scholarly journals Reduced Risk of Reoperations With Modern Deep Brain Stimulator Systems: Big Data Analysis From a United States Claims Database

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengyuan Wu ◽  
Sean J. Nagel ◽  
Rahul Agarwal ◽  
Monika Pötter-Nerger ◽  
Wolfgang Hamel ◽  
...  

Objective: There have been significant improvements in the design and manufacturing of deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems, but no study has considered the impact of modern systems on complications. We sought to compare the relative occurrence of reoperations after de novo implantation of modern and traditional DBS systems in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) or essential tremor (ET) in the United States.Design: Retrospective, contemporaneous cohort study.Setting: Multicenter data from the United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services administrative claims database between 2016 and 2018.Participants: This population-based sample consisted of 5,998 patients implanted with a DBS system, of which 3,869 patients had a de novo implant and primary diagnosis of PD or ET. Follow-up of 3 months was available for 3,810 patients, 12 months for 3,561 patients, and 24 months for 1,812 patients.Intervention: Implantation of a modern directional (MD) or traditional omnidirectional (TO) DBS system.Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: We hypothesized that MD systems would impact complication rates. Reoperation rate was the primary outcome. Associated diagnoses, patient characteristics, and implanting center details served as covariates. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to compare rates of event-free survival and regression models were used to determine covariate influences.Results: Patients implanted with modern systems were 36% less likely to require reoperation, largely due to differences in acute reoperations and intracranial lead reoperations. Risk reduction persisted while accounting for practice differences and implanting center experience. Risk reduction was more pronounced in patients with PD.Conclusions: In the first multicenter analysis of device-related complications including modern DBS systems, we found that modern systems are associated with lower reoperation rates. This risk profile should be carefully considered during device selection for patients undergoing DBS for PD or ET. Prospective studies are needed to further investigate underlying causes.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13592-e13592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrine Wallace ◽  
Adrienne Landsteiner ◽  
Scott Bunner ◽  
Nicole Engel-Nitz ◽  
Amy Luckenbaugh

e13592 Background: To date, there has been a paucity of information in the literature describing the epidemiology of mCRPC within the prostate cancer population. We present a real-world data study describing characteristics and mortality of patients with mCRPC within an administrative claims database of an insured population within the United States. Methods: In an administrative claims database of ≈18,000,000 covered lives, adult male patients were included if they had ≥1 claim for prostate cancer (ICD-9: 185 or 233.4; ICD-10: C61 or D075), underwent pharmacologic or surgical castration, and had a code for metastatic disease during the identification period (January 1, 2008–March 31, 2018). The index date was the first metastatic claim; 6 months of continuous enrollment (CE) prior to (baseline period) and after (follow-up period) the index date was required. Patients with metastatic claims in the baseline period were excluded. Patients were followed until the earliest of: death (unless prior to the 6-month CE), end of study period, or disenrollment. A claims-based algorithm was employed to identify locally advanced and distant mCRPC patients in the prostate cancer study population. Mortality data were sourced from the Social Security Administration Medicare data, and a claims algorithm. Results: 343,089 patients were identified with a claim for prostate cancer; of those, 3690 mCRPC cases (1.1%) were identified using the claims-based algorithm and met the study inclusion criteria. Median age was 75 years. Insurance type included commercial plans (27%) and Medicare (73%). Castration type included pharmacologic (99%) and surgical (1%). First claims for metastases were most commonly in the bone (65%) or lymph nodes (15%), with 20% in other sites. The study population averaged a Charlson comorbidity index score of 3.05 at baseline, with 16% of patients receiving a score of ≥5. The most common baseline comorbidities were hypertension (67%), urinary disease (58%), dyslipidemia (52%), and cardiac disease (45%). Median follow-up time among the mCRPC group was 538 days, during which 1834 deaths occurred; 50% of the population experienced mortality during the study period. Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, prevalence rate, and mortality of patients with mCRPC. Given the high mortality proportion of this disease, the development of novel therapies to prolong life in patients with mCRPC is warranted.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia N.M. Kraay ◽  
Peichun Han ◽  
Anita K. Kambhampati ◽  
Mary E. Wikswo ◽  
Sara A. Mirza ◽  
...  

