scholarly journals Weekly Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Cetuximab as First-Line Treatment of Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma for Patients Ineligible to Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Monocentric Study in 60 Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hélène Carinato ◽  
Mickaël Burgy ◽  
Régine Ferry ◽  
Cathie Fischbach ◽  
Michal Kalish ◽  
...  

ObjectiveFor most patients suffering from recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC), chemotherapy is the main option after considering surgery and reirradiation. Cetuximab combined with a platinum-fluorouracil regimen (EXTREME) has been the standard of care for over a decade. Nevertheless, a significant number of patients remain unfit for this regimen because of age, severe comorbidities, or poor performance status. The aim of this study is to investigate an alternative regimen with sufficient efficacy and safety.MethodsWe reviewed retrospectively the medical charts of all patients treated with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab (PCC) at our institution. Eligibility criteria were as follows: first-line R/M-HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx not suitable for local therapy, cisplatin, and/or 5-FU ineligibility, ECOG-PS: 0–2. PCC consisted of paclitaxel 80 mg/m2, carboplatin AUC 2, and cetuximab at an initial dose of 400 mg/m2 then 250 mg/m2, for 16 weekly administrations followed by cetuximab maintenance for patients for whom a disease control was obtained. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), and safety.ResultsWe identified 60 consecutive patients treated with PCC between 2010 and 2016 at our institution. Thirty-one patients (52%) were ECOG-PS 2. Fifty-five patients (92%) were cisplatin ineligible. ORR was 43.3% (95% CI, 30.8–55.8), and disease control rate was 65% (95% CI, 52.9–77.1). With a median follow-up of 35.7 months (IQR 28.6–48.8), median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.5–7.2), and median OS was 11.7 months (95% CI, 7.5-14.8). For ECOG-PS 0–1 patients, median OS was 14.8 months (95% CI, 12.2–21.7) while it was only 7.5 months (95%CI: 5.5-12.7) for ECOG-PS 2 patients (p < 0.04). Grades III–IV toxicities occurred in 30 patients (50%). Most toxicities were hematologic. Six patients (10%) had febrile neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicities were reported such as cutaneous toxicities, neuropathy, infusion-related reactions, or electrolyte disorders.ConclusionThe weekly PCC regimen seems to be an interesting option in cisplatin-unfit patients. This study shows favorable PFS and OS when compared with what is achieved with the EXTREME regimen and a high controlled disease rate with predictable and manageable toxicities even in the more fragile population.

Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 122 (15) ◽  
pp. 2350-2355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared M. Weiss ◽  
Stephen Bagley ◽  
Wei-Ting Hwang ◽  
Joshua Bauml ◽  
Juneko Grilley Olson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18054-e18054
Author(s):  
Valentina Fausti ◽  
Federica Recine ◽  
Flavia Foca ◽  
Sebastiano Calpona ◽  
Davide Bruschi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17505-e17505
Author(s):  
Andrea M Tufano ◽  
James Newman ◽  
Emile Gogineni ◽  
Jessie L Karten ◽  
Doru Paul ◽  
...  

e17505 Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been shown to provide locoregional control in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients (pts) who are not candidates for curative procedures due to poor performance status, comorbidities, or radiation dose limitations from prior treatment. The addition of chemotherapy (chemo) and/or cetuximab (CET) is hypothesized to improve outcomes compared to SBRT alone, but there is limited data on comparative effectiveness. We compared outcomes of pts treated with SBRT vs. SBRT + chemo and/or CET using retrospective observational data from our institution. Methods: We identified new and recurrent HNSCC pts treated with SBRT +/- systemic therapy from 2012 to 2018. Age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and stage were recorded. Primary outcome was locoregional disease control rate based on Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors on 3-month post-treatment imaging. Secondary outcome was overall survival (OS) at 1 year. Pts were divided into 4 groups: SBRT, SBRT+chemo, SBRT+CET, and SBRT+chemo+CET (cohorts A, B, C and D, respectively). Results: 90 pts with median age of 73 years and median follow-up of 11.5 months were included. 94.4% were stage III or IV, and 68.9% had recurrent disease. The most commonly utilized chemotherapy was carboplatin and paclitaxel. Cohorts A, B, C and D constituted 28.9%, 31.1%, 31.1% and 8.8% respectively. Groups were well matched except for pts in Cohort A being significantly older than those in Cohort B (74.9 vs. 68.4 years; p = 0.01). Average CCI estimated 10-year survival was 8.4%. There was a trend towards improved locoregional control at 3 months in Cohort B vs. A (57.1% vs. 34.6%, p = 0.09), and improved OS at 1 year (46.4% vs. 23.1%; p = 0.07). These trends were not observed in comparisons between other cohorts. Conclusions: Chemo + SBRT may improve disease control as well as 1 year OS in HNSCC pts who do not qualify for curative procedures. Given the younger age of pts receiving chemo, selection bias cannot be excluded. Prospective studies with larger patient cohorts are needed to further evaluate the benefits and toxicities of adding systemic treatment to SBRT in this population.


2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 489-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianni Fornari ◽  
Elisa Artusio ◽  
Lorenza Mairone ◽  
Mario Airoldi ◽  
Guido Bongioannini ◽  
...  

Aim and background To evaluate feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NA-CT) followed by CT + radiotherapy (RT) in locally advanced or unresectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods 22 HNSCC patients were enrolled (18 males, 4 females; median age, 59.5 years; median ECOG PS, 1). Sites of disease: oral cavity, 18.2%; oropharynx, 40.9%; hypopharynx, 18.2%; larynx, 4.6%, multiple sites, 18.2%. T (tumor) category: T2, 13.6%; T3, 31.8%;T4, 54.5%. N (nodes) category: N0, 9.1%; N1, 18.1%; N2, 40.9%; N3, 31.8%. Stage: III, 4.6%; IVA, 63.6%; IVB, 31.8%. Induction carboplatin (AUC = 6) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) × 3 cycles (q21 days) were given. Responders received definitive radiotherapy with concurrent carboplatin (35 mg/m2/day from days 1 to 5 in weeks 1, 3, 5 and 7) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2 on days 10, 24 and 38). Patients with node involvement were suggested to undergo postradiotherapy neck dissection. Results NA-CT. 97% of planned chemotherapy cycles were administered. Prevalent toxicity was hematologic: 50% G4 neutropenia and 31.8% G3, one neutropenic fever. All patients had alopecia. Complete responses in T and N were 4 (18.2%) and 3 (15%), respectively. Partial responses were 13 (59%) and 9 (45%). There was 1 progressive disease. CT + RT. 79.9% of planned cycles of CT were administered. In 19 patients (86.4%) more than 50% of planned cycles of CT were completed. Median dose of RT was 70.2 Gy on T/N+ and 54 Gy on N0. Limiting toxicity was mucositis in 77.3%, followed by neutropenia (59.1% G3–G4). Median weight loss was 4.9%. 18.2% of patients required hospitalization. Complete responses in T and N were 15 (68.1%) and 8 (40%), respectively. Partial responses were 5 (22.7%) and 7 (35%). Conclusions The preliminary results of this study are encouraging, despite the toxicity. Adequate follow-up is required to evaluate efficacy in terms of local-regional control and overall survival.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document