (MetS). It also aimed to determine if early-onset AGA among males and AGA among females increases the risk of developing MetS, and if severity of AGA increases the odds of developing MetS. Methods. Observational studies from electronic databases were selected by the consensus of three independent review authors. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analysis was used. Statistical analyses were accomplished using Review Manager software. Results. A total of 11 case-control studies, one prospective cohort study, and five cross-sectional studies were selected. In the meta-analysis of ten case-control studies and three cross-sectional studies (3840 participants), AGA was significantly correlated with MetS (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.51 to 4.44; p<0.0005). Early-onset AGA among males (<35 years old) showed significant association (OR 3.69, 95% CI 2.15 to 6.33; p<0.00001). AGA among females also increased the odds of developing MetS (OR 5.59, 95% CI 2.06 to 15.12; p<0.0007). Moderate to severe AGA in males, Norwood-Hamilton IV or higher, was also significant (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.42; p=0.01). The same trend was noted for females with Ludwig II and III (OR 5.82, 95% CI 2.54 to 13.34; p<0.00001). Conclusion. Although the pathophysiology still remains under investigation, the present study points to an association between AGA and MetS. It can be used as a marker to identify patients who should be screened for MetS and managed accordingly.

Download Full-text

Is childhood wheeze and asthma in Latin America associated with poor hygiene and infection? A systematic review

BMJ Open Respiratory Research ◽

10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000249 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. e000249 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Cristina Ardura-Garcia ◽

Paul Garner ◽

Philip J Cooper

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Latin American ◽

Observational Studies ◽

Case Control ◽

Asthma Prevalence ◽

Selective Reporting ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Increased Risk ◽

American Children

IntroductionHigh asthma prevalence in Latin-American cities is thought to be caused by poor hygiene and infections. This contradicts the widely accepted ‘hygiene hypothesis’ for asthma aetiology.MethodsSystematic review of observational studies evaluating the association between poor hygiene exposures or infections and asthma/wheeze among Latin-American children aged 4–16 years. MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and CINAHL electronic databases were searched following a predefined strategy to 18 December 2017. We quantified outcomes measured and reported, assessed risk of bias and tabulated the results.ResultsForty-five studies included: 6 cohort, 30 cross-sectional and 9 case–control studies. 26 cross-sectional studies were school-based surveys (14 of over 3000 children), whereas 5 case–control studies were hospital/health centre-based. Exposures measured and reported varied substantially between studies, and current wheeze was the most common outcome reported. Data showed selective reporting based on statistical significance (P value <0.05): 17/45 studies did not clearly describe the number of exposures measured and 15/45 studies reported on less than 50% of the exposures measured. Most exposures studied did not show an association with wheeze or asthma, except for a generally increased risk associated with acute respiratory infections in early life. Contradictory associations were observed frequently between different studies.ConclusionSelective reporting is common in observational studies exploring the association between environmental exposures and risk of wheeze/asthma. This, together with the use of different study outcomes (wheeze/asthma) associated with possibly distinct causal mechanisms, complicates inferences about the role of poor hygiene exposures and childhood infections in explaining asthma prevalence in Latin-American children.

Download Full-text

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease associated with biomass fuel use in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open Respiratory Research ◽

10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000246 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. e000246 ◽

Cited By ~ 35

Author(s):

Adama Sana ◽

Serge M A Somda ◽

Nicolas Meda ◽

Catherine Bouland

Keyword(s):

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽

Pulmonary Disease ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Case Control ◽

Chronic Obstructive ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽

Biomass Smoke ◽

Cross Sectional Studies

IntroductionChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major and growing cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The global prevalence of COPD is growing faster in women than in men. Women are often exposed to indoor pollutants produced by biomass fuels burning during household activities.MethodsWe conducted a meta-analysis to establish the association between COPD and exposure to biomass smoke in women.Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched MEDLINE and Scopus databases in 31December 2016, with the terms: “wood”, “charcoal”, “biomass”, “solid fuels”, “organic fuel”, “biofuel”, “female”, “women”, “COPD”, “chronic bronchitis”, “emphysema”, “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease”. Studies were eligible if they were case–control or cross-sectional studies involving exposure to indoor biomass smoke, conducted at any time and in any geographic location. Fixed-effects or random-effects meta-analysis was used to generate pooled OR.Results24 studies were included: 5 case–control studies and 19 cross-sectional studies. Biomass-exposed individuals were 1.38 times more likely to be diagnosed with COPD than non-exposed (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.57).Spirometry-diagnosed COPD studies failed to show a significant association (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.40). Nevertheless, the summary estimate of OR for chronic bronchitis (CB) was significant (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.70 to 2.52). The pooled OR for cross-sectional studies and case–control studies were respectively 1.82 (95% CI 1.54 to 2.10) and 1.05 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.30). Significant association was found between COPD and biomass smoke exposure for women living as well in rural as in urban areas.ConclusionsThis study showed that biomass smoke exposure is associated with COPD in rural and urban women.In many developing countries, modern fuels are more and more used alongside traditional ones, mainly in urban area. Data are needed to further explore the benefit of the use of mixed fuels for cooking on respiratory health, particularly on COPD reduction.

