scholarly journals The Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Injudicious Use of Cefuroxime

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann L. Arulappen ◽  
Monica Danial ◽  
Norliza Haron ◽  
Lim Choo Hau ◽  
Amer Hayat Khan
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Prescribing Pattern ◽  
Healthcare Settings ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
The Cost ◽  
The Impact

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program promotes the judicious use of antimicrobials. Hence, this study was conducted to analyze the impact of stewardship on the prescribing pattern of cefuroxime injection among the surgeons as perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (PAP). This study was conducted retrospectively in Malaysia. Various outcomes were measured including cefuroxime usage, compliance with the guidelines, surgical site infections, and cost savings. A total of 1,601 patients were recruited in the study. In terms of usage, the total defined daily dose (DDD) prior to the intervention was 202 DDD/100 procedures compared to that after intervention which was 144 DDD/100 procedures (p < 0.05). On the other hand, the excessively long administration of PAP dropped from 94.4 to 30.3% (p < 0.001). Focusing on the compliance with the newly developed local guidelines, it has increased from 53 to 94.3% after the interventions were made (p < 0.001), whereas the rate of surgical site infections was reduced from 17.0 to 9.0%. The cost of antibiotic being used has significantly reduced after the study intervention (p = 0.007). The quality of PAP directly impacts the antimicrobial usage, the surgical site infections, and the total cost involved. Thus, it is crucial to maintain the standard of PAP at all times in healthcare settings.

scholarly journals IMPACT OF ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM ON THE USE OF ANTIBIOTICS IN PNEUMONIA PATIENTS AT TEACHING HOSPITAL IN SURAKARTA INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
pp. 20-23
Author(s):  
HIDAYAH KARUNIAWATI ◽  
TRI YULIANTI ◽  
DEWI KUROTA AINI ◽  
FINISHIA ISNA NURWIENDA
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Inappropriate Use ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Method Show

Objective: Antibiotic resistance is a serious problem worldwide. One cause of antibacterial resistance is the inappropriate use of antibiotics. Thestudy of antibiotic use in hospitals found that 30–80% were not based on indications. Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) was developed tocontrol antimicrobial resistance. This study aims to evaluate the impact of ASP in pneumonia patients qualitatively and quantitatively pre-post ASPapplied.Methods: This research is a non-experimental study. Data were taken from the medical records of pneumonia patients and analyzed qualitativelyusing the Gyssens method and quantitatively using the Defined Daily Dose (DDD) method. Sampling was conducted through purposive sampling andresults were described descriptively.Results: During the study period, 96 samples were obtained with 48 data pre-ASP and 48 data post-ASP. The results of the qualitative analysis usingthe Gyssens method show an increase in the prudent use of antibiotics from 31.25% to 62.5% pre-post ASP, respectively. Quantitative evaluationshows a decrease of antibiotic use pre-post ASP from 90.84 DDD/100 patients-days to 61.42 DDD/100 patients-days.Conclusion: The ASP can improve the quality of antibiotic use in pneumonia patients quantitatively and qualitatively.

scholarly journals Impact of a mobile decision support tool on antimicrobial stewardship indicators in St. John’s, Canada

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252407
Author(s):  
Daniel Doyle ◽  
Gerald McDonald ◽  
Claire Pratt ◽  
Zahra Rehan ◽  
Tammy Benteau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Survey Tool ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

