scholarly journals The Association Between COVID-19 and Thyroxine Levels: A Meta-Analysis

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiru Chen ◽  
Xiuneng Li ◽  
Yu Dai ◽  
Jingjing Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Thyroid Stimulating Hormone ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Free Triiodothyronine ◽  
Time Restrictions ◽  
Literature Search Strategy ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Set Up ◽  
The Cochrane Library

ObjectivesRecently, a number of reports have described the potential relationship between COVID-19 and thyroid hormones, but the results were conflicting. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of the severity of COVID-19 on thyroid-related hormones and the effect of thyroid-related hormones on the outcome of COVID-19 in order to try to confirm the association between the serum levels of free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and the severity or mortality of coronavirus-19 patients.MethodsThe methodology was already registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database, and the protocol number is CRD42021269246. Systematic searches were carried out on the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases on November 15, 2021. We set up the literature search strategy based on the following keywords: [(T3 OR FT3 OR triiodothyronine) or (T4 OR FT4 OR thyroxine) or (TSH or thyrotropin)] and (COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2), without time restrictions.ResultsTwenty studies satisfied the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 3609 patients were enrolled in the study. From the analysis of the included studies, the incidence of thyroid-related hormone abnormalities was higher in patients with severe COVID-19, and the serum levels of FT3 and TSH were lower than those of patients with nonsevere COVID-19. However, the difference in the FT4 levels was not significant. Similar characteristics were shown between survivors and nonsurvivors. In addition, the outcomes of the meta-analysis showed that patients with abnormal thyroid-related hormones had greater mortality.ConclusionsLow FT3 serum levels, low FT4 serum levels and low TSH serum levels may increase the mortality of COVID-19 patients during admission. On the other hand, the higher the severity level of COVID-19, the higher the probability of decreases in the FT3, FT4, TSH levels.

scholarly journals Effects of Dexmedetomidine as an Analgesic Adjuvant for Surgery of Femur Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pharmacology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Shan Deng ◽  
Yonghao Yu
Keyword(s):  
Femur Fracture ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Block Level ◽  
Block Time ◽  
Sedation Scores ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Patients who undergo surgery of femur fracture suffer the excruciating pain. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a unique α2-adrenergic receptor agonist with sedative and analgesic properties, whose efficacy and safety are still unclear for surgery of femur fracture. Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of addition of DEX to general or local anesthesia in surgery of femur fracture were searched from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library database. Patients who received DEX infusion had a significant longer time to rescue analgesia compared with those without DEX coadministration. DEX treatment seemed to reduce the visual analog score; however, the significance did not reach any statistical difference. DEX as an analgesic adjuvant did not reduce the onset of sensory block time, shorten the time to achieve maximum sensory block level, and provide a longer duration of sensory block. The difference in mean sedation scores between 2 groups was not statistically significant. As for adverse effects, DEX therapy significantly increased the rate of hypotension. In conclusion, dexmedetomidine as a local anesthetic adjuvant in femur fracture surgery had a longer duration of rescue analgesia. However, the incidence of hypotension was markedly increased in these patients. It was worth noting that the evidence was of low to moderate quality.