Download Full-text

Association of dietary inflammatory potential with cardiometabolic risk factors and diseases: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of observational studies

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome ◽

10.1186/s13098-020-00592-6 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Zahra Aslani ◽

Omid Sadeghi ◽

Motahar Heidari-Beni ◽

Hoda Zahedi ◽

Fereshteh Baygi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Cohort Studies ◽

Dose Response ◽

Observational Studies ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Case Control ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Total N ◽

Prospective Cohort Studies ◽

Increased Risk

Abstract Context The association of dietary inflammatory index (DII®), as an index of inflammatory quality of diet, with cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs) and risk factors (CMRFs) has been inconsistent in previous studies. Objective The current systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis was performed to investigate the association of the DII score with CMDs and CMRFs. Data Sources All published observational studies (cohort, case–control and cross-sectional) using PubMed/Medline, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were retrieved from inception through November 2019. Data extraction Two reviewers independently extracted the data from included studies. Data analysis Pooled hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) were calculated by using a random-effects model. Results Ten prospective cohort studies (total n = 291,968) with 31,069 CMDs-specific mortality, six prospective cohort studies (total n = 43,340) with 1311 CMDs-specific morbidity, two case–control studies with 2140 cases and 6246 controls and one cross-sectional study (total n = 15,613) with 1734 CMDs-specific morbidity were identified for CMDs. Meta-analyses of published observational studies demonstrated that the highest DII score category versus the lowest DII score category was associated with 29% increased risk of CMDs mortality (HR = 1.29; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18, 1.41). Moreover, there was a significant association between the DII score and risk of CMDs in cohort studies (HR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.13, 1.61) and non-cohort study (HR = 1.36; 95% CI 1.18, 1.57). We found a significant association between the DII score and metabolic syndrome (MetS) (OR: 1.13; 95% CI 1.03, 1.25), hyperglycemia and hypertension. None-linear dose response meta-analysis showed that there was a significant association between the DII score and risk of CMDs mortality (Pnonlinearity < 0.001). Moreover, evidence of none-linear association between the DII score and risk of CMDs was not observed (p-value = 0.1). Conclusions Adherence to pro-inflammatory diet was associated with increased risk of CMDs, mortality and MetS.

Download Full-text

Consumption of Artificially-sweetened Soft Drinks and Risk of Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

Public Health Nutrition ◽

10.1017/s136898002100104x ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-50

Author(s):

Alfred Jatho ◽

Jansen Marcos Cambia ◽

Seung-Kwon Myung ◽

Keyword(s):

Cohort Studies ◽

Observational Studies ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Epidemiological Studies ◽

Case Control ◽

Soft Drinks ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

Gi Cancer ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Meta Analyses

Abstract Objective: There remain inconclusive findings from previous observational epidemiological studies on whether consumption of artificially-sweetened soft drinks (ASSDs) increases the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. We investigated the associations between the consumption of ASSDs and the risk of GI cancer using a meta-analysis. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: PubMed and EMBASE were searched using keywords until May 2020 to identify observational epidemiological studies on the association between the consumption of ASSDs and the risk of GI cancer. Subjects: Twenty-one case-control studies and 17 cohort studies with 12,397 cancer cases and 2,474,452 controls. Results: In the random-effects meta-analysis of all the studies, consumption of ASSDs was not significantly associated with the risk of overall GI cancer (odds ratio (OR)/relative risk (RR), 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.14). There was no significant association between the consumption of ASSDs and the risk of overall GI cancer in the subgroup meta-analyses by study design (case-control studies: OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82-1.11; cohort studies: RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.97-1.33). In the subgroup meta-analysis by type of cancer, consumption of ASSDs was significantly associated with the increased risk of liver cancer (OR/RR, 1.28; 95% CI,1.03-1.58). Conclusions: The current meta-analysis of observational epidemiological studies suggests that overall, there is no significant association between the consumption of ASSDs and the risk of GI cancer.