Objectives Inappropriate antibiotic use contributes to antimicrobial resistance. The SpectrumTM app provides antibiotic decision support, based on local antimicrobial resistance rates. We determined the impact of regional implementation of the app on inpatient antimicrobial appropriateness, inpatient antimicrobial usage (AMU), population-based Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) rates and cost, using a retrospective, before and after quasi-experimental design, including a one-year study period. Methods The SpectrumTM app was released to prescribers in February, 2019. We performed two one-day inpatient point prevalence surveys using the National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey tool, six months before (June 25, 2018) and six months after (June 25, 2019) app dissemination. Inpatient AMU in Defined Daily Dose/1000 patient days and CDI incidence were compared, before and after app dissemination. Results The pre-survey included 184 prescriptions, and the post-survey included 197 prescriptions. Appropriateness was 97/176 (55.1%) pre, and 126/192 (65.6%) post (+10.5%, p = 0.051). Inpatient AMU declined by 6.6 DDD/1000 patient days per month, and CDI declined by 0.3 cases per month. Cost savings associated with reduced AMU were $403.98/bed/year and associated with reduced CDI were $82,078/year. Conclusion We observed improvement in antimicrobial stewardship indicators following SpectrumTM implementation. We cannot determine the cause of these improvements.

scholarly journals 43. Impact of a Five-Year Intervention of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on the Optimal Antibiotic Prophylaxis Selection in Surgery in a Hospital without Restrictions on Antibiotics Prescription in Costa Rica

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S143-S143
Author(s):  
José P Díaz-Madriz ◽  
Esteban Zavaleta-Monestel ◽  
Jorge A Villalobos-Madriz ◽  
Alison V Meléndez-Alfaro ◽  
Priscilla Castrillo-Portillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Defined Daily Doses ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract Background In a private hospital without restrictions on antibiotic prescription, the success of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) depends mainly on prospective feedback and education. Previously, the ASP of this hospital (PROA-HCB) managed to achieve a positive impact on the antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean delivery. The purpose of this study is to characterize the impact after implementing the PROA-HCB on the optimal prophylaxis selection of all the procedures included in the clinical guideline for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in adult patients. Methods A retrospective observational study that compares the selection, duration, antibiotic consumption, bacterial resistance profiles and patient’s safety outcomes regarding antibiotic use for all surgical prophylaxis prescription over six months for the periods before (pre-ASP) and after a five-year intervention of PROA-HCB (post-ASP). Results After a five-year intervention, the percentage of optimal selection of antibiotic prophylaxis in Surgery was 21.0% (N=1598) in the pre-ASP period and 80.0% (N=841) in the post-ASP period (59% absolute improvement, p < 0.001). Percentage of optimal duration was 69,1% (N=1598) in the pre-ASP period and 78.0% (N=841) in the post-ASP period (8.9% absolute improvement, p < 0.001). Mean ceftriaxone utilization was 217.7 defined daily doses (DDD) per 1,000 patient days DDD for the pre-ASP period and 139.8 DDD per 1,000 patient days for the ASP period (35.8% decrease; p = 0.019). Mean cefazolin utilization was 14.9 DDD per 1,000 patient days for the pre-ASP period and 153.3 DDD per 1,000 patient days for the ASP period (928.6% increase; p = 0.021). Regarding percentage of bacterial resistance, there was detected an improvement in some isolates like Escherichia coli with a decrease of ESBL detection (11% decrease; p = 0.007). In addition, no serious adverse reactions or an increase in surgical site infections were detected after the intervention. Conclusion The implementation of an ASP in the surgical ward showed an overall positive impact on selection and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. Furthermore, this intervention could have had a positive impact on antimicrobial resistance and at the same time had no negative effects on the patients. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Impact of a pharmacist-driven antimicrobial stewardship program in a private hospital in Costa Rica

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
José Pablo Díaz-Madriz ◽  
Eugenia Cordero-García ◽  
José Miguel Chaverri-Fernández ◽  
Esteban Zavaleta-Monestel ◽  
Josué Murillo-Cubero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Private Hospital ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Resistance Patterns ◽  
The Impact