scholarly journals The Anterior Chamber Injection of Moxifloxacin Injection to Prevent Endophthalmitis after Cataract Surgery: A Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-lei Wang ◽  
Xiao-yong Huang ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
Wei Sun
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Anterior Chamber ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Corneal Edema ◽  
Intraventricular Injection ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Computer Based ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Purpose. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of an anterior chamber injection of moxifloxacin in the prevention of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Methods. A computer-based search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the Clinical Trial database for articles related to anterior intraventricular injection of moxifloxacin for the prevention of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery was performed through April 2019. Study selection, data exclusion, and quality assessment were performed by two independent observers. Statistical analysis for the meta-analysis was performed by RevMan5.3 software. Results. Eight studies were included, with a total of 123,819 eyes. The meta-analysis showed that an anterior chamber injection of moxifloxacin can prevent the incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (OR = 0.29, 95% CI (0.15, 0.56), P=0.0002), and the difference was statistically significant. There were no significant differences between the moxifloxacin injection and nonmoxifloxacin injection groups in regard to UCVA (log MAR) (SMD = −0.13, 95% CI (−0.62, 0.35), P=0.60), BCVA (log MAR) (SMD = −0.27, 95% CI (−1.28, 0.74), P=0.60), IOP (SMD = −0.04, 95% CI (−0.02, 0.01), P=0.22), corneal edema (OR = 1.03, 95% CI (0.23, 4.69), P=0.97), CCT (SMD = −0.01, 95% CI (−0.07, 0.05), P=0.77), or ECD (SMD = 0.00, 95% CI (−0.06, 0.07), P=0.94). Conclusion. An anterior chamber injection of moxifloxacin can effectively prevent the incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery, while the moxifloxacin injection and nonmoxifloxacin injection groups had similar results in regard to UCVA (log MAR), BCVA (log MAR), IOP, corneal edema, CCT, and ECD.

scholarly journals Meta-analysis of Corneal Biomechanical Effects after SMILE and FS-LASIK

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Qin ◽  
Tingting Fu ◽  
Qi Tang ◽  
Lu Yang ◽  
Min Chen
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Corneal Biomechanics ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cochrane Library ◽  
Chinese Group

Abstract Background: To evaluate and compare corneal biomechanics after treatment of myopia using small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Methods: We performed a meta-analysis and searched for reports concerning corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK using MEDLINE, EMbase, CNKI and the Cochrane Library. The analysis included corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) before and 3 months after the surgery. The quality of the reports was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan5. Results: Only six studies with a total of 771 eyes were ultimately included in this meta-analysis, and the random effects model was adopted. The preoperative and three-month postoperative CH and CRF of SMILE and FS-LASIK were compared by the meta-analysis. No statistically significant difference was found in CH or CRF between the SMILE group and the FS-LASIK group before the surgery (WMD，-0.12; 95% CI，-0.31～0.06; P，0.19; WMD，-0.05; 95% CI，-0.29～0.19; P，0.69). There was no statistically significant difference in CH between the two surgical methods 3 months after the operation in the foreign group (WMD，0.19; 95% CI，-1.02～1.41; P，0.75) or in the Chinese group (WMD，0.13; 95% CI，-0.16～0.41; P，0.75). Likewise, no statistically significant difference was found in CRF between the two surgical methods in the foreign group 3 months after the operation (WMD，-0.11; 95% CI，-2.53～-2.31; P，0.93). Nevertheless, the difference in CRF between the two surgical methods was statistically significant in the Chinese group (WMD，0.26; 95% CI，0.06～0.47; P，0.01). Concusion: This meta-analysis indicated that SMILE showed no significant postoperative advantage in CH in comparison with FS-LASIK. For CRF, SMILE exhibited no obvious postoperative advantage in comparison with FS-LASIK in the foreign group, whereas SMILE was superior to FS-LASIK in the Chinese group.

scholarly journals The effect of the head-up position in cardiopulmonary resuscitation – A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Chieh Huang ◽  
Kuan-Chih Chen ◽  
Zih-Yang Lin ◽  
Yu-Hsuan Chou ◽  
Wen-Liang Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cochrane Library ◽  
Acd Cpr ◽  
Impedance Threshold Device

