scholarly journals Paraneoplastic and Other Autoimmune Encephalitides: Antineuronal Antibodies, T Lymphocytes, and Questions of Pathogenesis

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Greenlee ◽  
Noel G. Carlson ◽  
Justin R. Abbatemarco ◽  
Ida Herdlevær ◽  
Stacey L. Clardy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Lymphocytes ◽  
Cell Surface ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Neuronal Death ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Neuronal Cell ◽  
Neuronal Injury ◽  
Neurological Injury

Autoimmune and paraneoplastic encephalitides represent an increasingly recognized cause of devastating human illness as well as an emerging area of neurological injury associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Two groups of antibodies have been detected in affected patients. Antibodies in the first group are directed against neuronal cell surface membrane proteins and are exemplified by antibodies directed against the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR), found in patients with autoimmune encephalitis, and antibodies directed against the leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 protein (anti-LGI1), associated with faciobrachial dystonic seizures and limbic encephalitis. Antibodies in this group produce non-lethal neuronal dysfunction, and their associated conditions often respond to treatment. Antibodies in the second group, as exemplified by anti-Yo antibody, found in patients with rapidly progressive cerebellar syndrome, and anti-Hu antibody, associated with encephalomyelitis, react with intracellular neuronal antigens. These antibodies are characteristically found in patients with underlying malignancy, and neurological impairment is the result of neuronal death. Within the last few years, major advances have been made in understanding the pathogenesis of neurological disorders associated with antibodies against neuronal cell surface antigens. In contrast, the events that lead to neuronal death in conditions associated with antibodies directed against intracellular antigens, such as anti-Yo and anti-Hu, remain poorly understood, and the respective roles of antibodies and T lymphocytes in causing neuronal injury have not been defined in an animal model. In this review, we discuss current knowledge of these two groups of antibodies in terms of their discovery, how they arise, the interaction of both types of antibodies with their molecular targets, and the attempts that have been made to reproduce human neuronal injury in tissue culture models and experimental animals. We then discuss the emerging area of autoimmune neuronal injury associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the implications of current research for the treatment of affected patients.

scholarly journals Integrating Circulating Biomarkers in the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment in Lung Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3625
Author(s):  
Boris Duchemann ◽  
Jordi Remon ◽  
Marie Naigeon ◽  
Laura Mezquita ◽  
Roberto Ferrara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Circulating Biomarkers ◽  
Liquid Biopsies ◽  
Technical Requirements ◽  
Mutational Burden ◽  
Tumor Mutational Burden

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are now a cornerstone of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tissue-based assays, such as Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-L1) expression or mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability (MMRD/MSI) status, are approved as treatment drivers in various settings, and represent the main field of research in biomarkers for immunotherapy. Nonetheless, responses have been observed in patients with negative PD-L1 or low tumor mutational burden. Some aspects of biomarker use remain poorly understood and sub-optimal, in particular tumoral heterogeneity, time-evolving sampling, and the ability to detect patients who are unlikely to respond. Moreover, tumor biopsies offer little insight into the host’s immune status. Circulating biomarkers offer an alternative non-invasive solution to address these pitfalls. Here, we summarize current knowledge on circulating biomarkers while using liquid biopsies in patients with lung cancer who receive treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, in terms of their potential as being predictive of outcome as well as their role in monitoring ongoing treatment. We address host biomarkers, notably circulating immune cells and soluble systemic immune and inflammatory markers, and also review tumor markers, including blood-based tumor mutational burden, circulating tumor cells, and circulating tumor DNA. Technical requirements are discussed along with the current limitations that are associated with these promising biomarkers.

scholarly journals The Role of Molecular Profiling to Predict the Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courèche Kaderbhaï ◽  
Zoé Tharin ◽  
François Ghiringhelli
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Dna And Rna ◽  
Tumor Mutational Burden ◽  
Tumor Expression

Immune checkpoint inhibitors radically changed the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only one-quarter of patients benefit from these new therapies when used as monotherapy. The assessment of Program Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor expression by immunohistochemistry is used to select potential responder patients, but this not an optimal marker since it does not predict the absence of anti PD-1 efficacy. Despite this shortcoming, PD-L1 remains the gold standard biomarker in many studies and the only biomarker available for clinicians. In addition to histological markers, transcriptomic and exome analyses have revealed potential biomarkers requiring further confirmation. Recently, tumor mutational burden has emerged as a good surrogate marker of outcome. In this review we will detail current knowledge on DNA and RNA related biomarkers.

Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GEP NENs) : The Role of Checkpoint Inhibitors

2022 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Arrivi ◽  
Nicola Fazio
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Precision Oncology ◽  
Disease Characteristics

Background: The treatment options for GEP-NENs includes various drugs and is based on grading, morphology and location of the primary Objective: The aim of our work is to investigate the clinical impact of new immune checkpoint inhibitors in order to define a new possible strategy of use within GEP-NENs. Method: A scientific literature search from 2015 to January 2020 was performed by using PubMed and Embase: reviews and prospective or retrospective studies with a minimum of twenty patients were selected; conference proceedings were included Results: several studies have been conducted to assess the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in NENs, but nowadays the current knowledge in this field is mainly based on a phase I-II studies. Immunotherapy showed limited antitumor activity, but higher response rate was reported in poor-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. No specific biomarkers were identified for patient selection and response assessment Conclusion: Immunotherapy appears as a powerful possibility to help our patients, but nowadays we see many gaps in this field. We must balance therapeutic possibility offered by precision oncology with the understanding the limitations of application of testing and treatment in clinical practice. Future efforts should focus on research of the best patients to candidate for immunotherapy in term of disease characteristics and previous treatments, and how to select them with accurate biomarkers.

PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors: between a dream and a nightmare

Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Zouein ◽  
Carole Kesrouani ◽  
Hampig Raphael Kourie
Keyword(s):  
Cell Surface ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Potential Biomarker ◽  
Companion Diagnostic ◽  
Score Reporting

PD-L1 is an important predictive biomarker for treatment by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). ICIs are now indicated for the treatment of various cancer depending on the level of expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells. PD-L1 testing is done using immunohistochemistry with five different assays approved as companion diagnostic for ICIs. However, these assays have different score reporting methods and do not accurately measure PD-L1 expression. Exosomal PD-L1 testing has recently emerged as an alternative for cell-surface PD-L1 testing however studies are still premature and more extensive knowledge about this new potential biomarker is needed.

Clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with brain metastases

Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 419-432
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Di Nunno ◽  
Giacomo Nuvola ◽  
Mirta Mosca ◽  
Ilaria Maggio ◽  
Lidia Gatto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Role ◽  
Negative Prognostic Factor ◽  
Solid Malignancies

Brain metastases (BMs) represent a negative prognostic factor for patients with solid malignancies. BMs are generally approached with loco-regional treatments and the blood–brain barrier limits the efficacy of some systemic drugs. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge about the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the management of brain metastases in patients with solid malignancies. We performed a review of available literature. Immune checkpoint inhibitors represent the standard treatment for several advanced solid malignancies. However, with the exception of melanoma their clinical role in other solid malignancies is not completely clear due to the exclusion of patients with BM from approval clinical trials. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors may be an effective treatment of brain metastases of melanoma while their clinical role on brain metastases from other solid malignancies is uncertain.

scholarly journals The immune tumour microenvironment of neuroendocrine tumours and its implications for immune checkpoint inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. R329-R343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim J Takkenkamp ◽  
Mathilde Jalving ◽  
Frederik J H Hoogwater ◽  
Annemiek M E Walenkamp
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumour Microenvironment ◽  
Kynurenine Pathway ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Major Interest

Immunotherapy in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has transformed the treatment landscape in numerous types of advanced cancer. However, the majority of patients do not benefit from this treatment modality. Although data are scarce, in general, patients with low-grade neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) do not benefit from treatment with ICIs in contrast to patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma, in which a small subgroup of patients may benefit. Low- and intermediate-grade NETs predominantly lack factors associated with response to ICIs treatment, like immune cell infiltration, and have an immunosuppressive tumour metabolism and microenvironment. In addition, because of its potential influence on the response to ICIs, major interest has been shown in the tryptophan-degrading enzymes indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO). These enzymes work along the kynurenine pathway that deplete tryptophan in the tumour microenvironment. IDO and TDO are especially of interest in NETs since some tumours produce serotonin but the majority do not, which potentially deplete the precursor tryptophan. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the immune tumour microenvironment of neuroendocrine tumours and implications for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We also discuss (targetable) factors in the NET tumour microenvironment that potentially modulate the anti-cancer immune response.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinomas: Current Knowledge and Future Directions

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 4341
Author(s):  
Jonathan Thouvenin ◽  
Nieves Martínez Chanzá ◽  
Omar Alhalabi ◽  
Hervé Lang ◽  
Nizar M. Tannir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Immune Microenvironment ◽  
Upper Tract ◽  
Molecular Alterations ◽  
Urothelial Carcinomas

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents a rare and aggressive malignancy arising from the renal pelvis or ureter. It can develop sporadically or have a hereditary origin, such as Lynch syndrome, caused by DNA mismatch repair deficiency, leading to microsatellite instability phenotype. According to molecular characterization studies, UTUC presents different mutational profiles as compared to urinary bladder urothelial carcinomas. In particular, it has been reported that UTUC harbored a higher level of FGFR3 alterations associated with a T-cell depleted immune microenvironment. The therapeutic landscape in urothelial carcinoma is rapidly evolving, with immune checkpoint inhibitors forming part of the standard of care. A greater understanding of the molecular alterations and immune microenvironment leads to the development of new treatment combinations and targeted therapy. This review summarizes the available evidence concerning the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the biological rationale underlying their use in high-grade UTUC.

Predictive markers of immune response in glioblastoma: hopes and facts

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (15) ◽  
pp. 1053-1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Di Nunno ◽  
Enrico Franceschi ◽  
Lidia Gatto ◽  
Stefania Bartolini ◽  
Alba Ariela Brandes
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Predictive Markers ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Critical Importance

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) represent a concrete hope for patients with advanced solid tumors. Indeed, patients responding to these agents may experience a long-lasting response. Recently, results of interventional clinical trials investigated the role of ICIs in patients with glioblastoma. Results of these studies suggested that only a small percentage of these patients could benefit from these agents. Research of predictive markers assumes a critical importance to adequately select patients likely to benefit from ICIs. Molecular and clinical variables associated to tumors and patients have been evaluated as potential predictive markers. Main aim of the current work is to summarize and critically evaluate current knowledge in this field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document