AbstractImportanceThe impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on incidence of other infectious diseases is still being assessed.ObjectiveTo determine if the observed change in reported norovirus outbreaks in the United States was best explained by underreporting, seasonal trends, or reduced exposure due to NPIs. We also aimed to assess if the change in reported norovirus outbreaks varied by setting.DesignAn ecologic, interrupted time series analysis of norovirus outbreaks from nine states reported to the National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS) from July 2012–July 2020.SettingSurveillance data from Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin were included in the analysis.Participants9,226 reports of acute gastroenteritis outbreaks with norovirus as an epidemiologically suspected or laboratory-confirmed etiology were included in the analysis, resulting in more than 8 years of follow up. Outbreak reports from states that participated in NoroSTAT for at least 4 years were included in the analysis (range: 4–8 years).ExposureThe main exposure of interest was time period: before (July 2012–February 2020) or after (April 2020–July 2020) the start of NPIs in the United StatesMain outcomeThe main outcome of interest was monthly rate of reported norovirus outbreaks. As a secondary outcome, we also examined the average outbreak size.ResultsWe found that the decline in norovirus outbreak reports was significant for all 9 states considered (pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) comparing April 2020-July 2020 vs. all pre-COVID months for each state= 0.14, 95% CI: 0.098, 0.21; P=<0.0001), even after accounting for typical seasonal decline in incidence during the summer months. These patterns were similar across a variety of settings, including nursing homes, child daycares, healthcare settings, and schools. The average outbreak size was also reduced by 61% (95% CI: 56%, 42.7%; P=<0.0001), suggesting that the decline does not reflect a tendency to report only more severe outbreaks due to strained surveillance systems, but instead reflects a decline in incidence.Conclusions and relevanceWhile NPIs implemented during the spring and summer of 2020 were intended to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2, these changes also appear to have impacted the incidence of norovirus, a non-respiratory pathogen. These results suggest that NPIs may provide benefit for preventing transmission of other human pathogens, reducing strain to health systems during the continued SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.DisclaimerThe findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadip Pant ◽  
Samir Patel ◽  
Harsh Golwala ◽  
Nilesh Patel ◽  
Apurva Badheka ◽  
...  

Introduction: With the technical advancements and expanding indications, utilization of TAVR is on the rise among various institutions in the United States .While appropriate patient selection and better techniques are essential to improving outcomes, the impact of institutional design (or hospital setting) on outcomes with TAVR has yet to be examined. Objective: The objective of our study is to compare TAVR complication rates among teaching vs non-teaching centers in the United States Methods: We used Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project - National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data , the largest all payer database of hospital inpatient stay available in United States, to identify patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent TAVR from Jan-Dec 2012. We constructed multivariable models to determine independent predictors (age, sex, race, Charlson’s comorbidity index, hospital size, hospital location and TAVR approach) of TAVR-associated complications. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata IC 11.0 (Stata-Corp, College Station, TX). Results: We identified 7,405 TAVR procedures performed in the United States in 2012. 88% of TAVR were performed in teaching centers. There was no difference in mortality following TAVR between teaching and non-teaching centers. The occurrence of any in-hospital complication was lower in teaching centers as compared to non-teaching centers (42% vs. 50%, p<0.001). Rates of individual complications in teaching vs. non-teaching centers are illustrated in the figure. In adjusted analysis, hemorrhage requiring transfusion (13.2% vs. 20.8%, p<0.001), renal complications requiring dialysis (1.2% vs. 2.3%, p=0.009), respiratory complications (7.5% vs. 11%, p<0.001) and complications requiring open-heart surgery (2% vs. 4.6%, p<0.001) were lower in teaching centers as compared to non-teaching centers. Vascular access site complications, pacemaker insertion, pericardial and neurological complications were similar between teaching and non-teaching centers (Figure). Conclusion: Institutional design impacts TAVR complication rates albeit no difference in mortality. In general, complication rates are lower in teaching centers compared to non-teaching centers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document