Abstract ObjectiveThe pros and cons of the head-up position (HUP) in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have been controversial in previous studies. This study aims to clarify the effect of HUP CPR compared to supine position (SUP) CPR.MethodThree databases were comprehensively searched (PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library) for articles published from database inception to 10 May 2021. The primary outcome was cerebral perfusion pressure (CerPP). The secondary outcomes were mean intracranial pressure (ICP), mean artery pressure (MAP), coronary artery perfusion pressure (CoPP) and the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate.ResultA total of 7 studies including 138 animals were included. We found that CerPP (SMD, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.98–2.19; p < 0.01; I2 = 51%) and ICP (SMD, -3.59; 95% CI, -5.16– -2.02; p < 0.01; I2 = 87%) were decreased significantly in the HUP group. HUP had a similar MAP (SMD, -0.54; 95% CI, -1.75–0.66; p = 0.38; I2 = 87%) and ROSC rate (RR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.31–2.60; p = 0.84; I2 = 65%) to SUP. In addition, there was an increased CoPP trend in HUP, but the difference was not statistically significant (SMD, 0.92; 95% CI, -0.24–2.08; p = 0.12; I2 = 84%)ConclusionThe HUP 30° in active compression-decompression CPR (ACD-CPR) with an impedance threshold device (ITD) can increase CerPP by significantly lowering ICP and maintaining MAP compared to SUP, and the effect is immediate and lasts the whole CPR duration. In addition, CoPP might also be increased compared to that with SUP.

Differences in the roles of types 1 and 2 diabetes in the susceptibility to the risk of fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaqing Dou ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Qiu Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Indirect Comparison ◽  
Excess Risk ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Upper Arm ◽  
Risk Of Fracture ◽  
Comparison Results ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Abstract Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) causes excess risk of fracture at varied sites. Whereas, the difference between the roles of types 1 DM (T1DM) and 2 DM (T2DM) diabetes in the risk of fractures remains limited and inconclusive. We, therefore, conducted a meta-analysis to assess the differences for the associations of T1DM and T2DM with the risk of fractures.Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library for eligible studies until May 2021. The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the pooled effect estimates for the associations of T1DM and T2DM with the risk of fractures using the random-effects model. An indirect comparison results for the ratio of OR (ROR) with 95% CI were also applied to assess the difference between T1DM and T2DM with the risk of fractures.Results: Twenty-two cohort studies involving a total of 6,484,851 individuals were selected for meta-analysis. We noted that T1DM was associated with an increased risk of all fractures (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.36–2.19; P < 0.001), and fractures at the hip (OR: 4.01; 95% CI: 2.90–5.54; P < 0.001), upper arm (OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.61–3.00; P < 0.001), ankle (OR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.24–3.14; P = 0.004), and vertebrae (OR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.85–2.57; P < 0.001). Moreover, T2DM induced excess risk to all fractures (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.09–1.31; P < 0.001), including fractures at the hip (OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.15–1.35; P < 0.001), upper arm (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.20–1.67; P < 0.001), and ankle (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01–1.31; P = 0.029). Furthermore, we noted that T1DM versus T2DM was associated with greater risk to all fractures (ROR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.12–1.87; P = 0.005), including fractures at the hip (ROR: 3.21; 95% CI: 2.30–4.48; P < 0.001), upper arm (ROR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.09–2.20; P = 0.015), and ankle (ROR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.06–2.78; P = 0.029).Conclusions: This study found that T1DM caused an excess risk to all fractures, including fractures at the hip, upper arm, and ankle than T2DM. Further studies should therefore be conducted to directly compare the differences between T1DM and T2DM with the risk of fractures at various sites.