Download Full-text

Neurology and neuropsychiatry of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the early literature reveals frequent CNS manifestations and key emerging narratives

Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry ◽

10.1136/jnnp-2021-326405 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. jnnp-2021-326405

Author(s):

Jonathan P Rogers ◽

Cameron J Watson ◽

James Badenoch ◽

Benjamin Cross ◽

Matthew Butler ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Cohort Studies ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Neuropsychiatric Symptoms ◽

Case Series ◽

Case Control ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Early Literature ◽

Cross Sectional Studies

There is accumulating evidence of the neurological and neuropsychiatric features of infection with SARS-CoV-2. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to describe the characteristics of the early literature and estimate point prevalences for neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL up to 18 July 2020 for randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies and case series. Studies reporting prevalences of neurological or neuropsychiatric symptoms were synthesised into meta-analyses to estimate pooled prevalence. 13 292 records were screened by at least two authors to identify 215 included studies, of which there were 37 cohort studies, 15 case-control studies, 80 cross-sectional studies and 83 case series from 30 countries. 147 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The symptoms with the highest prevalence were anosmia (43.1% (95% CI 35.2% to 51.3%), n=15 975, 63 studies), weakness (40.0% (95% CI 27.9% to 53.5%), n=221, 3 studies), fatigue (37.8% (95% CI 31.6% to 44.4%), n=21 101, 67 studies), dysgeusia (37.2% (95% CI 29.8% to 45.3%), n=13 686, 52 studies), myalgia (25.1% (95% CI 19.8% to 31.3%), n=66 268, 76 studies), depression (23.0% (95% CI 11.8% to 40.2%), n=43 128, 10 studies), headache (20.7% (95% CI 16.1% to 26.1%), n=64 613, 84 studies), anxiety (15.9% (5.6% to 37.7%), n=42 566, 9 studies) and altered mental status (8.2% (95% CI 4.4% to 14.8%), n=49 326, 19 studies). Heterogeneity for most clinical manifestations was high. Neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms of COVID-19 in the pandemic’s early phase are varied and common. The neurological and psychiatric academic communities should develop systems to facilitate high-quality methodologies, including more rapid examination of the longitudinal course of neuropsychiatric complications of newly emerging diseases and their relationship to neuroimaging and inflammatory biomarkers.

Download Full-text

Dyslipidemia Might Be Associated with an Increased Risk of Osteoarthritis

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2020/3105248 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2020 ◽

pp. 1-9 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jianping Xiong ◽

Junyu Long ◽

Xi Chen ◽

Ye Li ◽

Hai Song

Keyword(s):

Cohort Studies ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Hip Osteoarthritis ◽

Case Control ◽

Autoimmune Response ◽

Hand Osteoarthritis ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Cross Sectional Studies ◽

The Relationship

Background. According to several studies, the autoimmune response may lead to osteoarthritis and dyslipidemia and may affect the homeostasis of the human body’s internal environment and then cause its own immune regulation. Consequently, the risk of osteoarthritis might be increased by dyslipidemia, but this association is not universally acknowledged. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to study the relationship between dyslipidemia and the risk of osteoarthritis. Methods. In this study, PubMed, EMBASE, and the ISI Web of Science were used to identify related studies published before July 2018. The relationship between dyslipidemia and the risk of osteoarthritis was evaluated on the basis of relative risk (RR) values and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To further investigate this relationship, we also employed the random effects model proposed by DerSimonian and Laird. Results. A total of nine studies were included to study the effect of dyslipidemia on the risk of osteoarthritis, including four cohort, three case-control, and two cross-sectional studies. Among these studies, six stated data for knee osteoarthritis, two reported on hand osteoarthritis, and one reported on hip osteoarthritis. A total of 53,955 participants were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 22,501 patients with OA (19,733 hand OA, 2,679 knee OA, and 89 hip OA). Based on the meta-analysis of case-control and cross-sectional studies, osteoarthritis was clearly higher in those with dyslipidemia compared to those who did not suffer from dyslipidemia (case-control: OR=1.37; 95%CI=1.27–1.46; cross-sectional: OR=1.33; 95%CI=1.21-1.46). In addition, the meta-analysis of cohort studies did not present any relationship between dyslipidemia and OA (RR=1.00; 95%CI=0.85–1.14). Conclusions. Even though our meta-analysis of case-control and cross-sectional studies suggested a strong relationship between dyslipidemia and osteoarthritis; this relationship was not validated by our meta-analysis of only cohort studies. As a result, further investigation needs to be conducted on the relationship between dyslipidemia and osteoarthritis, considering the significant public health relevance of the topic.

Download Full-text