Objective. To measure the impact generated by the implementation of the pharmacy-driven antimicrobial stewardship program of the Clínica Bíblica Hospital. Methods. This is a retrospective observational study that evaluates the consumption of antibiotics for the periods before and during implementation of the Clínica Bíblica Hospital antimicrobial stewardship program, calculated by means of defined daily dose per 1 000 patient-days and days of therapy per 1 000 patient-days. In addition, bacterial resistance patterns for the periods 2014–2015 and 2016–2017 were compared. Results. Consumption of most-used antibiotics was calculated, looking for trends that might be associated with the activities implemented by the Clínica Bíblica Hospital antimicrobial stewardship program. Comparing some of the antibiotics with the highest consumption in periods I and II, use of levofloxacin and ceftriaxone showed a decrease of 54.0% (p < 0.001) and 14.6% (p = 0.003), respectively, whereas there was an increase in the use of cefazolin of 4 539.3% (p < 0.001). Regarding percentage of bacterial resistance, in most bacterial isolates no statistically significant changes were observed between the two periods. Conclusions. A reduction in the overall consumption of antibiotics has been achieved over time, most likely attributable to the antimicrobial stewardship program. However, this trend was not observed for all the antibiotics studied. The pattern of resistance among the commonly isolated microorganisms did not vary greatly between the periods studied, which suggests that either the antimicrobial stewardship program may have prevented an increase in bacterial resistance since its implementation, or that it is too soon to see impact on bacterial resistance.

An Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Based on Systematic Infectious Disease Consultation in a Rehabilitation Facility

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Tedeschi ◽  
Filippo Trapani ◽  
Maddalena Giannella ◽  
Francesco Cristini ◽  
Fabio Tumietto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Rehabilitation Hospital ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Resistance Patterns ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVETo assess the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on antibiotic consumption, Clostridium difficile infections (CDI), and antimicrobial resistance patterns in a rehabilitation hospital.DESIGNQuasi-experimental study of the periods before (from January 2011 to June 2012) and after (from July 2012 to December 2014) ASP implementation.SETTING150-bed rehabilitation hospital dedicated to patients with spinal-cord injuries.INTERVENTIONBeginning in July 2012, an ASP was implemented based on systematic bedside infectious disease (ID) consultation and structural interventions (ie, revision of protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis and education focused on the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions). Antibiotic consumption, occurrence of CDI, and antimicrobial resistance patterns of selected microorganisms were compared between periods before and after the ASP implementation.RESULTSAntibiotic consumption decreased from 42 to 22 defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 patient days (P<.001). The main reductions involved carbapenems (from 13 to 0.4 DDD per 100 patient days; P=.01) and fluoroquinolones (from 11.8 to 0.99 DDD per 100 patient days; P=.006), with no increases in mortality or length of stay. The incidence of CDI decreased from 3.6 to 1.2 cases per 10,000 patient days (P=.001). Between 2011 and 2014, the prevalence of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains decreased from 55% to 12% in P. aeruginosa (P<.001) and from 96% to 73% in A. baumannii (P=.03). The prevalence of ESBL-producing strains decreased from 42% to 17% in E. coli (P=.0007) and from 62% to 15% in P. mirabilis (P=.0001). In K. pneumoniae, the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant strains decreased from 42% to 17% (P=.005), and the prevalence of in methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains decreased from 77% to 40% (P<.0008).CONCLUSIONSAn ASP based on ID consultation was effective in reducing antibiotic consumption without affecting patient outcomes and in improving antimicrobial resistance patterns in a rehabilitation hospital.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;1–7

scholarly journals Eight-Year Experience of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program and the Trend of Carbapenem Use at a Tertiary Acute-Care Hospital in Japan—The Impact of Postprescription Review and Feedback