scholarly journals Differences in the roles of types 1 and 2 diabetes in the susceptibility to the risk of fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaqing Dou ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Qiu Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Indirect Comparison ◽  
Excess Risk ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Upper Arm ◽  
Risk Of Fracture ◽  
Comparison Results ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Abstract Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) causes excess risk of fracture at varied sites. Whereas, the difference between the roles of types 1 DM (T1DM) and 2 DM (T2DM) diabetes in the risk of fractures remains limited and inconclusive. We, therefore, conducted a meta-analysis to assess the differences for the associations of T1DM and T2DM with the risk of fractures. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library for eligible studies until May 2021. The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the pooled effect estimates for the associations of T1DM and T2DM with the risk of fractures using the random-effects model. An indirect comparison results for the ratio of OR (ROR) with 95% CI were also applied to assess the difference between T1DM and T2DM with the risk of fractures. Results Twenty-two cohort studies involving a total of 6,484,851 individuals were selected for meta-analysis. We noted that T1DM was associated with an increased risk of all fractures (OR: 1.72; 95% CI 1.36–2.19; P < 0.001), and fractures at the hip (OR: 4.01; 95% CI 2.90–5.54; P < 0.001), upper arm (OR: 2.20; 95% CI 1.61–3.00; P < 0.001), ankle (OR: 1.97; 95% CI 1.24–3.14; P = 0.004), and vertebrae (OR: 2.18; 95% CI 1.85–2.57; P < 0.001). Moreover, T2DM induced excess risk to all fractures (OR: 1.19; 95% CI 1.09–1.31; P < 0.001), including fractures at the hip (OR: 1.25; 95% CI 1.15–1.35; P < 0.001), upper arm (OR: 1.42; 95% CI 1.20–1.67; P < 0.001), and ankle (OR: 1.15; 95% CI 1.01–1.31; P = 0.029). Furthermore, we noted that T1DM versus T2DM was associated with greater risk to all fractures (ROR: 1.45; 95% CI 1.12–1.87; P = 0.005), including fractures at the hip (ROR: 3.21; 95% CI 2.30–4.48; P < 0.001), upper arm (ROR: 1.55; 95% CI 1.09–2.20; P = 0.015), and ankle (ROR: 1.71; 95% CI 1.06–2.78; P = 0.029). Conclusions This study found that T1DM caused an excess risk to all fractures, including fractures at the hip, upper arm, and ankle than T2DM. Further studies should therefore be conducted to directly compare the differences between T1DM and T2DM with the risk of fractures at various sites.

scholarly journals Low free-T3 serum levels and prognosis of COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Llamas ◽  
Maria Luisa Garo ◽  
Luca Giovanella
Keyword(s):  
Literature Search ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Free Triiodothyronine ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Literature Search Strategy ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Worse Prognosis

Abstract Objectives There is increasing interest regarding the relationship between serum levels of free triiodothyronine (fT3) and outcomes of COronaVIrus Disease-19 (COVID-19) patients. As several recent reports have described a worse prognosis in patients with low fT3 levels, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic role of fT3 serum levels in patients with COVID-19 as this information could be clinically relevant for the management of these patients. Methods The methodology was registered in the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) database under the protocol number CRD42021260952. A systematic search was carried out on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus from May to June 2021 without time and language restrictions. The literature search strategy was based on the following keywords: (T3 OR fT3 OR triiodothyronine) AND (COVID-19) AND (prognosis OR survival). Results The literature search identified 163 studies. Seven retrospective studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The included studies had a total of 1,183 patients. From the analysis of the included studies, lower fT3 serum levels were consistently observed in intensive care unit (ICU) than in non-ICU patients and in non-survivors than survivors, respectively. Conclusions Serum fT3 concentrations are significantly lower in patients with severe COVID-19 than in non-severely ill patients and predict all-cause mortality of patients with severe COVID-19. Accordingly, fT3 may become a simple tool for stratified management of patients with severe COVID-19.

Stump Invagination Versus Simple Ligation in Open Appendicectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1199-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daohai Qian ◽  
Zhigang He ◽  
Jie Hua ◽  
Zhenshun Song
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Fixed Effect Model ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Open Appendicectomy ◽  
Stump Closure ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
The Cochrane Library

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the superiority of stump closure between stump invagination (SI) and simple ligation (SL) during open appendicectomy (OA). The literature searching was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and http://scholar.google.com. Available data was extracted by 3 independent reviewers. The clinical outcomes were analyzed by meta-analytic software to compare the difference between 2 methods during OA. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were obtained by using fixed effect model. Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were finally included in this study involving 2634 patients. Postoperative pyrexia and infections were similar between SL and SI groups, respectively, but the former group had a shorter operative time (WMD: 8.72; 95% CI: 6.87–10.56; P &lt; 0.00001); less incidence of postoperative ileus (WMD: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.36–3.01; P = 0.0005); and quicker postoperative recovery (WMD: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.11–0.48; P = 0.002). The above results were based on 5, 11, 4, 11, and 9 articles, respectively. The clinical results revealed that SL was significantly superior to SI. SL should be suggested during OA.

Meta-analysis of alcohol consumption and venous thromboembolism

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingxia Zhang ◽  
Xinrong Chen ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Liang Du ◽  
Yong Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Alcohol Consumption ◽  
Alcohol Intake ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Reference List ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Moderate Alcohol Intake ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Abstract Background The associations of alcohol consumption and venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been investigated widely, but the conclusions were inconsistent. Objective To summarize the relationship of alcohol consumption and VTE. Methods This study has been registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42020164567). We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to September 2019 and reviewed the reference list of relevant articles to identify studies assessing the association between alcohol consumption and risk of VTE. Results Fourteen cohorts and four case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with non-drinkers, the risk of VTE was decreased (RR: 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–0.99) for alcohol drinkers. The pooled RRs of VTE were 0.91 (95% CI 0.84–0.99) for low to moderate alcohol intake (0.1–14.0 drinks/week) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.78–1.06) for high alcohol intake (&gt;14.0 drinks/week) compared with non-drinker. Subgroup analysis showed liquor intake might slightly increase the risk of VTE (1.01; 95% CI 0.85–1.21) although the difference was not significant. Conclusions Alcohol consumption in low to moderate was associated with a lower risk of VTE. However, precautions are needed when providing personal drinking advice considering the potential harm of alcohol. Further studies are warranted to determine whether moderate alcohol consumption has a causal role in VTE.

scholarly journals Patients With IBD Receiving Methotrexate Are at Higher Risk of Liver Injury Compared With Patients With Non-IBD Diseases: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Wang ◽  
Yimin Li ◽  
Yun Liu ◽  
Yifan Zhang ◽  
Ziliang Ke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Liver Injury ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Future Research ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Trim And Fill ◽  
The Cochrane Library ◽  
Rr Relative Risk

Background: Methotrexate is well-known in treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (Ps), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Several reports have indicated a higher incidence of methotrexate (MTX)-related liver adverse events in patients with IBD. We aim to investigate the risk of liver injury in patients with IBD and those with non-IBD diseases treated with MTX.Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles that reported liver adverse events in patients with IBD, RA, and Ps/PsA, receiving MTX therapy. Additional articles were obtained by screening the references of recent meta-analysis and reviews. Raw data from included articles were pooled to calculate the cumulative incidence of total liver injury (TLI), MTX discontinuation (MTX-D), and liver fibrosis (LF). RR (relative risk) was calculated to compare the difference between patients with IBD and those with non-IBD diseases.Results: A total of 326 articles with 128,876 patients were included. The patients with IBD had higher incidence of TLI [11.2 vs. 9.2%; relative risk (RR) = 1.22; P = 0.224] and MTX-D (2.6 vs. 1.8%; RR, 1.48; P = 0.089) than patients with non-IBD diseases. Due to the publication bias, trim-and-fill was performed. Afterwards, the patients with IBD showed significantly higher risk of TLI (11.2 vs. 3%; RR = 3.76; p &lt; 0.001), MTX-D (3.3 vs. 0.7%; RR = 5; p &lt; 0.001) and LF (3.1 vs. 0.1%; RR = 38.62; P = 0.001) compared with patients with non-IBD diseases.Conclusion: IBD is associated with a higher risk of MTX-related liver injury. The mechanism of MTX-induced hepatotoxicity might be different in IBD and non-IBD diseases, and needs to be verified in future research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document