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsubasa Akazawa ◽  
Yoshiki Kusama ◽  
Haruhisa Fukuda ◽  
Kayoko Hayakawa ◽  
Satoshi Kutsuna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Car Use ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objective We implemented a stepwise antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). This study evaluated the effect of each intervention and the overall economic impact on carbapenem (CAR) use. Method Carbapenem days of therapy (CAR-DOT) were calculated to assess the effect of each intervention, and antipseudomonal DOT were calculated to assess changes in use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. We carried out segmented regression analysis of studies with interrupted time series for 3 periods: Phase 1 (infectious disease [ID] consultation service only), Phase 2 (adding monitoring and e-mail feedback), and Phase 3 (adding postprescription review and feedback [PPRF] led by ID specialist doctors and pharmacists). We also estimated cost savings over the study period due to decreased CAR use. Results The median monthly CAR-DOT, per month per 100 patient-days, during Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 was 5.46, 3.69, and 2.78, respectively. The CAR-DOT decreased significantly immediately after the start of Phase 2, but a major decrease was not observed during this period. Although the immediate change was not apparent after Phase 3 started, CAR-DOT decreased significantly over this period. Furthermore, the monthly DOT of 3 alternative antipseudomonal agents also decreased significantly over the study period, but the incidence of antimicrobial resistance did not decrease. Cost savings over the study period, due to decreased CAR use, was estimated to be US $150 000. Conclusions Adding PPRF on the conventional ASP may accelerate antimicrobial stewardship. Our CAR stewardship program has had positive results, and implementation is ongoing.

scholarly journals Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Measures in Cardiac Surgery: Change of Protocol for Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Its Impact on Surgical Site Infections

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Güzin Surat ◽  
Dominik Bernsen ◽  
Christoph Schimmer
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Wound Infections ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objectives:The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact on a protocol change of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in cardiac surgery comparing the new in hospital prophylactic agent cefazolin versus the former standard antibiotic cefuroxime, initiated by the antimicrobial stewardship team. Methods: This retrospective observational study was performed in a tertiary care hospital in collaboration with the department of cardiothoracic surgery and the antimicrobial stewardship team following a new recommendation of the surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and included 1029 patients who underwent cardiac surgery. Two patient groups including 582 patients receiving Cefuroxime and 447 patients receiving Cefazolin respectively were compared without altering any other preventative perioperative measures. Adherence, overall infection rates, leg wound infections and deep sternal wound infections were compiled and analysed as well as a broad profile of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative patient data. Results:A complete adherence on the change of the agent was achieved.Overall surgical site infections occurred in 37 (6.6%) of the cases, with 20 (3,4%) SSI in cefuroxime patients and 17 (3,8%) in cefazolin patients (p-value=0,754). No statistically significant differences could be found in any of the primary and secondary endpoints including DSWI (2,1% for cefuroxime, 1,3% for cefazolin), vein harvesting site infections (1,2% for cefuroxime, 2,2% for cefazolin) as well as urinary tract infections, pneumonia, sepsis and overall mortality of all causes. Conclusions:These results demonstrate that compliance to antimicrobial stewardship standards is not associated with more surgical site infections.

scholarly journals Impact of Intervention by an Antimicrobial Stewardship Team on Rational Use of Antibiotics

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Alikhani ◽  
Farhang Babamahmoudi ◽  
Alieh Khabbaz ◽  
Hamideh Abbaspour Kasgari ◽  
Sabzan Mohabbati
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Oral Antibiotics ◽  
Medication Costs ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Intravenous Antibiotics ◽  
Rational Use Of Antibiotics ◽  
The Cost ◽  
The Impact

Background: An antimicrobial stewardship program can be defined as the set of actions performed in hospitals for the rational use of antibiotics. Early conversion from intravenous to oral antibiotics plays an important role in reducing the cost of treatment, shortening the length of hospital stay, and decreasing the workload of nurses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship program on duration of hospitalization and medication costs. Methods: We performed an interventional study in Razi teaching hospital. All hospitalized patients aged 18 and older who met the inclusion criteria were included. This study comprised two groups. The interventional prospective group to assess the impact of intravenous to oral antibiotic conversion, and a retrospective group in which the intervention had not been applied, used as the comparator. Results: A total of 260 cases were enrolled; 47 in the interventional group and 213 in the retrospective one. The length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the intervention group compared to the retrospective one (5.2 vs7.9 days, p<0.001). The cost of intravenous antibiotics and total medication costs significantly decreased in the intervention group. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that conversion from intravenous to oral antibiotics is effective for reducing the length of hospital stay, antibiotic cost, and excess use of intravenous antibiotics.

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Reducing Surgical Site Infections

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-261
Author(s):  
Alexander Rosemurgy ◽  
Jacqueline Whitaker ◽  
Kenneth Luberice ◽  
Christian Rodriguez ◽  
Darrell Downs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Potential Cost ◽  
Pancreatic Resections ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Abdominal Operations ◽  
The Cost ◽  
The Impact

Surgical Site Infections (SSI) represent an onerous burden on our health-care system. This study was undertaken to determine the impact of a protocol aimed at reducing SSIs on the frequency and cost of SSIs after abdominal surgery. Beginning in 2013, 811 patients undergoing gastrointestinal operations were prospectively followed. In 2014, we initiated a protocol to reduce SSIs. SSIs were monitored before and after protocol implementation, and differences in SSI incidence and associated costs were determined. Before protocol initiation, standardized operative preparation cost was $40.85 to $126.94 per patient depending on the results of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screen; after protocol initiation, the cost was $43.85 per patient, saving up to $83.09 per patient. With the protocol in place, SSI rate was reduced from 4.9 to 3.4 per cent (13 of 379) representing a potential prevention of eight infections that would have cost payers $166,280 ($20,785 per infection). Notably, the SSI rate after pancreatectomy was reduced by 63 per cent ( P = 0.04). With preparation and diligence, SSI rate can be meaningfully reduced and potential cost savings can be achieved. In particular, SSI rate reduction for major abdominal operations and especially pancreatic resections can be achieved. A protocol to reduce SSI is a “win-win” for all stakeholders and should be encouraged with thoughtful and active participation from all hospital disciplines.

scholarly journals 1025. Inappropriate Aztreonam Usage – Antimicrobial Stewardship Strikes Back

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S361-S361
Author(s):  
Brandon J Smith ◽  
Bridget Batykefer ◽  
Christina Andrzejewski ◽  
Mohamed Yassin ◽  
Ricardo Arbulu
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Alternative Therapy ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Pharmaceutical Expenditures ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Therapy Cost ◽  
Clinical Surveillance ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Background Several studies have demonstrated that patients with reportedly β-lactam allergies (BLA) receive less efficacious and more toxic alternative antibiotics. A previous study at our institution utilizing aztreonam as a surrogate marker for BLA demonstrated nearly 50% of patients receiving aztreonam had previously tolerated an alternative β-lactam (BL). In response to those results, our Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) provided dedicated hospitalist, medical resident and pharmacist education on appropriate utilization of aztreonam and BLA. Additionally, members of the ASP team began receiving real-time clinical surveillance alerts for all aztreonam orders. Methods A retrospective chart review of inpatients >18 years old who received at least one dose of aztreonam between July 1, 2018 – December 31, 2018. Patients were excluded if they did not have a documented BLA or if they received aztreonam as de-escalation therapy. Cost of aztreonam therapy was compared with the cost of alternative BL agents based on prior and subsequently tolerated classes of BLs. Comparator agents included: piperacillin/tazobactam (penicillin), cefepime (cephalosporin) and meropenem (carbapenem). Comparisons of total number of aztreonam patients and doses, cost of aztreonam, and cost of alternative therapy were compared with the index population from 2017 Results Similar to our prior study, 43.7% (48.5% in 2017) had prior BL tolerance with an additional 31.3% (19.4% in 2017) demonstrated subsequent BL tolerance following aztreonam administration. Following the ASP interventions, orders, doses and cost of aztreonam was reduced. Forty-eight patients during the 6-month period received aztreonam, a 26.7% reduction. There was a 38.5% reduction in the number of aztreonam doses (P = 0.001), which yielded a cost savings of $14,067.67 (extrapolated to 1 year). Median aztreonam cost in 2017 $382.40 vs. $191.20 in 2018 (P = 0.004). In 2018, 41.7% of patient’s allergy profiles were appropriately updated compared with 3.3% in 2017. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that ASP interventions including increased education, allergy documentation and clinical surveillance alerts targeted at reducing aztreonam utilization can reduce pharmaceutical expenditures. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document